Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old April 25th, 2011 #121
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry. View Post
Yes, here's a comment from a well known book I have. It was published at just the right time, 1914.

The author, Edward Ross, was well qualified to comment on all of the above, being Professor of Sociology and an authority on anthropology and criminology:



You should be able to download the book here http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924021182898

If you're looking in the pdf for that quote then the pagination is different and you'll find it on p.167 (I think).
Excellent - thank you for the link. I've heard a lot about it but never found it to read.
 
Old June 3rd, 2011 #122
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

An expansion of the 11 points. (thanks to Henry for the vid.)

 
Old July 24th, 2023 #123
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,350
Default Oppression by Orgasm?

The Porn Industry as Jewish Anti-Fascist Activism & Cultural Terrorism


Artemisia Gentileschi, Susanna and the Elders, circa 1610.

Revolutionary antecedents

Georg Bernard Baron Lukács von Szegedin — shortened György Lukács — was the son of a wealthy Jewish investment banker, a baron by inheritance in the former Austro-Hungarian Empire, and one of the most influential Marxist intellectuals of the early 20th century. In May of 1919, following the Hungarian Bolshevik Revolution and the establishment of Béla Kun’s (also the son of a wealthy Jewish family) Hungarian Soviet Republic, Lukács was appointed as the People’s Commissar for Education and Culture. Lukács had become disillusioned with the Christian working classes, who — as Cécile Tormay records in her famous An Outlaw’s Diary — refused to embrace international communism and remained faithful to God and country. For this reason, Lukács identified Western Christian culture as an obstacle to communist social emancipation and argued that the Marxist “worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the ‘annihilation of the old values’ and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries.”[17] As People’s Commissar of Education and Culture, Lukács aimed to “annihilate these old values” through state education, including comprehensive sex-education programs for schoolchildren and the promotion of feminism. A play on the “Red Terror” label used to describe the Bolshevik mass killings of 1918 (the perpetrators of which were also overwhelmingly Jewish), this sex education program came to be known as “cultural terrorism” by his opponents.[18] Under Lukács,

Special lectures were organized in schools and literature printed and distributed to “instruct” children about free love, about the nature of sexual intercourse, about the archaic nature of the bourgeois family codes, about the outdatedness of monogamy, and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of all pleasure. . . This call to rebellion addressed to children was matched by a call to rebellion addressed to Hungarian women. . . [One document published by Lukács’ Commissariat] calls upon women the world over to unite and overthrow the chains imposed upon them by exploitative bourgeois-spirited males.[19]

Lukács’ program was short-lived, as the Hungarian Soviet Republic was defeated and dissolved by Romania in August of 1919, and Lukács was forced to flee to Vienna. However, the idea of sexualizing children to combat reactionary sentiments would recur among prominent Jewish communists, such as Wilhelm Reich.

Born to a Jewish family in the Austro-Hungarian province of Galicia, Reich records his adolescence in his autobiography titled Passion of Youth (1988), where he fondly recalls raping his family’s maids, engaging in bestiality with the farm animals, masturbating to thoughts of his mother, and lusting after his friends’ sister because he was obsessed with “her glorious, long, blond hair.”[20] After studying medicine at the University of Vienna in the early 1920s, Reich pursued his career as a psychoanalyst, and is known for synthesizing the works of Sigmund Freud and Marx. After joining the Communist Party of Germany in 1930, Reich produced two highly influential books: The Sexual Revolution (1936), which provided the name for the sexual liberation movement of the 60s and 70s, and The Mass Psychology of Fascism (1933), which attacked authoritarian Right-wing movements in Europe. In the Soviet Union, the word psikhushka was used to describe the psychiatric hospitals where political dissidents were interned after being diagnosed as mentally ill by the state. In a similar application of politicized psychiatry, Reich claimed to have diagnosed fascist persuasions as a personality disorder caused by the repression of one’s sexuality during childhood. According to Reich,

Suppression of the natural sexuality in the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, “good” and “adjusted” in the authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is that of producing an individual who is adjusted to the authoritarian order and who will submit to it in spite of all misery and degradation. At first, the child has to adjust to the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family; this makes it capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of sexual inhibition and sexual anxiety.[21]

Reich’s verdict on curing the fascist personality disorder? “Give the children true sexual knowledge [i.e. encourage adolescent sexual exploration, such as masturbation], [to] free them from sexual confusion. . . Once children and adolescents are reached on a mass basis through their sexual interests, there will be a powerful counterweight against the reactionary forces.”[22]

Reich became a pariah for his endorsement of child abuse. The Danish Communist Party consequently blacklisted him, and after fleeing to America from the NSDAP in Germany, the American government also burned his research and imprisoned him for conduct related to his Orgonomic Infant Research Center, where child sexual abuse was reportedly rampant.[23] Despite the apparent failure of Lukács and Reich, however, their theories about dismantling Christian civilization through sexual liberation found philosophical maturity in the critical theory of the Frankfurt School.

