|
January 25th, 2016 | #1 |
Administrator
|
Imperium, by Francis Parker Yockey
Imperium, by Francis Parker Yockey
Introduction by Willis Carto and Foreward by Yockey http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...rium-Intro.mp3 (1:58) Notes: Imperium: Introduction + Foreward. are we free? we are not. aclu sides with perverts, not illegally persecuted geniuses like yockey. study how our "masters" seek to destroy positive men and movements. what are their tactics? silent treatment, first. assassinations if need be. ex.: Newton Armstrong, Jr. (1962, san diego). tactic: the Smear. distortions, libels, lies positive and negative, to confuse and isolate and destroy. tactic: infiltration and "building up false leadership." finally, if the movement has survived and become institutionalized, misinterpret it deliberately to try to channel it into supporting the desired patterns. christianity and nietzschean ideas have suffered this deliberate misinterpretation to serve Authority. ... faith is the essential ingredient in every historical force. yockey is "sequel" to spengler, who said cultures are organisms. spengler identifies 9 cultures, and says they all follow same path of development and decline, in their various ways. there are certain parallelisms in their evolution... west is addicted to finding universal laws of human behavior. last stage of culture is universalism, imperialism. that's where we are. we encourage minoirities to be nationalistic, but we must be citizens of the world. we are jaded in everything except discussion of race, our last taboo. heyerdahl, Kon-Tiki. Paul Hermann, Conquest by Man. what the west has comes from aryans - from europe. not from greece and rome and jews. there is active suppression of the racial view of history, and scientific efforts are misdirected to the middle east "cradle of civilization" is agitprop, thus we have only scratched the surface of true racial knowledge of our origins. blood mixing destroys Cultures. "at a certain stage, a Culture develops a bad case of universalism." carto says combine our racial knowledge with spengler, so that we can prevent universalist stage of cultural evolution, because that leads to absorbing foreign blood and ideas, which leads to the death of the culture. we must expand into space. that will satisfy our innate cultural Faustian drive to know and expand and conquer. without being culture-destructive. Yockey: Europe will either integrate or die, its people dispersed into colonies run by "extra-Europeans." the spiritual unity is the source of the rest of the unity (political, economic, etc) but it must first be liberated. spirit of Heroism and Discipline. |
January 25th, 2016 | #2 |
Senior Member
|
I might be wrong on this but wasn't Yockey a bit ahead of his time? From what I understand, Yockey very early on was against the US while many other nationalists and 'Nazis' (primarily those who were obsessed with Communism) at the time were propagating and working for the US; see post-WW2 Ukraine for example. He also recognized the legitimacy of the Arab movements who were against Israel and Zionism.
My impression of nationalists after WW2 is that most of them were positive towards the US, and against the Soviet Union. History, to me, has shown us that, that wasn't necessarily the correct position really. Last edited by Robbie Key; January 26th, 2016 at 05:07 AM. |
January 25th, 2016 | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,285
|
Yockey and the "Strategy of Tension"
Quote:
Yockey was not "pro-Soviet" or "pro-Russian" as many American racialists believe. Rather, he was an advocate of the Strategy of Tension. This was a strategic approach first devised in the late 1940s by Arthur Axmann and Werner Naumann, who were the de facto leaders of the remnants of the NSDAP in postwar Germany. Later it was taken up by other diehard NS'ers, such as Ernst Otto Remer, Otto Skorzeny and Hans Ulrich Rudel. I believe that Adolf von Thadden, one of the founders of the National Democratic Party, was also a practitioner of this strategy, and in any event he was certainly familiar with it. In essence, the Strategy of Tension called for National-Socialists in the West to advocate rapprochement with the Soviet Union, while those in the East would adopt a pro-Western stance. The goal was to create a space between East and West in which National-Socialism could exist and grow, in preparation for better days to come. In consequence, Western NS groups were often financed by the Soviets, while those in the East received support from the Americans, the British and the French. In other words, the goal was to play off the two occupying powers (the Americans and the Soviets) against each other. I guess that it was relatively successful, on a modest scale. With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the reunification of East and West Germany, this strategy became obsolete and was abandoned. Today, animosity in the German movement is directed almost entirely against America, as the remaining occupying power. Back in Yockey's day, the American movement was obsessed with the threat posed by the Soviet Union, which was felt to be a bastion of "Jewish Bolshevism." It seems almost inevitable that Yockey's nuanced, politically-adept stance would be