Home-Schooling your children is Best!!! Best for Who??

[William Robert]

Who Loves your Children more than you do?

Who wants their White children exploited by Jewish and Nigger Teachers, Guidance Counselors, and coaches?

Who wants their White children socially interacting with Young Niggers, mexicans, shit-skins of all shades and white Jews?

Who wants their children expelled for possesing a pair of Fingernail clippers at the public school because of the schools "Zero tolerance policies", let alone for their white pride, white heritage, white symbolism, and or white literature?

Who wants their White Children Taught False American History which demonizes the founders of America as Terrorists while elevating the status of worthless Niggers and Jews who continually do nothing but attempt to destroy our once great country?

Who Wants their white teen-aged girls Raped by niggers in the school, both nigger students and nigger teachers?

Who wants their Children taught How to be Homo-sexuals by Homo-sexual Jewish Teachers in the public schools?

Who wants Prozac prescribed for their 3 year old pre-schoolers by their Jewish teachers and psychologists in the public school?

Who wants their pre-pubescent teen-aged girls taught how to put condoms on bananas while silmultaneously being told condoms will protect them while they have sex with those big negro studs being forced on them, when the schools know damn well know that it won't protect the girls from most sexually transmitted diseases, especially when the condoms are not manufactured, packaged, stored, and used properly?

Who wants psychologial questionaires given routinely to their children asking questions like how many fire arms are in the house, whether or not there is yelling, with words like nigger, kike, or whore being used?

Who wants their children to be continually profiled by the tyrannical Jewish government through their public school records and beyond?

Who wants to pay taxes to fund the destruction of our childrens minds through Jewish propaganda being forced on them all the way from Washington D.C. throughout all of the public schools in our Country?

Who wants their White children victimized by the ever enlargening Horde of Brown skinned beasts who have overtaken the public school systems across the country?

Who wants to allow their children to be targeted for Anti-white Violence when the kikes have declared it "open season" for Brown on white violence by allowing the New Hate Crimes Law's Punishments to exist only for whites?

Thanks to the KIKES, niggers and other shitskins can never commit a hate crime against a white child. They are never prosecuted to the full extent of the law for their crimes against all of us whites.

Those are just 14 of the many Reasons why you ought to start thinking about Home-schooling. Better think about it quick before if becomes illegal like in Europe, Britain especially. Just Ask BrightonWNP, he'll tell you what it's like living were homeschooling is illegal.

Heres a White Nationalist Challenge!!

Can we collectively come up with 1000 Reasons why We should Homeschool our children, Teaching them the Traditions and Culture of Our Aryan Race?

[S.-O.]

As of today there are NO laws governing homeschooling in the state of texas.

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by S.-O.

As of today there are NO laws governing homeschooling in the state of texas.

That's good and should be taken advantage of. However, I believe Texas was first in the nation to equalize public shmuel funding across districts, ie, steal white parents money and give it to shitskins.

[S.-O.]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

That's good and should be taken advantage of. However, I believe Texas was first in the nation to equalize public shmuel funding across districts, ie, steal white parents money and give it to shitskins.

The lack of laws governing homeschooling is wonderful considering the piss-poor state of tx public schools. Especially in the Rio grande valley. The short time that we had our oldest boy enrolled was an absolute nightmare. You can't imagine what an empowered majority of beans can twist a liberal school system into. Let's just say we weren't going to let them try and mold our son's mind.

[William Robert]

This Article raises some very interesting points to consider.

Mom threatened with jail for teaching kids at home
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=59229

(excerpt)
A homeschooling mom in Utah has been ordered by a judge to enroll her children in a public school district within 24 hours, and have them in class tomorrow, all because of a paperwork glitch that very well could be the fault of the district.

The mother, Denise Mafi, told WND that she already has enrolled her children in the district, under the threat from Judge Scott Johansen, who serves in the juvenile division of the state's 7th Judicial District, that he would order her children taken away from her.

As WND has reported previously, such threats are becoming more and more common in Germany, but that nation still lives by a Nazi-era law that makes homeschooling illegal.

(excerpt)
German authorities operating under the law stemming from Hitler's desire to control the minds of youth have ruled not only that homeschooling is a basis for child endangerment charges, but a local government was remiss in allowing a mother to take her two children to another country where homeschooling is legal.

