Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old December 30th, 2011 #1
Gerry Fable
Senior Member
Gerry Fable's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,109
Gerry Fable
Default "The only religion I respect is Islam. The only prophet I admire is the Prophet Muhammad."

Adolf Hitler on Islam and the Muslims

abridged from an essay by Sean “Suhaib” Jobst
24 April 2006

Re: "The Political Testament of Adolf Hitler, 7th February 1945".

In the interests of free speech I have produced the article in full. I understand 'The Political Testament of Adolf Hitler, 7th February 1945' is not a genuine document.

Islam remains the most misunderstood religion in the world. Even though a quarter of the world's population adheres to its doctrines, there is little honest debate on Islam since a pack of lies dominates all attention. So we Muslims are told that our religion is evil, blood-thirsty, and backward.

But many non-Muslims have rejected the propaganda of the Zionists, Orientalists, and Christian missionaries. Several of the greatest minds in European history have praised Islam, including Samuel Johnson, Johann Goethe, Comte de Gobineau, George Bernard Shaw, and Julius Evola. Another was that great statesman Adolf Hitler, who contrasted the spread of Islam with the results of Christianity:

"In those continents which were inhabited, failure has been even more marked. In them, the white races have imposed their will by force, and the influence they have had on the native inhabitants has been negligible; the Hindus have remained Hindus, the Chinese have remained Chinese, and the Moslems are still Moslems. There have been no profound transformations, and such changes as have occurred are less marked in the religious field, notwithstanding the tremendous efforts of the Christian missionaries, than in any other. There have been a few odd conversions the sincerity of which are open to considerable doubt - except, perhaps in the case of a few simpletons and mentally deficients. The white races did, of course, give some things to the natives, and they were the worst gifts that they could possibly have made, those plagues of our own modern world - materialism, fanaticism, alcoholism and syphilis. For the rest, since these peoples possessed qualities of their own which were superior to anything we could offer them, they have remained essentially unchanged. Where imposition by force was attempted, the results were even more disastrous, and common sense, realizing the futility of such measures, should preclude any recourse to their introduction. One solitary success must be conceded to the colonizers: everywhere they have succeeded in arousing hatred, a hatred that urges these peoples, awakened from their slumbers by us, to rise and drive us out. Indeed, it looks almost as though they had awakened solely and simply for that purpose! Can anyone assert that colonization has increased the number of Christians in the world? Where are those conversions en masse which mark the success of Islam? Here and there one finds isolated islets of Christians, Christians in name, that is, rather than by conviction; and that is the sum total of the successes of this magnificent Christian religion, the guardian of supreme Truth!"[1]

This was a reiteration of his earlier statement in Mein Kampf. He was very impressed by Islam as he saw its great advances in Europe. By contrast, he saw the Christian church in disunity, losing "millions and millions of inward adherents" and ineffective in its overseas mission efforts[2]:

"An examination of the religious situation before the War shows that the general process of disruption had extended to this sphere also. A great part of the nation itself had for a long time already ceased to have any convictions of a uniform and practical character in their ideological outlook on life. In this matter the point of primary importance was by no means the number of people who renounced their church membership but rather the widespread indifference. While the two Christian denominations maintained missions in Asia and Africa, for the purpose of securing new adherents at home in Europe. These former adherents either gave up religion wholly as a directive force in their lives or they adopted their own interpretation of it. The consequences of this were specially felt in the moral life of the country. In parentheses it may be remarked that the progress made by the missions in spreading the Christian Faith abroad was only quite modest in comparison with the spread of Mohammedanism."[3]

This is an interesting observation and puts into perspective his later statement in his Political Testament. He contrasted Christianity with Islam, obviously favorable to the latter. The overwhelming attraction the holy city of Makkah had for Muslims, he sought to emulate for his own National Socialist movement:

"Only the existence of such a seat or centre, around which a magic charm such as that of Mecca or Rome is woven, can supply a movement with that permanent driving force which has its sources in the internal unity of the movement and the recognition of one head as representing this unity."[4]

What would Hitler say today?

Unlike Islam, the Christian churches came to lose any uniform or practical worldview. While the former retained an amazing devotion from its adherents, this certainly was not the case with Christianity. He would no doubt deplore the decadence and moral decay in modern Europe, a trend he sought to reverse with his National Socialist movement. If he were alive today, Hitler would look upon favorably at the piety of the Muslim immigrants in Europe compared to the indigenous Christians.

Islam is the fastest-growing religion, not least because of its remarkable conversion rates. Given his true nationalist and progressive principles, the Führer would look upon the Muslims' larger birthrate and conversions as demonstrating the vitality of Islam.

He would look upon the mass immigration of Muslims into Europe as the fault of the European peoples themselves. Since they have lost any real noble cause to defend, once they abandoned the Aryan values of their ancestors and replaced this with a thoroughly decadent lifestyle.

He would view the situation in light of the European peoples' ignoring the biological laws, by preferring their comfortable materialist, hedonist, lifestyle to breeding and increasing their numbers. Finally, he would be brought to tears by the failure of its people to appreciate his efforts in throwing off the yoke of Jewry.

Hitler, who devoted so much and sacrificed greatly for the cause of his race and folk, would be disappointed at the failure of the vast majority of his kindred to live up to the Aryan Ideal he espoused. He would point out how values such as honor survives elsewhere, not among the modern Europeans. His attitude would be bitterness mixed with pity, for the situation of the world and the West in particular since 1945.

The Aryan vs. Jewish spirit

Adolf Hitler was of Catholic origin. But his attitude towards religion was complex. He firmly believed in the existence of God but rejected the distorted picture of Jesus (alayhi as-salam) as propagated by the Christian churches. Hitler frequently evoked Jesus' revolutionary struggle against injustice, especially that of the Jewish leadership. He repeatedly stressed how the true message of Jesus had become loss in the teachings of the churches. One fundamental difference was the striving for a Hereafter, and a deep concern for moral problems and social justice:

"In the Aryan mind no religion can ever be imagined unless it embodies the conviction that life in some form or other will continue after death. As a matter of fact, the Talmud is not a book that lays down principles according to which the individual should prepare for the life to come. It only furnishes rules for a practical and convenient life in this world.

