Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old May 12th, 2017 #101
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

[couple embeds i'm not posting thru link]

MEME MAGIC
'Kill All Normies' Is About the Alt-Right But the Left Ends Up Looking Worse
RK
ROISIN KIBERD
May 12 2017, 10:00am

[IMG]https://video-images.vice.com/articles/5914a277acbe3813d7ea2c60/lede/1494530184738-magazine-1.jpeg?crop=1xw:1xh;center,center&resize=1444:*[/IMG]

Image: Pepe and Donald Trump. Image: YouTube

A new book from Irish author Angela Nagle chronicles the rise of the alt-right and how the worst of the internet went mainstream.

There are certain books where, as you're reading, you realize your mind is about to change. Reading Kill All Normies is one of those experiences. Written by Angela Nagle, an Irish writer and academic known for articles identifying "The New Man of 4chan," the book is a record of the recent online "culture wars", culminating in the 2016 US election and the triumph of the alt-right. It is also an indictment of the left, pinpointing just how it allowed this to happen.

The book opens with a cultural history, "From Hope to Harambe," outlining the progression from mid-00s pickup artist communities, to overtly anti-feminist "neomasculinity," to Gamergate (here Nagle's narration takes a near-audible sigh), leading to its collusion with 4chan's troll army and its political awakening as the alt-right. Nagle wrote her PhD dissertation on online misogyny, witnessing this evolution in real-time. "There's a sort of broad arch of reactionary politics which moves from anti-feminism to racism," she explains, meeting me in Dublin to talk about the book.

With its promise of a collective identity, the alt-right can seduce and assimilate these groups, lending them a sense of coherent identity.

Nagle approaches the alt-right as a tangle of wayward factions, united in their loathing of the left. Named for Marxist theorist Antonio Gramsci who argued that political change follows cultural change, the "Gramscian Alt-Light" are those people you've seen on 4chan threads: creative, angry, unpredictable, but politically vacuous and messy. The "Manosphere" are men threatened by feminists, who they claim augur in civilizational decline and "cucking." They have converted their misogyny into racism, which links them with more old-fashioned far-right bigotry.

What each group shares is a fear of the future, an atomized life spent forever alone. With its promise of a collective identity, the alt-right can seduce and assimilate these groups, lending them a sense of coherent identity.

Among the alt-right's leaders, Nagle sees Richard Spencer as the most influential and the most likely to sustain a political career. "Mike Cernovich, Lauren Southern and Milo, all those people are brilliant at media," says Nagle. "They're really good at Twitter, but they're shallow thinkers. Richard Spencer is much smarter. He realizes that conservatism will never be cool, so he's trying to bring in figures from the dissident left."

Essentialist arguments about what it is to "be a man" have evolved to address what it is to be a white man. Nagle cites "Return of Kings" (a "neomasculinity" blog) author Roosh V's transition from pickup artist to alt-right proponent as an example. Overwhelmed by a sexual hierarchy in which they cannot compete, and immersed in anti-immigration rhetoric and talk of "white genocide," the alt-right has coalesced around an aggressive, ultra-conservative version of white masculinity.


Nagle identifies a contradiction at the heart of the alt-right's demands: It might call for a return to old-fashioned values, but it fails to recognize how those same forces that brings it together erode any chance of returning to that lifestyle (the kind lived by people who hardly use the internet in the first place). "I think they want out of their lives, because their own lives are nothing like that," Nagle explains. "They're living the ultimate kind of individualism. They spend their time watching porn and playing video games. They're not part of any greater purpose." Spencer himself alludes to this in speeches, stating that "in a culture which offers video games, endless entertainment, drugs, alcohol, porn, sports, and a thousand other distractions to convince us of another reality, we want to cut all of that away."

This argument for the "real" stretches far beyond the online right: As a generation born far away enough from lifetime monogamy, home ownership, job security and a life without technology, we have little concept of the "normal" we're denied. On the alt-right, this plays out as an irresolvable frustration. "When they talk about 'normies,' explains Nagle, "they're also saying 'I want a normal life. I want a wife and a house and a family.' They're deeply conflicted, because everything they hate in this world is what they are the ultimate example of."

