View Single Post
Old April 21st, 2014 #8
andy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
Default

We had this debate in England in 60's and 70's. Usually the pretentious bourgeoisies with dubious "comrades" such as Colin Jordan made much play of how the term National Socialist should be used at all times

( It is noteworthy that over the years the most hot for the elongated terminology such as Tyndall, Edmonds et al of course all later renounced National Socialism )

Further other divisive traitorous scum have also championed the use of the term National Socialist over the Goebells approved Nazi. I cite Morrison and hill here in the UK as obvious examples of this tendency .

McLoughllin had a much more pragmatic solution to the problem that the faint hearts and those with a feminine agenda for the promotion of National Socialism via tea and crumpets in tea shoppes could carry on whimpering that they are "National Socialist" while the true activists could get on with trying to emulate Goebells amazing achievement of winning red Berlin over to the cause.

Of course the whole argument is pointless and worthless as National Socialists the world over do nothing for the race by any usual political measuring device or method. Not even as much as a graffiti swastika. Granted they like banquets on Hitlers birthday I went to one myself yesterday it was like a morgue or museum sixty or so nostalgics and crackpots. About as politically active as a kerbstone
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion

Chase them into the swamps