misunderstood by the American movement as being "pro-communist." Ideologically, Yockey wrote that while both the Soviet Russians and the Americans were enemies of the "European Race" (Yockey's term), in the long run the Americans posed a greater danger. He believed (1) that the Jews had a tighter control over the US than they did over the USSR; and (2) that the Russian occupation was superficial, whereas the corruption and degeneracy visited upon Western Europe by the Americans ran deeper and was more spiritually corrosive. Yockey was not a racialist in the biological sense that we normally use the term today, but if he had been he might have remarked that areas of Soviet occupation remained exclusively White, while race-mixing and mass immigration polluted Western, Americanized Europe. This happened slowly at first, and then accelerated over time to the catastrophic proportions that it has assumed today. But Eastern Europe has remained White, largely because of the legacy of the Russian occupation. _____________________________________ Point of correction in the OP: although the name "W.A. Carto" appears at the end of the 34 page introduction to Imperium in the Noontide Press edition of the book, that introduction was largely written (95%+) by Revilo Oliver, and not by Carto.
__________________
NEW ORDER Website: http://theneworder.org NEW ORDER on GAB: https://gab.ai/NEW_ORDER NS Publications: http://nspublications.com VNN National Socialist Union: https://vnnforum.com/group.php?groupid=58 Last edited by Jim Harting; January 29th, 2016 at 02:42 AM. |
|
January 26th, 2016 | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,689
|
Quote:
Under American occupation the victims in many cases don't even know they are occupied, they still think they are free, which was certainly not the case under Soviet occupation. Soviet occupation was really a very primitive clumsy amateur undertaking when compared to the fine Swiss clock functioning judeo American occupation. My personal view is that Slavs are too 'primitive' to be successful occupiers and tyrants on a global level, which is why jews have chosen the much more capable Anglo Saxons of America to be their global big stick with which to keep 'European (and other) anti semites' in line. As for Yockey he definitely was ahead of his time.
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race ''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers |
|
January 26th, 2016 | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 818
|
Holy crap, Alex is taking on Imperium, sounds good.
Like Jim Harting said, it's a difficult read, most give up, like myself. But one thing I remember, Yockey believed the west should of joined forces with "soviet Russia" to fight international Jewry. It makes sense because post war Russia, although communist, produced a very conservative/nationalistic class of people. Very different from Jewish communism. |
January 26th, 2016 | #6 |
Administrator
|
We'll see what Yockey says. I have read it before, I find it in parts wrong and muzzy, and in parts correct. I think the jews/USSR was set by the taking of power - it was bloody revolution. And never too secure, at the start. Thus it was set differently than jews coming into America, finding it open and friendly. So they could buy up media and make money and buy people. The circumstances gave birth to different types of jewing.
|
January 26th, 2016 | #7 |
Administrator
|
Imperium, by Francis Parker Yockey
Pages 1-16 http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...ium-pp1-16.mp3 (32m) Notes: history recks nothing of human logic. you can escape history or serve it. spengler. each culture-soul is individual expression, takes nothing from and gives nothing to others. spengler looked at 9 cultures. yockey traces path of these individualized cultures. yockey says euro nations are ORGANS of a culture, not cultures themselves. they forget or disbelieve this. culture passes into civilization. reason > religion. money and rationality over symbol and religion and philosophy. culture = inward - poetry, art, literature, religion. civilization = rationality = outward = economics and politics taking center stage. a culture is ORGANIC and as such it lives and dies. it is a unique expression, not to be repeated historically. a High Culture lives 35-45 generations. LIFE has DESTINY; CAUSALITY is for the INORGANIC. DESTINY and FATE are opposites. FATE is part of causality, which comes from science from religion. DESTINY is a thing's INNER NECESSITY and can't be changed, regardless of external incidents which might determine its fate, or outcome. each culture, nation, individual is unique - it has inner necessity and attempts to actualize in the world, where it encounters incidents which may determine its fate, but never alter its destiny, which proceeds, again, from inner necessity. causality is for explaining the inorganic but can never explain life. |
January 26th, 2016 | #8 |
Senior Member
|
The part about expansion into the space, in Carto's/Oliver's introduction, possibly being the new challenge for the White man and his Faustian soul sounded like something Pierce could've taken a lot of inspiration from. It got me thinking of his Cosmotheism, and the generel rhetorics surrounding it, right away.