It would be tempting to dismiss this as an attack on easy targets (a group of antisocial teenage boys), but Nagle never dismisses their hopes and frustrations. Instead, she traces where they come from. Nor does she spare the online left: Kill All Normies can be categorized alongside Jarrett's Kobek's 2016 anti-novel I Hate the Internet in that both titles attack the online left from the left. Beside the /b/tards and racists and the Men Going Their Own Way (aka "MGTOW," the anti-feminist group that claims to renounce women and sex entirely), still it is the left who come out looking worst of all.

This is what makes Kill All Normies so troubling, and in other ways so exhilarating to read. Nagle attacks a liberal internet sunk in filter-bubbled complacency, drunk on the relative ease of expressing one's politics in retweets, and obsessed with calling out the right-wing bogeyman.

Nagle links this stagnation to a poverty of thought: "The thing is, you cannot come up with new ideas if the intellectual culture of your movement is totally closed down. Which has been the case for years. That's why the alt-right has been such a shock, because everyone was banking on the fact that everyone now agrees with us."

Nagle's argument finds horrifying validation at the book's conclusion, which leaps forward to January of this year, immediately after the suicide of author and cultural critic Mark Fisher. Rather than mourning his loss, or expressing condolences to his bereaved family, members of the online left gloated and portrayed his untimely death as a victory:



Nagle is damning here, writing that "this response is a fairly typical example of precisely the sour-faced identitarians who undoubtedly drove so many young people to the right during these vicious culture wars."

In the recent past, Fisher came under fire online for his essay "Exiting the Vampire Castle," which argues against the online left's call-out culture as obstructing change, and breeding a further sense of futility among the online left. When I interviewed Fisher two years ago about his Facebook project "Boring Dystopia," he was certain that Facebook, Twitter and their ilk would die away within our lifetimes.

This hasn't yet come to pass. Rather, "online politics" have gone mainstream, and won an election. What went so horribly wrong in online life, that it got this bad? Have we learned to love the filter bubble so much that we've forgotten our own humanity?

More than anything, this book is about the a battle for the real. What is real? Who gets to be a normie?

It is tempting to dream of an end to Twitter, of Facebook imploding and Instagram going offline, to put an end to this culture war. But Nagle isn't convinced it would solve our dilemma: "I think it would be replaced by something that would fulfill the same purpose. I wouldn't want to suggest a technical solution to what is in essence an absence of ideas."

The book ends with the alt-right on the ascendant, spilling off the screen and into real life as riots erupt at American universities. The alt-right has been validated: we have already let them, to paraphrase Ivanka Trump (herself misquoting Ayn Rand). Now, who is going to stop them?

More than anything, this book is about a battle for the real. What is real? Who gets to be a normie? What will we accept as "normal," and what will we stand against? To Nagle, the challenge posed is a moral one: "We think of them as kind of a dirty word, one which reminds of us of reactionary politics, but moral questions are so important. We constantly make moral decisions, whether we want to or not. And the central issue of the alt right is a moral one."

Last edited by Alex Linder; May 12th, 2017 at 02:28 PM.
 
Old May 12th, 2017 #102
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

top four: non-white, mudshark, cuck, jew




Last edited by Alex Linder; May 12th, 2017 at 04:21 PM.
 
Old May 30th, 2017 #104
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

[moving this thread to general]

Alt-right.com publishes an article by "David Gellerman," with no bio. (5-30-17). from his responses below his article, appears to be jew in sweden, but that's not 100%. he makes the usual bullshit arguments you hear from the jew-exculpating amren crowd. a very bad sign.

https://altright.com/2017/05/29/nati...lass-on-board/


Quote:
David Gellerman Evolver1 • 12 hours ago
My nationalism is Swedish nationalism and none other.

It is no secret to the people who know me, that I am also a sympathizer with Jewish nationalism. One of WW1's bitter lessons is that peoples need to have nations, and more to the point, nation-states. The Jews need their state too. Building your state partly at the expense of others is no tea-party. But I fail to see what else could have materialized.

The Jews in Israel don't control the world from a big dashboard in Tel Aviv. No way. It's a hallucination by the many people who have overtaxed Occam's razor and think simplicity is always truth. Jews in Israel care about Jews in Israel. Nationalism standard A1 issue. We should allow them what we request for ourselves.

On the other hand, many Jews in the Occident, many in the media and in other of society's controlling heights have collectively flipped their lids. They have worked for multi-culturalism because they reminisc fondly about their place in multi-cultural Austria, prison of peoples, or similarly Ottoman Turkey. But they are wrong in that today's enforced multi-culturalism in Europe would keep them safe - on the contrary.