"But the Jewish religious teaching is not concerned with moral problems. It is rather concerned with economic problems, and very petty ones at that. In regard to the moral value of the religious teaching of the Jews there exist and always have existed quite exhaustive studies....which show up the kind of religion that the Jews have in a light that makes it look very uncanny to the Aryan mind. The Jew himself is the best example of the kind of product which this religious training evolves. His life is of this world only and his mentality is as foreign to the true spirit of Christianity as his character was foreign to the great founder of this new creed two thousand years ago."[5]

Because he sought to hold firm to the true teachings of Jesus (alayhi as-salam), he recognized that Islam contained those elements which the Judaized churches compromised. These include an honorable warrior spirit, actual yearning for the Hereafter, and a firm commitment to social justice.

Islam, a religion compatible for the Germanic peoples

Little wonder then that in his private conversations, Hitler spoke against Christianity and Judaism, expressing "a violent feeling of anger at the idea that some Germans were able to be taken in by theological doctrines devoid of any depth." He then contrasted these doctrines with "those of Confucius, of Buddha and of Mohammad," each of which provided spiritual "sustenance."[6]

His conversations on a number of subjects were recorded by his closest confidants. One of these was Albert Speer, chief architect and Reich Minister of Armanents and Munitions, who quoted Hitler's regret the Germans accepted Christianity rather than religions which would have been more compatible to them:

"Hitler usually concluded this historical speculation by remarking: 'You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?'"[7]

There was another aspect which several other National Socialist leaders discussed. This was the utterly violent manner in which Christianity subjugated the Aryan peoples to its creed. A rather dogmatic subject, although the descendants of these people like to forget and pretend Islam spread "by the sword"[8]!

Yet another aspect which Hitler praised was the fact that Muslims preserved ancient texts and passed on knowledge which otherwise would have been lost. He noted the remarkable achievements of Islamic civilization in all fields. During a meeting at the Wehrwolf on the afternoon of 27th August 1942, the Führer said[9]:

"It is only with the Roman empire where one can say that culture was a factor under the government. The government of the Arabs in Spain too was infinitely distinguished: many scientists, thinkers, astronomers, mathematicians, one of the most humane times, at the same time as a colossal knighthood. When, later, Christianity came there, then one can say: barbarians. The knighthood that the Castilians have is actually one of Arab heritage. If Charles Martel had not overcome in Poitiers: since the Jewish world already seized us - that Christianity is something well of insipid - we would have better received Mohammedanism, those doctrines of the reward of heroism - combatants alone have the seventh heaven! With that the Germans would have conquered the world. It is only by Christianity that we have been held distant."[10]

Continuing on from the last part of this statement, the Führer made an interesting analysis of religion which alluded to Islamic practices, such as Ramadan, Wudhu (ritual ablutions), and Adhan. He also admired the Islamic conception of the Paradise, particularly its promises of sensual rewards:

"The instructions of a hygienic nature that most religions gave, contributed to the foundation of organised communities. The precepts ordering peoples to wash, to avoid certain drinks, to fast at appointed dates, to take exercise, to rise with the sun, to climb to the top of the minaret - all these were obligations invented by intelligent people. The exhortation to fight courageously is also self-explanatory. Observe, by the way, that, as a corollary, the Moslem was promised a paradise peopled with sensual girls, where wine flowed in streams - a real Earthly paradise. The Christians, on the other hand, declare themselves satisfied if after their death they are allowed to sing Hallelujahs! All these elements contributed to form human communities. It is to these private customs that Folks owe their present characters."[11]

His support for the Islamic cause

Hitler was on the friendliest of terms with several distinguished Muslims, like Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Al-Quds, and the exiled Iraqi prime minister Rashid Ali al-Gailani[12]. He was greatly admired throughout the Islamic world and received numerous telegrams of support from all sectors of society. Even before he became Führer, great Muslims like Shaykh Hasan al-Banna (rahimahullah) sent him letters of support.

He pursued a bold policy of supporting Muslim liberation movements, after the hostile British intentions became apparent. These include the Arab revolt in Palestine (1936-39) and the Iraqi independence rebellion (1941). He opened up or improved diplomatic and other relations with Islamic countries already independent, like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Afghanistan.

The world is now witness to the utter hypocrisy and imperial hubris of the US government. Whether Iran's will to exercise its military right to self-defense or the Zionist activities in Palestine, it is only too obvious to the honest observer. In his Reichstag speech of 28th April 1939, the Führer gave a hard-hitting indictment of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's hypocrisy on the issues of Palestine and other subjugated nations:

"As for the fact, however, that one nation in Africa is alleged have lost its freedom – that too is but an error; for it is not a question of one nation in Africa having lost its freedom – on the contrary practically all the previous inhabitants of this continent have been made subject to the sovereignty of other nations by bloody force, thereby losing their freedom. Moroccans, Berbers, Arabs, Negroes, have all fallen victim to a foreign might, the swords of which, however, were not inscribed 'Made in Germany', but 'Made by the Democracies'.[13]

"The fact has obviously escaped Mr. Roosevelt's notice that Palestine is at present occupied not by German troops but by the English; and that the country is having its liberty restricted by the most brutal resort to force, is being robbed of its independence and is suffering the cruellest maltreatment for the benefit of Jewish interlopers.

"The Arabs living in that country will therefore certainly not have complained to Mr. Roosevelt of German aggression, but they do voice a continuous appeal to the world, deploring the barbarous methods with which England is attempting to suppress a people which loves its freedom and is but defending it."[14]

What a visionary! He anticipated the great colonial uprisings which would lead to the independence of dozens of countries. Due to his concern over their ambitions in Palestine, we can consider him one of the first anti-Zionist activists in Europe!

Little wonder, then, that he is seen in a very different light in Arab and Islamic countries. Little wonder that his armies were greeted as liberators in Muslim areas, such as Egypt or the Caucasus. Neither would it be any surprise to know thousands of Muslims - Arabs, Albanians, Bosnians, Chechens, Tatars, etc. - rallied to his cause by donning the uniforms of the Wehrmacht or Waffen-SS.

Contrary to all the lies which have been told about him, Hitler opposed imperialism. Certainly once the war began, he began actively doing so. He was far from being a racial supremacist, since he recognized all races had their own unique qualities. Neither did he seek a colonial empire - he merely wanted those areas which belonged to Germany historically.


