|
January 6th, 2017 | #3081 | |||
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 396
|
Will Williams and Women When Ben Klassen met Will Williams and Cindy Coleman in 1988 the couple was without work and essentially homeless. The unmarried pair had been together for six years, off and on, and it was obvious to Klassen that their live-in relationship was rough. In Klassen’s words: Will and Cindy “lived a sort of disorderly and troubled life.” Klassen badly needed help so he hired Williams May 15, 1988, though it was Cindy who did the essential work. Klassen required them to get married if they were going to live together, though: “I began to notice obvious friction between Will and Cindy.” Klassen married them: Cindy Did Not Smile on Her Wedding Day Quote:
Newlywed Gets Bruised Quote:
Williams Gives Cindy the Boot Quote:
|
|||
January 6th, 2017 | #3082 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 352
|
This story by Ben Klassen, William's former boss, is prophetic.
Quote:
See: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2...postcount=3031 and: http://www.narrg.com/2016/03/william...tery-of-woman/ We all will soon see if his conviction still stands all after the results of Williams' appeal of it. "Crowe" here on VNNF was also "prophetic" on May 29th, 2015: See: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1...postcount=1838 Ben Klassen was the founder of "Creativity" and of an atheistic White Racialism, or is of the making of the "White Race" or as it is as being one's own "religion". Emily H. supposedly has said that she is a "Creator" yet she rejects what the founder of it all has said about Will Williams in his personal experience of him. Time will tell just who or whom was right, or just as I had "warned" Michael O., and he had to learn the "hard way" or as well what Williams really is thus: just a Malignant Narcissist and a lying hypocrite that really just can't be trusted. See: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2...postcount=2801 Last edited by Paul Vogel; January 6th, 2017 at 11:18 AM. |
|
January 6th, 2017 | #3083 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 352
|
No "sleep disorder" just "Flying Monkeys" are boring.
Quote:
You really do not know what "REAL SCIENCE" is Emily. M theory isn't "wrong": it is only scientific speculation. Speculation is not "REAL SCIENCE". Do more research. Last edited by Paul Vogel; January 6th, 2017 at 11:05 AM. |
|
January 6th, 2017 | #3084 |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
Speaking of 'Research', Eh?
I communicate with Will's wife Svetlana Williams from time to time. She doesn't care to register here to argue ad nauseum with Bob 'Wiz of Oz' Demarais and Paul 'yawn' Vogel. But she reads these attacks from time to time, and asked me to publish the copy of their marriage certificate to show how "trustworthy" the information from DeMarais is.
She indicated that most of the 'facts' Bob posts are from his roomate's blog rantings (Garland Corse, aka 'Lucent Noble' on the interwebs). She said that Corse was diagnosed with a disorder (Aspergers possibly?) and that most of Paul's 'whole truths' come from NARRG or this blog. Lana also asked me to post a quote from her long comment under article https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/...ional-alliance that explains their divorce and remarriage. Excerpt: "..Hello, Mr.Terry! I’ve just read your article about my husband Will and I need to make some important correction. Will has been divorced just twice ( once by me). I left him in 2006, because it looked like our house which was being built by Will alone would never get finished. A highly professional architect and builder couldn’t find the time to build his own house because the cause has always been the main priority for him that was taking, practically, all his time. By 2008 I realized that Will is the most decent, trustworthy, reliable, talented, the strongest, the smartest, the funniest, the easiest man to be with. I called him, wanting to come back, we got remarried and soon enough built together not only our house, but a two-story headquarters building, as well. This summer I met Kevin Strom for the first time. If he is not a normal and traditional man, then nobody is. Kevin is extremely smart, interesting, nice and kind, as well as his beautiful fiancee and a wonderful teenage daughter that lives with them..." She goes on to say: "..Of course, that comment was soon deleted by SPLC while truly vulgar, libelous trolls' posts attacking me are still there. DeMarais, "Vogel", Corse, NARRG and other enemies of Dr. Pierce's legacy and the White people are just as "intellectually honest" as their proven ally SPLC. Actually, they work much harder than SPLC in their attempts to destroy the only organization that advocates for the white people. When the "Whole Truth" prevails in the courts this year, the "little people" are going to get very disappointed because the real truth is completely opposite to their "Truths". VNN people should see what "flying monkeys" Fred Streed and Hadding Scott say about Will's accusers if they want to know the truth: http://noncounterproductive.blogspot...