The vast majority of people in the media, politics and other weight-carrying societal institutions who have also orchestrated multi-culturalism are NOT Jews. They are, in a sense, our own, or should have been, as far as we could tell at the time. They have betrayed us. It is clear that they would have betrayed us in the same way, whether the few multi-cultural activist Jews in the Occident wil or nil.

Again, my nationalism is Swedish nationalism and none other. Moreover, I see a need to salvage Europe as a whole, and vaguely, I have started to feel that I am White and that Whites are all in danger, all European-descended peoples everywhere. It is my calling to try to roll that whole disaster back.

We can't agree on everything. We need discipline and focus on the 99% of issues and ideas that unite us, and not bicker among us like some loony 60's/70's left. Our situation is far too dangerous to allow us that destructive luxury.
so this guy is a jew and liar:

- we're doing it to ourselves (lie)
- we must appeal to middle class cowards (wrong)
- we should copy israeli nationalists (ignore that the same kikes prevent white nationalism in Europe and US)
 
Old June 1st, 2017 #105
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Greg Johnson’s Attacks And How To Deal With Them

There comes a time when the wider Alt-Right community must simply be made aware of Greg’s unacceptable behavior.

THE EDITORS June 1, 2017 108

For obvious reasons, an anonymous person can never lead anything, let alone an identitarian movement for the future of European peoples. Instead of humbly accepting this fact, Greg Johnson builds up a toxic resentment towards those who outshine him, who are willing to take risks and be public figures.

In a thread on the TRS Forum, Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents Publishing leveled a number of serious charges against Daniel Friberg, one of our Founders and Editors—without offering any evidence. Furthermore, Greg urged the entire Alt-Right movement to “shun” or “expel” Daniel and Arktos Media based on these unsupported—and sometimes illogical and contradictory—accusations.

The controversy centers around the Scandza forum, which held a recent conference at which Greg was a speaker and guest. Before the conference began, Greg issued a request that Daniel should not be allowed to attend (effectively, “it’s either him or me”). Greg’s actions have been confirmed by multiple people on the Altright.com Board who’ve spoken with the conference organizers and others. Bringing this level of divisiveness to Swedish nationalism is bad enough, but Greg made matters worse when, after receiving criticism, he brazenly lied about what occurred, claiming that the conference organizers, and not him, disinvited Daniel, and that, in fact, he urged them not to take these actions. Apparently, Greg has little compunction over throwing his hosts and sponsors under the bus.

More potentially damaging than Greg’s petty lies are his claims that Daniel Friberg,
  1. Doxxed the organizers of The Scandza Forum to the Antifa, apparently in revenge for being disinvited;
  2. Was an “embezzler” of funds from his own company, Arktos;
  3. Destroyed “an endless list of people both personally and financially.”

Greg must either present evidence supporting these allegations or retract them and apologize. Who are the people on this “endless list”? What evidence exist that a man who’s been a leader in Swedish nationalism for 20 years is actually a collaborator with antifa? If Daniel has been so destructive to Arktos, why is the company so productive?

We won’t hold our breath . . . The fact is, no evidence for Greg’s accusations exist; and if any did, Greg would have obviously already published it.

Secondly, it must be made clear that this behavior from Greg is nothing new. In recent years, he has attacked the following individuals, making unfounded accusations, sometimes demanding denunciations, or just randomly kvetching:
  1. Andrew Anglin of The Daily Stormer;
  2. Hunter Wallace of The Occidental Dissent;
  3. Richard Spencer of NPI and Radix;
  4. Matt Parrot and Matthew Heimbach of The Traditionalist Workers Party.

The repeated public and behind-the-scenes attacks on Daniel, along with the people above, stem from Greg’s wish to be THE leader and guru of the Alternative Right (or nationalist opposition or whichever term you prefer). The problem with this ambition is that Greg is afraid to show his face publicly, or perhaps has some reason to hide his identity, and imposes a complete ban on photos at every conference at which he speaks. Moreover, his generic name makes it difficult to do a proper background check on him.

