Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old July 17th, 2009 #1
SA Mann
National Socialist
 
SA Mann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,446
SA Mann
Default Walter Cronkite Dead

Just saw on CNN where Walter Cronkite has died. I know he was a liberal, but I still liked him to a point.
 
Old July 17th, 2009 #2
Fred
Commie Killer
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,546
Fred
Default

I just don't care. I consider him to be the enemy.

He was a Jew tool plain and simple.
 
Old July 17th, 2009 #3
SA Mann
National Socialist
 
SA Mann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,446
SA Mann
Default

I wasn't a member of his fan club or anything. Just think he was a better newscaster than the sorry lot that's on tv now. Which I know that's not saying much. America was a much different and better place when Cronkite was on tv. For many people my age he was the news. That was before my racial awakening and Fred is right about Cronkite being a tool of the jews. I'm pretty sure "Uncle Walter" never forgot who signed his paycheck.
 
Old July 17th, 2009 #4
Dan Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,787
Dan Allan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SA Mann View Post
America was a much different and better place when Cronkite was on tv.
That is true, but I'm pretty sure he helped destroy that better America with pro-snivel rights and Marchin' Lootin' Coon reporting. That's not to say he wasn't intelligent, or articulate, or well-mannered and classy, I'm sure he was and was probably very enjoyable to watch.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #5
SA Mann
National Socialist
 
SA Mann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,446
SA Mann
Default

Point well taken. I've got some relatives that are like that. They're really nice people, but they are so damn liberal in their views. I never discuss politics with them, as there's not any point to it. They're not going to change my views and I'm not going to change theirs.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #6
-JC
Doesn't suffer fools well
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,740
-JC
Default What you see & hear, growing up, stimulates nostalgia, acceptance...

Hillary, [CFR-member] Cronkite call for world government


Henry Lamb
Enter Stage Right
December 13, 1999








There was not a blip on the main-stream news media radar when Hillary Clinton introduced Walter Cronkite to the World Federalist Association (WFA) on October 19. Not until the Washington Times reprinted the Cronkite speech Friday, December 3, did Americans discover that both Hillary and Walter are avid advocates of world government.

Cronkite says “democracy, civilization itself, is at stake,” unless the “basic structure of our global community” is changed in the next few years. Cronkite’s appeal for world government came only five days before the release of the Charter for Global Democracy which embodies the version of world government preferred by the United Nations Association (UNA).


Both the UNA and the WFA have been promoting world government for years. Cronkite’s group, the WFA, prefers a “federalist” system which would create a weighted system of voting in the U.N. General Assembly to create a legislative body roughly akin to the American Congress. The UNA prefers a “consensus” process that takes into account recommendations offered by civil society (non-government organizations accredited by the U.N.).


Both organizations want to elevate the U.N. to world government status and empower the U.N. to enforce all international law. In fact, in 1986, the WFA filed suit against the United States over U.S. foreign policy, arguing that Article VI of the U.S. Constitution made the U.N. Charter as well as other U.N. treaties, the “supreme law of the land.” The courts ruled against the WFA in 1989.


Hillary’s presence at the WFA meeting, and her introduction of Cronkite, directly aligns her with the world government movement, and particularly with the WFA’s world government aspirations.


Cronkite called for the “revision” and limitation of the veto power of permanent members of the U.N. Security Council. The Commission on Global Governance and the Charter for Global Democracy, call for the elimination of both the veto and permanent member status on the Security Council. This latter recommendation will be presented as the needed “reform” to the Millennium Assembly next September. Cronkite’s more timid approach, as well as his “federalism” ideas have been overwhelmed by the U.N.’s “consensus” process now on a fast track toward adoption.


Cronkite called for the immediate ratification of a laundry list of U.N. treaties, including the infamous Convention on the Rights of the Child; the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW); and “most important,” Cronkite says, the International Criminal Court, which empowers the U.N. to prosecute American citizens whether or not it is ratified by the Senate.


Hillary made her support for these positions clear when she attended the U.N. Beijing Conference on Women in 1995.


Cronkite said in order to achieve world government, “Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty.” He said “the notion of unlimited national sovereignty means international anarchy.”


Under the world government scheme embodied in the Charter for Global Democracy, any individual nation could wield only the power assigned to it by the U.N. National armies would be disarmed to the level of a national police force. The U.N. would maintain a “directly recruited” standing army under the direct authority of the U.N. Secretary-General. Private citizens would be disarmed, and the U.N. would control the manufacture, sale, licensing and distribution of all fire arms.