The innocuously named Institute for Social Research was founded and funded by Felix Weil — the son of a wealthy Jewish-Argentinian merchant — in Frankfurt, Germany, 1923. It gathered a coterie of almost exclusively Jewish Marxist intellectuals, such as Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse, to develop Marxism by synthesizing Marxist social liberation with Freudian psychoanalysis, and with the works of luminaries such as Lukács. Two of the principal aims of the Institute were to address the “crisis of Marxism” (referring to the failure of communism to take hold amongst the working classes of Europe), and to confront the problem of rising antisemitism (no doubt a reaction to the cultural terrorism of Jewish Marxists like Lukács and Wilhelm Reich, to the mass persecutions of Christians by the Soviet Cheka, and to the revolutions instigated in Russia, Hungary, and Germany by Jewish revolutionary terrorists like Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Liebknecht and Kurt Eisner). The school fled Germany in 1933 and eventually found their way to America, where it continued its project with renewed intensity.


The Progress of “Modern Art,” a Dance with a Prostitute, 1930s German propaganda poster.

Marx famously stated that the point of philosophy is not to interpret, but to change the world. The Frankfurt School was similarly concerned with developing strategies for altering society, “but they were [also] aware of the many obstacles to radical change” — some of these obstacles being Christianity, the traditional family, and conventional sexual morals, as identified earlier by Lukács and Reich.[24] Marx vaguely stated that “an era of social revolution” would commence following the establishment of communism.[25] The Frankfurt School rearranged priorities, arguing instead that social revolution must come first.

In this regard, one of the Frankfurt School’s greatest contributions was the highly influential Authoritarian Personality study. The study, funded by the American Jewish Committee, attempted to identify authoritarianism and anti-Semitism as a personality disorder attributed to the following childhood values: the “conventional idealization of parent(s); submission to parental authority and values; [a] sense of obligation-and-duty to parents; [and the] “ingroup orientation to . . . [the] homogeneous-totalitarian family.”[26]

The study did not apply rigorous and empirical testing procedures to either verify or disprove the hypothesis, because it was intended by its authors to provide an empirical basis for the Frankfurt School’s a priori philosophical and political theory of antisemitism. In the words of Horkheimer, the study was an opportunity for social scientific research “to transform itself directly into propaganda.”[27] Hence, like Reich, the study pathologized healthy and “close family relationships. . . [as] an indication of psychiatric disorder. . . in an attempt to make [Western societies] resistant to Anti-Semitism.”[28]
While the study was essentially antifascist political activism masquerading as scientific research, it was heavily promoted and became massively influential in American social sciences — “no volume published since the war in the field of social psychology has had a greater impact on the direction of the actual empirical work being carried on in the universities today.”[29]

The most impactful contribution of the Frankfurt School is critical theory, which is a modernized Marxist analytical framework based on the synthesis of Marx and Sigmund Freud that identifies oppression as a social and cultural rather than political-economic phenomena. In the words of Horkheimer, the purpose of critical theory is “the abolition of social injustice. . . [and] the abolition of social relationships which presently hinder development. . . [to help] man to emancipate himself from coercion by nature and from those forms of social life and of the juridical, political, and cultural orders which have become a straitjacket for him.”[30] In other words, critical theory is a revolution against all the major social institutions of white Western civilization — Christianity, the traditional patriarchal family, chastity, and social convention — which critical theory identifies as irredeemable systems of social oppression.

Critical theory laid the foundations for the massively influential New Left movement, which championed civil rights, feminism, abortion rights, and gay rights. Just like Bolshevism, this movement was overwhelmingly Jewish. During the 60s there was “a political mass-migration of Jews from orthodox Marxism into the New Left” who had become disillusioned with communism following Stalin’s anti-Jewish campaign. Additionally, essentially all the New Left’s key figures were Jewish radicals like Alan Ginsberg, Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, and Daniel Cohn-Bendit.

Cohn-Bendit — who was a member of the European Parliament and still chairs parliament groups today — fought fascism in the style of Reich by molesting 5-year-olds in an anarchist “anti-authoritarian kindergarten” in the 60s. He describes these “sexual encounters” in his book The Great Bazaar (1975).[31]

The “father of the New Left” was the Jewish Frankfurt school theorist Herbert Marcuse, who — in the words of Matt Taibbi — “gave us everything from ‘Silence Equals Violence’ to ‘Too Much Democracy’ to the ‘Crisis of Misinformation’ to In Defense of Looting to the 1619 Project and Antiracist Baby.” Further, his work Eros and Civilization complemented the works of Wilhelm Reich in providing a theoretical framework for the sexual revolution. Marcuse also translated critical theory into the New Left’s revolutionary praxis by identifying strategies and key demographics for achieving social and political change. Marcuse argued that Orthodox Marxists had misplaced their faith in the proletariat, though while “the working class is not a revolutionary class. . . where the resistance of the poor has succumbed, students lead the fight against the soldateska and the police. . . [and] black militants pay with their lives.”[32] Marcuse urged the Left to embrace middle-class student radicals and minority coalitions as a new revolutionary vanguard, and to embrace strategies such as the long march through the institutions rather than the violent overthrow of bourgeois society. Marcuse worked to engage and mobilize “the college student as a revolutionary subject” throughout the 60s, and his works were among the central inspirations of the student uprisings of the decade, where student protesters and Jewish anarchists rioted in major cities and threw copies of Wilhelm Reich’s Mass Psychology of Fascism at the police.[33]