For obvious reasons, such a person can never lead anything, let alone an identitarian movement for the future of European peoples. Instead of humbly accepting this fact, he builds up a toxic resentment towards those who outshine him, who are willing to take risks and be public figures: Andrew Anglin, for running the most popular website among nationalists; Richard Spencer, for becoming the icon of the international Alt-Right and getting the most media attention; Matt Parrot and Matthew Heimbach, for managing to build a real organization, instead of merely hosting small meet-ups; Daniel Friberg, for succeeding where Greg failed, building a successful publishing house, Arktos, hosting the biggest Alt-Right conferences in Northern Europe, as well as co-founding AltRight.com with Spencer and others, etc.

Greg’s disruptive behavior is bound to continue. Until now, Daniel and Richard’s strategy has been to ignore Greg and resist playing his game.

But there comes a time when the wider Alt-Right must simply be made aware of Greg’s unacceptable behavior. Unlike Greg we’re not doing this to issue ultimatums about denouncing this and that person. We fully acknowledge the important accomplishments Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents have made over the years and thank them for it.

We are however deeply concerned about the division he’s creating and urge everyone to question his motives and hold him to the same standards you would anyone else in this movement. Today we are putting down our feet and say that “enough is enough”.

Daniel Friberg, European Editor of AltRight.com
Richard Spencer, American Editor of AltRight.com

https://altright.com/2017/06/01/greg...eal-with-them/
 
Old June 9th, 2017 #106
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

Do someone really belive that they can do something? Richard declare himself as Christian in situation where USA is full of mongrels in Curch. He did not mention jewish question because they are god chosen people. He respect American war against Germany in ww2 what had been after good for leftist for blame rightist and making mongrel USA. He support mongrels in one territory of his state and belive in legal democrat activity while white race have offical just one generation in this state what mean that all pro-white speech will be on target and with majority of mongrel votes it will be end of USA. Rather he can read some books by real pro-white Americans like Klassen,Pierce,Redbread. He think that he is academic so he do not understand that are academic institution anti-white but he is "well educated" . If he respect from Palestine,then he also can respect neo-Indian USA because his brain is on desert level as jewish rabbis who educated him. His savivor Jesus call himself as rabbi. When his apostoles called himself as rabbis Jesus according to New Testament clearly gave answer to them "do not call yourself as rabbis because it is just one rabbi" ie. him.

Last edited by Fico; June 9th, 2017 at 02:04 PM.
 
Old June 18th, 2017 #107
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

The Attacks on Arktos

This is the story of how a handful of individuals tried — and failed — to destroy Arktos over the past 12 months.

ARKTOS June 17, 2017 178

Quote:
In 2016, Daniel Friberg and his colleagues at Arktos experienced a brazen attempt at a hostile takeover, when its former Editor-in-Chief, John Morgan, initiated a failed coup against this publisher. Currently, Morgan is an Editor and shareholder at Counter-Currents, whose founder, Greg Johnson, has been leading a smear campaign against Friberg and Arktos for the past number of months.
https://altright.com/2017/06/17/the-attacks-on-arktos/
 
Old June 18th, 2017 #108
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

https://qz.com/1007144/the-neo-fasci...-technophiles/

The neo-fascist philosophy that underpins both the alt-right and Silicon Valley technophiles

A man hides his face behind a Pepe the Frog sign after Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump spoke at an airport campaign rally in Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S.

Before the alt right, there was Dark Enlightenment.

WRITTEN BY

Olivia Goldhill
June 18, 2017

From the outside, America’s alt right is a nebulous movement based on racism, nationalism, and white supremacy. In contrast, the tech elites in Silicon Valley look like a relatively worldly bunch, despite the calls from some quarters of the valley to break away from the plebeian masses of the US.

But despite their differences, strands of the two groups share strong links to “Dark Enlightenment,” an obscure neo-fascist philosophy started by a British academic in the 1990s.

The birth of a manifesto

The primary figure behind Dark Enlightenment is Nick Land, who was a philosophy professor at Warwick University until he quit academia in 1998. His work is a form of “accelerationism” (broadly speaking, a belief that the tools of capitalism and technology should be sped up and dramatically enhanced) and he was, for a time, something of a cult figure for his work on internet and cyber culture.

While at Warwick, Land was part of “Cybernetic Culture Research Unit,” which explored drugs, raves, and science fiction, and was affiliated with such notable figures as the philosopher Sadie Plant and the artists Jake and Dinos Chapman. Land has never been a typical academic, and that shows in his writing. His Dark Enlightenment manifesto, published online in 2012, is florid, contradictory, and opaque.