&max-results=3 Lana's words. To suggest she's 'watching Will all da timmee!' or 'not married to him' is just low, low behavior. This woman has done nothing to anyone to deserve being lied on. Feel free to begin assaulting this nice woman with your mouth-shows how scoundrel-ish a desire for displacing someone can make certain 'men.' Lana is a smart White woman, yet you lie on and defame her, deliberately. Svetlana and Will's Marriage Certificate: Attachment 9859
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier Last edited by Emily Henderson; March 23rd, 2017 at 12:15 PM. |
January 7th, 2017 | #3085 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 396
|
Heed Cindy’s Warning Cindy Coleman lived, off and on, with William Williams for over seven years. Quote:
Williams insisted that Klassen hire A.W.; Klassen did. Williams insisted that Klassen give A.W. a raise; Klassen did. Within a matter of weeks, Williams and A.W. were bitter enemies. How many examples do you need? |
|
January 9th, 2017 | #3086 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 396
|
Kevin Burned His Fingers Quote:
Some of Williams’ intermediaries are flying monkeys. Mostly they are noisy little primates scampering around in the treetops shaking branches and chattering. Other intermediaries are “cat’s paws.” A big ape uses trickery to convince a cat to pull hot chestnuts from a fire. The cat singes his paw, and the uninjured ape gobbles up the chestnuts leaving none for the cat. Three of Williams’ cats are Kevin Alfred Strom, David Martin Pringle, and Williams’ wife Svetlana. They singe their paws pushing the envelopes of legality and ethics. Willie gets the gain, and the cats risk the pain. Arrest records or jail is one form of pain. Another form of pain is disgrace. One example is when Kevin Alfred Strom disgraced himself by interviewing Frazier Glenn Miller; Miller is Will’s only long-term friend. Miller killed three people (it takes four to make the FBI’s mass murderer list). Of course, Miller was so drunk that he missed his other three targets. Williams gained the publicity that Williams’ perpetually seeks. What did Strom gain? If Williams is true to form, Williams shorts Strom’s pay. Williams deliberately pays his employees’ peanuts and then finds excuse after excuse to give them only part pay. |
|
January 9th, 2017 | #3087 | ||||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 352
|
Emily, yes, please do much more "research", you "Flying Monkey"!
Quote:
Apparently, just you have not seen "how" Will Williams has worked with the SPLC to dry-snitch out and slander his critics with "internet kook" and NA members both past and present, Emily. See: https://willwilliamssplcpartnerandsn...artner-snitch/ and: https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t11...2#post13862101 Giving the NA's worst enemy the SPLC so much private information and with so many interviews was being helpful to the NA exactly how? See: https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/...ional-alliance And that one was just one of so many "unwise decisions" by Will Williams as Chairman of the NA and Trustee of the CCC all since then. See: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1973355&postcount=1 and: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2099593&postcount=6 You are actually being "intellectually dishonest" and are a "lying hypocrite"-or most especially because I have never said anything negative about Lana Williams. Quote:
There are other such White "advocacy organizations", for one. And for two, Will Williams has done more to destroy the credibility of the NA and Dr. Pierce's true Cosmotheism and his legacy by really all of his own many so "unwise decisions" and by his own "clownish behavior" in a just few years than even what that EG did in a dozen years! See: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2...postcount=3067 You really do have no real clue, Emily, as none of William's "Flying Monkeys" ever really do here. What else isn't new? Quote:
"The Virginia Circuit Court judge had 30 days after the 7 December hearing of McLaughlin vs. National Alliance to rule on the Alliance's Motion to Dismiss the case. Since 7 January fell on the weekend, the ruling should come down tomorrow, 9 January. I will post the judge's decision here."--Will Williams at SF. Well? What was the judge's decision? Where is your update post Mr. Williams? Quote:
Why bother? We have already seen that Fred Streed is just another lying hypocrite here, http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2...postcount=2985 and just as also is the "gas-lighting" and the now banned here due to it Mr. "Hadding Scott". See this VNN Forum Thread: http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...55#post1973355 And all of the way and up until end of it all here: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2136336&postcount=14 Therein you will find these "Whole Truths" and all of the actual facts that all of these Williams's "lying and hypocritical" or "Flying Monkeys" all only and all do so falsely deny! Last edited by Paul Vogel; January 12th, 2017 at 11:28 AM. |
||||
January 9th, 2017 | #3088 | ||||
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
Learn who to attribute quotes to, yawn monkey ;)
Quote:
If you're going to resort to Fourth Grade insults, it's even more pathetic that you stole them from Dr. Bob. Sad. Geezus weeps. I was talking to Bob, duh. Quote:
Once again, duh. You do that more than once in your post. Perhaps you should stop yawning and be more careful when reading. You are quoting my post, but LANA'S words. Should I resort to a 'Paul-ism' and say you 'aren't very bright?' Quote:
Quote:
I'm bored. Yawn an' sheeit. At least come up with your own children's literature based insults, Paul.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier |
||||
January 10th, 2017 | #3089 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 396
|
Dirty Dave Pringle This isn’t about David Martin Pringle. It’s about how Will Williams treats his people. Pringle showed up here on Easter Sunday, 27 March 2016 and has not had a bath on the property since then. Nine months and no running water for a bath or shower. For a couple months only, there was running water in a tiny sink in a half bath. But that’s it. There are no bath tubs only showers; Pringle can carry water and sort of take a sponge bath. But that's it. Pringle and his fiancée suffer other primitive indecencies: no washing machine, no backup heat, etc. Right now it is 5˚F. Williams’ highest priority should be to take care of his people. Williams only looks out for Number One. The rest of his people don’t even make the list. |
January 10th, 2017 | #3090 | |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
Quote:
Thousands o' dollars saved, which helps Mr. Pringle and his wife right there to appropriate funds toward something other than lawyers. Where is your lackey to tell us the court decision? He done promised us an update!
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier |
|
January 10th, 2017 | #3091 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 352
|
Lana can post for herself, Emily.
Quote:
I do not believe your hearsay attributions. Fred Streed lost any respect or when he lied hypocritically here. You obviously have not read all of his foul-mouthed posts either. Not quite. I only care about the actual facts regardless of the source of them. Trust but verify them for yourself. OK. You are just a foul-mouthed lying hypocrite skanky wigger and the stolen "Flying Monkey" then. Definitely not for children to read your posts, Emily. What else isn't new? Last edited by Paul Vogel; January 11th, 2017 at 01:48 PM. |
|
January 10th, 2017 | #3092 | |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
Quote:
On Lana: Not interested in what you believe-but the link to where she said such is provided in the post. Direct quotes. Not hearsay. U dumb. You understand neither Law nor Science. This is why the standards of Scientific Speculations and Theories vs. faith based thinking goes over your head, repeatedly. As for being foul mouthed: Do you post 'skanky wigger' in front of 'da chilruns', fine Aryan specimen without the balls to use his real name? You forgot the court update. Upload your pic and we'll determine if you are 'skanky' or not, brave one.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier Last edited by Emily Henderson; January 10th, 2017 at 01:13 PM. |
|
January 10th, 2017 | #3093 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 352
|
Linking to the SPLC? William's partner in his Affinity Fraud.
