Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > General Discussion
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old September 2nd, 2012 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,415
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Jews: Vilest, Most Disgusting Genocidalist Haters on Earth - and They Suck Baby Dicks Too

NYC’s Effort to Warn Parents About Herpes Risks of Ancient Circumcision Ritual

Doug Barry




Super-duper Orthodox Jewish leaders in New York are bristling under the Health Department's plan to mandate a parental consent form before rabbis perform the ancient circumcision ritual called "metzitzah b'peh." So far, some 200 rabbis have objected to the city's mandate, and have signed a proclamation claiming that the city "printed and spread lies...in order to justify their evil decree," a decree that jeopardizes a religious ritual.

Ah, but I see we might have run on ahead of ourselves because the question remains: What is the antiquated penis-cutting ritual? Glad you asked! It's when a specially-designated circumciser called a "mohel" sucks the blood from a freshly clipped foreskin. Though most parents now insist that mohels use sterilized pipettes to perform the metzitzah b'peh, there are some holdouts that want the ritual carried out as if there have been no medical innovations over the last couple thousand years. The problem with this sort of anachronism, however, is that, according to the city's Health Department records, 11 New York boys have been infected with herpes from herpes-infected mohels who performed the ritual sans pipette.

The city will vote next week about whether to distribute consent waivers, but some rabbis are already saying that they're not going to comply no matter what the city says because, dammit, religious ritual is far more important than public health.

http://jezebel.com/5939969/orthodox-...mcision-ritual
 
Old September 2nd, 2012 #2
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,415
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[even a lot of lefty feminists at jezebel.com (a feminist site for fans of inadvertent humor) get it:

JenniferAustin
Reply

There's so much wrong with this whole picture. Ritualized mutilation of penises? No. Doing so without the consent of the penis owner? No. Rabbis who *want* to suck the blood? No. Rabbis whining about informed consent? All of them need to STOP THAT SHIT RIGHT NOW.
 
Old September 2nd, 2012 #3
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,415
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Libby Tarian and 1 more

Men without foreskins make too much friction regardless of lubrication. It's just not the same using pelvic floor muscles to grab the base of an uncircumcised dick to create the piston suction that creates a really great O as a dick that keeps sliding in and out of your grasp. A foreskin makes the seal tighter. Suction from the piston action of sex can draw down an egg. Orgasms are so much more intense all through the body with this suction. Not that you can't get that suction without a foreskin to roll up and down the penis, since lubrication is a substitute, but it just doesn't have the same mechanics.

Plus, uncircumcised men have to enter slowly and warm you up otherwise if they push to fast, it hurts them and can tear their frenulum. Uncircumcised men don't have this sensitivity. Also, if they masturbate a lot, and are tradesmen that work with their hands, their rough hands damage the nerves that would otherwise be protected by the foreskin and they become a bit more "work" as they age. I'm pretty sure this leads to a lot of men who can't keep it up. There's not enough stimulation from a vag after a rough hand has been used twice a day for years. Hence the poundings that seem de rigeur in porn. Pretty sad nobody seems to know the basics of natural mechanical sex, without genital mutilation any more. Pisses me off.

Foreskins make rushed sex difficult (yay for the ladies) and a sudden pounding with no warm up (rape) pretty risky and painful. Yeah bet you didn't know that did you. A dry orifice causes enough friction to rip a foreskin off it's head.
I despise genital mutilation of men. It's too late not to get me started. Just too late.
 
Old September 2nd, 2012 #4
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,415
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Dreamer_fla and 3 more
Reply

It's really a shame that this ritual is even allowed! A legal way for an old men to put his mouth on a baby's penis. Any other men would be in jail, but under the umbrella of religious freedom it suddenly is just a little warning thing? And anyone denouncing it is immediately labeled as antisemite?
 
Old September 2nd, 2012 #5
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,415
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Sol_Invictus
Reply

I'll state the obvious. If this were any other religion, then it wouldn't be tolerated in a modern society. I say this as someone with a lot of respect for Judaism.
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #6
Cale Sparks
anti-American
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,666
Cale Sparks
Default

Thread needs bumping.
__________________
The personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew.
- Hitler
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #7
StanSki
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Where the wild things live.
Posts: 332
Default

I encourage the jews to continue their ages-old tradition on their own kind in the hope that herps, gon, heps A, B, and C, AIDS, and any other communicable diseases will eventually help to destroy these vile creatures once and for all.
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #8
James Hawthorne
Senior Member
 
James Hawthorne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,037
Blog Entries: 89
James Hawthorne
Default

Quote:
Often enough, circumcision is deemed to be of medical benefit, for instance in preventing infectious diseases or cancer. But it's worth taking a closer look at the figures and the findings of related studies: Circumcised infants may have only a tenth as many urinary tract infections in their first year, but these infections generally occur so rarely that 100 circumcisions would be needed to prevent a single urinary tract infection. This doesn't make sense in otherwise healthy babies. There is no medical benefit to routine circumcision.
No medical benefit for this Semitic ritual.