That Oliver is said to have written most of the introduction only strengthens that suspicion. Last edited by Robbie Key; January 26th, 2016 at 03:49 PM. |
January 26th, 2016 | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 818
|
Quote:
|
|
January 26th, 2016 | #10 | ||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,689
|
Quote:
50's Prague trials Quote:
60's Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
On Purim, Jews Saved From Stalin’s Genocidal Plan Quote:
Just those 70's and 80's campaigns in America to free Soviet jewry clearly showed how jews felt about the mid to later period Soviet state which had managed to partially shake them off and re-establish some form of independence. America has always been the jew's promised land of milk and honey, no other country even came close.
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race ''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers Last edited by Serbian; January 26th, 2016 at 11:01 PM. |
||||||
January 27th, 2016 | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Quote:
After WW2, Communism was like the "Islam" of its time. The Nationalist movement worldwide split into two camps: those that sought to side with America and the "free world" and those who realized that the USSR and Warsaw Pact countries were (politically and culturally) dejudaizing and nowhere near as degenerate or internally anti-white as the West was. Not a surprise that it was during the 50's and 60's that all the red diaper kike babies began formulating modern American "conservatism". Basically, the movement in Yockey's time suffered from similar weaknesses as the one now: reaction vs revolution. Not to mention being a "fascist" working for NATO and America was far more profitable and safe. Today you see the equivalent of the first camp manifesting as groups like Pegida, who wave American and Israeli flags in "protest of Islam", despite the entire refugee crisis being orchestrated by these two very forces. Looking towards the Soviets and the various nationalist revolutionaries they were open to supporting worldwide (Qaddaffi, Arafat, Nasser) was thinking outside of the box at the time. The Soviets , Qaddaffi, etc were very willing to work with and fund genuine European nationalists, Nick Griffin and Roberto Fiore for example, but by and large this never took off because of crass reaction or inability to put aside bigotry of many nationalists.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona Last edited by Joe_Smith; January 27th, 2016 at 02:34 AM. |
|
January 27th, 2016 | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Quote:
This isn't entirely true. Yockey saw in the USSR the preservation of the "authoritarian personality", eg, certain traditional European concepts of society preserved in contrast to the heavily Judaized United States. Because of the "authoritarian personality" espoused by the Soviets, Yockey (Correctly) presumed that he could forge an alliance with them, and ultimately nudge them towards Nationalsocialism easier than the cultural Marxist USA. In retrospect, he was right. The only people fighting against immigration in Europe right now are the ex Soviet satellite states, still not totally "reconstructed" by Judeo-liberalism of the EU. That's because the Soviet system, thanks to Stalin, for all its faults retained some sense of normalcy in its society and population.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona |
|
January 27th, 2016 | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
If you check out Soviet academic literature on Jews from the 60's and 1970's, it's remarkably "anti-Semitic". While they rarely used the word Jew, they simply used "Zionism" instead, e.g., "Zionists control Wall Street in the United States".
