Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 5th, 2012 #61
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default California bans "gay cure" therapy

California bans "gay cure" therapy

SACRAMENTO, Calif. Gov. Jerry Brown has signed legislation that makes California the first state to ban a controversial form of psychotherapy that's aimed at making gay teenagers straight.

Effective Jan. 1, mental health practitioners are prohibited from performing sexual orientation change efforts — known as reparative or conversion therapy — for anyone under 18.

The therapies "have no basis in science or medicine and they will now be relegated to the dustbin of quackery," Brown said in a statement.

Mainstream associations representing psychiatrists and psychologists have dismissed reparative therapy in recent decades. A number of mental health associations in California — including the state's Board of Behavorial Sciences, the California Association of Marriage and Family Therapists and the California Psychological Association — supported the legislation.

But some organizations and ministries continue to use counseling and prayer to try to help conflicted Christians rid themselves of unwanted homosexual inclinations. Gay rights activists have said the damage they inflict on individuals can be deep and lasting and can put youth at higher risk of depression and suicide.

"We're grateful to Gov. Brown for standing with California's children," the Human Rights Campaign said in a statement. "LGBT youth will now be protected from a practice that has not only been debunked as junk science, but has been proven to have drastically negative effects on their well-being."

The group called on other states to follow California's lead on the issue.

Conservative religious groups and some Republicans have argued that banning conversion therapy would hinder parents' right to provide psychological care for children experiencing gender confusion.

The Encino, Calif.-based National Association for Research and Therapy on Homosexuality said in August that the bill was a case of "legislative overreach." They said Democratic state Senator Ted Lieu's claims of harm to children were based on politics, not research.

Lieu, who sponsored the bill, said the law will stop children from being psychologically abused.

Brown signed the bill Saturday amid a busy weekend that saw him act on more than 100 pieces of legislation, including a bill he signed late Sunday that would allow some illegal immigrants to get California drivers licenses.

The bill lets the Department of Motor Vehicles issue licenses to illegal immigrants eligible for work permits under a new Obama administration policy. It requires the department to accept as proof of legal residence whatever document the federal government provides to participants in its deferred action program.

The governor also signed into law a bill that will allow parents who don't have their children vaccinated to enroll their children in school. Parents would have to obtain a waiver from a physician or a nurse practitioner saying they received information about the benefits and risks of immunization.

Brown vetoed a bill that could have protected illegal immigrants from deportation if they committed minor infractions. The bill was dubbed "anti-Arizona" legislation, a reference to that state's immigrant identification law.

He also vetoed legislation that would have provided overtime pay, meal breaks and other labor protections to an estimated 200,000 caregivers, nannies and house cleaners. The Democratic governor said they deserve fair pay and safe working conditions but said the bill "raises a number of unanswered questions."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-...-cure-therapy/
 
Old October 5th, 2012 #62
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default College Student Studying To Be Ex-Gay Counselor Sues Over CA’s Reparative-Therapy Ban

A college student who claims he once had same-sex attractions but became heterosexual after conversion therapy has filed a lawsuit against California, which has enacted a law that bans so-called "gay cures" for minors.

The lawsuit, also joined as plaintiffs by two therapists who have used the treatments with patients, alleges that the law banning the therapy intrudes on First Amendment protections of free speech, privacy and freedom of religion.

The student, Aaron Blitzer, who is studying to be a therapist in that field, said the law would prevent him from pursuing his career, according to court papers filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California.

The lawsuit names as defendants California Gov. Jerry Brown, as well as 21other state officials, including members of the California Board of Behavioral Sciences and the California Medical Board.

The other plaintiffs are Donald Welsch, a licensed family therapist and ordained minister who operates a Christian counseling center in San Diego; and Dr. Anthony Duk, a psychiatrist and practicing Roman Catholic.

Both say the law would restrict their counseling practices, according to the lawsuit.

"It's it's an egregious violation of the rights of young people feeling same-sex attraction, and of parents and counselors who feel it would be beneficial for the individual needs of a young person," said Brad Dacus, president and attorney for the conservative Pacific Justice Institute, which asked a federal judge to prevent the law from taking effect.

"The legislature had an errant assumption that every individual struggling with same-sex attraction is caused by their DNA," he said. "It ignores thousands, including the plaintiff, who have gone through therapy and are now in a happy and healthy heterosexual relationship."

Dacus declined ABC News' request for direct access to the plaintiffs.

