|
March 11th, 2008 | #21 | |
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
|
Quote:
That's about one in ten thousand!
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together. |
|
March 11th, 2008 | #22 | |
Angry Shiksa
Join Date: May 2004
Location: the unholy land
Posts: 10,011
|
Quote:
The most important thing to remember here, perhaps is that any and all outside threats take a backseat to the problems within ourselves. Any outside group, even jews can only do what we have allowed them to do. That is the most difficult realization to come to and it will be the greatest problem to even attempt to solve. |
|
March 11th, 2008 | #23 | |||
out surfing. won't be back
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: where it's 4-6 & glassy
Posts: 2,879
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Why are you so willing to believe in a Jewish lie just because it is older than the other Jewish lies? New Jewish lies = "Why, those slimy kikes!" Old Jewish lies = "Our lord and saviour!" Last edited by Dietrich; March 11th, 2008 at 02:25 PM. |
|||
March 11th, 2008 | #24 |
Self Bannned
|
I thank all for their opinions, keep them coming. We can not so focus on the main threat that other threats slip under the radar screen and then develope into a even bigger threat.
I would ask once again for those saying silly things to please offer some proof or idea of logic behind your statements. Anything can be said then walk away, to have any effect requires explanation.
__________________
Blood, Honor, Conviction & Principle. |
March 11th, 2008 | #25 | |
Self Bannned
|
Quote:
Perhaps i am not correct I can not claim to have study your posting history enough to be very accurate, if so I apologize in advance. There are posters way across the line promoting muslims, and who tend to gang and flame with every thread that has to do with muslims, which is why I posted in the civil forum in the hopes they will be forced to watch their manners. if you are one or not I do not know, but do not let hatred of jews blind you to other worthless mud back stabbers. Is there not enough hate in your heart to spread it around a bit ? I say again, you, jews and muslims call for an end of Christians. Ironic ? Do you care to explain your strange allies ?
__________________
Blood, Honor, Conviction & Principle. |
|
March 11th, 2008 | #26 |
Angry Shiksa
Join Date: May 2004
Location: the unholy land
Posts: 10,011
|
The idea that we really only have one enemy and that all of our problems can be directly traced to that enemy is dangerously naive in my opinion. This kind of thinking sort of makes one a sitting duck. This is why I assume people like Holly and myself are so concerned about many of the things that get said around here in regards to Muslims, for example. It is dangerously naive to assume that jews are the only group out there who seek to force their will on others and dominate others to benefit themselves. Hell, we have done so and it has come back to haunt us in extremely negative ways. Saying this absolutely DOES NOT indicate the person believes the jews not to be a threat or that this person does not seek the removal of jews and their influence from our societies. This needs to be done. No one is going to argue against that idea. I will argue against the idea, though, that this is going to, in itself, be some magic cure for all of the ills of our society.
|
March 11th, 2008 | #27 |
Self Bannned
|
Dietrich, you believe what you want which may be fiction to me. My reality may be fiction to you also. What is clear is that you, jews and mud muslims are allies in wanting destruction of christian society. I presume but am not sure you want this replaced by some form of mystik paganism, the jews would want some form of mindless, soulless anarchy, and the muslims obviously would want radical islam to fill the vaccuum of spirits.
Can you explain your strange choice of allies ?
__________________
Blood, Honor, Conviction & Principle. Last edited by Holly; March 11th, 2008 at 02:51 PM. |
March 11th, 2008 | #28 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: JUDEAware, originally MassaJEWsetts
Posts: 8,901
|
Quote:
The main goal going from parasite to paradise. Last edited by Robert Bandanza; March 11th, 2008 at 03:20 PM. |
|
March 11th, 2008 | #29 |
Senior Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aztlan
Posts: 1,245
|
Unequivocally, without qualification or reservation.
"There never was a jEW or a mud which visited it's depredations upon a White without first having been enabled by a xombie."
__________________
Imagine: Our Own World... NO HOPE WITHOUT ROPE |
March 11th, 2008 | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Beograd
Posts: 3,186
|
When it comes to the enemies of the White race, jews have the whole-list to themselves as the biggest and mot dangerous threat.
