|
July 16th, 2008 | #681 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 660
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So, get busy proving. Otherwise, your entire fairy tale falls apart. EG was right. The mere goyim have quit caring. |
|||
July 16th, 2008 | #682 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
July 16th, 2008 | #683 | ||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And what is more, from someone who keeps yelling for "one gassed body" … Quote:
It must be because it’s like an atheist’s demanding proof that God made man in his own image, which a creationist would probably also call "chutzpah". Quote:
And I didn’t ask for what would be a "start", but for what would convince you that Nazi genocidal policies caused the death of at least 5 million Jews during World War II. I also asked the following: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||
July 16th, 2008 | #684 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 660
|
Less than a week ago, you had me as an enemy of Gerdes. Make up your mind.
BTW ... that is another jew trait. Quote:
There is much evidence to support the blood ritual. Even from a jew ... A just-published book by an eminent Italian-Israeli historian that revives European blood libels has Jews in Italy and abroad in an uproar. But the furor hasn’t hurt sales. “Bloody Passover: European Jews and Ritual Murder” sold out so quickly after its arrival in bookstores Feb. 8 that another edition is on its way. Ariel Toaff, who teaches Medieval and Renaissance history at Bar-Ilan University in Ramat Gan, Israel, wrote that Jews in the Middle Ages may have murdered Christian children to use their blood in religious rituals. The issue is especially disturbing for Italian Jews because Toaff is the son of Rabbi Elio Toaff, who from 1951 to 2001 was the chief rabbi of Rome, Italy’s largest Jewish community. Rabbi Toaff became a beloved and respected figure in Italian Jewry. Quote:
Quote:
It will never learn. |
|||
July 16th, 2008 | #685 | ||||||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
||||||
July 16th, 2008 | #686 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 3,683
|
Quote:
|
|
July 16th, 2008 | #687 | |
Member
|
Quote:
Fact is, this is the 21st Century and I am alive now. You are unable to answer Herr Gerdes questions re Evidence on this thread, so you are now coming back with different topics altogether. You are busy 'hondling' a deal over money with Herr Gerdes, a thing with which you are most comfortable. It is this sort of jewish BS that is going to end up with the jews losing israel [you do not really believe that the rest of the world is going to sit idly by whilst the jews nuke Iran do you?] - No, the juden have proven themselves incapable of managing the patch of land they bought with Hoax reparations and continue to support by using the Hoax as premise for further funding. So, yes, soon there will be no more israel, nor jew left in the middle east. As for the jew squatting on American and European soil, the repercussion to their thousands of years of meddling and further BS, will either be Folks sending them to aids infested Africa, providing we are in a mood to be compassionate. However, The Reich proved one thing, compassion toward jews failed. The jews were put to work in camps; separated from their Host, and they were so pissed about it, they had to invent and vent their rage by making up a holocaust - in their long history, they have made up several holocausts when offended by their Host. The jew is an angry vengeful parasite - much like their desert god [and goddess, let us not forget "God's Wife" - the jews' version of Astarte, or Asherah - they call her their 'Shekinah' whom ortho juden like to have spiritual sex with whilst bobbing and calling her forth in minyan] - When I tell you that holocaustians and jews are long overdue for another expulsion or permanent Disapora, I am telling the truth. This time their Disapora will be a real holocaust. Period. Deflection from Herr Gerdes challenge and refusal to adequately answer his questions posed on this thread is quite a relief for you isn't it, you priestly nonce and intellectual midget? Watch, you will reply to this post with yet more deferral, leading you to bring up yet another topic that has nothing to do with Herr Gerdes requests. When you fail at your financial negotiations, you will come up with yet a new topic; announcing that you have proven your claims; claims which you will also state you have 'forgotten' the content of, and then will ask Herr Gerdes to remind you, starting the whole debate over again from it's orginal Point A. So, whilst you are enjoying yourself, why not look around for that irrefutable evidence: Proof of one gassed, holocausted unto death kike. Last edited by EireannGoddess; July 16th, 2008 at 01:35 PM. |
|
July 16th, 2008 | #688 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
I thought you all might be amused at Retardo's latest email to me. Please notice how she is trying to control the language of the issue by "simplifying" the issue by "giving me a choice" of two questions to answer. Then, if I "refuse" to answer one of her two "simple" questions, she can then proclaim to all her homosexual / jewish buttbuddies that I refused to answer her simple questions - ergo - the nafcash challenge "is a hoax."
