View Single Post
Old February 9th, 2014 #41
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Smith View Post
The problem with capitalism is businesses large enough to influence society rarely have any higher or social goal other than giving people a temporary high and turning a profit.
That's unfair and inaccurate. Businesses give people what they actually want. Not what you think they ought to want. Business is just a way to connect people with good and services they want or need at a price that's roughly mutually painful/acceptable. It doesn't pretend to be more. Government does - but it offers less. It's the idealists who are generally useless or destructive to humanity; it's the people who concentrate on supplying, say, lumber or screws or light bulbs that are a little bit better quality or a little bit lower price who actually benefit humanity in the real world. I say generally. Sometimes idealists do create good things. Generally, they don't. Generally they interfere with good things. Idealists are people who have not the slightest concept of how difficult it is to do any serious thing, because they have never actually worked in business. So production to them is nothing, all they care about is their idea of a more equitable distribution. That's what's beautiful about the market - we don't have to live by some jew's idea of what's fair, we can buy and sell what we like, and the people supplying us will pay attention and adapt their offerings accordingly. As long as there's no force involved, it works well. Regulation is force. When the regulators step in, that's when you get monopolies and political distortion, in the form of artificially limited offerings or forced-purchasing, as in the ideas in school textbooks or the limitations on buying and selling medical products and advice.

Quote:
There are already talks and pettitions for Disney to create an obese disney princess:

http://thoughtcatalog.com/elissa-san...be-overweight/

Fat chicks want to see themselves being swept away by the handsome, wealthy Prince. With half of America's children being overweight, what's stopping them from a profit point of view? "Real" bodies (...of American women) are what people are willing to pay to see, as it makes them temporarily feel good, and the healthy girls who see it will think being fat is normal or acceptable and fall into the trap as well.
That's just leftist ideology. Disney was taken over by jews many years ago; their last several princesses have been colored, at least the last several before Frozen. Of course the feminists go on and on about what they'd like to see...if it were left up to ordinary people, most of them are happy with the traditional blonde and blue-eyed princess. They don't mind other types, but they wouldn't push for it ideologically as the leftists do.

Quote:
End result of consumer rule: a whole nation of infantile fat chicks expecting a handsome, wealthy Prince.
Um...no. The market isn't pushing for fat princesses, that's the leftists. The feminists. Even they care less about fat than about ethnicity. The market is perfectly happy with the Grimm-standard princess. But obviously feminists have closer connections to the jews running Disney than the average consumer does, and jews always put politics ahead of profits in media, which certainly includes Hollywood.

Quote:
Compare that to a Fascist government that would, instead, celebrate physical exercise and fill the void people have in their gut with something of spiritual substance-ideals and goals-instead of ice cream and twinkies.
Yeah, maybe they could federally enforce Hitler's vegetarianism on everybody, that would surely result in serious weight loss.

Your urge to boss people around is noted. This is one of the deepest problems with white politics - there isn't any agreement on how whites should live among themselves. You want a regimented society, and many feel the way you do, and I want a free society, and many feel the way I do.

Quote:
End result: a society full of people who are as healthy and enlightened as they can be.

The women of Nationalsocialist Germany:


The women created by the free market of Ameri-kwa:

Cherry-picking. You could find legions of fit AmeriKwans and communist Chinese, if you wanted to. Pretty much every advance in working out and diet has come from the free United States, as far as I know. I never heard of any idea from Europe except kettle bells. Germany had food rationing. It was absolutely miserable and onerous for most - not for the connected party insiders, though. They had whatever they wanted. That's how that stuff always ends up, the government class lives high off the hog, and the people get what's left over. No thanks.

It was the US government that set up the FDA and promoted, all through my public-school childhood, the notion of the food pyramid in which the bulk of the diet was supposed to be not meat but grains/cereal which we now know to be the cause of obesity and these various chronic diseases. The government is never on the side of the people; at best it's a necessary expedient to deal with the tiny number of problems that truly are collective rather than personal-moral-individual problems.

I don't see any difference between your faith in government and a christian's faith in Jesus. There's no evidence to support either one; in fact, the evidence runs entirely the other way.