Just this week, California lawmakers voted to outlaw therapy aimed at changing the sexual orientation of minors who say they are gay, making California the first state to adopt such legislation. The law is set to go into effect Jan. 1, 2013.

The bill's sponsor, California state Sen. Ted Lieu, said the therapy -- called "conversion therapy," "sexual orientation therapy," "reparative therapy" or "sexual orientation change efforts" -- amounts to "psychological child abuse."

"I read the lawsuit and, as a matter of fiction, it is a good read," Lieu said in a prepared statement after the suit was filed. "But from any reasonable legal standard, the lawsuit is frivolous. Under the plaintiffs' argument, the First Amendment would shield therapists and psychiatrists from medical malpractice and psychological abuse claims simply because they use speech in practicing their medicine. That is a novel and frivolous view of the First Amendment."

Lieu is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit.

Several members of the California Board of Behavioral Sciences and the California Mental Board were named in the lawsuit.

"Our board voted to support that piece of legislation after working with the author's office to further define sexual orientation change efforts," said Kim Madsen, executive officer for the sciences board, which licenses and oversees therapists.

She had no comment on the lawsuit, but said the board would investigate any complaints of conversion therapy after Jan. 1.

The law's critics say that it infringes on the rights of families and therapists, particularly young people who have same-sex attractions as a result of being victims of sexual abuse.

Dacus said the law makes them "victims twice, as a result denying them counseling and healing."

He said that counseling in "direct violation" of religious or personal beliefs, "only precipitates greater confusion and depression and the likelihood of suicide."

"This legislation is a classic example of psychiatric ignorance combined with political neglect," he said, complaining of "compromises" that members of the California Psychiatric Association. made with state legislators to enact the law.

"They clearly say that one size fits all and ignore the complexity of same-sex attraction and varying degrees of such attraction, depending on age and background," said Dacus. "It's out of place for the legislature to put such restrictions on it."

Members of the California Psychiatric Association. have "mixed feelings" about the law, according to Randal Hagar, director of government relations for the organization.

"There is no psychiatrist who would engage and practice it and, if they did, they would be subject to ethical sanctions," he said.

The American Psychiatric Association has outlawed conversion therapies for more than a decade, insisting they are harmful.

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/christi...4#.UG2ONxh5HUQ
 
Old October 5th, 2012 #63
Sebastian
Member
 
Sebastian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 330
Sebastian
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by littlefieldjohn View Post
Big Queer was invented by the Jew, too, you miserable diseased reptile.
Reptile? What the fuck? What, lizards are gay now?
 
Old October 5th, 2012 #64
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default

Excellent post by littlefieldjohn, wanted to make sure it was captured here as well. Once again, this program targets Elementary and Middle Schools. Why indoctrinate children in ELEMENTARY Schools about homosexuality?

Quote:
Originally Posted by littlefieldjohn View Post
Homosexual 'Mix It Up' day - Is your child's school on the list?
Southern Poverty Law Center behind gay indoctrination program


From American Family Association
quoteOctober 1, 2012

On, Tuesday, October 30, over two thousand schools across the nation will be observing "Mix It Up" (MIT) day. MIT is a nationwide push to promote the homosexual lifestyle in public schools. A strong focus is directed specifically to elementary and junior high grades.

MIT is a project of the fanatical pro-homosexual group, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). This is the same organization that launched hateful and malicious rhetoric toward the Family Research Council just prior to the August shooting of a security guard by a SPLC sympathizer.

See if your school is on the list.
http://www.tolerance.org/mix-it-up/map


AFA is joining other family-oriented groups in urging parents to keep their children at home that day if their local school is sponsoring the "Mix It Up" project.

The Southern Poverty Law Center is using this project to bully-push its gay agenda, and at the same time, intimidate and silence students who have a Biblical view of homosexuality.

TAKE ACTION

See if your school is on the list. If it is, a simple phone call or letter to school administrators telling them your child will not attend school on October 30 may be enough to cause some participating schools to change their plans to sponsor, endorse, or promote "Mix It Up" day.

Note: If your school is listed, it may be without the knowledge or permission of school administrators. If so, ask them to send an email to www.tolerance.org/ and instruct the SPLC to remove their school from the list immediately.
 
