Mr. Conservative: Goldwater on Goldwater

[Tommy Vercetti]

A HBO production on early neo-con Barry Goldwater.

A good many years later, the Jews got the libertarian, neo-con, pro-Capitalist they wanted into power, with Ronald Reagan.

Likewise with Reagan, Jews are keen to defend him and portray him falsely as a "conservative".

The Jews learned a few things since Goldwater though, making sure that Reagan made meaningless gestures against on-demand abortion, instead of advocating it, as Goldwater did. Needless to say, informed by the libertarian neo-con ideology, Reagan went on to install a pro-abortion Supreme Court Judge, but who cares, it's all about how it's managed in terms of PR.

Social conservatives and the "religious right" had the man they wanted, or so they thought. Their opinion was formed.

In terms of propaganda and publicity management, the Jews came on leaps and bounds from their early foray with Goldwater. Today neo-conservatism has a slick propaganda machine designed to fish in as many real conservatives as possible.

Neo-con'ism is a Jewish lie that has to be carefully managed if it is to work at all.

[Tommy Vercetti]

Ronald Reagan in a 1964 presentation in favour of Barry Goldwater for President - Google Video [27 mins]

The link between these two scumbags is close.

Looking at this video, it's interesting to note just how little of the libertarian/neo-con talking points have changed.

[Tommy Vercetti]

We need more Government, not less.

But that Government must be driven by the right IDEOLOGY.

If it has the wrong ideology it doesn't matter how "large" (or "small" for that matter) a Government is, it is bound to fail.

That is where many White Nationalists get it wrong. Many of them end up propagating the same libertarian/neo-con bullshit that Ronald Reagan is above. "We should reduce the size of Government", "Government is the problem", "if only we could get Government under control our problems would be solved".

I'm afraid not folks.

Nazi Germany was a "Big Government".

[Rick Ronsavelle]

Execrable claptrap.

Conflating liberty with neocons.

May I suggest a new brain, or perhaps some smart nutrients, such as DMAE, combined with L-arginine pyroglutamate?

Did it ever occur to you that Mr. Reagan was lying (about smaller government)?

Here he is at Bohemian Grove (circa 1957):

[Julian Lüchow]

Originally Posted by Tommy Vercetti

We need more Government, not less.

But that Government must be driven by the right IDEOLOGY.

If it has the wrong ideology it doesn't matter how "large" (or "small" for that matter) a Government is, it is bound to fail.

That is where many White Nationalists get it wrong. Many of them end up propagating the same libertarian/neo-con bullshit that Ronald Reagan is above. "We should reduce the size of Government", "Government is the problem", "if only we could get Government under control our problems would be solved".

I'm afraid not folks.

Nazi Germany was a "Big Government".

NS is the only system that works. Why? It is an updated version of feudalism. Feudalism worked in Europe for ages. And this was a system which gave the central figures, viz. nobility and royalty, the ability to plan the economy from top to bottom. Our history refutes the "central planning doesn't work" argument. NS/Fascism merely replaces the nobles with syndicates.

Why didn't Bolshevik "big government" and central planning work? Because it was orchestrated by fanatic ideologues who had no idea how to organize an economy and whose priorities were entirely insane and backward (i.e., promote the detritus of society over the productive ones). But self-serving plutocrats use the Bolshevik, "socialist" example as an argument against all forms of central planning and "big government." Go figure.

[Mike Parker]

Good thread. The involvement of Jews like Goldwater and Rothbard (and the shabbos goy Buckley) ensured that the US had no conservatism, only different versions of liberalism, replete with its bourgeois terminology. The liberals of the left whine about human rights, the liberals of the right whine about property rights. It's all the same ahistorical, anti-European fantasy.

[Julian Lüchow]

One other thing springs to mind: Goldwater was a Jew but it would have been better for whites if he'd been elected. LBJ was disastrous on so many fronts for white people: "civil rights", welfare for scum, war for judeo-communism, spiraling unrest and riots, diminution of white identity/birth of PC, etc. It's no surprise that LBJ was FDR's favored protege in light of how destructive he was.

[Tommy Vercetti]

Originally Posted by Mike Parker

Good thread. The involvement of Jews like Goldwater and Rothbard (and the shabbos goy Buckley) ensured that the US had no conservatism, only different versions of liberalism, replete with its bourgeois terminology. The liberals of the left whine about human rights, the liberals of the right whine about property rights. It's all the same ahistorical, anti-European fantasy.

Quoted for truth.

[Tommy Vercetti]

Originally Posted by Rick Ronsavelle

Execrable claptrap.

Conflating liberty with neocons.

Do you have a comprehension problem?

I didn't say anything about "liberty". "Liberty" is a stupid, meaningless abstration.

I did however conflate and neo-conservatism and libertarianism.