After World War II, world Jewry was extremely weak and discombobulated. As a cold autocrat, Stalin saw his opportunity to take the USSR away from them and launched a war against "Rootless Cosmopolitans". Guess who got caught up, almost exclusively, during the cultural campaign against rootless cosmopolitans? A lot of writers, critics, musicians who used Gentile sounding names had their real kike names exposed on the radio, and were decimated as a class. Jews were never able to recover after this. When Stalin took power in 1925-26, the Soviet Central Committee was entirely Jewish except for him and a couple others (all of them had Jewish wives though). By 1953, the CC was majority Russian with only a few Jews (thanks to Stalin's magic). By the 60's and 70's the Soviet kikes saw the doors were closing and fled to America in order to find a way to destroy their frankenstein. When his daughter with his second (non-Jewish wife) wanted to marry some Jew filmmaker, Stalin flew into a rage and deported this Jew to the Arctic Circle . The USSR's development was a big deal to the Frankfurt School. They ended up concluding that just like the Jew revolutionaries preserving the tricolor in 1789 France led to the dejudaizing nationalist force of Napoleon, the Soviet retention of collectivism and civic participation led to a similar situation with Stalin, and broke with Soviet-style communism. Thus, the "Authoritarian Personality" was identified as the main vehicle for anti-semitism, and Soviet Man was considered under this umbrella.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona |
January 27th, 2016 | #14 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...um-pp17-37.mp3 (54m) NOTES: pg 17-37: Destiny (unchangeable, organic), Causality (for inorganic world). see behind and underneath the external facts of a man to the soul driving within. significance defined by relation to destiny. if D not involved, then the fact is merely Incident. of course, this is subjective. "history is the relationship between the past and present." "Life-tendencies": sacred, profane, skeptical. corresponding to political states. Western culture has the most historic soul, of all cultures. conscious of SIGNIFICANCE of our battles etc. history is "true" in that it informs the minds of "significant" men meaning they see its meaning and their lives in relation to it. ... archaeology destroyed the linear view of history by proving different Cultures existed and mattered, they weren't just tie ins or lead ins to Western or Classical culture. only toward end of 1800s did historians begin to treat different Cultures as independent organisms. idea of cultural history, burckhardt's history of italian renaissance is perfect example. schiller articulated need. only later did people come to grasp meaning of High Cultures as organisms, needing to be looked at in totality of social-cultural expression, taken as a unit, an organism, unique and transient in history. the linear view divides into threes: classical, medieval, modern, but it refuses to see that other cultures are INDEPENDENT of our own, not preludes. "the basis of the linear view was cultural egocentricity" (centering the jew, the leftist might say, or israelites, per old testament). history is made not in streets but on "heights." historical RELATIVITY of cultures is the possession of a few high minds. "The number of men in the Western Civilization who were aware of the actual meaning of the Second World War is countable in thousands." |
|
January 27th, 2016 | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,285
|
No, what I wrote was entirely, 100% true.
Yockey, following Spengler in Decline of the West, writes that Russia itself (not just Jewish Bolshevism) is separate from, outside of, and hostile to Western Civilization. Yockey contrasts Western European Civilization, which is of Germanic origin, with Eastern Europe, which is Slavic and is irreconcilably opposed to the West. Yockey famously terms the Jews as "Culture Distorters" who wreck the West by replacing authentic Western civilization with a Judaized version. As Serbian notes above, the Jews use the Anglo-Americans as their primary tools in this process. The Russians, however, are merely "Barbarians" in Yockey's assessment. Their influence on the West is superficial and temporary. He further expounds that the Slavic Russians under Stalin have overcome the Jewish Bolsheviks in the Soviet regime. Consequently, they are the lesser of the two evils, and to that extent are preferable to the Anglo-Americans. But the Russians are still enemies of the West, and outside the pale of Western Culture.