To finance this expanded world government, the U.N. would be given the authority to impose taxes on the exchange of currency, on the use of resources, including the air, outer space, and the seas. Taxing authority is seen not only as the source of unlimited revenue, but also as a way to force a reduction of natural resources, especially fossil fuels, water, trees, and minerals.


Like the Clinton administration, and other world government advocates, Cronkite demeans opponents. He says that like America’s rejection of the League of Nations, current opposition to world government is “led by a handful of willful Senators who choose to pursue their narrow, selfish political objectives at the cost of our nation’s conscience.”


He goes even further to single out the “Christian Coalition and the rest of the religious right wing” as the culprits who have kept the world in a state of sovereign anarchy and prevented the emergence of a “civilized force of law” administered by the United Nations.
The fact that people of the stature of Hillary Clinton and Walter Cronkite are now willing to publicly advocate world government is an indication of their confidence that the world is now ready to accept their plan. World government is no longer the exclusive domain of the “black helicopter crowd.” Finally, the sinister plans to rule the world are being exposed by those who expect to rule.


The time line is, indeed, short. After decades of silent and denied preparation, the United Nations has made public the millennium year agenda which is crowned by the largest gathering of heads of state in the history of the world next September.


World government, called “global governance” by the U.N., will not occur on a day certain. It is a process that has been underway for years. The Millennium Assembly and Summit next September, with the adoption of the Charter for Global Democracy, is seen to be the point from which there is no turning back.


The only way to stop world government at this late date, is for the American people to send a government to Washington in the next election that can muster the courage to just say no.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #7
MikeTodd
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
 
MikeTodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
MikeTodd
Default

Hell's demons score new plaything!

(Fuck you, Uncle Walter!)
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #8
Mike Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
Mike Parker
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeTodd View Post
Hell's demons score new plaything!
Teddy Kennedy will soon be joining him.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #9
White Winger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,234
White Winger
Default

I would think they're going to be waaaaaaaay too busy with Michael Jackson for a long while.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #10
SA Mann
National Socialist
 
SA Mann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,446
SA Mann
Default

Hey look on the plus side CNN finally quit talking about that freak Michael Jackson for a few minutes.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #11
Eilert
Blood Snob
 
Eilert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,022
Eilert
Default

Cronkite may have been good at what he did, but he never would have become a famous news anchor if he hadn't toed the Jewish media line. Simple as that.
__________________
Anthony Weiner: the epitome of the Jew.
 
Old July 20th, 2009 #12
The Bobster
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Filthydelphia
Posts: 10,095
Default

http://blog.vdare.com/

19 July 2009
Walter Cronkite: When Tried, He Failed
BY Patrick Cleburne

VDARE.com does not subscribe to the conventional view that the death of a public figure should be an occasion for self-indulgent emotional display and sentimental posturing. We think it is an opportunity for evaluation and assessment: it is imperative to learn from the past. Hence Peter Brimelow’s discussions of William F. Buckley here and here, Jack Kemp, and Ronald Reagan.

WorldNetDaily, laudably, apparently feels the same where Walter Cronkite is concerned. Meet the real Walter Cronkite ‘Most trusted’ newsman pushed radical agenda by Joseph Farah July 18 2009 is an valuable antidote to the deceptive platitudes being served up in huge quantities by the MSM generally. It reveals the interesting fact that Cronkite was promoted for the anchor spot at CBS Evening News by a prominent leftist power-broker, Blair Clark. It also documents Cronkite’s significant behavior in his later years:

After leaving his position with CBS, Cronkite’s political activism and offbeat ideas had no restraints…

He spoke openly about the need for America to give up its national sovereignty.

“American people are going to begin to realize they are going to have to yield some sovereignty to an international body to enforce world law, and I think that’s going to come to other people as well…

I myself have been told of an extraordinary tantrum thrown by Cronkite at a New York dinner party when confronted by a foreign guest who thought there might be some merit in the ongoing Clinton Impeachment.

But being a (discreet) left partisan is not the worst blot on the Cronkite record. That honor must be given in his spearhead role in sabotaging the American effort in Vietnam in February 1968.