Land’s writings on in his blog and twitter can read like an alt-right rant, and comment sections on the far-right outlet Breitbart are apt to mention his work. Academic writers and former students of Land’s have expressed ideas that are vaguely influenced by Dark Enlightenment. Others are more outspoken: One philosopher with clearly Landian ideas, Jason Reza Jorjani, who lectures at New Jersey Institute of Technology, is co-founder of altright.com and spoke at a white nationalist meeting led by Richard Spencer.

What are the tenets of Dark Enlightenment theory? There are a few consistent themes, circling around technology, warfare, feudalism, corporate power, and racism. “It’s an acceleration of capitalism to a fascist point,” says Benjamin Noys, a critical theory professor at the University of Chichester and author of Malign Velocities: Accelerationism and Capitalism.

Those who have studied Dark Enlightenment describe an almost cult-like vision of a dystopian future. “It is a worship of corporate power to the extent that corporate power becomes the only power in the world,” says David Golumbia, a new media professor at Virginia Commonwealth University. “It becomes militarized, and states break down. For some reason that’s difficult to understand, they seem to think these highly weaponized feudal enclaves would be more free than the society we currently have.”

Land believes that advances in computing will enable dominant humans to merge with machines and become cybernetic super beings. He advocates for racial separation under the belief that “elites” will enhance their IQs by associating only with each other.

Capitalism has not yet been fully unleashed, he argues, and corporate power should become the organizing force in society. Land is vehemently against democracy, believing it restricts accountability and freedom. The world should do away with political power, according to Dark Enlightenment, and instead, society should break into tiny states, each effectively governed by a CEO.

Fans in high places

Earlier this year, Politico reported that White House strategist Steve Bannon is a fan of Dark Enlightenment. Meanwhile, the major proponent of the movement other than Land is software engineer Curtis Yarvin, who blogs as “Mencius Moldbug.”

And while most Silicon Valley techies are unaware of and uninterested in Dark Enlightenment, there are notable figures and ideas that seem to share intellectual heritage and connections with the movement.

Venture capitalist Peter Thiel is a major backer of Yarvin’s start-ups and, as The Baffler reports, in 2012, Thiel gave a lecture at Stanford with distinct Dark Enlightenment themes. “A startup is basically structured as a monarchy,” he said at the time. “We don’t call it that, of course. That would seem weirdly outdated, and anything that’s not democracy makes people uncomfortable.”

Growing Silicon Valley interest in creating a small, separate state is straight out of Land’s writing. Meanwhile there are growing numbers of techies who identify with Yarvin and “neoreactionary” ideas.

And, of course, both Silicon Valley and Dark Enlightenment are products of and devotees to internet culture. Noys notes that certain values in Silicon Valley are vaguely sympathetic to Land’s thinking. “There’s this entrepreneurial belief that you’re the master of the universe,” he says. “They believe they’re the exception that proves the rule, that anyone can be successful.”

Land says that, though he expects Dark Enlightenment micro-states to first form on islands, Silicon Valley is “bound to be involved in the process” as these societies form.
The alt right and Silicon Valley are not the only two cliques with ties to Dark Enlightenment thinking. Avant-garde art artists have also dabbled in Dark Enlightenment. A London gallery, LD50, was shut down amid protests after Land was invited to talk at the gallery, providing a platform for Dark Enlightenment ideas.

“You could argue—though I wouldn’t—that the alt right and Dark Enlightenment are artistic works,” says Noys. “Twenty-first century art has been interested in transgression and shock, so there’s an interest in how these people have used their memes to achieve their goals.”

The philosophical masters of a popular movement

US president Donald Trump, Land says, is a “symptom of crisis” and sign that the West is broken. But Land views White House chief strategist Steve Bannon as, “an unusually interesting politician.”

Dark Enlightenment proponents see themselves as “the philosophical masters” of the alt-right movement, says Noys. “Land sees himself as above all that, as a Philosopher King of a movement that’s too populist and grubby for this liking,” says Noys. “He’s part of this continuum, that’s pretty clear. But he’s fighting to distinguish himself from the more populist end of things.”