Old October 29th, 2012 #65
Dway
S.H.A.R.P. Communist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oligarchy Death Camp
Posts: 62
Dway
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A.Anderson View Post
[In this thread we will document Big Queer's agenda for Normal White America. Homosexual behavior has traditionally been viewed as a psychological disorder. This changed in the early seventies when the relevant professional association succumbed to vicious pressure leveled against it by the homosexual lobby, resulting in the formal normalization of homosexuality. Around that same time, 'homophobe' was coined, in order to stigmatize anyone who resisted the agenda the queers would try to push on America in succeeding decades.

Homoseuxality was removed from the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) in 1973. This was done, not based upon any medical evidence, but by Jewish politcal activists and lobbyists. The exact same thing is being done, today, to remove Pedophilia.

This subforum will contain all information relevant to understanding what homosexuality is, and what organized homosexuals, working in conjunction with the jews who control the media, schools and government, have on their agenda for the other 98%, or Normal White America, as we call it. --A.L.]
CFR. You have not cited an accredited or peer reviewed source. All you have done here is state an interpretation of historical events (?) and opinion. It is now your responsibility to respond appropriately. Either you substantiate your claim or retract it.
 
Old October 29th, 2012 #66
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dway View Post
CFR. You have not cited an accredited or peer reviewed source. All you have done here is state an interpretation of historical events (?) and opinion. It is now your responsibility to respond appropriately. Either you substantiate your claim or retract it.
Sorry, pal, I'm not retracting or removing anything.

Fags have a tendency to throw a hissy fit when they read anything that paints them in a negative light, no matter the accuracy. It is a play out of their jewish handlers' playbook.

As to your ultimatum, the subsequent posts and their content ARE the sources that back up the initial post, to include specifically LGBT leadership saying those exact words (quoted and sourced) that you highlighted. http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1419765&postcount=11 Point number 11 and 12.

If you have a problem with it, take it up with the fags themselves.

Last edited by Mr A.Anderson; October 29th, 2012 at 04:43 PM.
 
Old October 29th, 2012 #67
Dway
S.H.A.R.P. Communist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oligarchy Death Camp
Posts: 62
Dway
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A.Anderson View Post
Sorry, pal, I'm not retracting or removing anything.

Fags have a tendency to throw a hissy fit when they read anything that paints them in a negative light, no matter the accuracy. It is a play out of their jewish handlers' playbook.

As to your ultimatum, the subsequent posts and their content ARE the sources that back up the initial post, to include specifically LGBT leadership saying those exact words (quoted and sourced) that you highlighted. http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1419765&postcount=11 Point number 11 and 12.

If you have a problem with it, take it up with the fags themselves.

What kind of caveman logic relates "fags" to Jews? They are nowhere near the same thing! Come on bud...why don't you just say a black person is a Jew just because Jew is used to slander someone? It doesn't work. It shows ignorance.

You continue to fail to substantiate your argument. Pedophilia? Really?!? You mean like old guys who rape young women? Men who rape young men? Women who rape young men? Women who rape young women?

Let's try not to get on the path of a slippery slope.

Again, CFR. You have failed to provide an accredited and peer-reviewed source for your claims. You undermine your own integrity and credibility by not answering, appropriately, the CFR.
 
Old October 29th, 2012 #68
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dway View Post
What kind of caveman logic relates "fags" to Jews? They are nowhere near the same thing! Come on bud...why don't you just say a black person is a Jew just because Jew is used to slander someone? It doesn't work. It shows ignorance.

You continue to fail to substantiate your argument. Pedophilia? Really?!? You mean like old guys who rape young women? Men who rape young men? Women who rape young men? Women who rape young women?

Let's try not to get on the path of a slippery slope.

Again, CFR. You have failed to provide an accredited and peer-reviewed source for your claims. You undermine your own integrity and credibility by not answering, appropriately, the CFR.
So, the multitude of jews that I listed, with source, that are the pioneering founders of the LGBT isn't enough of a connection for you? In the same way that the jews were the founders of the negro rights movement and the founders of the NAACP? Jews are pulling the strings, setting the tone, and dictating the dialogue.

The quote that got your panties in a bunch is from the LGBT's own lips, not mine. I have sourced that sufficiently...and yet you completely ignore it. Hey, like I already said, take it up with Dr. Berlin and the LGBT if you don't like it. They are the ones who have said it.

You are pathetic. And unlike that silly little faggot George, you don't even make me chuckle. The information is there, in thread, and sourced. It is obvious either you haven't read it, or you simply ignore its existence as it is not the dialogue you and your kind wish to be discussed.

