|
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
December 27th, 2011 | #1 |
baппed
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: A:\
Posts: 3,367
|
Ron Paul foreign policy is "sheer lunacy" says ex-aide in latest hit-piece. Read this fucking unbelievable shit...
[Posting this not because I care, but the boldness of its characterization attempt on the man should shake-up the steadiest doubter about media operating in tandem with government.]
Ex-Aide: Ron Paul Foreign Policy is 'Sheer Lunacy' National Journal By Jill Lawrence | National Journal – 15 hrs ago Ron Paul is not having the best holiday season. First the media discovered racist, anti-Semitic newsletters that went out under Paul’s name in the 1970s, ‘80s and ‘90s. Then the New York Times did a story about the support Paul draws from white supremacists and anti-Semites. Now there’s former Paul staffer Eric Dondero purporting to describe the ins and outs of Paul’s positions on everything from Israel (it shouldn’t exist) to Hitler (we shouldn’t have fought him) to 9/11 (U.S. authorities may have known about the attacks) to Afghanistan (we shouldn’t have invaded). He calls Paul’s foreign policy “sheer lunacy.” Or, as the conservative Weekly Standard summarized in hits headline: “Ex-Aide Says Ron Paul Is a 9/11 Truther & Isolationist Who Thinks U.S. Shouldn't Have Fought Hitler.” In his 2,100-word piece, posted at RightwingNews.com, Dondero says he held several campaign and Capitol Hill posts with Paul from 1987 to 2003. At his own website, LibertarianRepublican.net, he said he was revealing much of the information for the first time. “Much of what I have to say will not please the liberal media hacks. Though, the Ron Paul diehards will find much objectionable, as well,” Dondero wrote. Paul campaign manager Jesse Benton, in a statement circulated to the media, called Dondero “a disgruntled former staffer who was fired for performance issues. He has zero credibility and should not be taken seriously.” Still, Dondero’s bill of particulars was getting wide pickup on Twitter and on conservative sites such as the Standard, National Review and HotAir. Dondero goes out of his way to say that Paul is not anti-Semitic or a racist. He said Paul has hired many black and Hispanic employees and “I never heard a racist word expressed towards Blacks or Jews come out of his mouth. Not once.” In fact, Paul’s current campaign spokesman, Gary Howard, is black. Still, any way you cut it, the picture Dondero paints isn’t pretty. Among his contentions: --Paul is anti-Israel. “His view is that Israel is more trouble than it is worth, specifically to the America taxpayer. He sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs.” -- “He is not all bigoted towards homosexuals. He supports their rights to do whatever they please in their private lives. He is however, personally uncomfortable around homosexuals” and refused to use a bathroom in a gay supporter’s home. -- “Ron Paul was opposed to the War in Afghanistan, and to any military reaction to the attacks of 9/11.” He planned to vote against the invasion despite threats of staff resignations and a constituent uproar, Dondero says; he changed his mind at the last minute. “If Ron Paul should be slammed for anything, it’s not some silly remarks he’s made in the past in his Newsletters. It’s over his simply outrageously horrendous views on foreign policy, Israel, and national security for the United States. His near No vote on Afghanistan. That is the big scandal,” he concludes. Paul has said he did not know what was in the newsletters. The Times looks at the newsletter issue more broadly, and gets Paul to comment on his less savory supporters. He told the newspaper that he rejects their extremist views but not their backing. http://news.yahoo.com/ex-aide-ron-pa...it4730256.html |
December 27th, 2011 | #2 |
Self imposed ban
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The redwood forest
Posts: 787
|
The American people love to wear that Israeli yoke. Many times throughout the history of this country, a chance has come along to take it off, but the stuck on stupid Israel lovers just keep putting it back on. The Evangelicals will never vote for a sensible foreign policy on Israel because Israel plays a vital role in their little fantasy of eventually being sucked out of their bodies one random day and wafting up to magic skyheaven, or having the little baby jebus come back and fix the world through total destruction, or some such asinine mumbo jumbo that is no different than any crap spouted from the minds and mouths of African witch doctors. I can't believe these assholes STILL get to make my decisions for me regarding the people who run this country.
Anyhow, the point being, Paul has committed the cardinal sins here in the US; denying favoritism to skygod's happy little orc kingdom, being slightly uncomfortable around a buttfucker, and telling a watered down truth about blacks and Latinos. He could have had any number of affairs, divorces, embezzled any amount of money, "flip flopped" on any position and STILL been a media darling as long as he didn't go into jewish "no no" land; insulting the holy trinity of Israel, gays, and non whites. Hope Dondero is enjoying his 30 pieces of silver.
__________________
Hell really is other people. |
December 28th, 2011 | #3 | |
anti-American
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,052
|
Quote:
__________________
The personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew. - Hitler |
|
December 28th, 2011 | #4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 459
|
another one looking for a book deal or gig. they always come out at the most opportune moment
__________________
There is only one white race Since you can't change the world you can always stop caring |
December 28th, 2011 | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 389
|
If Ron Paul can win the nomination the status quo is going to find out that a lot of people don't care about Israel
|
December 28th, 2011 | #6 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
There's plenty of opposition to Israel in this country, left and right. Just talk to people. It's just another 'issue' where you can't get any honest discusssion. |
|
December 28th, 2011 | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
|
Note that this Dondero & the judenpresse waited until now to take off the gloves, now that the Iowa race is in the home stretch & Paul is coming on like gangbusters (in spite of the initial ignore/dismiss gambit).
The kikes & their whores are really going into a panic - and it's sweet 'n' juicy..... |
December 28th, 2011 | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Caught in the Interwebs
Posts: 1,226
|
Apparently, his real name is Rittberg. What is this again about an alliance with "Race Realist" jews?
Quote:
http://rightwingnews.com/election-20...anti-semitism/ |
|
December 28th, 2011 | #9 |
Administrator
|
What could a young, strong man do if he coupled Paul's American domestic and foreign policies with overt racial appeals?
Until people call the jew's bluff, the kikes will continue to destroy all opposition by calling it racist. They're daring whites to speak out in their own name. They know that is the only basis from which they can be successfully opposed - that's why they make it the ultimate sin and taboo - appealing to white men not as economic men not as spiritual men not as citizens not as patriots but as White Men. That's what they fear. That's where the gold lies. The right way for WN to act is to support Paul, or not, as they see fit - but privately. Paul has chosen not to make direct racial for whatever reason, whether he believes in individualism or because he doesn't think overt racial appeals will work politically. Give him his pure test. Pure from his point. See how the jews go after him. See why he succeeds or fails. That's the value of Ron Paul to our cause. See what works, what doesn't. What we should borrow, what we should avoid. |
Tags |
2012, 9/11, ex aide, foreign policy, ron paul |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|