Quote:
Lol! Those are "direct quotes" of Lana you say? No such "words by Lana" were actually even there where you had linked, Emily. No surprise there! Linking to the enemy SPLC now? Ha! I was just pointing out the obvious. Anyone here can also read all of your posts, Emily, and just see this for themselves. That description of you in bold here: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2...postcount=3076 both was and is quite accurate. Science vs. Scientism. Rational faith vs. Blind faith. Speculation vs. Scientific fact. True reason vs False reason. You really do have no real clue and just are not very bright. What else isn't new? You are William's "Flying Monkey" and lackey, so go for it and post the update yourself. No thanks, "skank". My photo is none of your business and the SPLC and Williams' NA are partners in crime. Last edited by Paul Vogel; January 11th, 2017 at 01:56 PM. |
|
January 11th, 2017 | #3094 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 396
|
Quote:
Williams sued Oljaca; Williams sued DeCourcy; Williams has threatened to sue me. Williams created this entire mess. Williams caused all his legal problems, but he is looking to NA members to pay his legal bills. Williams, aided and assisted by others, has made my life, and the lives of several others, miserable for the last 15 months – terroristic night screaming driveby, rapid midnight gunfire, and the continual threat of blocking the access road to my house. Williams is losing and at an accelerating rate. Six months ago, we were unprepared and vulnerable; that is no longer the case. |
|
January 11th, 2017 | #3095 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 352
|
Williams caused all his legal problems, but he is looking to NA members to pay his legal bills.
Quote:
Indeed! And then both he and KAS have the gall to ask why so few new members and supporters? Again, it is not rocket science! See: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2...postcount=3043 Last edited by Paul Vogel; January 11th, 2017 at 02:17 PM. |
|
January 11th, 2017 | #3096 | |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
Quote:
Didn't click the link, as I'm sure it's me being called a whore or similar. By some Klanner or fake WN. Just as you are saying 'skank.' You've never met me, nor have any of the writers on VNN, so any sexual slander or character smears are just that, dirtbag. Pathetic. And niggerish. You are a coward. Like all cowards who get a raging case of butthurt, you start yelling nana nana boo boo. Call me a skank to my face sometime-if you can find the time, as you are too busy 'thumbs down'ing' the Matt Hale thread like a whiny loser. Oh yeah: 'Scientism' isn't a word, you Fundie tard (same mentality as a Fundie Hagee worshipping Baptist). Just as you don't know what 'hearsay' is, nor the standards for a Scientific Speculation. Science Lesson for the Chronically Mindfucked: String theory is a mathematical model constructed by physicists. Some people think that it's not valid as a theory because it doesn't make predictions. Wrong to say that it can't make any definitive predictions. It can't make any NEW predictions yet. Some day, string theory might finalize the reformulation of the standard model of particle physics, (LOOK UP JACOB BARNETT, A GENIUS-UNLIKE DEIST BLIND FAITH-ERS). String theory has triggered the developments of alot of new math, like: calculations related to high temperature superconductivity, or holographic models of QCD. So we would still trust string theory at very high energy. That's where it's self-consistent. Today's standard model would not. Show me what makes this ^^^^likely untrue, according to some evidence for your worldview. Or scream 'skank', that'll work. This is way over your head Paul, seeing as you don't know the difference between a quote and hearsay, you make up words a la Scientology, and you go into John Hagee style mini rages and start screaming 'skank' when you look stupid. *Also note: Moderators are just now getting to work on the stuff Will asked you to do that you failed to do. So likely add lazy to the mix of your other wonderful Aryan qualities. Attachment 9863 Go read a book. Start with a fourth grade science book, hon, and in ten years you might be able to join in the discussion.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier Last edited by Emily Henderson; March 23rd, 2017 at 12:15 PM. |
|
January 11th, 2017 | #3097 |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
If it were rocket science, you'd have to excuse yourself from the room.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier |
January 12th, 2017 | #3098 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 396
|
Quote:
What will unfold is a scene like that of the Iraqi army retreating down that big highway from Kuwait. And the sky swarming with of A-10 Thunderbolts waiting their turn to slaughter the hapless vehicles. Saddam Hussein had no exit strategy. Williams needs one fast. |
|
January 12th, 2017 | #3099 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 352
|
Today is 12 January, so Will Williams is late, which likely means Williams lost.