Towards his last days, the Führer had time to contemplate a number of things. Increasingly, he spoke of his past mistakes and what would await the future. It was here where he expressed a number of sentiments we Muslims can truly appreciate. I conclude with some of these remarks[15]:

"At the same time they would have had to renounce their pretentions in North Africa and the Near East; and that would have allowed Europe to pursue a bold policy of friendship towards Islam." - 4th February 1945

"The laws of nature follow a logic which does not necessarily always conform to our own ideas of logic. We ourselves were disposed to compromise. We were ready to throw our forces into the scales for the preservation of the British Empire; and all that, mark you, at a time when, to tell the truth, I feel much more sympathetically inclined to the lowliest Hindu than to any of these arrogant islanders. Later on, the Germans will be pleased that they did not make any contribution to the survival of an out-dated state of affairs for which the world of the future would have found it hard to forgive them." - 4th February 1945

"What we want is a Monroe doctrine in Europe. 'Europe for the Europeans!' a doctrine, the corollary of which should be that Europeans refrain from meddling in the affairs of other continents." - 7th February 1945

"Never, at any price, should we have put our money on France and against the peoples subjected to her yoke. On the contrary, we should have helped them to achieve their liberty and, if necessary, should have goaded them into doing so. There was nothing to stop us in 1940 from making a gesture of this sort in the Near East and in North Africa.... Our 'gentlemen' obviously preferred to maintain cordial relations with distinguished Frenchmen, rather than with a lot of hirsute revolutionaries, with a chorus of musical comedy officers, whose one idea was to cheat us, rather than with the Arabs, who would have been loyal partners for us." - 14th February 1945

"Our Italian ally has been a source of embarrassment to us everywhere. It was this alliance, for instance, which prevented us from pursuing a revolutionary policy in North Africa. In the nature of things, this territory was becoming an Italian preserve and it was as such that the Duce laid claim to it. Had we been on our own, we could have emancipated the Moslem countries dominated by France; and that would have had enormous repercussions in the Near East, dominated by Britain, and in Egypt. But with our fortunes linked to those of the Italians, the pursuit of such a policy was not possible. All Islam vibrated at the news of our victories. The Egyptians, the Iraqis and the whole of the Near East were all ready to rise in revolt. Just think that we could have done to help them, even to incite them, as would have been both our duty and in our own interest! But the presence of the Italians at our side paralysed us; it created a feeling of malaise among our Islamic friends, who inevitably saw in us accomplices, willing or unwilling, of their oppressors. For the Italians in these parts of the world are more bitterly hated, of course, than either the British or the French. The memories of the barbarous reprisals taken against the Senussi are still vivid. Then again the ridiculous pretensions of the Duce to be regarded as The Sword of Islam evokes the same sneering chuckle now as it did before the war. This title, which is fitting for Mahomed and a great conqueror like Omar, Mussolini caused to be conferred on himself by a few wretched brutes whom he had either bribed or terrorized into doing so. We had a great chance of pursuing a splendid policy with regard to Islam. But we missed the bus, as we missed it on several other occasions, thanks to our loyalty to the Italian alliance!

"In this theatre of operations, then, the Italians prevented us from playing our best card, the emancipation of the French subjects and the raising of the standard of revolt in the countries oppressed by the British. Such a policy would have aroused the enthusiasm of the whole of Islam. It is a characteristic of the Moslem world, from the shores of the Atlantic to those of the Pacific, that what affects one, for good or for evil, affects all....

"Further, this futile policy has allowed these hypocrites, the British, to pose, if you please, as liberators in Syria, in Cyrenaica and in Tripolitania!" - 17th February 1945

"While, therefore, it is not possible to adhere to rigid principles in dealing with foreign countries and one must always be prepared to adapt one's policy to the changing conditions, it can nevertheless be asserted with confidence that Germany will always recruit her staunchest friends from among those peoples who are actively resistant to Jewish contagion. I am sure that the Japanese, the Chinese and the peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France, in spite of the fact that we are related by blood." - 2nd April 1945


1. The Political Testament of Adolf Hitler, 7th February 1945.

2. "Did Hitler Use Jesus To Justify His Actions?,"

3. Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf. Translated by James Murphy. London: Hurst and Blackett Ltd., 1939, p. 152.

4. ibid., p. 197.

5. ibid., pp. 173-174.

6. Jean and Michel Angebert, The Occult and the Third Reich. New York: Macmillan, 1974, p. 246.

7. Albert Speer, Inside the Third Reich. New York: Macmillan, 1970, p. 96.

8. Rather, Islam spread due to its superior creed and sincere arguments. Jihad by the sword was always directed against the tyrants and oppressors, aimed at stopping injustice and removing all obstacles to the da'wah.

9. "Hitler and the Muslims,"

10. Adolf Hitler's Monologe im Führerhauptquartier (Monologue with Headquarters of the Führer). Hamburg: Albrecht Knaus, 1980.

11. Hitler's Table Talk, 14th October 1941, midday.

12. Both Husseini and Gailani were of noble lineage: The direct descendants of the Prophet's grandson Hussein ibn Ali, and the medieval Islamic scholar Abdul-Qadir al-Jilani, respectively.

13. David Brockschmidt, "History Lessons from the Memory Hole - Let them eat their own words,"

14. Michael Walsh, "History Repeats Itself: Wise Words From Europe's Most Popular Statesman,"

15. The Political Testament of Adolf Hitler, February - April 1945.
Last edited by Abdullah Abbas; 26th September 2008 at 08:07 PM.

Last edited by Gerry Fable; December 30th, 2011 at 04:48 AM.
Old December 30th, 2011 #2
Gerry Fable
Senior Member
Gerry Fable's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,109
Gerry Fable

General Remer

Rami: General Remer, what do you think of the "New World Order?"

Remer: The "New World Order" suffers from two drawbacks, in that it is neither "new" nor does it cover the world. This concept is nothing but a new mask behind which lies hidden the international power of the Jewish organizations.

The rule according to which the Jewish organizations play were laid down after he defeat of Germany in World War II. In fact and in truth, it was the mafia of the Jewish organizations that emerged as the true victors out of that struggle of the nations. All peoples whose governments allied themselves in World War II against Germany have lost the war - as Germany has.

The states that allied themselves against Germany were, whether they knew it or not, in the service of Jewish interests and plans that were geared not only against Germany but also against the Islamic and Arab nations and against the western nations. The rape of Palestine and the creation of the Israeli state after World War II is no coincidence but the outcome of a planning process methodically implemented over generations.

The former Soviet Union (that had been set up by the Jews) was the first state that gave official recognition to the colonial state of Israel. The "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" offer the clearest statement of the plans of the Jewish organizations to implement their actually very old "New World Order".

Signs of change: Germany and Japan wage economic war against the United States of America

Rami: Don't you think that after the demise of the Soviet Union and after the Persian Gulf war there is a completely new stand of affairs?