Fuck off, faggot. Dicks are for chicks.

Last edited by Mr A.Anderson; October 29th, 2012 at 07:10 PM.
 
Old October 30th, 2012 #69
Soldatul Vostru
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dway View Post
What kind of caveman logic relates "fags" to Jews? They are nowhere near the same thing! Come on bud...why don't you just say a black person is a Jew just because Jew is used to slander someone? It doesn't work. It shows ignorance.

You continue to fail to substantiate your argument. Pedophilia? Really?!? You mean like old guys who rape young women? Men who rape young men? Women who rape young men? Women who rape young women?

Let's try not to get on the path of a slippery slope.

Again, CFR. You have failed to provide an accredited and peer-reviewed source for your claims. You undermine your own integrity and credibility by not answering, appropriately, the CFR.
You're too stupid to realize that he wasn't relating fags to jews as in calling a nigger a jew just because jew is used to slander someone. He was saying the filthy jews are behind the filthy fags and their filthy agenda.

Moreover you're also too stupid to realize that the text you quoted was typed by Alex Linder, hence the "-A.L." at the end.
 
Old October 30th, 2012 #70
Soldatul Vostru
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A.Anderson View Post
So, the multitude of jews that I listed, with source, that are the pioneering founders of the LGBT isn't enough of a connection for you? In the same way that the jews were the founders of the negro rights movement and the founders of the NAACP? Jews are pulling the strings, setting the tone, and dictating the dialogue.

The quote that got your panties in a bunch is from the LGBT's own lips, not mine. I have sourced that sufficiently...and yet you completely ignore it. Hey, like I already said, take it up with Dr. Berlin and the LGBT if you don't like it. They are the ones who have said it.

You are pathetic. And unlike that silly little faggot George, you don't even make me chuckle. The information is there, in thread, and sourced. It is obvious either you haven't read it, or you simply ignore its existence as it is not the dialogue you and your kind wish to be discussed.

Fuck off, faggot. Dicks are for chicks.

The Truth Is Like Kryptonite To A Commie

 
Old October 31st, 2012 #71
Dway
S.H.A.R.P. Communist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oligarchy Death Camp
Posts: 62
Dway
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldatul Vostru View Post
You're too stupid to realize that he wasn't relating fags to jews as in calling a nigger a jew just because jew is used to slander someone. He was saying the filthy jews are behind the filthy fags and their filthy agenda.

Moreover you're also too stupid to realize that the text you quoted was typed by Alex Linder, hence the "-A.L." at the end.
Hey! Moron! When you cite a source to propagate your argument, you become responsible for the content. Perhaps it has been a while since you either wrote an essay or (god forbid) presented an essay. Did they guy who initially quoted Mr. Linder show any amount of disagreement with him? I don't believe so unless I completely missed something.

Get your shit straight. Dialogue, discussion, essays require all the bases of responsibility and accountability to be upheld.
 
Old October 31st, 2012 #72
Dway
S.H.A.R.P. Communist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oligarchy Death Camp
Posts: 62
Dway
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A.Anderson View Post
So, the multitude of jews that I listed, with source, that are the pioneering founders of the LGBT isn't enough of a connection for you? In the same way that the jews were the founders of the negro rights movement and the founders of the NAACP? Jews are pulling the strings, setting the tone, and dictating the dialogue.

The quote that got your panties in a bunch is from the LGBT's own lips, not mine. I have sourced that sufficiently...and yet you completely ignore it. Hey, like I already said, take it up with Dr. Berlin and the LGBT if you don't like it. They are the ones who have said it.

You are pathetic. And unlike that silly little faggot George, you don't even make me chuckle. The information is there, in thread, and sourced. It is obvious either you haven't read it, or you simply ignore its existence as it is not the dialogue you and your kind wish to be discussed.

Fuck off, faggot. Dicks are for chicks.
Ovington, Wells, DuBois, Walling, Villard, Moskowitz, and Grimke weren't "Jews" by race or religion. I took a class several years ago on American activism and movements and none of these NAACP founders were said to be Jewish. And don't bother with the "conspiracy to cover up" bullshit.

Also, I do appreciate the extensive posts of information that you provided. I began reading them the day that we first interacted on this board. I'm checking the sources, source accreditation, context, and studies. Systematically, such an extensive amount of information that you've provided can become a house of cards.