Sexual Revolution as a Jewish Defense Against Anti-Semitism

A brief examination of the intellectual origins of the sexual revolution reveals a discernible trend of prominent Jewish radicals exhibiting a relentless and visceral hostility towards the central institutions of white European civilization and culture: religion, sexual responsibility, and cohesive traditional families. This is because they explicitly identify these institutions as seedbeds of antisemitism, i.e., sources of gentile social capital, and therefore as threats to the Jewish community. These two things are not unrelated. As Dr. MacDonald shows, these “Jewish intellectuals and political activists strongly identified as Jews and saw their work as furthering specific Jewish agendas.”[34] This attack on strong, patriarchal gentile family structures and conventional sexual morality, and the replacement of the old Christian values with the egocentric narcissism of the 68ers, was motivated by the desire to break down the social capital and cohesion of America and thereby manufacture a new society that would be heavily insulated against manifestations of anti-Semitism.

One notorious example that is not treated above is Sigmund Freud. Freud laid the intellectual groundwork for the theories of Wilhelm Reich and the Frankfurt School by launching his own assault on conventional Christian sexual attitudes and behaviors. And just like the Frankfurt School, Freud also saw his theories “as a mechanism for ending anti-Semitism.”[35]
In his own writings, Freud fantasized of himself as “Hannibal, the Semitic leader of Carthage. . . in a war on gentile culture. . . [and against] Rome and its daughter institution, the Catholic Church,” which he identified as irredeemably evil, repressive and antisemitic.[36]

The notable Jewish sexual revolutionaries of the 20th century were motivated by the same goals. Reich called the family “the authoritarian miniature state” because it produces people who are “afraid of authority,” “good,” “adjusted,” and “obedient” — people who are conscious of themselves as committed members of a political body. By attacking high-investment parenting and conventional sexual morality, the mortar that binds every cohesive political community together, Jewish sexual revolutionaries sought to inaugurate a new social order incapable of cohering as an exclusive political body, because such a society would be incapable of discriminating against Jews.

Free love, critical race theory, and gender studies (all derivatives of critical theory) are the dominant ideologies of the West today. And now that these ideologies are firmly in power, you can find plenty of books and articles in which the Jewish community happily takes credit for pushing the cultural envelope, and for its role as a vanguard of the sexual liberation movement. Jews call their mission to fight against all forms of discrimination and prejudice tikkun olam (Hebrew for the Jewish obligation to “heal the world”).

An article from the Times of Israel reads: “How ‘tikkun olam’ inspired world’s first openly gay politician Harvey Milk.”

An article from Tablet Magazine reads: “Broadway’s First Lesbian Kiss Was Originally in Yiddish.”

An article from Haaretz reads: “Brilliant actors like Larry David and Sarah Silverman are challenging America’s powerful religious, family-friendly culture and asserting their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity.”

While praising Jews at a Jewish American Heritage Month event, Joe Biden stated: “I bet you 85% of those changes [referring to the public acceptance of gay marriage], whether it’s in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.” Professor Abrams agrees: “Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish.”

UNZ:
Oppression by Orgasm? 24 VII 2023.



Images of Frankfurt School Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Reich




U.S Founding Fathers' Statements Concerning the Jews

"They (the Jews) work more effectively against us than the enemy's armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in. It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pests to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America."


Source: Maxims of George Washington by A.A. Appleton & Co.

The founding fathers on the jewish question
snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com›2009/09/…
It seems that the American Founding Fathers at the time of the American Revolution tried desperately to warn their newly found nation about the dangers of allowing the Jews to establish themselves in America.
 
Old July 29th, 2023 #124
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,350
Default







From The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt, on the list of articles at the bottom of the page.
















WEDNESDAY DROP: WOKE:Willingly Overlooking Known Evil: JULY 26. 2023
 
Old August 4th, 2023 #125
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,350
Default Frankfurt School and Critical Theory / Death of the West Buchanan.

Frankfurt School - Death of the West by Pat Buchanan.



The Death of the West / Pat Buchanan.


When Cornwallis’s army marched out of Yorktown, the fife and drums played “The world turned upside down.” Now our world has been turned upside down. What was right and true yesterday is wrong and false today. What was immoral and shameful – promiscuity, abortion, euthanasia, suicide – has become progressive and praiseworthy. Nietzche called it the transvaluation of all values; the old virtues become sins, and the old sins become virtues. p5


About the same time, music critic Theodor Adorno, psychologist Erich Fromm, and sociologist Wilhelm Reich joined the Frankfurt School. But in 1933 history rudely intruded. Adolf Hitler ascended to power in Berlin, and as the leading lights of the Frankfurt School were Jewish and Marxist, they were not a good fit for the Third Reich. The Frankfurt School packed its ideology and fled to America.