Remer: What is "new" lies not in the order but in the developments, which are not favorable for some of the Zionist powers. Because of those developments, the shadow leaders of the "Old World Order" have shuffled the deck of cards anew for a new deal, in order to turn to good account the winds of change.

One of those developments is that both great losers of World War II, Germany and Japan, became superpowers, even if only in the economic area. Against the background of those relations, there is a kind of economic war between Germany and Japan on the one hand, and the United States of America on the other, between the two losers in the war and the USA. That is what is new.

The Islamic revolution in Iran is a positive development

At the same time, the Islamic revolution of Afghanistan, sprung exclusively from spiritual roots, dealt a heavy blow to the communist regime in the former Soviet Union. In face of that revolution, the red Soviet empire had to concede that it is incapable, in spite of its military superiority, to defeat the Mujaheddin, whose main weapons were their right and their spiritual strength.

Another quite new situation appeared as a consequence of the Islamic revolution in Iran, that destroyed the Zionist rule in that country and shook its foundations in that part of the world. Khomeini's letter to Gorbachev, in which he was inviting the latter to convert to Islam, had great symbolic power! What is new again is the movement of Islamic rebirth and the continuous decay of the strength of the colonial government bodies directed from afar by Israel in many Islamic countries.

And another new situation arose from the fact that Iraq was on the way to break the Israeli monopoly on the atomic bomb in the Near East, and to break the Israeli technological hegemony, and thus to jeopardize the Israeli power over the Islamic parts of the world.

Moreover, the development of the so-called "Islamic bomb" which is allegedly being carried on in Pakistan, will lead to a completely new constellation. And finally, among the new developments I cite the emergence of new countries in which the Jewish organizations have no influence. All those new items have made the puppeteers of the "Old World Order" to panic.

They reacted strongly, in order to avoid the threatened loss of their power over the fate of the nations. Those developments at that time certainly did not please them. The triumph of Islamic might in Afghanistan gave hopes to the peoples who lived under Soviet dominion.

That was seen in the emergence of revolutionary independence movements, and it led to the complete collapse of the red empire, to the reunification of Germany and to the independence of Islamic republics that lie south of the former Soviet Union.

Rami: Today certain powers in the so-called third world deplore the collapse of the Soviet Union. They believe that two devils who compete for power are better than just one devil who rules over all. That is true of the smaller countries. What do you think?

Remer: The USSR was rabidly anti-Islamic. It almost managed to turn Afghanistan into a new Palestine, after having left nothing undone in order to annihilate religion in its Islamic republics. An obvious reality is also the enonnous power of the Jewish lobby in the USA.

It has been already generations since all United States Presidents must earn favor with the Jews in order to ensure that they be elected, respectively re-elected, with the help of the Jewish mass-media. Please read Zionist books like "The Jewish Paradox" of Nahum Goldmann, or "Hammer", the autobiography of the Jewish billionaire Armand Hammer. Hammer's firm "Petroleum Occidental" owns extensive Arab oil fields and oil wells. It is well known that that Jewish financial magnate was a close friend of Lenin, Stalin, and all further Soviet leaders.

As an American Jew and capitalist, he owned in the Soviet Union huge oil fields and oil wells. Did you know that a plan was implemented during the American Civil War according to which two branches of one and the same Jewish bank - the bank of Rothschild - financed both sides of the conflict? The Paris branch of the Rothschild bank financed the Southern Confederates, and the London branch of the Rothschild bank financed the Northern States.

The aim of that strategy was to ruin both sides, making them get hopelessly in debt to the same bank. The head of the London branch was the Jew August Belmont Schonberg. The Paris branch was represented by his uncle, the Jewish Senator from Louisiana, John Slidell. The latter was also a good friend of the then British Prime Minister, the Jew Benjamin Disraeli.

It is well known how astutely the Jews that are higher up have always.known in the course of history how to cast their roles in pursuit of the same Zionist aims. So as not to fall a prey to those Jewish machinations, every country and every nation must need develop its own strategy for the protection of its national security. That must not depend on the existence or the collapse of a superpower.

Let us take Sweden or Switzerland as an example. Both countries call themselves "neutral" and have no conflict with any other country. No part of their territory is occupied by a foreign power. Nevertheless both countries maintain their own armies and carry on an independent policy of national security, while not relying on the support of a superpower. During both World Wars, Sweden was neither attacked nor occupied by the Soviet Union.

And that not because she was neutral, but because on account of her military strength, she would have been conquered only with severe losses on the part of the attacker. The strategy of the Soviets was to get to control the Arab and Islamic countries through the local communist parties. The described aim was in Palestine, for instance, "liberation of Man", what translates in communist lingo to the fact that the human becomes a communist.

Therefore Palestine was to turn communist too, which would have been nothing but another form of Jewish influence. At any rate the Soviet empire carried the seeds of its own destruction within itself; the small third world countries that deplore today the disappearance of the Soviet Union can do nothing about it.

The Persian Gulf War was no war but a barbaric slaughter

Rami: How do you evaluate the Gulf War?

Remer: What is being called "the Gulf War" was no war or battle. There were no important land, air, or sea fights. What took place there was a barbaric slaughter in the form of a onesided attack. To illustrate the opposite: when Argentina occupied the Falkland Islands, Great Britain carried on a war for their recovery, but not for the slaughter of the Argentinean population.

The USA on the contrary did not intervene to liberate Kuwait, as they alleged, but solely for the purpose of destroying Iraq; to destroy the Iraqi army, the Iraqi state, the Iraqi civilian population snd the Iraqi infrastructure and economy. After the "war" and after the "liberation," the USA made their purpose public: the economic, technological, industrial reconstruction of Iraq must be prevented duing the next centuries.

Rami: Why is that?

Remer: Everybody knows that Iraq could not threaten America even if she had atomic weapons. Saddam Hussein has neither the secret nor the declared intention to attack the USA, what would be a sheer military and strategic impossibility. Normally, there is absolutely no issue or conflict between Iraq and the USA.

The economic interests of the USA proper were never threatened by the Iraqis or the Persians either, and are not threatened today. It remains a fact that Iraq has never planned a war against the USA, and even less has it declared one! Why then has America mobilized her entire forces and those of her western and Arab allies against Iraq?

