[Serbian]

Creativity Rev. John King writes an email to Lauren Donovan of The Bismarck Tribune

Subject: Media Hate Campaign waged against Mr. Cobb -- Expect Violence
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 04:11:05 +0000

Dear Ms. Donovan,

My name is John King. I am resident of (deep) southern Indiana and a correspondent with The White Voice (thewhitevoice.com). We are pro-white media venture, and we do not seek the permission of anyone to present and comment upon the concerns and aspirations of the European-American community. We have two radio shows at present, "The White Voice" and "Standing Our Ground" (with Frank Taffee of Zimmerman fame).

At the end of Episode 25 of The White Voice we discussed the activities of Craig Cobb in Leith. We have no connection with him other than basic philosophical underpinnings. Obviously your articles were our primary source. I feel that you are engaging in a hate campaign against Mr. Cobb. Your article are full of vile incendiary language. I assume when other residents of Leith are egged on by your reporting to commit violence against Mr. Cobb you'll be following the ambulance as well. It seems to me that you are attempting to incite law breaking through your articles. While it is not illegal it is reprehensible. And when violence occurs you'll be the first to deny a correlation. I do not see any balance in your writing. You are like a verbal assassin.

You incessantly use the term "white supremacist". While such ideas may have been entertained by some whites living two or three generations ago, finding someone today in 2013 who wants to "lord over or dominate" (the dictionary definition of supremacy -- often used in a military setting) the black or brown man in some sort of superior/inferior relationship is like looking for Dukakis supporters. They may exist but they're like pink elephants i.e. very rare. I have been involved in the white advocacy cause for many years and I have never spoken with anyone who wants to put the shackles back on the black man. The whole crux of pro-white activism these days is to "drop out" of the multicultural milieu and spend one's life living among people who share one's ethnic heritage. I use the term "racial separatism" with some reservation as this term has been loaded with negative connotations by the media. I myself have led my life around this principle. When I was younger I lived in a highly multiculturalized area of the East Coast. Then, for my mental health and the benefit of my children (especially their education), we moved to monocultural southern Indiana. I have a lot of respect for North Dakota but I'm afraid I couldn't handle the winters. I moved not because I hate blacks, browns, etc but because I love being around white people. Life is too short to be stuck in a place you don't like. We all have the right of "association" under the US Constitution. That means we associate with people we have a lot in common with and don't associate with people we share little in common with.

In your article you use contradictory terms. You call Cobb a "white supremacist" which means a white person who wants to lord over other races. And in the next sentence you say that he has an "all-white vision". I'm not a true scholar as I only have a MAEd. But explain to me how someone who wishes to build an "all-white" community could lord over people of other races if they aren't there, if they aren't a part of this community? Do you fail to undestand that "supremacy" and "all-white" communities are opposite terms? In lands where the population is homogenous e.g. Japan, Korea supremacy over another group is impossible. It is possible that Mr. Cobb finds European culture superior over others but that is an opinion not an action.

I suspect for many North Dakotans it may seem a bit odd for a white person to harbor pro-white feelings. This is probably due to the lack of "minorities" in your state. But keep in mind that those of us who have lived in highly multiculturalized areas have gone face-to-face with people of other racial groups and often been the minority, though white minorities are never accorded affirmative action. I should imagine that for a great many North Dakotans their only exposure to black and Latino "culture" is on TV. And having lived on the East Coast I will tell you that most blacks are not like Dr. Huxtable of the Cosby Show , Morgan Freeman or the Fresh Prince of Bel Air. Within the last decade two members of my family have been victims of violent black crime. Roughly 85% of the estimated 770,000 annual violent interracial crimes involve a black perp and a white victim. While most black men have never engaged in such criminality a white person such as my uncle and mother-in-law (victims of black hate crime) have to contend with the risk of falling prey to this minority of black men who virulently hate white people and are encouraged to hate because of anti-white stories in the mass media. I see the same kind of manipulative technique in your articles. You are telling the people of Leith that is 'ok' to hate Mr. Cobb while at the same time you'll tell us that "hate is wrong".