Among the new weapons of cultural conflict the Frankfurt School developed was Critical Theory. The name sound benign enough, but it stands for a practice that is anything but benign. One student of Critical Theory defined it as the “essentially destructive criticism of all the main elements of Western Culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism.”


Using Critical Theory, for example, the cultural Marxist repeats and repeats the charge that the West is guilty of genocidal crimes against every civilization and culture it has encountered. Under Critical Theory, one repeats and repeats that Western societies are history’s greatest repositories of racism, sexism, nativism, xenophobia, homophobia, anti-semitism, fascism and Nazism. Under Critical Theory, the crime of the West, flow from the character of the West, as shaped by Christianity. One modern example is “attack politics,” where “surrogates” and “spin doctors” never defend their own candidate, but attack and attack the opposition. Another example of Critical Theory is the relentless assult on Pius XII as complicit in the holocaust, no matter the volumes of evidence that show that accusation to be a lie.


Critical Theory eventually induces “cultural pessimism,” a sense of alienation, of hopelessness, of despair where, even though prosperous and free, a people come to see its society and country as oppressive, evil and unworthy of its loyalty and love. The new Marxist considered cultural pessimism a necessary pre condition of revolutionary change. Under the impact of Critical Theory, many of the sixties generation, the most privileged in history, convinced themselves that they were living in an intolerable hell.


Erich Fromm’s Escape from Freedom and Wilhelm Reich’s The Mass Psychology of Fascism and The Sexual Revolution reflect Critical Theory. But the most influential book the Frankfurt ever published was The Authoritian Personality. In this alter-piece of the Frankfurt School, Karl Marx’s economic determinism is replaced with cultural determinism. If a family is deeply Christian and capitalist, ruled by an authoritian father, you may expect the children to grow up racist and fascist. Charles Sykes, senior fellow at the Wisconsin Policy Research Centre, describes The Authoritarian Personality as “an uncompromising indictment of bourgeois civilization, with the twist that what was considered merely old-fashioned by previous critics was now declared both fascistic and psychologically warped.” Where Marx criminalised the capitalist class, the Frankfurt school criminalised the middle class. That the middle class had given birth to democracy and that middle class Britain had been fighting Hitler when the comrades of the Frankfurt School in Moscow were cohabiting with him did not matter. Nor did it matter that middle-class America had given Adorno and his colleagues a sanctuary when they had fled the Nazis. The truth did not matter, for these were Marxists ideologues, and they alone defined the truth.


Having discovered fascism’s nesting ground in patriarchal families, Adorno now identified its natural habitat: traditional culture: “It is a well known hypothesis that susceptibility to fascism is most characteristically a middle class phenomenon, that ’it is the culture ‘ and hence, that those that conform the most to this culture will be the most prejudiced.”


Edmund Burke once wrote, “I would not know how to draw up an indictment against a whole people.” Adorno and the Frankfurt School, however, had just done exactly that. They flatly asserted that individuals raised in families dominated by the father, who are flag waving patriots and follow the old time religion, are incipient fascists and potential Nazis. As a conservative culture breeds fascism, those deeply immersed in such a culture must be closely watched for fascist tendencies.


These ideas have been internalised by the Left. As early as the mid sixties, conseratives and authority figures who denounced or opposed the campus revolution were routinely branded “fascists.” Baby boomers were unknowingly following a script that ran parallel to the party line laid down by the Moscow Central Committee in 1943: Members and front organisations must continually embarrass, discredit and degrade our critics. When obstructionists become too irritating, label them as fascists, or Nazis or anti-Semitic… The association will after enough repetition, become “fact” in the public mind.


Since the 1960s, branding opponents as haters or mentally sick has been the most effective weapon in the arsenal of the Left. Here is the “secret formula” as described by psychologist and author Thomas Szasz: “If you want to debase what a person is doing …. call him mentally ill.” Behind it all is a political agenda. Our sick society is in need of therapy to heal itself of its innate prejudice. Assessing the Frankfurt School’s Studies in Prejudice, of which The Authoritarian Personality was best known, Christopher Lasch wrote: the purpose and design of Studies in Prejudice dictated the conclusion that prejudice, a psychological disorder rooted in the “authoritian personality structure, could be eradicated only by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective psychotherapy – by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum.” This is the root of the “therapeutic state” a regime where sin is refined as sickness, crime becomes antisocial behaviour, and the psychologist replaces the priest.