The recent decision from the Federal High Court in Karlsruhe, Germany's highest court, was reported by the German edition of Agence France-Presse as well as Netwerk Bildungsfreiheit, an advocacy organization for Germans who wish to homeschool.

Now the organization is noting the similarities with earlier court rulings, when Adolf Hitler was in power.

A ruling from the State Court in Hamburg dated 1936 pointed to "endangerment of the mental wellbeing of children, who would have been denied participation in the national community…," a premise that corresponds to the recent Federal Supreme Court decision, the group said.

"Only the words have been chosen somewhat differently by the Supreme Court in order to conceal the fascist spirit of the decision," the analysis said.

"It is quite chilling that the reasons stated by the authorities and courts in child custody terminations in Hitler's regime … correspond in their spirit exactly to the decision recently rendered by the Federal Supreme Court," the analysis said.

It said what courts used to call the "national community" now is the "public" and what was "participation in the national community" now has been called a justified interest in "counteracting the formation of religiously or ideologically characterized parallel societies and integrating minorities in this area."

The analysis found that the "National Socialist (Nazi) regime" specifically targeted members of the Jehovah's Witnesses organization, including the State Court in Hamburg decision from 1936 in which judges found: "Custody rights shall be terminated for parents who, as fanatical Bible students, cannot rear their children in accordance with today's State and because this endangers the mental wellbeing of the children, who are thereby prevented from participating in the national community."

Hundreds of children were taken from their families for reasons no more important than they failed to sing Nazi songs with others, the analysis noted.

"Authorities, who interpreted the civil code according to their national socialist legal notions, considered it beyond question that the childrearing practices of Jehovah's Witnesses was 'endangerment of child welfare' and 'mental and moral neglect,'" the analysis said.

WND has reported previously how German officials targeted an American family of Baptist missionaries for deportation because they belong to a group that refuses "to give their children over to the state school system."

A teenager, Melissa Busekros, also returned to her family months after German authorities took her from her home and forcibly detained her in a psychiatric facility for being homeschooled.

And WND has reported on other families facing fines, frozen bank accounts and court-ordered state custody of their children for resisting Germany's mandatory public school requirements, which by government admission are assigned to counter "the rise of parallel societies that are based on religion or motivated by different world views."

In the case involving Melissa, a German appeals court ultimately ordered legal custody of the teenager, who was taken from her home by a police squad and detained in a psychiatric hospital for being homeschooled be returned to her family because she no longer is in danger.

The lower court's ruling had ordered police officers to take Melissa – then 15 – from her home, if necessary by force, and place her in a mental institution for a variety of evaluations. She was kept in custody from early February until April, when she turned 16 and under German law was subject to different laws.

At that point she simply walked away from the foster home where she had been required to stay and returned home.

Wolfgang Drautz, consul general for the Federal Republic of Germany, has commented on the issue on a blog, noting the government "has a legitimate interest in countering the rise of parallel societies that are based on religion or motivated by different world views and in integrating minorities into the population as a whole."

Drautz said homeschool students' test results may be as good as for those in school, but "school teaches not only knowledge but also social conduct, encourages dialogue among people of different beliefs and cultures, and helps students to become responsible citizens."

The German government's defense of its "social" teachings and mandatory public school attendance was clarified during an earlier dispute on which WND reported, when a German family wrote to officials objecting to police officers picking their child up at home and delivering him to a public school.

"The minister of education does not share your attitudes toward so-called homeschooling," said a government letter in response. "... You complain about the forced school escort of primary school children by the responsible local police officers. ... In order to avoid this in future, the education authority is in conversation with the affected family in order to look for possibilities to bring the religious convictions of the family into line with the unalterable school attendance requirement."

[Sean Martin]

Wow this thread generated a lot of action. Here is one reason, I posted a thread a while back that gave over a thousand instances of teacher on student relations. That is one reason. Another reason is the Jena factor. Negro gangs trying to kill white children. So there are 2 reasons. A third reason is children schooled by public schools are generally stupid. Even the most intelligent of the students are held back due to the invasion on non-white people and stupid kwans so they cannot achieve their full potential. There is 3 reasons. The fourth is it brings parents and children closer together. Instead of a child spending it’s time in a multicultural sewer with retards for teachers they are spending time with their parents and growing closer with their family, which is the true social security. Parents should rely on the children in their twilight years if for some reason they become helpless instead of pumping money into ZOG for Israel and getting nothing in return.


So here are the reasons in point form.

Teacher on student relations.