The answer is that Israel saw her interests and her regional hegemony threatened through the growing strength of Iraq. For that reason, America in the service of Israel waged war against Iraq. (Federal Chancellor Kohl stated in a press conference in the Rose Garden of the White House on September 16, 1991: "I am a little surprised that exactly that man [President Bush] is being attacked in such a manner, he being the one who more than anyone else, even to the extent of [a Gulf] war, has taken the responsibility and has stood by Israel and stands by Israel").

Israel saw in Iraq a military threat for her dominion over the muslims in that area. That is why she mobilized, as usual, her Jewish propagandists, who control the mass-media in the West. (About that the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz writes on January, 13, 1991: "The Jewish lobbyists in the USA are deeply involved in the propaganda work of the champions of a war against Iraq".)

The propaganda of the Jewish organizations knew perfectly how to exaggerate the military strength of Iraq. Thus they wanted to enhance the strike against Iraq and to make it annihilating. Nowadays Israel sees in Iran a military and ideological threat. The Jewish state will no longer forego any opportunity to incite the USA against Iran, and thereby the entire West and the "public opinion" of the western states controlled by the mass-media. Israel's aim is to liquidate Iran - and at the same time to destroy the Islam, the Islamic movement, and also any resistance against the tyranny of the Zionist world order.

Last edited by Gerry Fable; December 30th, 2011 at 07:01 AM.
Old December 30th, 2011 #3
Gerry Fable
Senior Member
Gerry Fable's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,109
Gerry Fable

The General Remer Interview

General Remer and Ahmed Rami

Part two:

Rami: In your opinion, is there a plan to destroy Iran in the sane manner in which it happened with Iraq during the Gulf War?

Remer: As you know, the Jews are numerically a very small minority. Their entire strength lies in the might of their organizations. That might rests first and foremost in the shrewdness and abitity to maneuver of those organizations, and also in the way they propagate historical forgeries and falsities, using their influence in the mass-media. With those historical forgeries and the falsities they propagate, the Jewish organizations enslave the souls of the non-Jews. To do that, they use, as we said before, the media they control, such as the cinema, the press, the television, the news agencies, the publishing houses etc.

On top of that, they control most political parties and political as well as non-political organizations. In the Arab society, the Israeli agents from the Jewish communities work like microbes; that is, they work from within, in order to decompose the organism of the nation, by exploiting its weaknesses. Under present-day circumstances, the Islamic movements play the part of antibodies striving to preserve the health of the nation.

The Islamic revival movement is today, to use a metaphor, the life-preserver of the respective peoples. It embodies a cultural revolution aiming at the liberation of culture, of the mass-media, of the language, of politics, and of education. The Islamic revival movement takes over the role of the lifepreserver, in order to save the Islamic nation from drowning in the sea of corruption of the Jewish organizations. In your countries nowadays the leading political, cultural and opinionmaking class is the product of western intellectual and cultural colonialism, which is strongly Jewish in its essence. The prevalence of the Jewish secret police in the West can be compared with diseases such as cancer, or AIDS. (Victor Ostrovsky, "Der Mossadt, Hoffmann and Campe, 1991, p. 14: "The Israeli secret police can rely on an important and loyal support from the Jewish communities the world over. That is possible through a unique system of voluntary Jewish activists"). Inimical cells, disguised as antibodies belonging to the body, have penetrated the body. The organism trusts the disguised immunizing cells and has thus become defenseless against a viral attack. The organism dies.

The Islamic system of Persia is the only legitimate form of government of the muslim world, because it springs from the way the people think and expresses their will. The government of Sudan is like that, too. Khomeini did not seize power through a military coup, through sheer force, or through a partisan movement: his trump card was his spiritual power and the support of the people.

The Islamic system has remained stable in Iran even after the death of Khomeini and the change in the person of the leader and of the leadership group the only one to remain stable in the entire Islamic world.

On the contrary, the demise of the Shah meant at the same time the collapse of his regime, his artificial form of government, and his army. All that went to the dustbin of history. The same fate awaits the other regimes that prevail in the muslim world. Israel knows that very well.

She tries desperately to cause the wheel of history to stand still. However, any strike against Iran or against the growing Islamic movements, will cause the anger of the muslim masses to grow, and the fire of the Islamic revolution to ignite. Nobody will be able to suppress that revolution.

Rami: Having been one of the greatest military commanders of World War II, and having to this moment attentively followed developments in military technology and strategy, how do you see the future of the militaly power of the Islam?

Remer: The Jewish organizations, helped by their state alliances, have humiliated what remained of Germany after World War I.

Our nation was degraded then in the same manner in which the Islamic peoples are today. The Versailles Dictate was thrust down our throat. My generation was took comfort in Abd el-Krim's victories in the Rif war against the French and the Spaniards at the beginning of the twenties [Abd el-Krim, 1880-l963, the leader of the Rif Kabyls, fought against French and Spanish occupation and was exiled and imprisoned by the French between 1926 and 1947].

I remember how my mother used to rave about the courage of Abd el-Krim. He was very popular in the twenties in the rest that remained of Germany, that was humiliated by the French. Later, I was privileged to meet personally that great Arab hero, and I was honored with his friendship.

The German people sees from his life story and from his tragedy that he has something in common with the fate of the Palestinians and the muslims. As a result of World War I and World War II, millions of Germans were chased away from their homeland and their country. The rest of Germany was torn apart.

To this day, large German regions are occupied, especially by the Poles, who got them from the Soviet occupation armies. In West Poland there certainly is a German Palestine. It will be the task of future generations to recover those areas, the same as it will be the task of the Intifada generations to free Palestine.

Because Hitler recognized the interests and problems that he had in common with the Arab peoples, during World War II he proposed to the Mufti of Jerusalem, Mohammed Aman Husseini, to relocate to Berlin. The mufti was received in Germany like a head of state.

The humiliations brought upon us in World War I prompted us to great efforts, and occasioned a great national rebirth under Hitler. Under Hitler, Germany became free of the elements that had always been responsible for the weakening of Germany before. The German nation has always managed in its long history to rise again after deep collapses.

Until the 1945 capitulation, the defeats we suffered could never destroy our cultural, ethnic and civilization-building greatness and our achievements. Until then, it had been mostly military defeats. Until 1945 we had never lost a war without fighting. In only six years (1933-1939) we made it possible in an unprecedented act of might - prompted only by joy and trust - to wring out of the earth an industry, an agriculture, a united people, that have remained without equal in history.