Golumbia agrees that “He probably thinks he’s smarter than all of them [the alt right], or they haven’t gone far enough. But they are definitely fellow travellers.”
Land himself is dismissive of the alt right, which he calls “a predictable (and predicted) development of mass democracy, as it enters its collapse-phase” in an email to Quartz.
Still, he says, “Insofar as it marks the end of global governance on the basis of evangelical egalitarian-universalism, it makes space for more realistic political conversations, which have notably begun to happen.”

Land also rejects the idea that Dark Enlightenment has fascist elements, writing that “Fascism is a mass anti-capitalist movement, when the word isn’t (more usually) simply a childish insult.” As for racial divides, he says the science is “an empirical question” but “that human population groups are significantly distinct, however, is a matter so self-evident to ordinary people that it makes for a natural default.”

Land’s theories sound easily dismissible, and Nick Land is still largely unknown, but his neo-fascist ideas are finding niches where they flourish.. “I think there’s this emergent fringe,” says Noys.

Golumbia notes that Land’s work attracted plenty of impressionable graduate students decades ago. It undoubtedly helps that offensive ideas are masked with references to respected writers and philosophers: Land has his own idiosyncratic reading of the German philosopher Nietzsche, for example, and the French 2oth century thinkers Deleuze, Guattari, and Bataille. And as far as accelerationism goes, Noys traces its intellectual heritage to the Italian futurists (who had their own ties with fascism).

Despite their long lineage, the ideas fall apart under scrutiny. “To those of us who were more skeptical, it looked like it had the seeds of a disturbing belief in a superman: This kind of digital hybrid cyber-being who was a lot better than the ordinary weak people,” says Golumbia. “His writing is more and more obsessed with race, Islam, echoing the things that people like Nigel Farage say. He sounds like a visionary but really he’s nothing but these reactionary clichés about how minority people are to blame for all of our problems.”

Land, who has long perceived himself as a visionary, firmly believes that society and government as we know it will break down and his vision for the future will come to pass. “The crack-up is obvious to everyone,” Land writes. “(That’s why you’re doing this story.)”
 
Old June 18th, 2017 #109
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
Default

Neo-feudalism is jewism wearing a Nietzsche mask. Right now the jew parasites control the world, but imperfectly so; so a strong push has been on to perfect that control. It involves getting normal people to accept slave status mentally while reducing them to debt-peons physically. The principal targets are Whites; muds are also on the plantation, but Whites must be deconstructed most, and thus we see what we see and bitch about.

The biggest larf about the "Dark Enlightenment" fraud is the implication (or inference) that Whites Was Kangz - literally. That in other words the monarchies in European lands were always pure-White-gentile. That the jews were simply henchmen of the White elites, down there among the thatched-roof huts demanding taxes. While the reality is that jews were breeding with the "nobility" ("the principal ruffians of some restless gang," in Paine's words; i.e. gangstas, cf. "tough jews") from Day One. Gangstas are parasites but they know how to strut. Dey got they gats - they cannons, "Ultima Ratio Regum" (the ultimate argument of kings).

A return to the feudal system, as Gene Jones (Eugene Michael Jones) pushes, would suit the fucking kikes just fine. The enshrinement of the higher parasitism. A tapeworm drest in a little purple brief.
__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action

Last edited by Sean Gruber; June 18th, 2017 at 01:30 PM. Reason: grammar, accuracy
 
Old June 18th, 2017 #110
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
Default

White Nationalism faces great dangers and snares set by our six-parentheses misleaders. Neofeudalism, "civic nationalism," much alt-light stuff (including the dismissal of "purity-spiraling" and the inclusion of "good jews") are among these traps.

Remember this.
__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action

Last edited by Sean Gruber; June 18th, 2017 at 01:31 PM.
 
Old June 18th, 2017 #111
Ted Ferguson
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
"Christianity has nothing to do with liberalism. 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you' is not liberalism , it is called human decency"
Modern liberalism, the idea that government should be "doing unto others" as you would want the government to "do unto you" is a false bastardization of christian principals. It takes the intense, human and one-on-one interaction of Christian compassion and monetizes it, builds a huge factory to dispense it and points a gun in the face and demands that everyone pay for it's sustenance.