Non-white gangs attacking children.

No child left behind dumbing down of children.

Home schooling brings parents and children closer together.

Here is a bonus, hey white parent you may just learn something that isn’t on Oprah.

[Alex Linder]

Those are good reasons.

Apart from the violence, etc, just look at it this way.

Is the state hostile to Whites?

Yes.

Is a state school ever going to teach anything but what it thinks will advance it's own agenda?

No.

If you send your children to public schools, they are going be indoctrinated to support a system hostile to their own interests and their own family. Public schooling is subsidized mental colonization of your children's minds by your worst enemies.

[Alex Linder]

An Open Letter to Homeschoolers – Will the Real Homeschool-Friendly Candidate Please Stand Up?

by Shana Kluck

Daily I read a new article about overtures being made to the homeschooling community by prospective presidential nominees.

John and Elizabeth Edwards are educating their children at home with the help of a private tutor; so now, supposedly, they can identify with other homeschoolers.

I've got news for them – that's not even remotely close to the "real" world of the average homeschooling family.

Mitt Romney claims that he wants to offer homeschoolers tax breaks. Sounds palatable until you find out he also supports No Child Left Behind, the worst legislation passed by the federal government on education since... well, since ever. Now, it's true that No Child Left Behind does not directly affect homeschoolers, but supporting it indicates a belief that the federal government has the authority to set standards for the public schools. Anyone who has read the Constitution knows that no such authority exists. And of course, there's the whole "slippery slope" to consider. Since the federal government now controls the public school system, what's to stop them from also claiming control of private schools, parochial schools and eventually home schools?

That leads me to the 2nd former governor from Hope, Arkansas – Mike Huckabee. Now I realize I'm endangering my life by saying anything negative about Chuck Norris's favorite politician, but I'll take my chances. Mike Huckabee is all the "buzz" in the homeschooling circles – at least according to the trustworthy main-stream-media. He's riding high on the endorsements of the Homeschool Legal Defense Association, the Minute Men, Janet Folger, Jerry Falwell, Jr, the NH NEA, Chuck Norris..... Wait a minute. Back up there. The New Hampshire National Education Association? The NH NEA is supporting Mike Huckabee? Aren't they also supporting Hillary Clinton? Isn't the NEA the group that has passed a resolution that would effectively end our right to homeschool if implemented? Isn't the NEA the group that calls homeschooling parents "wannabe amateurs" on their website? Their New Hampshire organization is supporting homeschool-friendly, Mike Huckabee? As a homeschooling mom, this sets off warning bells in my head.

But my concern about Mike Huckabee goes much deeper than his endorsers. It's really about his philosophy of governing. Individual rights, especially parental rights, are at the heart of homeschooling. We recognize that children are gifts to their parents, not chattel of the state. The responsibility to care for them, to educate them, to nurture them is exclusive to the home. Parents may choose to "outsource" this responsibility at their discretion, but government intrusion regarding these areas should be extremely rare. Any politician who does not whole-heartedly embrace that idea is a danger to our continued freedom. As Dr. Paul said in his intro to the Family Education Freedom Act, "Parental control of child rearing, especially education, is one of the bulwarks of liberty. No nation can remain free when the state has greater influence over the knowledge and values transmitted to children than the family."

So, does Mike Huckabee believe in a hands-off approach to governing or is he a nanny-state neo-con, determined to shape Americans into his mold of morality? Looking at just his current rhetoric, it might be possible to give him some benefit of the doubt; but his past governing record and statements should weigh heavily into our consideration.

His call for a nationwide smoking ban speaks volumes, especially compared to Dr. Paul's statement, "I don't want to tell you what you can eat, drink or smoke." I find his need to pass a law while governor, making it mandatory to have every student's Body Mass Index measured, chilling. What's the next step – controlling our menu or making students eat at state-run cafeterias to ensure their weight stays at acceptable levels?

He openly admits that he raised taxes to fund and improve the public school system. How is increasing the tax burden of homeschooling families in order to fund state schools homeschool-friendly? He intimated in his speech to the NEA this summer that it's the state's responsibility to help educate future teachers, enable them to continue their education and that the government-funded student loans of exceptional teachers should be "forgiven." Does he need to be reminded about how the state funds these loans?