ANOTHER OF THE INSIGHTS of Horkheimer and Adorno was to realize that the road to cultural hegemony was through psychological conditioning, not philosophical argument. America’s children should be conditioned at school to reject their parents’ social and moral beliefs as racist, sexist , and homophobic, and conditioned to embrace a new morality. Though the Frankfurt School remains unfamiliar to most Americans, its ideas are well known at the Teacher’s Colleges back in the 1940s and 1950s. The school openly stated that whether children learned facts or skills at school was less important than that they graduate conditioned to display the right attitudes. When Alan Bloom wrote in The Closing of the American Mind that “American high school graduates are among the most sensitive illerates in the world,” with some of the lowest scores on earth in comparative exams, but the highest scores for sensitivity to issues like the environment, Bloom was testifying to the success of the Frankfurt School. Parents may consider today’s public schools costly failures where children no longer learn. To the Frankfurt School, they are a success; for the children coming out of them exhibit all the right attitudes. On entering college, these students now go through orientation sessions, where they are instructed in the new values that obtain in college campuses – to get their minds right, as the warden said in Cool Hand Luke.


America’s mass media have become the siege guns in the culture war and a vast Skinner Box for conditioning America’s young. p 80 – 85


Writing in the Spectator Eleanor Mills is an authentic voice of her generation: “The fact is that girls like me – i.e., healthy, hearty, middle class women in their 20’s – are just not breeding.” Why not? Because she writes “my generation’s twin preoccupations are, unfortunately, looks and money.”


Political correctness is cultural Marxism, a regime to punish dissent and to stigmatize social hersey as the Inquisition punished religious hersey. Its trademark is intolerance. By classifying its adversaries as haters, or mentally ill, writes journalist Peter Hitchens in his lament for his country, The Abolition of Britain, the new regime imitates the methods of the Soviet Union’s Serbsky Institute, which used to classify political dissidents as insane before locking them up in a psychiatric hospital. “What Americans describe with the “casual phrase … political correctness,” says Hitchens is “the most intolerant system of thought to dominate the British Isles since the Reformation.” As it is in the United States. Scholar and author Paul Gottfried calls it “the dehumanization of dissent.” Words are weapons, said Orwell. By calling an enemy a racist or fascist, you no longer need to answer his arguments. He must defend his character. In a court of law, the accused is innocent until proven guilty. But if the charge is racism, homophobia, or sexism there is today the presumption of guilt. Innocence must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.


Orwell heard the word fascist used so often he assumed that, if Jones called Smith a fascist, Jones meant, “I hate Smith!” But if Jones had said “I hate Smith,” he would be confessing to unchristian hatred. By calling Smith a fascist, he need not explain why he hates Smith or cannot best Smith in debate; he has forced Smith to prove that he is not a closet admirer of Adolf Hitler. Huey Long was right. "When fascist comes to America it will come in the name of antifascism.” p 89 & 90


Seventy years ago , the Itilian Marxist Antinio Gramsci ( 1891 – 1937 ) wrote the most important mission for socialism was to “capture the culture.” By the end of World War II, the liberal Left had managed to capture not only the arts, theatre, literature, music, and ballet, but also motion picture, photography, education and media. Through its control of the culture, the Left dictates not only the answers, but the questions asked. In short, it controls the cosmological apparatus by which most Americans comprehend the meaning of events. This cosmology is based on two great axioms: the first is there are no absolute values in the universe, no standards of beauty and ugliness, good and evil. The second axiom is – in a Godless universe – the Left holds moral superiority as the final arbiter of man’s activities. p 95 .


“A statesman must take the long view.” Richard Nixon. p 122


Aztlan belongs to those who plant the seeds, water the fields, gather the crops and not to foreign Europeans. We do not recognize capricious frontiers on the bronze continent.” Slogan “For our race, everything. For those outside our race, nothing.” p 130


“To destroy a people you must first sever their roots.”
Alexander Solzhenitzyn. p 147


CULTURAL MARXISTS UNDERSTOOD this. Their Critical Theory was a prototype of the politics of personal destruction. What the latter does to popular leaders, Critical Theory does to an entire nation through repeated assaults on its past. It is the moral equivalent of vandalizing the graves and desecrating the corpses of its ancestors. Many of the institutions that now have custody of America’s past operate on the principles of Big Brother’s Ministry of Truth: drop down “the memory hole” the patriotic stories of America’s greatness and glory, and produce new “warts and all” histories that play up her crimes and sins, revealing that we have loved to be loathsome and those that we have revered to be disreputable even despicable. Many old heroes have not survived the killing fields of the New History. Ultimate goal: Destroy patriotism, kill the love of country, demoralize the people, deconstruct America. History will no longer unite and inspire us, but depress and divide us into the children of victims and the children of villains of America’s past. p 148


In the dismantling of America, Arthur Schlesinger cites a character out of Milan Kundera’s The book of laughter and forgetting: “The first step in liquidating a people is to erase its memory. Destroy its books, its culture, its history. Then have someone write new books, manufacture a new culture, invent a new culture, invent a new history. Before long the nation will begin to forget what it is and what it was.” p 152


In our Orwellian world of Newspeak, diversity means conformity. In the name of diversity, every military school must look alike. None may be all male, even if that is what those to whom the school belongs desire. Is this freedom/ Is this democracy? No. Orwell got it right. ”One makes the revolution …. To establish the dictatorship.” The French, and Russian and Maoist and Khmer Rouge and Taliban revolutions all dethroned the old gods and desecrated their temples. So it is with our cultural revolution. It cannot abide dissent. Only after Senator McCain apologized for not having denounced the Confederate flag over the South Carolina capitol, and confessed to opportunism and weakness was he restored to the good graces of the revolution.