Mr. Cobb has never expressed any desire to lord over people with a dark complexion than his. For a matter of fact, if you brought him a dozen or so black men in chains and said, "Hey, here are your slaves", I can guarantee that he would tell you to take them off his property lest he call the sheriff. Mr. Cobb is not a law breaker. This thing you say about him being a fugitive from Canada is total deception. There is no first amendment right to free speech in Canada and you know that. What he has been accused of in Canada, a mere statement of his beliefs, would be laughed out of a US court room. Indeed it is possible that what I'm writing here violates some arbitrary fascist law in Canada. Actually saying "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children," would probably run me afoul north of the border. That you would support this sort of Stalinist policy does not speak well of you as a person.

You seem to be relying on a certain Mark Potok for a lot of your ammunition. I quote: "He's one of the most vicious neo-Nazi activists around," Potok said
I have never seen a more sleazy anti-white organization than the SPLC. I could easily say about Potok, "He a vicious anti-white and he denies the existence of Jesus Christ." But what purpose would that serve? None. Slandering someone even when legal rises to the level of a 4th grader. And as a parents I hear enough name calling at home! Here at The White Voice we have had the honor of being named a "Hate Group" by the SPLC. And coming from such semitic satanic vermin I take it as a compliment that I'm doing something right and making an impact on the public. I kind of like the SPLC "hate map". Here at The White Voice we are thinking about creating our own hate map where will list all anti-white organizations. I'm afraid we're going to have to label "The Bismarck Tribune" as a hate group. You wear your vicious hate against Mr. Cobb on your cuff and your hate against white people who want to live in like minded communities as I and Mr. Cobb do is simply pathological. A few months ago we created this fact filled video on the SPLC Slime Machine. I am the speaker in the video. If you can quote these SPLC vermin after watching this, you've got quite a stomach.

http://thewhitevoice.com/the-white-r...race-merchants

Even this term "neo-Nazi" is suspect. I personally am not a "Fuehrer Fan" and at one time wrote an article entitled "Adolf Hitler: History's Biggest Loser". But do I gather that if I'm pro-white than I'm a "neo-Nazi" regardless of my opinion on this (historic) Nazis? I know there is a NSM, National Socialist Movement and they are Nazis. But I don't see where either you or Potok have proven that Mr. Cobb raises his arm to Hitler. The burden of proof is yours.

I found this passage from your article to be of interest:
Cobb himself lives in a small house in Leith and residents knew he was buying up other lots last year. It wasn't until the past few days that they learned of his scheme to turn Leith into a white nationalists' community, where people could fly Nazi flags and other racial banners, take over the city through elections and write their own laws.

I hope you understand that a person may fly any flag of their choice on their property. Flags are a classic example of free speech and to my knowledge no one has suspended the 1st Amendment. How does winning an election constitute "taking over". Barack Obama, as an example, took over the reins of power in 2008 by virtue of winning an election fair and square. That's the American way. This isn't North Korea. The majority rules and the majority picks its elected official. This is where your anti-white bias is very visible. If Pakistani-Americans or Somali-Americans were to move into Leith and form the majority and choose a mayor never in a million years would you dare say, "The Somalis are taking over Leith." The term "taking over" has a pejorative use and that is just part and parcel of your style of writing and your hateful demeanor.

In closing, I hope that you lighten up. Maybe there is a better way (sports?) to take out your aggression rather than beating people up with words.

And for the benefit of Sheriff Steve Bay I am an honorably discharged veteran, have no outstanding warrants and my criminal record consists of one misdemeanor conviction for driving on a suspended license from 2002. I payed my $330 fine and picked up garbage in city parks for 40 hours. My debt to society was paid in full.

Kind Regards,

John M. King, MAEd
College of William & Mary '89, '95
The White Voice
Jasper, Indiana