Quote:
The foreskin also plays a role in arousal. In contrast to the glans, which has deep sensitivity, the foreskin has what are known as tactile corpuscles which can only be found in similar density in the tips of the fingers, the lips and the eyelids. It's therefore hardly surprising that the foreskin is considered a male erogenous zone.
__________________
http://podblanc.mobi
__________________
Aryan Matters

VNN Media
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #9
Dylan Jones
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 555
Dylan Jones
Default

A practice that should be made illegal for individuals to make the decision for another individual. It is up to the individual on whether or not he wants his foreskin removed and he should be of an age where he is of the right disposition of mind to make the permanent choice.
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #10
Kievsky
Senior Member
 
Kievsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,229
Kievsky
Default

Right! Circumcision should only be performed on adults. Babies by definition have no choice.

Jewish kike doctors imposed this on American boys, the swine. How dare they!

They did it so that, in the event of another Holocaust, we wouldn't be able to tell Jews from non-Jews by pulling down their pants. So American boys got foreskinned because of Jewish paranoia.
__________________
Godzilla mit uns!
http://mindweaponsinragnarok.wordpress.com
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #11
Lew_
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 146
Lew_
Default

When my son was born, the hospital staff was very pushy about circumcision. My wife and I refused, and they didn't seem to like it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Libby Tarian and 1 more

Men without foreskins make too much friction regardless of lubrication. It's just not the same using pelvic floor muscles to grab the base of an uncircumcised dick to create the piston suction that creates a really great O as a dick that keeps sliding in and out of your grasp. A foreskin makes the seal tighter. Suction from the piston action of sex can draw down an egg. Orgasms are so much more intense all through the body with this suction. Not that you can't get that suction without a foreskin to roll up and down the penis, since lubrication is a substitute, but it just doesn't have the same mechanics.

Plus, uncircumcised men have to enter slowly and warm you up otherwise if they push to fast, it hurts them and can tear their frenulum. Uncircumcised men don't have this sensitivity. Also, if they masturbate a lot, and are tradesmen that work with their hands, their rough hands damage the nerves that would otherwise be protected by the foreskin and they become a bit more "work" as they age. I'm pretty sure this leads to a lot of men who can't keep it up. There's not enough stimulation from a vag after a rough hand has been used twice a day for years. Hence the poundings that seem de rigeur in porn. Pretty sad nobody seems to know the basics of natural mechanical sex, without genital mutilation any more. Pisses me off.

Foreskins make rushed sex difficult (yay for the ladies) and a sudden pounding with no warm up (rape) pretty risky and painful. Yeah bet you didn't know that did you. A dry orifice causes enough friction to rip a foreskin off it's head.
I despise genital mutilation of men. It's too late not to get me started. Just too late.
Fascinating comment. Nature evolved human sex mechanics over millenia. It shouldn't be surprising tampering with those mechanics has more consequences than people appreciate.
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #12
Lew_
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 146
Lew_
Default

Two excellent articles re: Jews and male genital mutilation.

Andrew Hamilton

http://www.counter-currents.com/2011...by-comic-book/

Greg Johnson

http://www.counter-currents.com/2011...-jewish-power/
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #13
James Hawthorne
Senior Member
 
James Hawthorne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,037
Blog Entries: 89
James Hawthorne
Default

Quote:
When my son was born, the hospital staff was very pushy about circumcision. My wife and I refused, and they didn't seem to like it.
Thank you Lew and your wife for not allowing this semitic ritual on your son.
__________________
Aryan Matters

VNN Media
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #14
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,415
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Fascinating comment. Nature evolved human sex mechanics over millenia. It shouldn't be surprising tampering with those mechanics has more consequences than people appreciate.
Yep. But we have christianity. Who needs thinking? And we have British culture. All that matters is what everybody else is doing. If they're chopping off their kid's dick, by God we'd better do it too. Keep up appearances, you know.
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #15
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
N.B. Forrest
Default