But the cultural revolution is purging the history “of those illustrious heroes and statesmen” from public schools to prepare a new curriculum to separate children from parents in their beliefs, and to cut the children off from their heritage. Said Solzhenitzyn: “To destroy a people you must first sever their roots.” To create a “new people” the agents of our cultural revolution must first create a new history; and that project is well advanced. p 173


THE WAR ON America’s past and the dumbing down of American children – to make their minds empty vessels into which the New History may be poured – is succeeding. p 174


But secular humanism is a faith, the faith of America’s elite, and it is being imposed by the Supreme Court. Perhaps the greatest success of Christianity’s greatest rival is to have convinced Christians it is not a rival, just ideas reached by reason alone. p187


Seeing Americans bow to its will, the Supreme Court became supremely confident in its coup. In the Richmond Newspapers decision ( 1980 ), Justice William J Brennan described the new order. Judges he wrote, “are not mere umpires, but in their own sphere, lawmakers.” In 1985 he told Georgetown Law School, “Majoritarian process has appeal under some circumstances, but I think ultimately it will not do.” It is the court’s role “to declare certain values transcendent, beyond the reach of temporary majorities.” What Justice Brennan meant was that his personal values were transcendent, the will of the American majority notwithstanding. p 189


The revolution will coexist until it attains hegemony. Then it will dictate.
p196


Sam Francis, the syndicated columnist and author of Revolution from the Middle, “is that we are not fighting to conserve something, we are fighting to overthrow something.”We must understand clearly and firmly that the dominant authorities in … the major foundations, the media, the schools, the universities, and most of the system of organised culture, including the arts and entertainment – not only do nothing to conserve what most of us regard as our traditional way of life, but actually seek its destruction or are indifferent to its survival. If our culture is going to be conserved, then we need to dethrone the dominant authorities that threaten it.” p 215


In its agenda for world community, the Humanist manifesto of 1973 was prophetic. Americans, it declared must “transcend the limits of national sovereignty and .. move towards the building of a world community … We look to …. A world order based on transnational federal government.” In words that echo Gramsci and The Greening of America, the manifesto rhapsodized: the true revolution is occurring … At the present juncture of history, commitment to all humankind is the highest commitment of which we are capable; it transcends the narrow allegiances of church, state, party, class, or race in moving towards a wider vision … What more daring a goal for humankind than for each person to become, in ideal as well as practice, a citizen of the world community.


This ideal of an end of nations and the creation of a world government, has been a dream of intellectuals since Kant. Though utopian, it occurs in every generation. It is a Christian heresy. When the philosophies of the Enlightenment repudiated the church, they needed a substitute for the church’s promise and vision of heaven. So they created a new vision of all mankind labouring together to create heaven here on earth. The trading away of the hereafter for the here and now is the bargain. And the children of the enlightenment are now far along with their project. As Christianity dies in the West, the foundation and first floor of a world government are already in place. The UN is to be its parliament with the Security Council its upper chamber ( the veto is to be abolished ), and the general assembly its lower house. The International Criminal Court, the World Court, and the World Trade Organisation would constitute its judicial branches. The IMF is its Federal Reserve. The World Bank and its sister development banks are the foreign aid agencies. The UN Food and Agricultural Organisation and the World Health Organisation are among its welfare agencies. The model and forerunner is the EU. Clinton’s roommate at Oxford and architect of his Russian policy in a column a decade ago in the Time described the regime that will rule in the closing decades of the twenty first century: All countries are basically social arrangements …. No matter how permanent and even sacred they may seem at one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary … within the next hundred years … nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority. A phrase briefly fashionable in the mid-20th century – “citizen of the world” – will have assumed real meaning by the end of the 21st


In Talbott’s vision, the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank are the “proto-ministries of trade, finance and development for a united world."


Today the people of Europe are being told that decency, justice and rightful restitution for their past sins require that they throw open their doors and share their national homes with the descendants of those their fathers misruled and persecuted, however many wish to come. Can the nations of Europe resist the non-negotiable demands of the cultural Marxists? For what is being demanded of them is nothing less than demographic, national, and cultural suicide of their countries - for the good of mankind. p 236 239


In November of 1996, Fr Richard John Neuhaus, editor of First Things conducted a symposium, “The End of Democracy? The Judicial Usurpation of Politics.” Born out of angry and frustration with recent court rulings, the symposium was based on this proposition: The Government of the United States of America no longer governs by the consent of the governed … The question here explored is whether we have reached or are reaching the point where conscientious citizens can no longer give moral assent to the existing regime.”[/I] p 253

From the book - The Death of the West / Pat Buchanan.


The Jewish Frankfurt School and the Destruction of Western Germanic Culture



George Washington:
"They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy's armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in... It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America."

- From The Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton & Co.