As a christian. you'd never give that drunk on the side of the road the $5.00 he wants for a beer, but your "compassionate government" gives him a $968.00 SSI payment every single month, like clockwork, the proceeds of other people's labors being converted into the addictive poison that has made him dependent on your governments "christian generosity" to begin with. As long as there is litter on the side of the freeway, there is work for "the poor" to do.
 
Old June 18th, 2017 #112
Ted Ferguson
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
- we must appeal to middle class cowards (wrong)
This is the most toxic notion of all. The middle class achieves it's position by contorting itself into whatever shape it needs to in order to avoid the punishments meted out to everyone else. People that advocate this retarded notion are an infected boil that need to be lanced and drained.
 
Old June 19th, 2017 #113
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
The Attacks on Arktos

This is the story of how a handful of individuals tried — and failed — to destroy Arktos over the past 12 months.

ARKTOS June 17, 2017 178


https://altright.com/2017/06/17/the-attacks-on-arktos/
Greg Johnson:

Reply to Daniel Friberg

https://www.counter-currents.com/201...aniel-friberg/
 
Old June 19th, 2017 #114
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Good response by Greggy. I tend to believe him. Not that I know Friberg at all.
 
Old June 22nd, 2017 #115
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Some fella going by the name "Omar Filmersson":

Greg Johnson Told the Truth

https://www.counter-currents.com/201...old-the-truth/
 
Old June 22nd, 2017 #116
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Quote:
Greg Johnson
Posted June 22, 2017 at 6:56 am | Permalink

I want to thank Omar Filmersson for this very important corroborating testimony, which settles some of the issues that have been central to this controversy since the beginning: 1. That Friberg made an ultimatum, not I (he repeatedly claimed I did). 2. That he was not invited to the conference in the first place (my friends at TRS apparently banned me for making this truthful claim). 3. That Friberg threatened to sabotage the event after 22.00, on Tuesday 16 May, by means of arranging a boycott — a threat which he later made good on, as anyone can see.

Friberg has lied repeatedly and shamelessly, and gotten others to lie on his behalf, about all three of these points; and he has attacked and slandered me repeatedly, and gotten others to attack me on his behalf, for telling the truth on all three of these points.

This clearly shows that he has been completely dishonest from the very beginning.
https://www.counter-currents.com/201...omment-1387717
 
Old June 22nd, 2017 #117
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

I wonder how Spencer will react to this.
 
Old August 3rd, 2017 #118
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

 
Old August 11th, 2017 #119
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

What It Means To Be Alt-Right

A meta-political manifesto for the Alt-Right movement

RICHARD SPENCER August 11, 2017 19

The Charlottesville Statement

August 11, 2017

1. Race

Race is real. Race matters. Race is the foundation of identity.

“White” is shorthand for a worldwide constellation of peoples, each of which is derived from the Indo-European race, often called Aryan. “European” refers to a core stock—Celtic, Germanic, Hellenic, Latin, Nordic, and Slavic—from which related cultures and a shared civilization sprang.

2. Jews

Jews are an ethno-religious people distinct from Europeans. At various times, they have existed within European societies, without being of them. The preservation of their identity as Jews was and is contingent on resistance to assimilation, sometimes expressed as hostility towards their hosts. “Judeo-Christian values” might be a quaint political slogan, but it is a distortion of the historical and metaphysical reality of both Jews and Europeans.

3. The Ethno-State

Nations must secure their existence and uniqueness and promote their own development and flourishing. The state is an existential entity, and, at its best, a physical manifestation of a people’s being, order, and will to survive. Racially or ethnically defined states are legitimate and necessary.

4. Metapolitics

Spirit is the wellspring of culture, and politics is downstream of that. The Alt-Right wages a situational and ideological war on those deconstructing European history and identity. The decrepit values of Woodstock and Wall Street mean nothing to us.

5. White America

The founding population of the United States was primarily Anglo-Saxon and Protestant. By the Great War, a coherent American nation emerged that was European and Christian. Other races inhabited the continent and were often set in conflict or subservience to Whites. Whites alone defined America as a European society and political order.

6. Europe

Europe is our common home, and our ancestors’ bone and blood lie in its soil.

European unity emerged at critical points in history, but so did fragmentation, rivalry, and betrayal. As brother nations, Europeans have competed with one another, and even hated and killed one another. We can no longer afford the luxury of intra-racial squabbling. “Brothers wars” gain us nothing, and directly lead to our collective downfall. Europeans must come together as a family.