I was born in a Catholic hospital, so my dick is as nature intended.
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #16
Lew_
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 146
Lew_
Default

There is so much sick and repulsive shit in Judaism it could fill volumes. Jews have very sick minds. Child sacrifice is an obvious theme with the Jews (God kills the first-born of every Egyptian gentile, God orders Abraham to kill his own son, God sends Jesus, his son, to suffer torment and execution). I posted a snippet from the Talmud this morning that seems to condone pedophilia. The Talmud also claims Jesus' punishment for opposing the Jews is eternal boiling in excrement. Jews seem to have a bit of an obsession with excrement. Freud claimed expelling excrement was central to personality development.
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #17
America First
Senior Member
 
America First's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,699
America First
Default

With the exception of retards or evanjellycull nut cases, if you hand people quality literature explaining why baby boys should not be mutilated they always stop it from happening.

Have not done so for a couple years now, but the last couple thanked me profusely and told the hospital staff tried to brow beat them in to doing it !

Had given them a copy of Angry White women's article on why it is a crime to do so, she use to post here.

Also had a copy from the 1984 March or April New Yorker Magazine two part issue written by a jooish doctor and jooish pediatric R.N. explaining in detail why it is a horror and is much less hygienic to do such an act against a boy child.

No wonder so many Whites are messed up in the head.

This crime started big time after their victory in 1945.

Catholic hospitals at one time banned such criminal acts against babies.
__________________
Isn't it strange that we talk least about the things we think about most?

We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples
to lead our country to destruction.

-Charles A. Lindbergh
http://www.fff.org/freedom/0495c.asp

Last edited by America First; September 3rd, 2012 at 06:53 PM.
 
Old September 4th, 2012 #18
James Hawthorne
Senior Member
 
James Hawthorne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,037
Blog Entries: 89
James Hawthorne
Default

Quote:
Right! Circumcision should only be performed on adults. Babies by definition have no choice.
Only in extreme cases and with the adults consent. As I posted at post #8 there are clearly no health benefits for babies having this sick vile semitic ritual done to them.
__________________
Aryan Matters

VNN Media
 
Old September 5th, 2012 #19
James Hawthorne
Senior Member
 
James Hawthorne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,037
Blog Entries: 89
James Hawthorne
Default

[Ungrateful jew whines about dick cutting ritual - calls Germans wolves]

Germany has been debating the rights and wrongs of circumcising infant boys ever since a German court ruled in June that the ritual, a core part of the Jewish religion, was unlawful.

Now Charlotte Knobloch, 79, the former president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, has had enough. In a furious editorial published on Wednesday in one of the country's top newspapers, Süddeutsche Zeitung, she said the controversy was calling the existence of Germany's small Jewish community into question and asked: "Do you still want us Jews?"

"For 60 years I have defended Germany as a survivor of the Shoah. Now I ask myself if that was right," she wrote. Knobloch is president of the Munich Jewish community and vice president of the World Jewish Congress.

The verdict by a court in Cologne, though extremely limited in its scope, was denounced by Jewish, Muslim, Catholic and Protestant leaders as a serious intrusion on religious freedom. Chancellor Angela Merkel said Germany risked becoming a "laughing stock" if Jews were not allowed to practice their rituals.

In July, the lower house of parliament passed a resolution to protect religious circumcision and the government has promised a new law to make clear that doctors or families will not be prosecuted for carrying out the procedure.

Foundations of Jewish Religion 'Dragged Through the Mud'

But the debate has gone on. Doctors and politicians have weighed in, warning about supposed health risks and infringements of infants' rights.

"It didn't occur to me even in my nightmares that I should have to ask myself the question ahead of my 80th birthday whether I was allowed to survive the "murder" of the Jews to have to witness this," wrote Knobloch.

Born in Munich in 1932, she survived the 'holocaust' because a former employee of her uncle's, Kreszentia Hummel, took her in and pretended she was her illegitimate daughter. Knobloch's father survived the 'holocaust' as a forced laborer. Her grandmother was "murdered" in Auschwitz in 1944. Her mother was not Jewish and her parents had got divorced in 1936.

Knobloch wrote that circumcision was at the core of Jewish identity. "The zeal with which the self-appointed are unfeelingly and thoughtlessly dragging our religious foundations through the mud is unequalled. People who apparently have no idea of the religious significance of the Brit Mila (circucision ceremony) who presumably have never spoken to a Jew, now want to tell us whether and how we can follow our religion.