And then there's his defense of No Child Left Behind. According to the Washington Times, Huckabee called No Child Left Behind "the greatest education reform effort by the federal government in my lifetime." "The federal No Child Left Behind Act is often misunderstood and unfairly maligned as a total federal intrusion," Huckabee said. "As long as the states are allowed to develop their own benchmark exams to determine the manner to create standards … there's a value of having a national effort to at least set high standards." He feels that as long as there is a distinction between the state governments' and federal government's role in education, legislation like this is not only acceptable, but welcome. There's only one problem – there is no role for the federal government in education. None. How can homeschoolers believe that this man will protect our Constitutional rights when it's obvious that he hasn't read the Constitution?

I prefer a candidate that has consistently voted to protect the rights of parents and limit the power of the federal government. Dr. Paul has openly praised homeschoolers and authored legislation to help ease the tax burden of all parents – no strings attached. He recognizes No Child Left Behind for what it is – an unconstitutional federal intrusion that has introduced a quagmire of bureaucratically-crafted standards and effectively tied the hands of hard-working teachers. He wants to get rid of the Department of Education, ensure parity for homeschool graduates, continue the homeschool Tier 1 pilot program, and foster a culture of educational freedom.

Dr. Paul said it best – "The best way to improve education is to return control to the parents who know best what their children need. Congress should empower all parents, including homeschoolers, to control their children's education." But, listen up homeschoolers – it's not just what Dr. Paul says that sets him apart. He is the authentic homeschool-friendly candidate because his voting record and statements for the past 30 years prove that he means what he says. He has not changed his mind. He has not flip-flopped. He doesn't craft his answers on this issue, or any other, according to his audience or popular opinion.

Homeschooling parents can rest assured that, as President, Dr. Paul will do all that he can to protect our rights. He has given homeschoolers a voice in Congress and now seeks to represent our interests in the White House. One of the best ways to empower the homeschooling community and protect our rights is to make sure that Dr. Paul is allowed to continue speaking for us.

That is why he has the support of this homeschooling mom.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/kluck1.html

[White Will]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

An Open Letter to Homeschoolers – Will the Real Homeschool-Friendly Candidate Please Stand Up?

by Shana Kluck

Daily I read a new article about overtures being made to the homeschooling community by prospective presidential nominees.

John and Elizabeth Edwards are educating their children at home with the help of a private tutor; so now, supposedly, they can identify with other homeschoolers.

I've got news for them – that's not even remotely close to the "real" world of the average homeschooling family.

Mitt Romney claims that he wants to offer homeschoolers tax breaks. Sounds palatable until you find out he also supports No Child Left Behind, the worst legislation passed by the federal government on education since... well, since ever. Now, it's true that No Child Left Behind does not directly affect homeschoolers, but supporting it indicates a belief that the federal government has the authority to set standards for the public schools. Anyone who has read the Constitution knows that no such authority exists. And of course, there's the whole "slippery slope" to consider. Since the federal government now controls the public school system, what's to stop them from also claiming control of private schools, parochial schools and eventually home schools?

That leads me to the 2nd former governor from Hope, Arkansas – Mike Huckabee. Now I realize I'm endangering my life by saying anything negative about Chuck Norris's favorite politician, but I'll take my chances. Mike Huckabee is all the "buzz" in the homeschooling circles – at least according to the trustworthy main-stream-media. He's riding high on the endorsements of the Homeschool Legal Defense Association, the Minute Men, Janet Folger, Jerry Falwell, Jr, the NH NEA, Chuck Norris..... Wait a minute. Back up there. The New Hampshire National Education Association? The NH NEA is supporting Mike Huckabee? Aren't they also supporting Hillary Clinton? Isn't the NEA the group that has passed a resolution that would effectively end our right to homeschool if implemented? Isn't the NEA the group that calls homeschooling parents "wannabe amateurs" on their website? Their New Hampshire organization is supporting homeschool-friendly, Mike Huckabee? As a homeschooling mom, this sets off warning bells in my head.

But my concern about Mike Huckabee goes much deeper than his endorsers. It's really about his philosophy of governing. Individual rights, especially parental rights, are at the heart of homeschooling. We recognize that children are gifts to their parents, not chattel of the state. The responsibility to care for them, to educate them, to nurture them is exclusive to the home. Parents may choose to "outsource" this responsibility at their discretion, but government intrusion regarding these areas should be extremely rare. Any politician who does not whole-heartedly embrace that idea is a danger to our continued freedom. As Dr. Paul said in his intro to the Family Education Freedom Act, "Parental control of child rearing, especially education, is one of the bulwarks of liberty. No nation can remain free when the state has greater influence over the knowledge and values transmitted to children than the family."