When I have finished compiling data about the information you provided, I will respond accordingly.
 
Old November 3rd, 2012 #73
Roy Wagahuski
professional critter
 
Roy Wagahuski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: under your bed
Posts: 1,618
Roy Wagahuski
Default Meanwhile, in mud-world...

Quote:
-- Official Gaydar: Malaysia's Education Ministry has held at least 10 seminars recently to teach parents and teachers how to head off the pesky homosexuality that their kids may be in "danger" of developing. According to officials, sure signs are when boys wear "V-neck" or sleeveless shirts or carry big handbags. For girls, the most obvious sign is "having no affection for boys." Last year, according to a September Reuters report, the government set up camps specifically to teach "masculine behavior" to "effeminate" boys. [Reuters via Washington Post, 9-14-2012]
Something tells me they can expect a near-future visit by hillary.

http://www.newsoftheweird.com/archive/
__________________
"Don't underestimate the power of 'evil.' ... The fact is, 'evil' makes women horny and men curious. Use those to further the cause."
 
Old November 3rd, 2012 #74
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,618
Crowe
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dway View Post
I took a class several years ago on American activism
Ok that makes you an expert, continue on
 
Old November 3rd, 2012 #75
Soldatul Vostru
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dway View Post
Hey! Moron! When you cite a source to propagate your argument, you become responsible for the content. Perhaps it has been a while since you either wrote an essay or (god forbid) presented an essay. Did they guy who initially quoted Mr. Linder show any amount of disagreement with him? I don't believe so unless I completely missed something.

Get your shit straight. Dialogue, discussion, essays require all the bases of responsibility and accountability to be upheld.
Mr. Linder is the owner of this site you fucking retard. It is obvious, to all but a dumb fuck like you that the OP's post has been edited by the Admin. Don't know why but it was. I was just telling your stupid ass that - I wasn't citing any sources, I wasn't writing any essays - I was correcting your stupid ass.


The unintelligent pay no attention to detail.

Last edited by Soldatul Vostru; November 3rd, 2012 at 11:26 AM.
 
Old November 10th, 2012 #76
Tintin
∞ 𐌙 λ
 
Tintin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,497
Tintin
jewsign

North American Man/Boy Love Association is an is a homo-pedophile "advocacy" organization. The pro-homo-pedophile group was founded by the jew "activist " and fag
David_Thorstad David_Thorstad
who a previously found the "human rights" organization
Gay_Activists_Alliance Gay_Activists_Alliance
. The jew "artist" and "rights advocate" and fag,
Allen_Ginsberg Allen_Ginsberg
was the most famous member and defender of the pro-homo-pedophile organization. The jew "producer/directory/writer" Adi Sideman created the "documentary"
Chicken_Hawk:_Men_Who_Love_Boys Chicken_Hawk:_Men_Who_Love_Boys
with the intent to "raise awareness" and "provide context" about homo-pedophilia.

What is it with the and the sodomizing of little boys?

Question to the jew-enablers: If White and/or Christian men played similar roles to that of Thorstad, Ginsberg, and Sideman in a "rights" organization that promoted the rape of little girls, what would your reaction be? Would you defend them by saying that "all races" or "all religions" rape little girls?

Last edited by Tintin; November 11th, 2012 at 10:55 AM.
 
Old November 10th, 2012 #77
Tintin
∞ 𐌙 λ
 
Tintin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,497
Tintin
Default

Many fag enablers and apologists hold two contradicting position on fagitry:

1) The Catholic Church turns normal healthy men into fags. The most cited reason for this is the environment, i.e. celibacy requirement. *

2) It is not possible to turn a fag into normal healthy men. The most cited reason for this is that fagitry is genetic.

How can both of these claims be true?

This contradiction should be pointed out whenever ever possible.


* But seriously, if you were a normal healthy man and was going to violate the celibacy requirements, why would you not go cruising for nuns?
 
Old November 11th, 2012 #78
MP
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 141
MP
Default

"I took a class several years ago on American activism and movements and none of these NAACP founders were said to be Jewish."

That's the problem - you took a class instead of researching the matter for yourself.