__________________
NEW ORDER Website: http://theneworder.org NEW ORDER on GAB: https://gab.ai/NEW_ORDER NS Publications: http://nspublications.com VNN National Socialist Union: https://vnnforum.com/group.php?groupid=58 |
January 27th, 2016 | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Quote:
Some assertions in Imperium are carried over from assumptions (some of them false) from the second world war. If you read his later stuff he talks about the "Euro-Russian Symbiosis", IE, the historical contradictions between the Slavic world and the West were inverting to the point of the post-war USSR being more "western" in its political organization and cultural essence in a sense than Americanized, deracinated Judeo-liberal Western Europe. Here is one of his later works that touches on this: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/pdf_boo...myofeurope.pdf With talk about the "bolshevism of Washington" and sickness of New York and Hollywood, Yockey appears to be hinting at the future Jew cultural revolution of the 1960's. It can get difficult to tease out what Yockey is prescribing, granted. But it should be noted that the above work was written for the Socialist Reich Party of Otto Ernst Remer, which was a Nationalsocialist party that was being supported by the Soviet Union (who supported them over the Communist Party itself in West Germany, interestingly enough). Not sure where you get that he was for a "Strategy of Tension" or his idea of creating an alliance between pro-whites and the USSR was some cynical master plan. Yockey was anti-imperialist (as the Soviets and Arab nationalists were) in the trans-racial sense because he saw cross-cultural expansionism as the beginning of the end for civilizations. To my knowledge, the strategy of tension was the tactic of NATO and American financed "stay-behinds" trying to rationalize their collaboration (GLADIO) with Jews and the CIA, nothing to do with Yockey. Similar to the laughable alibi "Ukrainian Nazis" give to their followers when the leader of Azov battalion goes to Brussels to conspire with anti-white Jews and eurocrats.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona Last edited by Joe_Smith; January 27th, 2016 at 04:29 PM. |
|
January 27th, 2016 | #17 |
Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,679
|
This talk about the relationship between Russians and Europeans is tangentially related to Alexander Dugin's book Heidegger: The Philosophy of Another Beginning
I'm about 2/3 through the book and I don't understand much of it, but I get the idea that Dugin may be trying to infer a philosophical lineage from the Third Reich to the Fourth Rome (his term for a future Eurasian empire). |
January 27th, 2016 | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,285
|
I am talking about the total body of Yockey's work, which comprises a more or less seamless whole.
This includes not just Imperium, but also:
Concerning The Enemy of Europe: it was written specifically in support of Naumann and the Socialist Reich Party, which originated the Strategy of Tension (as near as I can tell). Kevin Coogan's massive biography of Yockey (longer than Imperium itself!) includes an entire chapter on the Strategy of Tension (chapter 34). See: The Dreamer of the Day: Francis Parker Yockey and the Postwar Fascist International by Kevin Coogan. Autonomedia, New York (1999). See also: The Beast Reawakens by Martin A. Lee. Little, Brown and Company (1997). See especially Chapter Two, "The Seesaw Strategy." Lastly, my mentor when I first joined the Movement, back in the long-ago 1960s, was James Harting Madole, who knew Yockey personally and was intimately familiar with his thought. I was privileged to have had the opportunity to speak with JHM about Yockey on several occasions.
__________________
NEW ORDER Website: http://theneworder.org NEW ORDER on GAB: https://gab.ai/NEW_ORDER NS Publications: http://nspublications.com VNN National Socialist Union: https://vnnforum.com/group.php?groupid=58 |
January 28th, 2016 | #19 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
Pages 38-57 http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...um-pp38-57.mp3 (48m) Notes: pp38- : History is the record of the lives of eight High Cultures, each an organism. they are indivudal, not all manifesting some common civilization, as the linear-ists think. experience is a relationship between a soul and an outer event. life is the unfolding a soul, for individual and for High Culture. each culture is essentially religious, which gives a unique cast to its philosophy, science etc, and even makes its atheism uniquely distinctive. the progressive is a rationalist who believes civilization is not a stage in Culture but some fixed thing, toward which we are always making "progress." any other thought is pessimism. economics is the bottom of the pyramid in a High Culture. it is the alimentary canal (akin to feeding system in man). the "seven" high cultures preceding our own were "morphologically identical." "If pessimism is despair, optimism is cowardice and stupidity. Is there any need to choose between them? They are twin soul-diseases. Between them lies realism, which wants to know what is, what must be done, how it can be done. Realism is historical thinking, and it is also political thinking." |
|
January 28th, 2016 | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,689
|
Quote:
Russian life is fundamentally barbarian. The barbarian is to be distinguished not only from Culture-men, but from savages, primitives, fellaheen, and decadents as well. Barbarian is a word full of promise, for the barbarian is inwardly in motion. The Germanic tribes that occupied Imperial Rome were barbarians, and from this Germanic stock came, many centuries later, men who wrought the Western Culture. The barbarian is the pre-Cultural form of humanity, just as different from the fellah, the end-product of a Culture, as from the savage, the proto-human type that stands in no relation whatever to a High Culture
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race ''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers |
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|