The facts are well summarized in Cronkite and Vietnam: Part I Neo-Neocon July 18th 2009. Returning from Vietnam while the Tet Offensive was still raging, Cronkite advocated surrender.

it is increasingly clear to this reporter that the only rational way out then will be to negotiate, not as victors, but as an honorable people who lived up to their pledge to defend democracy, and did the best they could.

Meantime, the North Vietnamese had sacrificed most of their military and political infrastructure in South Vietnam, failed in all their objectives, and were (they now report) in despair. The disparity between the facts and the way the US media reported them is trenchantly detailed in Peter Braestrup’s The Big Story – seminal reading, in my view, to understand the era and the Media’s role in it.

Perspective is needed: and very difficult to develop for those who have to rely on the tendentious and dishonest accounts found in the US educational system today.

For a generation, America had watched with increasing alarm as the Soviet Union built on its sweeping geopolitical success of WW2 and successfully subverted many of the ex-colonial new nations in the “Cold War”. Now, in the North Vietnamese, the Russians had found a way of fighting a large-scale surrogate war of aggression. At the time, it was still seriously argued that the Communist system could match the West economically. The view that Communism would eventually triumph was widespread – a point those who do not remember the era have great difficulty crediting.

The Liberal/Left in America (to say nothing of overseas) was highly ambivalent throughout the Cold War. Ideological and (for some) ethnic ties encouraged sympathies with the Soviets. Then (as now) the Middle-American patriotism exemplified by the US military excited disdain and contempt. Many were tempted to seek accommodation. (What was Bill Clinton doing in Moscow in January 1970?)

Because the North Vietnamese aggression was so egregious in late 1965, and the consequent surge in American patriotic fervor so intense, the Left took some time to organize. But they immediately grabbed at the unprecedented uncontrolled free access they were allowed to the battlefield. Vivid pictures of shocked, wounded American soldiers became everyday fare, stories of South Vietnamese brutality and corruption became formulaic.

The contrast with the lack of interest the MSM shows similar stories from Iraq and Afghanistan is stunning.

Equally stunning were the constraints anti-war forces succeeded on placing on the use of America’s great advantage: military technology. Fire constraints unheard of in Iraq and Afghanistan crippled effectiveness. According to Jack Broughton’s extremely valuable Going Downtown
the Johnson White House was rigidly dictating flight paths into North Vietnam, greatly helping the Anti-Aircraft gunners there.

Again, in contrast to the present wars.

Of course, the beneficiary is not the same.

The consequence of the ultimate defeat in Vietnam was of course a major extension of Communism, resulting in the Pol Pot massacres in Cambodia, the suffering of the Boat people, years of destructive war in Angola and Mozambique and the dangerous years of the late 70s. The rot was finally stopped by the election of Ronald Reagan – and the courage of the Mujahideen.

Because of this fortuitous outcome, to which Cronkite contributed nothing, it is easy to forget the appalling consequences which did occur, and the far worse events which might have occurred following America’s strategic humiliation.

As neo-neocon says of Cronkite and his colleagues:

It never seems to have occurred to them, of course, that in reacting to Tet as they did they were participating in a different falsehood, the propagation of North Vietnamese propaganda about the situation.

For a moment, Walter Cronkite was in a position to influence his country’s destiny. He failed America.
 
Old July 20th, 2009 #13
EireannGoddess
Member
 
EireannGoddess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,979
Blog Entries: 5
EireannGoddess
Default

I found the VDARE article very good and informative. What I know of Walter Cronkite, I learned in my 'Literature and Propaganda' class at Uni - and that's not much, really. I asked a few questions about his politics, and they went basically ignored. I was told that he represented the "best of the finest" in terms of American journalism and the class was then shown the infamous footage of him breaking down during a live newscast report of (president) Kennedy's death, confirming assasination.

I took my daily "dose" of MSM media with this morning's coffee and they are still going on about Michael Jackson, the nigger's answer to Elvis Presley (and jewess actress Elizabeth Taylor it seems, his many facial surgeries were his attempt to look as much like her as possible).

So, other than this blip of Cronkite on the telly screen crying when learning of the death of Kennedy, what else did he do - besides cover the Viet Nam war, from the communist view point, to earn him such a title proffered to me by my jewish Professor. Is there anything but that?
 
Old July 20th, 2009 #14
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,495
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

These news actors, the ones at the top, are exactly like the top political people: they're essentially actors or storefronts. They're there to look and sound like the people they're trying to fool - the bulk of the populace; the peasant-descended lackwits in Flyover.

