Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 2nd, 2013 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,378
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default The Legal Situation in Switzerland

[fromm]

Free Speech Lawyer Sylvia Stolz Threatened With Prosecution in Switzerland

A great woman. Miss Stolz was sentenced to three years and three months in prison for her spirited defence of political prisoner Ernst Zundel in 2005.

On November 24, she was a guest speaker at the 8th Anti-Censorship Conference held in Chur, Switzerland. She spoke of the difficulties lawyers have in defending Europe's new heretics -- those who express doubts about the so-called holocaust. One can deny God, even deny science, believe in creatures from outer space, but to question Europe's new state religion of holocaust is to invite persecution, heavy fines or prison. She reflected on the fact that "holocaust" is not clearly defined and that many of the tenets of this new religion have not actually been proven in court.

Well, all hell broke loose. The organizers of the Civic Hall at which the meeting was held have been told they cannot rent it again. An investigation is under way to see whether any "far right" literature was distributed. In this video Sylvia Stolz explains that "far right" is widely used by the politically correct to label any nationalist who stands up for his "volk" or people. Now, there are calls for criminal charges of "casting doubt on the holocaust" to be laid against Miss Stolz and conference organizer Ivo Sasek. Already, a Swiss lawyer has filed a complaint against Miss Stolz.

A politically correct Inquisition holds sway over much of Europe, where a new secular religion -- another group's tribal history, is imposed upon the populace. Anyone who suggests that some of the religion's claims seem exaggerated or impossible is not argued with but prosecuted and jailed. Further, any lawyer too vigorous in the heretic's defence faces jail or disbarment. A new Dark Age has descended over a Europe that grins like the village idiot (or, perhaps, more politically correctly 'mentally challenged person') and considers itself a champion of democracy and human rights.

In this video (English sub-titles) German lawyer Sylvia Stolz replies to her critics as rumours swirl that she will be charged (again) with 'Holocaust Denial' for a speech she gave at an anti-censorship conference in November 2012.

 
Old May 17th, 2014 #2
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,378
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

6 months prison for antisemitic web postings

http://www.rts.ch/info/regions/fribo...-internet.html

Geneva - A 55-year-old man has been found guilty of racial discrimination by a Geneva court for posting antisemitic articles on the internet.

The court heard that the man had directed his comments against all Jews and had denied the Holocaust existed in 50 articles published between January 2010 and May this year.

Although he’d repeatedly been asked by authorities to remove the texts, he refused to do so.

He was sentenced to six months in prison.

http://antisemitism.org.il/article/8...c-web-postings
 
Old April 30th, 2015 #3
Samuel Toothgold
Charachature incarnate
 
Samuel Toothgold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Already in accordance with the future Repulsive Tapir Avatar Mandate
Posts: 4,068
Samuel Toothgold
Default "Swiss Folk's Party" member sentenced for Twittering a maybe Crystalnight for Moslems:

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...90#post1832590

What's surprising is that despite typing the word, "maybe", whatever they charged him with stuck. Also puzzling is how the court was able to accuse him of violating the "human dignity" of Moslems, despite them being pointed out as religious entities and not biological ones. Obviously, did the court not take ethnic Swiss Moslems into account. The court decided to somehow connect the word, "Kristallnacht" to "discrimination against Jews", as if they have a copyrighton this particular word and any use of this word for any other purpose automatically poses a crime, evidently, no matter for what purpose. What would have happened if he would have used the words, "Death march through the Syrian desert", for example. In that case, the court would be forced to tack on extra charges of copyright violations for a phrase which strictly belongs to Armenians?

Quote:
...«Vielleicht brauchen wir wieder eine Kristallnacht ... diesmal für Moscheen». Damit habe der Mann nicht nur gegen die Menschenwürde der Muslime verstossen, sagte der Gerichtsvorsitzende am Montag. Der Hinweis, eine Kristallnacht sei nötig gewesen, diskriminiere auch Juden...
__________________
youtube.com/watch?v=-EDJRcwQvN4 youtube.com/watch?v=S0lxK5Ot5HA
youtube.com/watch?v=HFv92Lc8FXg

Last edited by Samuel Toothgold; April 30th, 2015 at 05:40 AM.
 
Old August 20th, 2015 #4
Samuel Toothgold
Charachature incarnate
 
Samuel Toothgold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Already in accordance with the future Repulsive Tapir Avatar Mandate
Posts: 4,068
Samuel Toothgold
Default Press spokesman for Zürich's police to hush criminal ethnicities - Male on society crime revelations to remain:

http://www.blick.ch/news/schweiz/nat...id4086807.html

Quote:
...Wer die Nationalität nennen wolle, sei ein Brandstifter, sagte ein Grüner Gemeinderat. Gerade jene, die gegen ein Verbot seien, schürten die Hetze gegen Ausländer...
__________________
youtube.com/watch?v=-EDJRcwQvN4 youtube.com/watch?v=S0lxK5Ot5HA
youtube.com/watch?v=HFv92Lc8FXg
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 PM.
Page generated in 0.07596 seconds.