So, does Mike Huckabee believe in a hands-off approach to governing or is he a nanny-state neo-con, determined to shape Americans into his mold of morality? Looking at just his current rhetoric, it might be possible to give him some benefit of the doubt; but his past governing record and statements should weigh heavily into our consideration.

His call for a nationwide smoking ban speaks volumes, especially compared to Dr. Paul's statement, "I don't want to tell you what you can eat, drink or smoke." I find his need to pass a law while governor, making it mandatory to have every student's Body Mass Index measured, chilling. What's the next step – controlling our menu or making students eat at state-run cafeterias to ensure their weight stays at acceptable levels?

He openly admits that he raised taxes to fund and improve the public school system. How is increasing the tax burden of homeschooling families in order to fund state schools homeschool-friendly? He intimated in his speech to the NEA this summer that it's the state's responsibility to help educate future teachers, enable them to continue their education and that the government-funded student loans of exceptional teachers should be "forgiven." Does he need to be reminded about how the state funds these loans?

And then there's his defense of No Child Left Behind. According to the Washington Times, Huckabee called No Child Left Behind "the greatest education reform effort by the federal government in my lifetime." "The federal No Child Left Behind Act is often misunderstood and unfairly maligned as a total federal intrusion," Huckabee said. "As long as the states are allowed to develop their own benchmark exams to determine the manner to create standards … there's a value of having a national effort to at least set high standards." He feels that as long as there is a distinction between the state governments' and federal government's role in education, legislation like this is not only acceptable, but welcome. There's only one problem – there is no role for the federal government in education. None. How can homeschoolers believe that this man will protect our Constitutional rights when it's obvious that he hasn't read the Constitution?

I prefer a candidate that has consistently voted to protect the rights of parents and limit the power of the federal government. Dr. Paul has openly praised homeschoolers and authored legislation to help ease the tax burden of all parents – no strings attached. He recognizes No Child Left Behind for what it is – an unconstitutional federal intrusion that has introduced a quagmire of bureaucratically-crafted standards and effectively tied the hands of hard-working teachers. He wants to get rid of the Department of Education, ensure parity for homeschool graduates, continue the homeschool Tier 1 pilot program, and foster a culture of educational freedom.

Dr. Paul said it best – "The best way to improve education is to return control to the parents who know best what their children need. Congress should empower all parents, including homeschoolers, to control their children's education." But, listen up homeschoolers – it's not just what Dr. Paul says that sets him apart. He is the authentic homeschool-friendly candidate because his voting record and statements for the past 30 years prove that he means what he says. He has not changed his mind. He has not flip-flopped. He doesn't craft his answers on this issue, or any other, according to his audience or popular opinion.

Homeschooling parents can rest assured that, as President, Dr. Paul will do all that he can to protect our rights. He has given homeschoolers a voice in Congress and now seeks to represent our interests in the White House. One of the best ways to empower the homeschooling community and protect our rights is to make sure that Dr. Paul is allowed to continue speaking for us.
That is why he has the support of this homeschooling mom.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/kluck1.html

The author of this piece, Shana Kluck, of the Kluck Klan, leads Homeschoolers for Ron Paul Meetup group with over 200 members now. I was one of the first five members of Shana's group before I was axed from Meetup for telling too many intolerable tuths on taboo subjects.

Follow the links here if you are interested in networking with people like Shana, all of whom, for good reason, like Ron Paul best among all presidential candidates:

http://homeschool.meetup.com/

[Sean Martin]

Originally Posted by White Will

I was axed from Meetup for telling too many intolerable tuths on taboo subjects.

Is there anything you have been a part of that didn’t “axe” you? If you have been axed from everything you have ever been a part of that should tell you after 6 decades there has got to be a character flaw somewhere. It isn’t everyone else around you.

[William Robert]

We should use all of the homeschooling resources at our disposal.

Originally Posted by White Will

The author of this piece, Shana Kluck, of the Kluck Klan, leads Homeschoolers for Ron Paul Meetup group with over 200 members now. I was one of the first five members of Shana's group before I was axed from Meetup for telling too many intolerable tuths on taboo subjects.

Follow the links here if you are interested in networking with people like Shana, all of whom, for good reason, like Ron Paul best among all presidential candidates:

http://homeschool.meetup.com/