"Faced with similar challenges, however, there was virtually no cooperation between organizations from the two communities except on the Left. On the individual level, elite or politically well-connected Jews and African Americans often cooperated with one another. Black socialist labor leader A. Philip Randolph considered Jews among his most reliable supporters; Jews were disproportionately represented on the founding boards of the NAACP and National Urban League. The NAACP's first two presidents, Joel and Arthur Spingarn, were Jewish. African American Judge Hubert Delaney defended Jewish interests; Jewish Julius Rosenwald underwrote black educational endeavors; before his appointment to the Supreme Court Louis *Brandeis offered his legal services and his contacts to the NAACP. The black press described East European pogroms and the Jewish press covered lynchings. Beyond these individual or informational contacts, however, formal organizations rarely contacted their counterparts in the other community for cooperative action." - http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/...3_0_03042.html

"The NAACP was incorporated a year later in 1911. The association's charter delineated its mission:

To promote equality of rights and to eradicate caste or race prejudice among the citizens of the United States; to advance the interest of colored citizens; to secure for them impartial suffrage; and to increase their opportunities for securing justice in the courts, education for the children, employment according to their ability and complete equality before law.

The conference resulted in a more influential and diverse organization, where the leadership was predominantly white and heavily Jewish American. In fact, at its founding, the NAACP had only one African American on its executive board, Du Bois himself. It did not elect a black president until 1975, although executive directors had been African American. The Jewish community contributed greatly to the NAACP's founding and continued financing. Jewish historian Howard Sachar writes in his book A History of Jews in America of how, "In 1914, Professor Emeritus Joel Spingarn of Columbia University became chairman of the NAACP and recruited for its board such Jewish leaders as Jacob Schiff, Jacob Billikopf, and Rabbi Stephen Wise."[15] Early Jewish-American co-founders included Julius Rosenwald, Lillian Wald, Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch and Wise." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation...Colored_People

The second quote is from Wikipedia but cites the source ("The History of Jews in America" by Jew Howard Sachar).
 
Old November 12th, 2012 #79
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default

Bisexual Women and Gay Men at Higher Risk for Intimate Partner Violence
A shocking new report show the dangers facing bisexual women and gay men.

http://www.advocate.com/health/menta...rtner-violence

Bisexual women and gay men face elevated risks of intimate partner violence, according to a new Williams Institute report published in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

“As Congress considers reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and we reflect on Domestic Violence Awareness Month, our report’s findings highlight that these issues also impact the LGBT community,” said Naomi G. Goldberg, MPP, who created the report along with Ilan H. Meyer, Ph.D., senior scholar for public policy at the Williams Institute.

Among the key findings:

* Bisexual women had elevated risks of experiencing intimate partner violence compared with heterosexual women, lesbians, and women who have sex with women over the course of the lives and in the past year. But significantly, in 95% of intimate partner violence annual incidents reported by bisexual women, the perpetrator was a male intimate partner, so the violence occurred outside a same-sex relationship.

* Gay men had elevated risk of experiencing intimate partner violence compared with heterosexual and bisexual men, as well as men who have sex with men but do not identify as gay or bisexual. Almost all (97%) of the annual incidents of intimate partner violence incidents occurring to male victims involved a male intimate partner.

* Binge drinking and a history of psychological distress predicted intimate partner violence, but these factors did not explain disparities between bisexual and heterosexual women or between gay and heterosexual men.

The researchers’ findings are based on a 2007-2008 sample of the California Health Interview Survey. The authors compared patterns of intimate partner violence among four groups: heterosexual men and women, bisexual men and women, gay men and lesbians, and men and women who have had sex with members of the same gender but are not identified as gay, lesbian, or bisexual. The study defined intimate partner violence as physical and verbal abuse, or threats of physical abuse, by a current or former wife, husband, boyfriend, girlfriend, or someone else an individual has lived with or dated.



You can read the entire study, "Sexual Orientation Disparities in History of Intimate Partner Violence: Results From the California Health Interview Survey," here.
 
Old November 12th, 2012 #80
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default Obama beholden to Gays

Gay Donors Now Pressing for Top Spots for LGBTs in Obama Administration
By Pierre Tardif Fri., Nov. 9

: Big Gay News, Top Headlines

The Washington Post reports that various supporters of President Obama — the ones who pulled out their wallets and turned out their constituencies for his reelection — will soon be coming to call at the White House.

Read the full story from The Washington Post here.

http://www.lavendermagazine.com/big-...dministration/
 
Reply

Tags
homosexual agenda, homosexual lobby, homosexual news, homosexuality

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM.
Page generated in 0.19340 seconds.