'Sham' Of a Flourishing Jewry

"I don't want to go on bearing that silently. Not after all we Jews had to suffer in Germany," wrote Knobloch. "And I'm no longer prepared to go along with the sham in which people are talking about a new, fresh, flourishing Jewry in Germany, to give Germans the feeling that time can heal even the greatest conceivable wound. The fact is that German Jewry has never gotten over the Shoah. The few who survived it are marked and defined to this day by the absence of that Jewish life that existed at the start of the 20th century."

Knobloch said Jews in Germany had to put up with a lot: Nobel Laureate Günter Grass writing about the risks Israel posed to world peace, "obsessive world improvers" calling for boycotts of Israeli products, sympathy for Palestinian suicide bombers, and the Prague Declaration in which "some civil rights activists equate the crimes of communism with that of the 'holocaust'."

She also mentioned attacks on Jews such as the assault on a rabbi in Berlin last month. She said German Jews had spent decades justifying their continued presence in Germany to their families and friends abroad.

"For six decades I have had to justify myself because I stayed in Germany -- as a remnant of a destroyed world, as a sheep among wolves," wirte Knobloch. "I always readily carried this burden because I was firmly convinced that this country and these people deserved it. For the first time my basic convictions are starting to shake. For the first time I feel resignation. I seriously ask if this country still wants us."

http://www.spiegel.de/international/...-a-854070.html
__________________
Aryan Matters

VNN Media

Last edited by James Hawthorne; September 5th, 2012 at 08:33 PM.
 
Old October 5th, 2012 #20
James Hawthorne
Senior Member
 
James Hawthorne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,037
Blog Entries: 89
James Hawthorne
Default

[Germany caves to juden pressure]

Three months after circumcision ban, German government to legalize rite

Cabinet will approve a bill allowing professionally trained mohels to perform brit milah

The German government is set to pass legislation that would legalize ritual circumcisions if they are performed by a medical professional, allowing local Jews to breathe a sigh of relief three months after a local court criminalized the rite and criminal charges were filed against two rabbis.

German-Jewish leaders welcomed the bill, a copy of which has been obtained by The Times of Israel. The cabinet in Berlin will discuss the 26-page bill next Wednesday, after which it will proceed to the floor of the Bundestag, where it it is expected to be voted into law within the coming days.

“It is a clear political signal that Jews and Muslims are still welcome in Germany,” said Dieter Graumann, the president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany. “We are happy that Jewish commandments and Jewish life are not being pushed into illegality.”

‘Nowhere else in the world was this issue debated with such sharpness, coldness and sometimes brutal intolerance’
According to what is expected to become paragraph 1631 of the German Civil Code, parents of newborn sons can agree to have someone carry out ritual circumcisions “if they are performed according to rules of medical art.”

Ritual circumcisions can be performed by “a person chosen by a religious community who is especially trained” for such procedures, the bill postulates. In practice, that means that traditional Jewish circumcisers, or mohels, will continue to be able to perform circumcisions if they possess the*necessary*medical know-how.

“We certainly have to make some compromises about this. Yet the fact that professionally trained mohels can perform a brit milah according to Jewish rite is a good and important decision,” Graumann said.

In June, the Cologne district court ruled that parents having their sons circumcised are liable of causing bodily injury, even if they did so for religious reasons. According to the judges, the constitutional freedom of religion cannot justify interventions such as circumcision.


Eli Yishai, standing, attends a circumcision ceremony in Jerusalem (photo credit: Matanya Tausig/Flash90)

The court ruling drew heavy criticism from Jews in Germany, who, in a first reaction, called it “an outrageous and insensitive act.”

Amid a heated public debate about the legality of ritual circumcisions, criminal charges*were filed*against at least two rabbis who had pledged to continue performing circumcisions. In the wake of such news and countless articles and comments by opponents of ritual*circumcisions,*some prominent Jewish leaders had suggested that Jews were no longer welcome in modern Germany.

Several*senior Israeli officials — including President Shimon Peres, Interior Minister Eli Yishai and Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger — got involved, asking German authorities to create legal safety for Jews seeking to circumcise their newborn sons.

“The circumcision debate sometimes turned very hostile, which was not rationally explicable. Nowhere else in the world was this issue debated with such sharpness, coldness and sometimes brutal intolerance,” Graumann said. “I hope that, after the legal safety, we will now also receive emotional safety from the people in this country.”

http://www.timesofisrael.com/three-m...legalize-rite/
__________________
Aryan Matters

VNN Media
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM.
Page generated in 0.13636 seconds.