Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old December 26th, 2008 #1
banjo_billy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,032
Default Why Jacob Schiff Financed the Bolsheviks

Why Jacob Schiff Financed the Bolsheviks
by Banjo_Billy

While the Jewish banker, Jacob Schiff, donated $20 million in gold to the the Jew Leon Trotsky and the Bolsheviks, the Jewish banker, Olaf Aschberg, in Scandinavia was setting up investment portfolios for the Bolsheviks to keep them supplied with money.

Jacob Schiff (head of Kuhn, Loeb & Co.) along with the investment bankers Kuhn, Loeb, Warburg and Rothschild, were all related to one another through marriage. So, besides being Jews, they were relatives who worked together in the financial markets on both sides of the Atlantic.

"A Jew cannot at the same time be a true American and an honest adherent of the Zionist movement," said Jacob Schiff on September 8, 1907. And he proved his philosophy by helping to overthrow Christian Russia and betray the people of the United States.

All of this is historical fact. But what is not commonly known about these events, is the other side of the ledger book.

Schiff and his Jewish partners gave $20 million in gold to the Communists. If you are to believe in their "Jewish morals" and "sincere devotion to Zionist ideals" and "opposition to Czarist anti-Semitism", then you probably have been suckered into the standard Jewish con. This swindle is where the Jew banker points to the debit side of his ledger book in order to show the great losses he sustained for the sake of his "moral duty". If you are Jewish, then perhaps you go away with a tear in your eye and a great upwelling of pride in your heart at such selfless, Zionist showmanship.

But the Jewish banker only shows you his "losses" and never shows you the other side of the ledger book. Why is this? Christian charity is such that nothing is asked in return and is best when it is given anonymously so that only God knows of the gift. But Jewish charity always prefers something more. Jewish philanthropy is never philanthropy unless it is given only to other Jews and there is a profit to be made somewhere either as a tax write-off, a show of extravagance or as a kickback of extra income.

So, here is the other side of the ledger book in the Communists' account with Kuhn, Loeb and Company. It is found on page-225 of "Czarism and Revolution" by A. Goulevitch:

"Mr. Bakhmetiev, the late Russian Imperial Ambassador to the United States, tells us that the Bolsheviks, after victory, transfered 600 million roubles in gold between the years 1918 and 1922 to Kuhn, Loeb and Company."

This makes a very good return for a measely $20 million dollars. And this makes a good quote to keep in your research files.
 
Old December 26th, 2008 #2
fdtwainth
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Blog Entries: 397
Default

To achieve ethnic interest, and to make money in the process of course. Or, integrating particular interest into the general interest of his race. That's the way big money are made ethically (from the jewish viewpoint in this case).

That what I and my organization do, we integrate our particular interest into the general interest of White Race, our ethnicity and our people.
 
Old December 26th, 2008 #3
Gerald Wheeler
Vigilance is First
 
Gerald Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,050
Gerald Wheeler
Default

I wasn't aware of the 600M, but it stands to reason that the first thing the jews were interested in doing was to put their hands on the gold and getting it out of Russia. Another case of jewish math: 20 + 0 = 600.
__________________
Gold is the currency of kings; silver is the currency of gentlemen; barter is the currency of peasants, and debt is the currency of slaves.
________________
 
Old December 26th, 2008 #4
Hugo Böse
Jeunesse Dorée
 
Hugo Böse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Four Seasons Jalalabad
Posts: 7,905
Hugo Böse
Default

It all makes sense now, bankers, even jewish ones wouldn’t support communism if it meant them giving up their banks and living like lowly state apparatchiks, so there had to be something else that motivated these fuckers to give the commie kikez money.

Didn’t communists have a reputation for being sought after trading partners because they were good payers?
__________________
_______
Political correctness is an intellectual gulag.

Last edited by Hugo Böse; December 26th, 2008 at 03:14 PM.
 
Old December 27th, 2008 #5
banjo_billy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Right is Right View Post
It all makes sense now, bankers, even jewish ones wouldn’t support communism if it meant them giving up their banks and living like lowly state apparatchiks, so there had to be something else that motivated these fuckers to give the commie kikez money.

Didn’t communists have a reputation for being sought after trading partners because they were good payers?
The Communists never repaid anything to the American government. But to the Jews they were reliable business partners. And it was the Jews, over the decades who kept the USSR afloat through such Jewish commodity brokers and traitors such as Armand Hammer.

The Jews were able to get Russia's gold just as the Jews were able to get America's gold, by making it illegal to own it.

A central bank is a corner stone of Communism. Thus, the Jew bankers would be happy to support Communism because they would be the owners of the central bank.
 
Old December 27th, 2008 #6
Bassanio
Hath not a Goy eyes?
 
Bassanio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Venice
Posts: 4,287
Blog Entries: 6
Bassanio
Default

Quote:
A central bank is a corner stone of Communism. Thus, the Jew bankers would be happy to support Communism because they would be the owners of the central bank.
Quoted for truth.

This is why communism has in fact been taking shape in Western Europe for several centuries now. Wherever there was a central bank, there was communism sowing its seeds. I believe Britain was the first European nation to establish a central bank way back in the 17th century, followed by France.

Today we have the European Union, the elimination of borders, cross-border abductions of innocent people (think of the latest extradition of Danish citizens to Germany), a central government in Brussels, a central court in the Hague, and a European central bank in Frankfurt.

And manning all of these institutions we have the sons and grandsons of the judeo-Bolsheviks.

Welcome to the EUSSR.


Quote:
It is found on page-225 of "Czarism and Revolution" by A. Goulevitch:

"Mr. Bakhmetiev, the late Russian Imperial Ambassador to the United States, tells us that the Bolsheviks, after victory, transfered 600 million roubles in gold between the years 1918 and 1922 to Kuhn, Loeb and Company."

This makes a very good return for a measely $20 million dollars. And this makes a good quote to keep in your research files.
Great information. It's a pity, though, that the "600 million" figure is in rubles. Makes it hard to put a value on that in US dollars.

Also, I'm assuming that the "$20 million" figure hasn't been adjusted for inflation. So, considering that the US dollar was worth 14x more in 1920 than it is today, that would be about $280 million the swindling kike invested in Trotsky and the 'Viks.
__________________
The Goy cries out in ecstasy as the Jew strikes him.
 
Old December 27th, 2008 #7
psychologicalshock
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Right is Right View Post

Didn’t communists have a reputation for being sought after trading partners because they were good payers?
Capitalists love Communists because Communists are what a capitalist aspires to - a national monopolist.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 AM.
Page generated in 0.09235 seconds.