If we were to have a supplementary list of the second biggest enemies, it would have to start with "white kikes" , those former whites who have sold themselves to every form of racially harmful idea the jews promote are easily next in line as far as enemies are conserned. Niggers ofcourse are dangerous and pose a threat, but they are too weak to be a serious danger to racially aware Whites. The groids history and continuing failures show them to be a destructive force, but one that can easily be controlled, so they do not qualify. The 'putacanos' of LaRaza will never achieve anything beyond numbers and they will always depend on White society. Being a mongrel race which they are they will always suffer from White envy and wish they were "real" Whites while playing at dellusional identity politics based on lies. Anything of value in South and Central America is White made and maintained, everything else is useless. No matter what they say they know they need White more than we need them. Muslims are a threat only because they are allowed into White nations, which goes back to kikes and their goyim whores. What are these middle easterners beyond a merchant culture? Very little. Their religious beliefs are no different than qualifying "atheists" as a danger to the White Race because they may want us to "believe" what they do not believe in. Since no one wants to force islam to be anyhting different, just as islam has to accept that we do not have an interest in being muslims. We have our home, they have theirs. Most 'islamic" ideology is just Arab supremacism anyway. Either way we have to keep Race separate from religion, otherwise we get screwed by the old trick of teh "wet jew" which make it easier for them to blend into White society as one of "us" and claim to believe the same thing. Asian could be a serious threat since they are a capable race and have been able to create an Asian civilization, but in a world where White interests are defined, they could do very little to-harm us, beyond open warfare which is unlikely. the one advantage Asians have is they do not particularly care for other Races and have a sense of racial identity, which many in the former White nations are lacking. But there is NO real threat beyond JEW and the "usefull white goyim" everyhting else is merely a symtom of the sickness, nothing more.
__________________
"To survive a war, you gotta become war." Rambo, John J. |
March 11th, 2008 | #31 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: JUDEAware, originally MassaJEWsetts
Posts: 8,901
|
Quote:
By your posting history, everyone can see that we have siamese twin with that Heath Ledger luster SouthernCross. I never did say I support the entire non-white world and perhaps I do admire the freedom fighting Arabs and Persians in the Middle East, so what is your point. Having non-white allies to better your own people is the best way to go. Leon Degrelle has been quoted saying something similar. I posted it on the forum somewhere, but it might be gone because it was during the data loss. Anyway, posters here do not all have the same identical ideals. We are all pro-Indo European in some shape or forum(minus the Opposing Jews section), but political platforms very well may differ amongst us. Anyway, that is all I gotta say. BTW, if you are so angry about my posts, maybe I should start posting news from Jewish controlled nations accomplishing nothing. Political platforms that contain Islamic terrorism as the main feature fail and will continue to. Anti-Jewish campaigns, but all pro-Indo European parties must begin as soon as possible or none of these wounds will heal from the destruction of them. Where there is anti-nationalist laws, they are going to have to defy the system. The Talmudic regimes cannot jail every single patriot out there. |
|
March 11th, 2008 | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia.
Posts: 725
|
Quote:
I have lived in heavily populated hispanic areas (unfortunately, and not for long believe me!) and if I still did, I would probably vote them. But, in my little microcosm here in Charlottesville, Niggers are a worse problem, and a bigger problem than Mexicants, who I truly hate more than I hate niggers, generally speaking. Incidentally, all you people who think Myslims dont hate Xtians, Mohammad called for the annihilation and eradication of all cultures and religions and everyone that didnt support Muslim beliefs and faiths, and specifically targeted Xtians, because if people believed Jesus was a son of god, they would not believe that Mohammed was the prophet he wanted them to. Its in the Quran. Ive seen passages of it mentioning this, elsewhere. I think everyone gets so shortsighted about Muslims because they are just all wrapped up in being jew tools, they lose sight of the fact that Muslims hate us, would destroy us, and in no way support xtianity.
__________________
Humanitarianism is the expression of stupidity and cowardice. -Adolf Hitler NOBAMA '08 |
|
March 11th, 2008 | #33 |
Ιuστην Λεε
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,005
|
If they're nonwhite we should oppose their presence in our lands equally. It's got nothing to do with who we hate more. I don't really have a problem with Asians but I don't want to live around them. So in that sense, even though I don't care about them either way, they're in the same category with muslims, niggers, and spics.
They're all an equal threat. Jews get an emphasis put on them because it was their fucked up politicking that put us in this situation. And it's not the first time as I'm sure you're well aware of. If you're surrounded by muslims I can understand the fixation. That's how I felt about spics until our nigger population increased 10 fold. I've never thought you were too soft on anyone. If anything some posters here hold muslims in too high of a regard. Those people have no interest in an alliance with WNs. Why would they? How would it benefit them? And I'm sure they've thought about it but in the end we're too ineffective at this point in time. I respect muslims in the Middle East who are fighting for their people. I don't respect muslims in Europe because of the way to conduct themselves. In America they lay very low these days, so it's hard to really get too worked up about them.
__________________
Mirror in the bathroom, recompense For all my crimes of self defense Cures you whisper make no sense Drift gently into mental illness |
March 11th, 2008 | #34 | |
out surfing. won't be back
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: where it's 4-6 & glassy
Posts: 2,879
|
Quote:
You keep asking for "logic" as if you want clarity. Here you go: You worship a Jew. Now you go hold your breath until I feel, in the light of this revelation, like I need to explain why I admire people who fight the Jews tooth-and-nail. |
|
March 11th, 2008 | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,718
|
Holly, compare and take these things in regard. And, I by no means love “Muslims.”