Quote:
Indeed. If Williams had actually won he would have been already braying like an ass that he did win or just have had one of his "Flying Monkeys" all post it in here by now. |
|
January 12th, 2017 | #3100 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 352
|
All one has to do is just read your posts, Emily. "Skank" is apt.
Quote:
The only "mini rage" is all just in your own pea brain, Emily. See: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2...postcount=3028 All one has to do here is just read your own posts, Emily. See: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2109891&postcount=33 Yes, "Skank" is quite apt. See: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Skank The shoes do fit you Emily, and these are not glass slippers, and you most certainly are not Cinderella. Neither are you anymore able to ever fill the sandals of Hypatia, since you just are not very bright, Emily. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia Nor is nor has Will Williams any really good substitute as Chairman for the late great Dr. William L. Pierce. In fact, all Williams has been able to do is to sully, denigrate, and to destroy his true legacy: Cosmotheism. See: http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2...postcount=3072 And "Scientism" is a "real word" for just another "Blind-faith" based philosophy. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientism "Scientism is a belief in the universal applicability of the scientific method and approach, and the view that empirical science constitutes the most authoritative worldview or the most valuable part of human learning—to the exclusion of other viewpoints. Accordingly, philosopher Tom Sorell provides this definition of scientism: "Scientism is a matter of putting too high a value on natural science in comparison with other branches of learning or culture."[1] It has been defined as "the view that the characteristic inductive methods of the natural sciences are the only source of genuine factual knowledge and, in particular, that they alone can yield true knowledge about man and society".[2] The term "scientism" frequently implies a critique of the more extreme expressions of logical positivism[3][4] and has been used by social scientists such as Friedrich Hayek,[5] philosophers of science such as Karl Popper,[6] and philosophers such as Hilary Putnam[7] and Tzvetan Todorov[8] to describe (for example) the dogmatic endorsement of scientific methodology and the reduction of all knowledge to only that which is measurable.[9] Philosophers such as Alexander Rosenberg have also appropriated "scientism" as a name for the view that science is the only reliable source of knowledge.[10] Scientism may refer to science applied "in excess". The term scientism can apply in either of two senses: To indicate the improper usage of science or scientific claims.[11] This usage applies equally in contexts where science might not apply,[12] such as when the topic is perceived as beyond the scope of scientific inquiry, and in contexts where there is insufficient empirical evidence to justify a scientific conclusion. It includes an excessive deference to claims made by scientists or an uncritical eagerness to accept any result described as scientific. This can be a counterargument to appeals to scientific authority. It can also address the attempt to apply "hard science" methodology and claims of certainty to the social sciences, which Friedrich Hayek described in The Counter-Revolution of Science (1952) as being impossible, because that methodology involves attempting to eliminate the "human factor", while social sciences (including his own field of economics) center almost purely on human action. To refer to "the belief that the methods of natural science, or the categories and things recognized in natural science, form the only proper elements in any philosophical or other inquiry",[13] or that "science, and only science, describes the world as it is in itself, independent of perspective"[7] with a concomitant "elimination of the psychological dimensions of experience".[14][15] The term "scientism" is also used by historians, philosophers, and cultural critics to highlight the possible dangers of lapses towards excessive reductionism in all fields of human knowledge.[16][17][18][19][20]" As is usual, Williams' "Flying Monkeys", and all such lying and hypocritical "skanks" like this Emily H., really do have no real clue. What else isn't new? PS--I don't bother at all with your "Matt Hale" thread here: http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=496139 so Emily, you are just barking up the wrong tree or regarding any such thumbs up or any such thumbs down or there by me. In fact, I look upon his case as being politically-motivated and selective prosecution and or a "set-up" by the Usual Suspects. Maybe some others on VNNF also think that you are a "skank"? Last edited by Paul Vogel; January 12th, 2017 at 11:22 AM. |
|
Tags |
kevin alfred strom, national alliance, will williams |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|