I say that because a strong army is not possible without a strong economy and industry, without progressive technology and without a legitimate government supported by the people. In today's Islamic world your citadels are threatened from within, with the exception of Iran and Sudan. You barely have legitimate states and legitimate forms of government, that should express the will of the people. One could say that you live under the worst kind of occupation: occupation that is intellectual, cultural, journalistic, and economic.

Your leaders, whether consciously or unconsciously, are mere subordinates of the external enemy. Your armies do not serve today to defend the Islamic nation, but to defend the reigning regime. In the Islamic countries, the army no longer perceives an external enemy as the enemy, but the Islamic movement and the Islam. Nowadays, in the Israeli Embassy in Berlin there are dozens of scientific and technological "attaches" who are conversant with scientific, technological and economic spying. That serves to ensure the strategic security of the racist Jewish state in Palestine.

In contrast, in the embassies of the Islamic states, with the exception of that of Iran, hundreds of police spies do their worst, and their task is the surveillance of their own citizens who live in Germany. That is supposed to ensure the security of the regime in power in the Islamic countries. The money that is being spent for that kind of work would suffice to keep alive an entire Palestinian city. It would be better to close down all those embassies and to spend for the poor in the Islamic and Arab countries, the money that is being used for them. The damage that those embassies do to their countries by & surpasses the benefits they bring.

As for the journalists and the press in your countries, they have regrettably become parrots that recite the propaganda of the Jewish organizations that is being handed to them by the so-called "news agencies". I am speaking as a friend who wishes the Islamic nation well. I have been for a year and a half a political and military adviser of the Egyptian President and general staff.

That was in the years 1953 to 1954. I have lived for six years in Syria. I looked upon the Islamic land as my second homeland. It pains me to have to bear the humiliations and wrongs inflicted upon the Islamic nation by neocolonialism and by the puppet regimes it has set up. I read recently about the military talks between USA and Egypt. I was very surprised to learn that the Egyptian army will buy used materials from the American army.

The blue paper prepared by the Egyptian delegation stresses that the role of the Egyptian army is to help the USA in ensuring "peace" and "stability" in the region! What kind of stability? Quite obviously Egypt's adversary is no longer Israel but the Islam, Iran and Sudan! How is it possible that the Islamic world has fallen to that depth of decadence and degradation? In the meantime, I can hardly believe the reports about the huge rifts between the leaders of the Islamic countries and the striving of their peoples. The Islamic nation deserves a better fate, a more honorable place among the peoples and more capable leaders.

The riches of the Islamic states lie hidden in the safes of the Jewish bankers who finance the state status and the economy of Israel. Your heroes, your great persons languish in jail or live in exile. The traitors enjoy power and determine your fate. Your armies have become instruments for the maintenance of "stability" and "peace", i.e., for the defense of the Israeli occupants and tourists, while those who resist and flght are beinB considered "terrorists" and "extremists".

Treason is being labelled "wisdom" and "diplomacy" in your news-media. Loyalty to one's principles is being called "extremism". The future will be the fruit of our present-day actions. In view of all that, I see no way out of the serious current circumstances other than the setting up of a true Islamic society and of an Islamic state in every muslim country, and the implementation of the political and economic unity of the Islamic states. The setting up of a large, strong state on the foundation of a cultural and social Islamic revolution is a prerequisite, if you wish to be able to efficiently meet the challenges that face you.

Rami: Currently, a wave of racism is seen in the West directed especially against Arabs and muslims. How do you account for that phenomenon, that has increased in violence in the past three years?

Remer: In the first place: I do not want to hear our Islamic friends reciting like parrots the hogwash of the Zionist media.

The front-line does not run between the Islamic world and the West. The cherished dream of Israel, of the Jewish organizations, and of their media, is to convince public opinion in the West that the Islam is an enemy and a threat for the West, and that all the Jews want is but preventive protection from an Islamic strike force in order to defend the West. Islamism is a world religion that is accessible to all. Judaism on the contrary is reserved for the racist ethnic group of the Jews, the "chosen people".

The witch hunt against the Islam is a tactical propaganda of the Jewish organizations that served at its time to sway public opinion in favor of a war against Iraq. The same tactic is being used today in the witch hunt against Persia. Unfortunately, there are no Islamic media that should be a match for the Jewish media.

There is an urgent need for the setting up of a training institute for Islamic journalists, where our epoch, the geopolitical map of the West and today's problems, should be taught more thoroughly rather than the 6th century. Your schools for training journalists and your Islamic Al-Azhar University are not equal to the task of producing educated Islamic cadres.

The war against the Jewish organizations is a total war that must be waged in the areas of spirituality, the news-media, science, culture, and politics. In the West, the prevalence of the Jewish organizations in those areas is the foundation of their strength. The Jews have never waged a real war themselves and have never gained a victory by their own means.

To conquer Palestine, they have made the West serve them, not because the people of the western states loved the Jews, but because the Zionists have studied thoroughly the frame of mind and the political systems of the West. That has made it possible for them to find out how one can occupy and control the West. With the Arab leaders (such as Saddat), they did the same. Thus did they gain entrance in the Islamic world without a battle. They could get to control a whole country without firing a single shot. Let us not be led by the nose by the mendacious propaganda of the Jewish organizations. The real front-line runs between Good and Evil, between Right and Wrong, not between the Islam and the West. If the Islamic media were the equal of the Jewish ones, then the majority of the people in the West would be conv inced of the righteousness of the Islamic cause.

They would side with right and not with the Zionist wrong. The "Satanic Verses" by Salman Rushdie and "Not without My Daughter" by Betty Mahmoudi are consummate propaganda. They have most certainly been commissioned. Both books were financed and published by Jewish publishing houses. Their style is attractive and easy to understand.

They were distributed in the West in million-strong editions and they contain mendacious propaganda against the Islam and the muslims. If only one book with similar content were written against the Jews, both author and publisher would promptly find themselves in jail. Books of that kind, together with the Jewish propaganda in the media, have played a great part in the stirring up of racial hatred against the Arabs and the Islam.

The agents of the Mossad commit or organize the terrorist attacks against foreigners in Germany and in other parts of Europe, in order to besmirch the reputation of the German people and to stir up enmity between the Germans and the muslims. I draw attention to the fact that in Rostock there are more former Soviet-block Jews than Turks, yet the violent attacks are not directed against the Jews. Racist propaganda is an invention of the Jewish organizations.

Naturally the economic crisis, the raging unemployment, and the glut with foreigners have created in Europe a set of circumstances that give rise to an alarmed defensive attitude in the indigenous population. That is normal. In view of that state of things, the only solution for the preservation of the dignity of the muslims and of the Arabs is for them to return to their homelands.