But before I share with you what she wrote, let me give you an example of how her transparent jew tactic works. My two simple questions to Roberta: The question still pending now is the following - Roberta: Which of the following statements is true, Roberta? A - Did you get your HIV / AIDS via anal sex with your boyfriend nickterry? B - Did you get your HIV / AIDS via anal sex with another member of your holocaust controversies fruitloop troop? Simple answer, no bullshit: Is it A, or is it B ? Now take a look at what she's asking me to answer: Quote:
Roberta, by having your alleged "proof" published in "Skeptic" or Archaeology magazines, you will have completed the vetting process, and can then submit said published material / "proof" to nafcash for consideration for THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE reward. Now, once the previously mentioned published / vetted material is presented, nafcash will then have to make a determination as to whether or not the submitted material actually meets the requirements for the claimant to receive the reward. And if it does, you will be declared the recipient of said reward. Put simply, the presented material will have to be authenticated and validated before any determination / declaration can be made. Once all requirements have been met and Greg Gerdes (the executor of nafcash's - THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE) has officially declared that the submitted material has been authenticated and validated as legitimate proof and has met all requirements - expressed and implied, then, and only then, will the supporters of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE be notified that they have 30 days to pay the declared recipient the monetary amount they are legally bound to pay as is stipulated in their contracts. All contracts will then be turned over to the reward recipient to ensure payment. If the reward claimant feels that they have been unjustly denied, or if a reward recipient does not receive the promised money, then of course that claimant / recipient has at their disposal the U.S. court system and the myriad jews who infest it to help them get relief. Now that Retardo, is the answer to your two "simple" questions. |
|
July 16th, 2008 | #689 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
"Suing NAFCASH and/or the challenge supporters won't help me, as neither of them ever undertook a legally binding commitment to pay the reward if the stated requirements for claiming it are met." This of course, is a flat out lie and just another lame attempt by Roberta to weasle out of her public acceptance of - THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE. This is exactly what Hugh was talking about when he posted Hitlers remarks about the jew tactics of: Quote:
My Post #587: Sam, Because of the restrictions on the type of nonprofit organization that nafcash is (501 (c)(3)(exempt), Scientific / Historical Educational Organization), I am not able to hold cash. I do of course have access to the promissory notes that have been signed and notarized by the supporters of The Final Solution Forensic Challenge. Every one of the supporters of said challenge not only has more than enough money to cover their contracts, but they are ready, willing and able to meet their contractual obligations.(I would have rejected their contracts if I had any inkling what-so-ever that they would not.) In fact, I wouldn’t even have asked them to become supporters if I didn’t believe that they not only had the means, but would pay up if and when they were told to do so. My Post #592: Sam: “I would have to see the promissory notes that are signed and notarized to believe there is any cash." Me: Fine. What do I care what you believe? Do you believe that there was a Treblinka holocaust Sam? What hard physical evidence have you seen to support such a belief? What's harder to believe? That 20 people have pledged $5,000.00 each to pay someone a reward to prove something that will never be proven, or that the Germans murdered 870,000 jews without leaving a trace of their crime? If you're such a skeptic Sammyboy, then why do you believe in an 870,000 death toll / perfect crime? Hell Sam, even with baby sitting and paper route, you could probably come up with $5,000.00. Virtually every single supporter of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE TM has a house and two vehicles and who knows how many toys and how many other valuables. What is your bicycle worth Sam? How about your comic book collection? Like I said, I bet even you could come up with 5 grand. When you get to be an adult Sam, you will realize that, for most intelligent / educated people,$5,000.00 is pocket change. My Post #596 Sam: "Without a central repository guaranteeing the available funds, the reward is useless and virtually unenforceable." No Sam, every unpaid legally binding pledge could be used to put a lien on the house of the person who didn't pay up by the winner of the challenge in the allotted time stipulated in the nafcash contracts. That means they have teeth. That's why all supporters have to be legal residents of the U.S. Sams Post #619 Mr. Gerdes Can you demonstrate tangible proof that you can satisfy even 1% of the offered award? 