Originally Posted by Roberto Muehlenkamp
The eyewitness evidence I provided he feebly tried to discredit, then chose to simply ignore it. The documentary evidence I provided he didn’t even dare to address. Therefore, and although he cannot show any rules or standards of criminal investigation and/or historical research whereby physical evidence is the only evidence that matters, he eventually went back to yelling for physical evidence and physical evidence alone.
It's because there has been a lot of lying on the Holocaustian side of this issue, some of it organized. Surely you know that.
There was also falsification of documents after the war.
If what people say
is dubious, then you have to base your conclusions on physical evidence.