In that manner they will be able to put an end to their unworthy exile and to contribute to the liberation of their fatherland from under tyranny and corruption. The tyrants who reign there are the main reason that millions of muslims have fled poverty, injustice, and corruption.

The immigration into the West from Islamic countries is a loss for you, because many educated and creative persons, whom you need urgently, are lost to you. The problem of immigration into Europe is a result of your internal economic, political, and social difficulties. You cannot conquer those by exporting to Europe your sons and daughters by the millions.

The increase in your migration to Western Europe will not improve your image, on the contrary it will sully it, and it will detract from your national dignity. You have been colonized in the past, because you were in a state that allowed colonization, because of your decadence and internal dissolution. Today, it is one of your outstanding duties to shake off colonialism and to conquer the decadence and degradation that have struck roots in your hearts.

The occurrences of Iran were not only a change in the form of government but a change in the consciousness of the Iranian people. When that people rose and conquered its fear and passivity, the Shah fled immediately like a scared dog. Your corrupt regimes are just the peak of a pyramid of corruption and decadence. Colonialism could also gain entrance only thanks to your internal rottenness.

Your weakness is Israel's strength. When Islam and the muslims wake up, the earth will shake under the feet of the Israelis and of the Jewish organizations in the West, and their control of the West will be shaken in its very foundations. Find your strength inside yourselves!

Rami: Now do you see a possible solution of the Palestinian question?

Remer: The main task of your generation is finding a healthy and honorable solution to the Palestinian question. Capitulating before Israel is not a solution; it is betraying the future generations. If you cannot obtain a victory today, the least you can do is not to capitulate without resisting. Instead of giving up, you must work seriously and create the economic, political and social conditions for the future victory. In the first place, you must conquer tyranny, decadence and corruption in your own heart!

You must know that your strength is Israel's weakness. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics collapsed like a rotten shed, whereas the vitality of the German people has been preserved in the seed and could lead us Germans to fresh progress. The Islam began in the 6th century as a cultural, spiritual and reforming movement against the superpowers of that time.

The military strength of the Islam grew as a consequence of its spiritual strength. The only real solution of the Palestinian question lies in the return of the Palestinian people to their fatherland, in the setting up of a true Palestine, that should be able to confine within its limits the Jewish usurping state. Any solution violently extorted, any unjust peace will be rejected by future generations.

The regimes that are in power in the Arab and Islamic world are like dead bodies. They perished because of their weakness. The future belongs to the forces of Islam. The Hamas and the Jihad [two uncompromising Islamic movements] are the Islamic response to the Zionist challenge. This is what takes place in your countries today: your leaders are politically finished. Instead of stepping down in honor, they cling bitterly to power and try to drag their peoples along into the precipice.

Boutros Ghali's Jewish wife qualified him to be appointed Secretary General of the United Nations Olganization

Rami: How do you judge the UN?

Remer: The world is ruled today by the USA without a rival. That means: whoever controls the USA, controls the world. As a matter of fact, in the USA the Jewish organizations hold the scepter.

The UN in its present-day state is nothing but an executive body in the worldwide strategy of the Jewish organizations and of Israel. Israel, with its Israel-lobby in the USA, takes the decisions in the domestic and foreign policy of the USA. That executive body was faced now with the problem of Japan's and Germany's emergence as economic superpowers, what should have normally ensured them the right to a permanent seat in the World Security Council.

In that case, naturally, the question of the veto would have arisen: would Japan and Germany have it or not? At any rate, the role of the UN in its current state consists of giving a semblance of legality to the American world hegemony. I read somewhere, that one of the main assets that Boutros Ghali brought to qualify him as General Secretary of the UN is the fact that he is married to a Jewess!

If, for instance, Israel's interests had been affected directly in Bosnia, the United Nations, which are of course controlled by the USA, had struck long ago, as they did in the Gulf War. [On August 9, 1993, in the 10:30 news commentary, Martin Schulze said, about US influence in the UN: For it is the USA that have that kind of influence in the UN that determines war and peace].

Since in Bosnia and in Palestine only muslims are slaughtered, the United Nations never moved a finger in either case. I learned recently from a French TV broadcast that 95 percent of the arms smuggled to the Serbians come from Israeli sources ... What were the matters discussed at the Tokyo conference of the Great Seven [economic powers]? US President Bill Clinton, Israel's errand boy, stated that he would bring before that conference the blockade of Iran and of Sudan and the hedging in of the Islamic threat.

He said he would ask Germany and Japan to participate in that policy. As far as Francois Mitterrand is concerned, he stated that he "had promised Israel to bring up at the conference the question of the end of the Arab economic boycott of Israel." And John Major promised in a statement that he would support any action against the Islamic threat! Thus it is obvious that in the elevated club of the great economic powers everything is a matter of loyalty toward Israel and the Jewish organizations.

That slavish allegiance to the Jewish organ izations finds expression in the fight against the Islam! France and the USA have even assured officially the governments of Algiers, Tunis and Egypt that they will cover them in their fight against the Islamists.

In the last year that Bush was president, America has presented Israel with an additional $10 billion, to finance the invasion of former Soviet-block Jews into Palestine. For a long time already, the USA has given and continues to give Israel at least $3.5 billion yearly, to which must be added all the military deliveries, that ensure the latter's military superiority over all Islamic countries taken together.

As a German, I am ashamed that my country gives in to American pressure and throws away yearly 3 billion German marks as war restitution, upon a state that did not exist in World War II and therefore suffered absolutely nothing during that war. Germany has presented Israel with more than 100 billion German marks since it was set up.

According to the conditions imposed upon Germany, my country must give to Israel until the year 2030 further 37 billion marks. And that without mentioning the "loans" which turn mostly into gifts. Germany has financed 72 percent of the building of the economic and industrial infrastructure of Israel.

That is acknowledged by Nahum Goldmann in his book "The Jewish Paradox". Goldmann has been for many years the president of the World Jewish Congress. In his book he shamelessly boasts of having milked Germany of billions of marks, and all that only through wiles, blackmail, and the spreading of myths. Please note: myths, not history. Every years the German communities must invite and treat 20,000 Jews from the USA, Israel, and other countries. Each Jewish tourist costs the German tax-payer easily 20,000 mark. And all that at a time when financial problems and unemployment increase threateningly, and the Germans suffer seriously from recession.

