Condoms/Birth Control/Abortion should be all banned

[Marin]

Condoms and Contraception were illegal until very recently in the Republic of Ireland

http://www.thejournal.ie/open-thread...81590-Nov2012/

They had it right, all they do is promote impiety, promiscuity, infidelity and adultery. Condoms are the absolute evil as well as the pill. The purity of a woman before marriage is a sacred pillar of civilization.

Gregory Goodwin, of the three fathers of the "pill", guess the race goyim.

https://www.biography.com/people/gre...incus-21199819

How the Nazis Annihilated a Jewish Businessman's Condom Empire

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/b...e-julius-fromm

http://berlinbooks.org/brb/2011/01/t...-to-the-nazis/

[RobJ81]

YEAH... Just learn how to pull out, Duh.

I guess looking at the bigger picture I see your side of it. I would have to agree really. I never looked at it in that perspective either.
I am willing to bet not that many people knew condoms and contraception pills were illegal in Ireland until 1996 i believe it was. I learned something new today!

[Skinhead Zack]

The only case in which abortion is okay is when a White victim of rape aborts a mud rapist's baby.

Otherwise, they should be charged with murder.

[Adolf Goldbergstein]

Originally Posted by Skinhead Zack

The only case in which abortion is okay is when a White victim of rape aborts a mud rapist's baby.

Otherwise, they should be charged with murder.

Well, I would extend it to any rape myself.

[Skinhead Zack]

Originally Posted by Adolf Goldbergstein

Well, I would extend it to any rape myself.

You're right because 95% of all rapists are non-White.

And the White dudes who make up only 5% apparently have serious mental health issues caused by drugs and other degeneracies.

[Marin]

"In speaking here of knowledge, the Bible indicates the deepest essence of the reality of married life... Becoming "one flesh", the man and the woman experience in a particular way the meaning of their body. In this way, together they become almost the one subject of that act and that experience, while remaining, in this unity, two really different subjects. In a way, this authorizes the statement that "the husband knows his wife" or that both "know" each other. Then they reveal themselves to each other, with that specific depth of their own human self. Precisely this self is revealed also by means of their sex, their masculinity and femininity. Then, in a unique way, the woman "is given" to the man to be known, and he to her" (ibid.).

It would be a parody to reduce this biblical mutual "knowledge" to a mere sharing of sensation. This in effect is what the proponents of contraception do. In contraceptive sex, the spouses do not "reveal themselves to each other" (and this should be especially evident in the case of the use of condoms). They do not "know" each other or possess each other [3]. For they have not actually given that which physically encapsulates the gift of themselves. By excluding the mutual gift of their procreative potential they cannot become the one unified subject of the act. They are not thereby united; rather they are "using" each other. Their sexual act will hinder, not foster respect for one another and actually becomes a force for division rather than union. Neither the sense of possessing the other, nor that of surrendering oneself to the other, can be present; only the experience of an appetite satisfied - but in a way that effects no union, that is empty and non-communicative, marked by one-sided appropriation rather than conjugal sharing.

You can disagree with basic christian morality, but deep down you know they are right sometimes. If you pump and dump women without concern you are a scumbag, women that otherwise might have been good wives and mothers.

Chads are all niggers even if they are white.

[Longbaugh]

You can disagree with basic christian morality, but deep down you know they are right sometimes.

A broken clock is right twice a day.

If you pump and dump women without concern you are a scumbag,

White knighting pussy.

We're plenty concerned. We're concerned that she might have a disease, hence condoms. We're concerned that she might trap us with pregnancy, hence condoms.

Why don't you lecture women about not being sluts and whores?

women that otherwise might have been good wives and mothers.

You really no nothing, or next to nothing about women. Yeah, because a broad who's let a bunch of guys fuck her before she let me fuck her is someone with whom I'd want to raise my kids and share my wealth.

Chads are all niggers even if they are white.

Spoken like a true, white knighting, beta cuck. Keep putting that golden vag on a pedestal...

[Phaedrus]

Originally Posted by Marin

Condoms and Contraception were illegal until very recently in the Republic of Ireland

The same is true, or will be true, about sodomy, weed, miscegenation, porn.

This is how the jew destroys a culture/nation. Find some destructive means to give each segment of a society so they will destroy their own society.

The men will never give up porn, the women will never give up abortion, the boomer-cuck will never give up weed, the homo will never give up sodomy, the race mixer will never give up miscegenation, once the "right' has been given.

[Marin]

Originally Posted by Longbaugh

A broken clock is right twice a day.







White knighting pussy.

We're plenty concerned. We're concerned that she might have a disease, hence condoms. We're concerned that she might trap us with pregnancy, hence condoms.

Why don't you lecture women about not being sluts and whores?





You really no nothing, or next to nothing about women. Yeah, because a broad who's let a bunch of guys fuck her before she let me fuck her is someone with whom I'd want to raise my kids and share my wealth.





Spoken like a true, white knighting, beta cuck. Keep putting that golden vag on a pedestal...

You can't have a whore without a manwhore, women just follow the dominant culture. It is the duty of men to create a culture in which women follow the natural rules. If they are told that by having sex they will trap a guy to marry they are being misled, they are being thrown to the wolves and then become used-up. It is men who must decide what kind of culture they want.

[Marin]

[Crowe]

Another potential exception for abortion:

They have test they can run to check if your baby has down's syndrome. It's not a flawless test, but it's still based on science. Which is why you should probably get a 2nd or 3rd opinion.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-...t/drc-20355983

If a couple wants to choose to abort based on a high % probability that child has down's syndrome, or some sorta other crippling genetic disorder, they should be able to. This is eugenics. Eugenics is pro-White.

Christians are trying to make it illegal to abort down's syndrome babies:

http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/health/2...-down-syndrome

Iceland officials boasted virtually a 100% "eradication" of Down Syndrome thanks to their mandatory early detection test.

Effective eugenics practices on display. While, nobody knows how to eliminate the disorder from showing up in the first place, that person is guaranteed to be unfit to be a productive member of society. If some cooky christian wants to give birth to a tardlet anyway, they should relinquish all rights to any government assistance for its care. I don't think you should be able to even claim it as a dependent.

[Marin]

Comstock Act (1873)

Sandra Rierson

The brainchild of a zealous and devout New England Congregationalist, Anthony Comstock, the Comstock Act (17 Stat. 599) was passed after little debate in March 1873, in the last days of Ulysses S. Grant's first term as president. The act prohibited the dissemination of any "article of an immoral nature, or any drug or medicine, or any article whatever for the prevention of contraception or procuring of abortion" through the U.S. mail or across state lines. Although the act was amended to delete references to contraceptive devices, it remains on the books today and forbids use of the mails to distribute "obscene" material and anything "which is advertised or described in a manner calculated to lead another to use or apply it for producing abortion...." The act's constitutionality was upheld in three cases on the grounds that the First Amendment does not protect "obscene" speech (Smith v. United States, 1977; United States v. Reidel, 1971; and Roth v. United States, 1957). However, the courts have not ruled on its provisions regarding abortion-related information, largely because they are not enforced

https://www.encyclopedia.com/history...stock-act-1873

Contraceptives and inmorality have been illegal before in the U.S. People never actually get to know or have any idea of this. They turned sex from the unitive, conjugal, procreative and spiritual act that it really is into a plaything for degenerates, a consumer good. Sex became cheap.