|
December 15th, 2014 | #1 |
vnn member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,182
|
How did germany lose the war!
How on earth germany lost the war ? The power germans had.... Damn! The allies should had been crushed!!!! With great pleasure!!!
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=743453322410533 |
December 15th, 2014 | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 17
|
Those noble Aryan Nationalsocialists only wanted to secure a future for White children, but the Big Bad jew didn't like it – probably because he wanted to secure the existence of his own race –, so he divided the Aryan countries into competing groups: the Aryan Slav was forced to fight his Aryan German brother. The jewish revolutionaries decided not to completely eradicate the Nordic Russians (descendants of Vikings), so they used them for slave labour and send them to fight their White brothers.
The Nationalsocialist Germany was the last bastion of hope for the White race. Hitler's Fatherland was simply overrun by the huge jewish-led armies of slaves. Also, don't forget that the French Revolution was in fact a jewish war against the Nordic French aristocracy. |
December 19th, 2014 | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Medford,Oregon
Posts: 108
|
The more mundane explanation,the japs attack at Pearl Harbor and the round
of declarations of war forced Hitler to kick off the European war at least 10 years earlier than planned. The German nation of the 1950's would have had jet aircraft,stealth technology,a vast u boat and surface fleet,night vision, i.c.b.m.'s,nuclear weapons. And been the only nation to have all this and more as well as a huge army.
__________________
Si hoc legere, scis nimium erudiotionis habes. |
December 31st, 2014 | #4 | |
vnn member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,182
|
Quote:
Ive learnt that the US maybe were not pushing for a war with Germany, if only Hitler never declared war on US. A story pop up on FB of US air man joining RAF because America was still neutral. America took his citizenship away. America was neutral, so any American took up arms against any axis had his citizenship revoked. His own back round was German... His last name was Wolfe. You would think The US would love an American with german background killing other germans, but no, that wasn't the case. I feel america wasn't that anti german even though jews had so much influence on US. I feel Britain was more anti herman than America was. |
|
December 31st, 2014 | #5 | |
vnn member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,182
|
Quote:
Declaring war on US was a mistake. Number one reason: US didn't want actually war on Germany... Even though US was aiding Britain and France with materials. America could've declared war on Germany at anytime even in 1939.... But she never did. America was at war with Japan, not with germany. Hitler should've waited for US response. I doubt US would declare war on germany since it was japan that who attack. Hitler in fact wanted the Japanese to attack SU, not US. With SU and Britain, I feel germany had a chance but with three, germany was gone. |
|
January 16th, 2015 | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,695
|
Germany ran out of fuel and weapons. Every time an allied tank was destroyed it could be replaced. Every time Germany lost a tank in action, it was either not replaced or not as easily replaced. Yes both the Panther and the Tiger were better tanks than the Sherman, but the allies could continually keep putting more and more tanks etc into the battle. Also Germany ran out of fuel to keep their armies moving. During the North Africa campaign, Germany used up tons of fuel just getting fuel to the front line. The same thing happened on the Eastern front
Also the japs betrayed their German allies by signing a peace treaty with the soviet union which allowed the soviets to move their far eastern armies to the front against Germany. Never trust a gook. |
January 16th, 2015 | #7 | |
vnn member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,182
|
Quote:
It took donkeys years too fix tiger or panther. A T34 was replaced right away. |
|
February 11th, 2015 | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,248
|
They also ran out of manpower. With at least 4 million soldiers killed and hundreds of thousands POWs of the Allies, teenage Hitler Youth and elderly Volkssturm were desperately thrown into the last battles of the war. Actually, German industry despite devastating Allied bombing, continued to crank out tanks, aircraft and other weaponry until war's end, but there was no fuel for them since all the oil refineries and synthetic fuel plants had been destroyed.
|
February 11th, 2015 | #9 | |
vnn member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,182
|
Quote:
You are correct. Shortage of man power. However, i had thought Germany with 80 million population would have more than 17million men in service. I just wished Hitler stayed within western Europe boarders with only 17 million men available. Also not all fighting at the same time. {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252 {\fonttbl\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Helvetica;} {\colortbl;\red255\green255\blue255;\red171\green171\blue161;\red24\green24\blue23;} \deftab720 \pard\pardeftab720\sl360\partightenfactor0 \f0\fs24 \cf2 \cb3 \expnd0\expndtw0\kerning0 \outl0\strokewidth0 \strokec2 } |
|
June 23rd, 2015 | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,110
|
Quote:
I just got done researching the Eastern Front, and some of the stuff I read changed my mind about the inevitability of defeat against Russia. I think if Hitler had abandoned the Atlantic blockade to concentrate solely on blockading supplies to Russia, then retreated before Stalingrad happened, that he could have won a Roman peace. The Russians were on the brink of starvation, with almost all of their most productive farmland occupied. The only thing that kept them alive was lend lease. If Hitler had concentrated all U-boats off the coast of Norway along with more shore-based planes, sent a few commando raids to destroy the Iranian railroad, and kept Russia from planting and harvesting crops in most areas, all he would have had to do was wait a year, then move in to bury the corpses. This is sort of what William the Conqueror did when the north of England revolted. He couldn't spare many troops or the south would revolt as well, so he sent in just enough to burn crops and burn villages. Even 20 years later much of the north was a depopulated wasteland. ("harrowing of the north") His troops didn't do most of the killing, starvation and exposure from a lack of housing did. |
|
December 18th, 2018 | #11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 12
|
A large part of their defeat lay in SIGINT interception, imo.
|
December 20th, 2018 | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,646
|
Deutschland lost the war because they were outnumbered. Too many countries and the "wonder weapons" or miracle weapons did not come into service in time.
If they would have got to the atomic bomb in time the course of the war could have changed. Especially if they got into production their long range bomber that could be used to reach the US East Coast and use the bomb on Jew York City or DC. Other problem would have been the number of bombs needed since it's likely some bombers would have been shot down by air defences most likely. Could have used it on London or something too. I almost thing they should have waited longer before starting WW2 until getting an atomic bomb and long range bombers. At least a couple more years. |
December 21st, 2018 | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 20
|
Because they were a small European nation of 80 million people who was fighting against multiple enemies on all fronts. Also, Germany has very little natural resources. This is why they tried to get more African colonies.
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|