Were America's Founding Fathers Anti-Jewish?
rense.com›general25/anti.htm
 
Old August 5th, 2023 #126
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,350
Default The Frankfurt School in Your Child's Classroom




One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ ~ the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. But you, dear reader, are already well aware of that fact.

If you have not yet read it, I point you to Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt. In this piece every aspect of the assault of the Frankfurt perversions upon America and its once Christian populace is covered in depth with clear insight into the insidious war on human decency we are dealing with today.



The use of the term "allies" gives this a rather militaristic tone, does it not? This word is used repeatedly in most cultural Marxist propaganda. No surprises there! Instilling that divisive "us" and "them" mentality at an impressionable age.

‘Sexual differences are a contract;
if it feels good, do it; do your own thing.'




Consider what has happened in America since the installation of its first gay president? The release of the "gender wars" that has become an extremely divisive sickness within our society has become invasive beyond belief politicizing even the most minor of activities. (Please see: CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IN THE CLASSROOM)

We hear of the books used to propagandize and normalize these behaviours in the classroom. The other day I stumbled across the ADL link titled "LGBTQ People and Homophobia/Heterosexism"; needless to say, I checked out the list. The length and variety of topics was almost unsettling but the Chosen have a good eye for a market they created for themselves. I noted that many of the names of the male characters were Tribal, as were the authors. Just sayin'.

We know who lies behind all of this liberalism. To aid the further corruption education of our children in these matters, the ADL contributes the following wisdom:

"The lack of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) people in children’s books and the curriculum as well as the bias, stereotyping, discrimination and violence faced by LGBTQ people is important to address with young people in school. Understanding homophobia, heterosexism and the history of struggle for equal rights is critical. LGBTQ People and Homophobia/ Heterosexism includes learning more about LGBTQ people and their history and interests, understanding manifestations of homophobia and heterosexism and learning about LGBT rights such as marriage equality and others."

. . .

When Kayla Was Kyle: Author: Amy Fabrikant; Category: gender and sexism, LGBTQ people and homophobia/heterosexism; Can Kyle find the words to share his feelings about his gender ~ and can his parents help him to transition into the girl he was born to be?




The Frankfurt School in Your Child's Classroom 05 VIII 2023.



Joan Rivers : Obama Is Gay, Michelle Is Transgender

WebSave. 578K views 4 years ago. A few weeks before she died of complications during routine elective surgery, Joan Rivers said Barack Obama is gay, and Michelle Obama is transgender.


Family is the social building block. Destroy the family and you destroy the society.

In Isreal they certainly know that the Family is the social building block, that's why many have what today we would call big families.
 
Old August 10th, 2023 #127
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,350
Default

 
Old August 28th, 2023 #128
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,350
Default Snippets

Pure Frankfort School agenda ~ 'We will make America so degenerate she will not be able to stand herself.' If you find time, please read a piece I did 12 years ago on this very topic.


THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL: CONSPIRACY TO CORRUPT

28 VIII 2023.

Last edited by jagd messer; August 29th, 2023 at 12:38 PM. Reason: Wrong link
 
Old September 2nd, 2023 #130
Ole Massa
Senior Member
 
Ole Massa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Florida's Redneck Riviera
Posts: 1,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jagd messer View Post
Pure Frankfort School agenda ~ 'We will make America so degenerate she will not be able to stand herself.' If you find time, please read a piece I did 12 years ago on this very topic.


THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL: CONSPIRACY TO CORRUPT

28 VIII 2023.


Truth brah.
 
Old September 12th, 2023 #131
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,350
Default



SATURDAY CARTOONS: AIN'T NOTHING BUT A GANGSTER PARTY: SEPTEMBER 9, 2023

12 IX 2023.
 
Old January 31st, 2024 #132
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,350
Default Saul Alinsky



'Beware the Useful Idiots submitted by Garret Geer "Recall that Hillary did her college thesis on his writings and Obama Writes about him in his books. Saul Alinsky died about 43 years ago, but his writ- ings influenced those in political contro) of our then live. nation today. Died: June 12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA Education: University of Chicago Spouse: Irene Alinsky Books: Rules for Radi- cals, Reveille for Radicals Anyone out there think that this stuff isn't hap- pening today in the U.S.? All cight rules are cur- How to create a social state by Saul Ali of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social important.
1) Healthcare Control healthcare and you contro) the people.
2) Poverty - Increase the Poverty level as high as possible; poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are these providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control- Re- move the ability to defend themselves from the gov- ernment. That way you are able to create a police state,
5) Welfare Take con- trol of every. aspect of which they their lives (Food, Hous- , and ing, and Income).
6) Education - Take you control of what people read and listen to - take af al Jearn in school.
7) Religion Remove the belief in the God from the government and schools. 8) Class Warfare Di- vide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discon- tent, and it will be easier to take (tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. Does any of this sound like what is happening to the United States? Alinsky merely sim- plified Vladimir Lenin's original scheme for world 'conquest by communism, under Russian rule. Stalin described his converts as "Useful Idiots." The Useful Idiots have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control. It is presently happening at an alarming rate in the US. "Its difficult to free fools from the chains they re-

beware-the-useful-idiots-submitted-by-garret-geer


Saul David Alinsky was born in 1909 in Chicago, Illinois, to Russian Jewish immigrant parents, the only surviving son of Benjamin Alinsky's marriage to his second wife, Sarah Tannenbaum Alinsky.[8] Alinsky stated during an interview that his parents never became involved in the "new socialist movement". He added that they were "strict Orthodox, their whole life revolved around work and synagogue ..