The "gas chambers and the destruction of 6 million Jews" are shameless lies

Rami: Why does Germany give Israel and the Jews such financial support?

Remer: The Jews have enriched their religious legendary inheritance with the legend of the murder of six million Jews, who it is claimed were for the most part killed in German "gas chambers" during World War II. Although the number of Jews in the territories controlled by Germans did not rise above 1.5 million, the Jewish organizations, with the help of the media controlled by them, managed to turn their legend into "common knowledge."

The alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz are just one of the many propagandistic lies of the Jewish organizations against Germany. I declare categorically as one of the top military commanders of World War II that our army never murdered not even as much as one human being in any gas chamber.

As a well-informed general I learned that Hitler's plan was to free Europe from the control of the Jewish organizations. The Jews were to be relocated to Eastern Europe and Russia; in Birobidjan (in Siberia) there had been already set up a Jewish state. Hitler had categorically refused an offer of the Jewish organizations aimed at striking an alliance between the National Socialists and the Jews, whose aim should have been the immigration of the Jews into Palestine.

We must not forget first and foremost that it was the Jewish organizations that repeatedly declared war against the German Reich between 1933 and 1939. The loss of human lives through the death of defenseless German women and children and of German soldiers was more than a hundred times greater than the loss of Jewish lives. During World War II there were approximately 55 million victims. No other ethnic group except the Jews demands such perennial restitutions.

The Jewish pillage policy against the German people is a continuous provocation for our national feelings and for our human dignity, especially since we know that the entire aid that we give Israel is but a contribution to Israel's war efforts against the Palestinian people and against the Islamic nation. Currently, Israel has over 200 atomic bombs, that were basically built for the destruction of muslims.

Is there a leadership in the Islamic world that has prepared a strategic plan for the defense of the Islamic national security in view of this threat that hangs over every muslim? In Nasser's time there were serious efforts to bring about a common Arab plan that should guarantee national security from Israel. Nowadays, on the contrary, we see nothing but Arab dissensions and Arab armies that see their task as being to defend the ruling regime even at the cost of cooperating with the enemy.

After Nasser, up to now, only once has there been a common military operation undertaken by a number of Arab states - and that one was controlled by an American-Jewish leadership during the Gulf War, and destroyed an Islamic country. In areas where there is no freedom and no legitimate popular government, where civilized political rules do not apply, where state terrorism prevails, in order to achieve political change or to express the will to political change, there is only one way, namely to reveal the true nature of the despotic state power.

Take, for example, Sweden. That nation does not have the same serious problems (decadence, corruption) that the Islamic world has. Still, the people can elect their government every three years.

The Islamic nation struggles against huge difficulties, but also has giant possibilities. It should be possible to discuss its problems in free, open debate.

For one of the main reasons why decadence has prevailed among you is the political tyranny that suppresses any free discussion. Nothing is more dangerous than a stupid tyrant. How many such stupid tyrants are there in your countries?

Nasser rose against colonialism, Saddat capitulated, and the Islamic movement has taken up again the torch of the struggle

Rami: What is your personal message to the readers of AL-SHAAB?

Remer: Through the newspaper AL-SHAAB, I greet the generous, sympathetic Egyptian people, among whom I lived wonderful years during the revolution. Ever since those years I have attentively followed Egypt's fate and the fate of its people.

In Egypt, none of the succeeding regimes managed to suppress the freedom of the press completely. And that not because of the "humaneness" of the rulers, but because freedom is not given, it is conquered. In Egypt, the journalists - especially those of AL-SHAAB nowadays - play an extremely important part in the education of the people, the clarification of notions, and the fight against corruption and treason. An opposition and a press of the opposition are the attributes of every freedom-loving and legitimate governing system.

The free press can be useful even to an intelligent dictator, helping him see the negative sides of his rule, that in the absence of a courageous, open-minded and constructive opposition remain hidden from him. The existence of the AL-SHAAB newspaper, its freedom of expression and its continuous appearance does honor to President Mubarak and proves that there is still hope to improve Egypt's condition without violence and without civil war.

The circumstances of the Islamic nation are tightly knit with those of Egypt. The latter's progress and regress are mirrored in the entire muslim world. The Egyptian people has launched the anticolonial struggle during the forties up to the sixties from Cairo. However, after Nasser's death and Saddat's capitulation, capitalism has spread over the entire Islamic world. Nowadays, the Islamic movements raises the torch of the resistance. That torch burns brightest in Iran and Sudan. Egypt will soon occupy the place she deserves in the Islamic world - in the struggle for freedom, dignity and justice.

AL-SHAAB: We thank our friend, General Remer, for granting our newspaper this interview.
Old December 30th, 2011 #4
Senior Member
Serbian's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,246
Thumbs down

If, for instance, Israel's interests had been affected directly in Bosnia, the United Nations, which are of course controlled by the USA, had struck long ago, as they did in the Gulf War. [On August 9, 1993, in the 10:30 news commentary, Martin Schulze said, about US influence in the UN: For it is the USA that have that kind of influence in the UN that determines war and peace].

Since in Bosnia and in Palestine only muslims are slaughtered, the United Nations never moved a finger in either case. I learned recently from a French TV broadcast that 95 percent of the arms smuggled to the Serbians come from Israeli sources ...

What a load of shit. This senile old fool is simply repeating the western jewish and Islamic narrative on Bosnia.
95% of arms coming from Israel, what a retarded old fucker. He should've known that all arms used by the Serbian side was locally manufactured, {see socialist Yugoslavian arms industry} even most of the stuff used by the muslims was local, apart from the NATO weapons they also had access to.

If not for the US and Zionist UN these animals would not have even started the war, nor would thousands of foreign islamic mud people have flocked to Bosnia to wage jihad. Remer should've lived in Sudan or Pakistan.
Some people let their hatred of kikes blind them so much that they are willing to push the lies of the worst type of muslim scum and accept their propaganda as truth. Someone like Remer should have known better than to suck up to this filth.
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''

Last edited by Serbian; December 30th, 2011 at 10:20 PM.
Old December 31st, 2011 #5
Gerry Fable
Senior Member
Gerry Fable's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,109
Gerry Fable

A bit harsh there, Serbian. I am in no way able to disprove, or agree, with what you say because my knowledge on that region and subsequent conflicts is almost zero. But the general thrust of his article is spot on. Regarding the New World Order, Jewry and Middle East conflicts.


Display Modes

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.
Page generated in 0.17659 seconds.