1% Sams Post #631 Did I miss it, did Gerdes provide evidence that he can provid just 1% of the alleged reware money? Just one percent - can you do it? My Post #638: Sam: "Did I miss it, did Gerdes provide evidence that he can provide just 1% of the alleged reward money? Just one percent - can you do it? Then show it." Just 1 % Sam? So you're challenging me to prove to you that I have, at my immediate disposal,$1,000.00 in cold hard cash on this date of 6 - 8 -18? Ok Sam, but we can do even better than just 1 %, can’t we? Lets you and me have a little wager, OK? Currently the reward officially stands at $80,000.00, but it will soon be, very soon,$100,000.00, so let's use that figure, OK? And rather than 1 %, let’s say, Oh, let's go with 10 % shall we? That’s a nice round figure - 10 % of $100,000.00. So, you will be betting me, dollar for dollar, that I can't prove, that on this date of June 8th, 2008, that I have at least $10,000.00 in cash at my immediate disposal. Not resources / things of value, but actual cold hard cash. OK, let’s use the amount that I currently have (at least) in JUST ONE my checking accounts alone, on this very date of 06 - 08 - 08. This is a figure that can be proven or disproven and in an account that can be irrefutably verified, at any date in the future, correct? So that’s the bet then Sam - you bet your $10,000.000 that I don't have at least $10,000.00 in JUST ONE of my checking accounts on this date of 6 - 8 – 08 - Deal? Do we have a wager Sam? Do we have a deal on the conditions? You set the wager up with an attorney. You will of course have to come up with your own $10,000.00 and deposit it with said attorney. He will of course make out the contracts that will ensure that the money goes to the winner. But of course, the loser of the bet will also have to pay the attorney’s fees, so we better raise the amount that we bet to $15,000.00. So how’s that for a deal then Sam? You’re betting me $15,000.00 that I don't have, at the very least $15,000.00 in JUST ONE my checking accounts on this date.(The side wager of $5,000.00 is for covering the attorney’s fees.) So again, the bet is, your putting your $15,000.00 up betting me that I can’t prove that I have, in JUST ONE of my checking accounts alone, AT LEAST $15,000.00 - on this date of 6 -08 -08. Get an attorney and get things set up Sam. I will accept that bet. Bring it on Sam! BTW Sam, please contact me via the email address at the bottom of the nafcash site: http://nafcash.com/ And give me all your pertinent personal information so I know who it is that is challenging me to such a bet. After all, only a coward would make the childish statements that you’ve been making anonymously and then not be a man enough to follow up on them. Right Sammy? My VNN post #619: ...BTW Roberta, do any of your fellow funny boy freaks who live in the U.S. want to accept the challenge I gave to semen sucking Sam? What's wrong Roberta? Are they as big as cowards as you? She's really working overtime looking for an angle out, isn't she? It's the most cowardly thing I've ever seen. Only a jew... |
|
July 16th, 2008 | #690 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
BTW Roberta, big-change-a-coming to nafcash, just for you.
I hate to do what I’m doing, but it's all being done in the name simplicity. So simple, that even the dullest of the dull will be able to understand it. Simplify and clarify. Simplify simplify simplify. And clarify. |
July 16th, 2008 | #692 |
The Epitome of Evil
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
|
I would have thought 'Holocaust and Genocide Studies' would be more likely to publish Roberto's screeds than 'Skeptic' although its a tough competition to see whose bar is lower Richard Breitman or Michael Shermer...
__________________
|
July 16th, 2008 | #693 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Alex:
"Greg - maybe this info is in thread, if so I apologize, but perhaps you could tell us - who are you, how did you become interested in this stuff in the first place?" I’ve just had a life-long interest in history that eventually led me to investigate the big-lie. All my life, while sitting in history classes or watching some movie / TV show about the hoax (when I used to own a TV I was a big fan of The History Channel) or reading the stories about jews just standing in line like good little sheep waiting to be slaughtered - all the while knowing exactly what was in store for them… it just never made any sense to me. It all just didn’t seem plausible - It didn’t add up. There was always - ALWAYS - a big lingering question mark in my head telling me that something just wasn't right. (EXACTLY like when I was sitting in church growing up.) It was that inborn Bullshit meter that most of us here have that made me skeptical. But I just couldn’t put my finger on it because while I was growing up there was no internet. So that's all it ever was - just lingering doubts that I couldn’t investigate properly because I just didn't know where to look for information. And when I did look of course, ALL the books in the libraries were the same old claptrap. So for a long long time I was just in limbo with my doubts. But then I found the internet, and I started to read and study like a mad man - BOTH - sides of the story I might add, but of course it didn’t take long to see which side had the story right. So there you have it. I was a seeker of the truth who finally found the truth and who is now speaking the truth. (And everything that I've said about the hoax can be said about "the jews.") |
July 16th, 2008 | #694 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
"You will hear from me again on this subject when you find an issue of SKEPTIC or ARCHEOLOGY magazine with an article about my research findings in your mailbox." Nothing in my mailbox today but bills. Maybe tomorrow Roberta? LOL!!! And here's a thought Roberta - Why not both of them? What do you think about of what your man says here Roberta? "...when they got so entangled that they could not find a way out they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons... The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened." That's you to a T, isn't it Roberta? (And the continued silence of Roberta on the Chelmno / Sobibor vids is just deafening, isn't it?) |