Wikipedia


31 I 2024.
 
Old February 10th, 2024 #133
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,350
Default How the Commies Castrated Western Males

How the Commies Castrated Western Males Stephen Volk.


Marxist Frankfurt School Horkheimer and Adorno 1964.
(Commie creeps, Horkheimer and Adorno. Only Freemasons shake hands like that.)

Social engineering pioneered by the Frankfurt School is the reason the West suffers from a dearth of male leadership.
by Stephen Volk henrymakow.com)

Patterned after the Marxist Moscow Institute, the Frankfurt School was dedicated to destroying "the authoritarian male of western civilization."

This was kicked off in the west with their heinous 1950 English translation of The Authoritarian Personality. Contrived first in their strong but covert philosophy, it then wormed its way into the arts of the western world.

Especially music, under the influence of Frankfurt's Theo Adorno, who also authored his subversive The Culture Industry, to aid the profiteering complicit left.

Now, here was an ongoing, profiteering agenda, with tentacles spreading all over western civilization! It started with country western music in the 1950s, engineered to collectively bring male IQ down, several percentage points, with lyric, melody, harmony and rhythm dumbing-down thought processes and emotions, as only a Marxist musicologist as Adorno was capable.

It was a good start for the subversive Frankfurt School - who showed their gratitude to the west, by betraying it, though the USA sheltered them away from Hitler during WWII, to protect them.

A big and costly mistake for the compassionate USA... But this only spanned part of the male population of the west. It was not enough.


Enter The Beatles! Now, that could reach the globe! But western culture was the main target. Gender role reversal was strongly underway. The long-haired Beatles initiated an effeminate look which the complicit, profiteering media popularized. (See The Marxist Minstrels by David A. Noebel.) Many Beatle songs were written by the same social-engineering, Marxist musicologist Theo Adorno.

The songs were directly or indirectly to do with "Love." Frankfurt's Herbert Marcuse popularized "Make Love, Not War," an attractive Viet Nam-era slogan to distance the American male, not only from an unjustified war, but all defense. Beatle manager Brian Epstein was, in this profiteering control of American culture, as dangerous as the criminal Jeffrey Epstein to follow.

For both, American culture was the target, through controls over the American male, to seriously denigrate God-given male authority; the male authority which kept America free, to now be weakened till Communist takeover. Marxist Adorno, in 1934 banned from teaching in Germany due to his Jewish father, now took revenge in full swing, combining philosophical and composing talents, for subversion.

School's anti-western and anti-male perpetrators were momentarily outraged, when The Beatles departed from their "Love" lyric agenda and recorded "Taxman."

Of course, while this Marxist subversion was underway, the Viet Nam War disposed of hundreds of thousands of authoritarian males of the west.

The complicit military/industrial complex made tons of money in the process. Meanwhile, the movie/industrial complex promoted the strong woman image at every turn. In leadership roles over males for decades, while males timidly buckled and succumbed to the authority of Leninist feminists. Wonder Woman for this ethnic ilk was their symbolic crowning achievement, as was Family Guy (which Russia rightfully banned). Somehow, by some miracle, a man by the name of Donald Trump managed to avoid these social-engineering effects. Though he by no means survived, unscathed, he did survive enough effects to still emerge as the authoritarian male they feared.

And the Hollywood agenda to produce a Leninist-feminist consciousness backfired, to a small but important degree. Marjorie Taylor Green, Kari Lake, Danielle Smith, and the professional female physicians and nurses exposing COVID, assumed roles in overt leadership.


beatles-satanists. Notice the satanic imagery and Aleister Crowley.


They undoubtedly were influenced by the over saturation of domineering Hollywood actresses; but use strong leadership to empower and defend western civilization. Now, the direct anti-male-energy weapons are out of control and rage everywhere! Unwitting males wolf down soy products at every opportunity, effeminizing themselves into the abyss. Satanically-profiteering transgenderism is emasculating the potential authoritarian males of the west, daily, crippling them for life. And once-credible church-organization have liberalized and compromised males beyond recognition.

Who is replacing the freedom-defending, family-defending, food-defending, private- property-defending, males of western civilization? The State. The freedom-destroying, family-destroying, food-destroying, private-property-destroying, State! Are you happy with this? It's time to act now, before the gender-specific deadly viruses - invented in Israel and sold to Communist China - finish off the "authoritarian" male of the west.

henrymakow:
How the Commies Castrated Western Males
10 II 2024.
 
Reply

Tags
frankfurt school

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 AM.
Page generated in 4.29466 seconds.