The so-called “refugee crisis” is an invasion, a war without bullets, taking place on the fields of race, religion, sex, and morality. At stake is Europe’s very identity—whether the continent will be the locus of our people’s shared story, or become just another Islamic outpost.

7. Family

The family—a man and woman in a loving relationship that produces offspring—is an essential, indispensable foundation for a healthy and functioning society.

8. Human Nature

Man is not a blank slate on which to be written, nor was he born a guileless, noble savage. Human nature—the reality of race, sex, heritability, and innate endowments—is the most powerful force shaping individuals, families, societies, and nations.

9. Women and Sex

Women, as mothers and caregivers, are key to the future of our race and civilization. We oppose feminism, deviancy, the futile denial of biological reality, and everything destructive to healthy relations between men and women. We must overcome today’s debased and lonely “porn culture” and return to a sexuality that is fruitful and erotic in the truest sense of the word.

10. Foreign Affairs

The foreign policies of European states (including immigration, diplomacy, and war) should be based on the safeguarding of its peoples—and not be beholden to special or foreign interests, nor to corporate profit motives, nor to the chimeras of globalism, humanitarianism, or the End of History. Insofar as “chauvinism” means attempting to transform non-Europeans into Europeans, we are not “Western chauvinists.”

11. Speech

American citizens should enjoy freedom of speech as guaranteed by the Constitution; we endorse this value for all European peoples. We oppose those who seek to suppress the speech of people with whom they disagree, whether through government censorship, corporate policy, digital platform denial, or intimidation.

12. Firearms

All U.S. citizens, and all Europeans, should have the right to bear arms, as a means of protecting themselves and their families and enjoying the manly sport of hunting.

13. Globalization

International trade and the good-faith exchange of ideas can be beneficial to all. Economic and political globalization, however, has been destructive to authentic cultures. Industrialized countries are being transformed into great “nothings” and “nowheres”: indistinguishable, concrete dumping grounds and shopping centers, divorced from culture, people, and history. Globalization threatens not just Europeans but every unique identity on Earth.

14. The Left

Leftism is an ideology of death and must be confronted and defeated. “Losing gracefully” will eventuate in the destruction of our people and civilization.

15. Economics

Economic freedom is not an end in itself. All economic policies should serve the people of the nation; the interests of businessmen and global merchants should never take precedence over the well-being of workers, families, and the natural world.

16. Urban Life

The automobile, the highway system, and resultant “car culture” have contributed to the death of cities and towns. While not everyone will live in urban environments, cities are vital institutions of culture, community, learning, and the arts. They should never have been abandoned by American Whites of older generations and should be reestablished as jewels of our civilization.

17. The Natural World

We are a special part of the natural order, being in it and above it. We have the potential to become nature’s steward or its destroyer. Putting aside contentious matters like global warming and resource depletion, European countries should invest in national parks, wilderness preserves, and wildlife refuges, as well as productive and sustainable farms and ranches. The natural world—and our experience of it—is an end in itself.

18. The ‘68ers

The generation born between the years 1945 and 1964 abrogated its duty to safeguard and pass down a civilization to its children. The so-called “‘68ers” engage in childish narcissism of the most extreme kind; they bear responsibility for today’s lamentable state of affairs; and they are seemingly unable even to recognize their culpability.

A new generation of leadership is desperately needed.

19. Education

Modern education—from preschool to the doctoral level—has become corrupted past the point of recognition. This industry (both public and private) serves leftist ideologues, loan financiers, and a new class of administrators far more than it serves students and parents.

Children should not be indoctrinated in liberal dogma but given a foundation in language, mathematics, the arts, history, and science. Higher education—far from being a “right” or a “pathway to the middle class”—is only appropriate for a cognitive elite dedicated to truth; it is improper, even detrimental, for most. Practical education—trade schools and apprenticeships—should be revived as the norm for most citizens.

20. Personal Duties

A man distinguishes himself by his deeds. And every man, in his own way, must strive to be something more than a man: to be honored by his heirs; to be part of something greater than his self.

https://altright.com/2017/08/11/what...-be-alt-right/
 
Old August 11th, 2017 #120
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

altright.com is down ... a DDOS attack i would guess
 
Reply

Tags
#1 thread, altright, andrew anglin, richard spencer, vox day

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.
Page generated in 0.41964 seconds.