July 17th, 2008 | #696 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Are you kidding me, Mr. Gerdes? If this were an honest challenge, the 100,000 dollars would at some time, say when the applicant has submitted all his evidence to NAFCASH, be placed on an escrow account with a bank that is instructed to pay the amount to who presents either a) a declaration signed by Greg Gerdes certifying that the submitted material has been "authenticated and validated as legitimate proof" and has met all requirements "expressed and implied" of the challenge, or b) a decision by a court of law that he's entitled to the reward. Or, at the very least, the winning applicant would be handed a statement signed by all supporters of the challenge whereby they are jointly and severally liable for the 100,000 dollars, meaning that the winning applicant can claim the entire amount from any of them. Of course the latter wouldn't help the applicant much if each of the supporters has only a fraction of that amount of money. It would be like trying to get money out of a naked miner's pockets, to quote a saying from the Ruhrgebiet industrial region of Germany, where my parents are from. If this is so - and I wouldn't be surprised if it is - the only way to make the NAFCASH challenge an honest and fair challenge, instead of a thinly disguised rip-off, would be the above-mentioned escrow account provision. |
|||
July 17th, 2008 | #697 | |||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Second, stinking liar Gerdes is quoting out of context my statement about the expected futility of suing NAFCASH and/or the challenge supporters, which is included in my post # 668 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=668:, and thereby completely altering its meaning. The context of this statement is the following: Quote:
Gerdes is mendaciously trying to make believe that I postulated as an established fact what I actually only considered as one out of several possible hypotheses. But then, it has long become obvious that Gerdes is a compulsive, pathological liar. Quote:
The above characterization fits your stance like a glove, Mr. Gerdes. If it describes fallacies that are specifically Jewish, I guess that makes you a Jew. If I were any of your brothers-in-spirit here, I would demand you show a certificate of "Aryan" descent to make sure you’re not a self-hating kike. Quote:
This is not about being a "skeptic" or not, Gerdes (a skeptic is the last thing you are, by the way). It is about the right and legitimate interest of someone who considers applying for your challenge reward, with the amount of effort, time and money that gathering the required evidence implies, to make sure that he will see the money if he succeeds. Whoever does this mainly for the reward money wouldn’t want to risk not being able to recover his investment because there’s no reward money around, don’t you think so? Quote:
Is that what you call "teeth", Mr. Gerdes? If this were an honest challenge, the 100,000 dollars would at some time, say when the applicant has submitted all his evidence to NAFCASH, be placed on an escrow account with a bank that is instructed to pay the amount to who presents either a) a declaration signed by Greg Gerdes certifying that the submitted material has been "authenticated and validated as legitimate proof" and has met all requirements "expressed and implied" of the challenge, or b) a decision by a court of law that he's entitled to the reward. Or, at the very least, the winning applicant would be handed a statement signed by all supporters of the challenge whereby they are jointly and severally liable for the 100,000 dollars, meaning that the winning applicant can claim the entire amount from any of them. Of course the latter wouldn't help the applicant much if each of the supporters has only a fraction of that amount of money. It would be like trying to get money out of a naked miner's pockets, to quote a saying from the Ruhrgebiet industrial region of Germany, where my parents are from. If this is so (and I wouldn't be surprised if it is, despite Gerdes' claim that he checked the supporters' financial capacity, as I've seen the fellow lie way too often) the only way to make the NAFCASH challenge an honest and fair challenge, instead of a thinly disguised rip-off, would be the above-mentioned escrow account provision. Quote:
Quote:
The fellow who refused debating me on an equal-opportunity forum like RODOH but rather chose a place where he knew his buddies would back him up against a lone opponent and he would thus have numbers in his favor. The fellow who has dodged most of my questions and ignored most of my arguments as well as most of the evidence I have shown throughout this discussion. See, for instance, my question about the alleged Shermer claims that Gerdes made such a fuss about, post # 423 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=423 : Quote:
As I have said before (and I know CS resents this parallel, but it’s just so fucking appropriate), Greg Gerdes calling me a coward is like Elton John calling Brad Pitt a faggot. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||
July 17th, 2008 | #698 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Don't forget the part about the escrow account when you "simplify and clarify". Or, if you don't want to include that part, make it very clear that if not paid the winning applicant will have to sue x number of different persons in y number of different places for z part of the reward amount each, OK? |
|
July 17th, 2008 | #699 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
# 609: http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=609 # 648 http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=648 # 610: http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=610 # 650: http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=650 |
|||||
July 17th, 2008 | #700 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|