Look at these two pictures to begin with. Both are from the “homeland and birthplace of Islam,” in nowadays' Saudi Arabia. The Ka'aba in the al-Haram al-Maki al-Sharif [الحرم المکي الشريف] mosque in Ottoman-controlled Mecca, 1889. Idem ditto, but in 2005 and 2006 respectively, and with millions of people attending the Hajj in Mecca. How you mean “Islamic fundamentalism” a ‘Western’ fabricated and instigated modern-day trend... From an old and quite liberal pilgrimage tradition to a forciful and obligatory ‘business’ of millions and mass-obsession. Nowadays you'll see in practically 100% Islamic states (like Pakistan), mostly Sunni ones, that Muslims constantly refer to themselves as “Muslim” and that they like to stress’ that often. Or what about Saudi Arabia, a state founded and led by the British and American ‘royal’ vassal family of Āl Sa'ūd [آل سعود ;House Saud]. Non-Muslims, for instance, aren't allowed in Mecca. That's discrimination, not racial, but still. Not that that even bothers me, but it's still a policy — and double standard — tollerated by the forces that originally installed the regime that upholds these things. And that while Saudi Arabia is the foremost funder and facilitator of mosques and Muslim — or rather, arabization advocacy — groups in [Western] Europe, and of states like “Bosnia & Hertzegovina,” “Kosova,” Albania, etc. ... As for Saudi Arabia's zionistic connection. Let me start by showing this picture of 1918 of Chaim Weizman (one of the founders of the zionist entity [“Israel”]), shown below, together with emir Faisal al-Sa'ūd I. The first monarch and leader of Saudi Arabia, as ‘liberated’ by the Brits and facilitated by the Allied bloc. Then there's also the hypocrisy among Muslims and the unwillingness of ‘our’ [Jew] media to show the Middle East in its full extent. Demonstrations like the one pictured below in Afghanistan (controlled by a [pro-]Western installed government), against the ‘anti-Islam film’ of the zionist Geert Wilders (who certainly loves this kind of attention), don't come about naturally. In all of those ‘Islamic states’ demonstrations are usually organized by the government, or alowed (which they otherwise aren't). Not all the women weir ‘veils’ and so on... ... and there are a lot of traditions that'd even be deemed degenerate in the West of today. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLqTOHRfh8s The list goes on and on and on and on (I should perhaps write a big article on it some time). But, to recap and conclude. So-called “Islamic fundamentalism” — by the media and the neo-cohns' definition — is a new concept that came about in the 1950s and became more wide-spread in the late 1980s, since the Soviet campaign in Afghanistan, til the day today that it became a ‘social standard’ (more in the form of a trend) among all Muslims (particularly, as I said before, among Sunni Muslims) world-wide with the increased “conservatism.” Even if this phenomenon may've existed before, doubtably like this, it hasn't existed in the form we know it today for virtually centuries. |
March 11th, 2008 | #36 |
Senior Member
|
The first enemy is the jew, the secondary enemy is composed of those who do the dirty work of the jew knowingly, including many of the more rabid xians. The distinction must be made on account that if a tertiary class was to be introduced i.e. those who do the work indirectly, the list would be too great and 'diminishing returns' come into play.
As for the Asians, the Chinese are likely not going to be a threat on account that their birthrate is below that required to replenish the population. Same goes for the Japanese; the southern Asians, namely those in India, Indochina and Indonesia are worrisome, though they are of low-enough IQ not to constitute a threat if kept in their own lands As for the Arabs, they are not a problem if they are left alone, but kept in their own lands. As for the Spics, I would not mind seeing them exterminated, though that is merely on account of a personal distaste for that subspecies. As for the congoloids, they are the greatest domestic enemy, though it is an unwitting participant in the kosher escapades. Due to their propensity for criminal behavior, they must be deported. Last edited by Cernunnos; March 11th, 2008 at 08:11 PM. |
March 11th, 2008 | #37 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: JUDEAware, originally MassaJEWsetts
Posts: 8,901
|
Quote:
|
|
March 11th, 2008 | #38 | |
Self Bannned
|
Quote:
__________________
Blood, Honor, Conviction & Principle. |
|
March 11th, 2008 | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,718
|
Holly, did you see my post? I sure as hell didn't ‘flame’ you, I responded with argumentation, but if you're going to ignore my post — having spend some time writing it and uploading pictures — you're essentially treating me worse than people that ‘flame’ you. I don't like to come across as a “whiner,” but to write posts to be ignored isn't my idea of spending [my] time usefully either...
|
March 11th, 2008 | #40 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 251
|
This is an easy one. It is vulture capitalists.
__________________
Occidental Dissent "A functioning police state needs no police." —William Borroughs |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|