These people are easily taken in by a facade of directness. There is a great market in simulated earnestness, such as Kronkite (and radio host Paul Harvey, another recent deceased) supplied. The public is no shrewder than a bass in taking artificial lures for real food. If you sound honest and straightforward, the public accepts that you are. Even though five minutes of research would reveal you're a leftist tool for the New World Order.

Tory men, liberal policies is an old, old game. That mean, judeo-leftist agenda items are best put over by wrapping them in conventional form - an honest-looking and -sounding white man from the middle of the country (Walter Kronkite, Kansas; Tom Brokaw, North Dakota; Dan Rather/George Bush, Texas).
 
Old July 20th, 2009 #15
Steve B
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
Default

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned who Cronkite worked for at CBS. William S. Paley, yeah a jew.
 
Old July 20th, 2009 #16
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,495
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve B View Post
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned who Cronkite worked for at CBS. William S. Paley, yeah a jew.
Also at that time there were only three networks, so you had a complete concentration of media, all of whose "anchormen" (lol) were respected and accepted by dullards as legitimate heavyweights, rather than actors/frontment/tools.

Whites are undermined by their cultural proclivity for taking motives at face value. I suppose this is a corollary to the "do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Regardless of origins, it's a killer.

White children, in particular, should not be taught the golden rule, they should be taught to suspect motives. The golden rule is best replaced with "mind your own business." But anytime you have interactions with others, particularly those of another racial group, but also including members of your own, Whites should be taught to look at it from every possible angle. This is where the jews have us beat - they question motives and never let up. Being jews, they can't understand that there are non-financial, non-sexual motives. All their tv reflects their belief, or their intention to put across the idea, that people are driven wholly by those motives, and anything else is dissimulation. The jew or nigger always cuts through the bullshit to keep it real when a character pretends otherwise. The jews can be used as an evolutionary pressure forcing whites to become shrewder, more suspicious.
 
Old July 20th, 2009 #17
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
N.B. Forrest
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
These news actors, the ones at the top, are exactly like the top political people: they're essentially actors or storefronts. They're there to look and sound like the people they're trying to fool - the bulk of the populace; the peasant-descended lackwits in Flyover.

These people are easily taken in by a facade of directness. There is a great market in simulated earnestness, such as Kronkite (and radio host Paul Harvey, another recent deceased) supplied. The public is no shrewder than a bass in taking artificial lures for real food. If you sound honest and straightforward, the public accepts that you are. Even though five minutes of research would reveal you're a leftist tool for the New World Order.

Tory men, liberal policies is an old, old game. That mean, judeo-leftist agenda items are best put over by wrapping them in conventional form - an honest-looking and -sounding white man from the middle of the country (Walter Kronkite, Kansas; Tom Brokaw, North Dakota; Dan Rather/George Bush, Texas).
Yes, for most bovines out there, to seem is to be. Hence this cheap nostalgic sentimentality over the belated demise of that tool's tool.

Enjoy the All-You-Can-Eat Crankcase Buffet, squigglies.
 
Old July 20th, 2009 #18
ohgolly
Senior Member
 
ohgolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florida CSA
Posts: 1,904
ohgolly
Default

I thought Cronkite bought it a long time ago. Nursing home maybe? Well excuse me while I flush.

About the only one from that period I detested more was Eric Severeid.
 
Old July 20th, 2009 #19
Fissile
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
the peasant-descended lackwits in Flyover.
I'm descended entirely from Eastern European peasants, and I've never been fooled by any of it, not in my adult life in any case. It's my understand that most of my illiterate peasant ancestors were pretty damn jew-wise. They could also grow their own food, make their own clothes, and build their own houses. If most "modern, educated" Americans embraced their inner peasant, our jew/mud problems would soon be over.
 
Old July 20th, 2009 #20
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,495
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fissile View Post
I'm descended entirely from Eastern European peasants, and I've never been fooled by any of it, not in my adult life in any case. It's my understand that most of my illiterate peasant ancestors were pretty damn jew-wise. They could also grow their own food, make their own clothes, and build their own houses. If most "modern, educated" Americans embraced their inner peasant, our jew/mud problems would soon be over.
That begs the question of how the problem arose in the first place, with all of these virtuous peasants. No, regardless of any one man's reaction, the mass of middle-class, peasant-descended white Americans are fooled by jew frontmen such as Bush, Harvey, and Kronkite.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.
Page generated in 0.15561 seconds.