|
|
January 7th, 2006 | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
A Question For The Xtians
Perhaps one or more of our xtian members could answer this question which has puzzled me for some time?
What happens to all those non-whites who are born again bible believing xtians? Do they share the same heaven as you or will there be a segregated version of heaven with blacks living in the ghetto part?
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
January 7th, 2006 | #2 |
......
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,397
|
You have a sick perverted fascination with Christianity and everyone knows you are not sincere. You entire point is to take discussion away from the Jew and place it on white racist Christians which makes you a bait and switch anti. When I clicked the new thread search on VNNF this morning what did I see? Almost the first page of results being Christian threads bumped by you.
Since you don’t believe it anyway what is the point of asking your foolish questions? Especially ones that have been answered before. Use your search function and stop using bandwidth to exercise your perversion. If you want to ramble on Christianity start your own Christian forum where you can pay for your own bandwidth. Frankly I think everyone here at VNNF is sick of seeing your posts day after day hour after hour. Even the anti-Christians are getting sick of you because you make VNNF into a Christian debate forum. Go to Stormfront I hear they do that over there. Since we all your goal is to take discussion away from the Jew I don’t think any Christian should treat you with civility or answer any more of your foolish questions. Why do you want to take attention from the Jews anyway? Are you hiding something?
__________________
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...64&postcount=9 Doppelhaken, Draco, Richard H, ToddinFl, Augustus Sutter, Chain, Subrosa, Jarl, White Will, whose next? |
January 7th, 2006 | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
QUOTE=sean(doc)martin]You have a sick perverted fascination with Christianity and everyone knows you are not sincere. You entire point is to take discussion away from the Jew and place it on white racist Christians which makes you a bait and switch anti. When I clicked the new thread search on VNNF this morning what did I see? Almost the first page of results being Christian threads bumped by you.
You continue to sell the xtian lie and I will continue to oppose you.It is you and not I that bows down before a jew on a stick.So who has the "sick perverted fascination"? Since you don’t believe it anyway what is the point of asking your foolish questions? Especially ones that have been answered before. Use your search function and stop using bandwidth to exercise your perversion. If you want to ramble on Christianity start your own Christian forum where you can pay for your own bandwidth. Frankly I think everyone here at VNNF is sick of seeing your posts day after day hour after hour. Even the anti-Christians are getting sick of you because you make VNNF into a Christian debate forum. Go to Stormfront I hear they do that over there. You won`t answer my question because you don`t have an answer do you?You know as well as I do that there is nothing "white" about xtianity. Since we all your goal is to take discussion away from the Jew I don’t think any Christian should treat you with civility or answer any more of your foolish questions. Why do you want to take attention from the Jews anyway? Are you hiding something?[/QUOTE] So says a man who worships the god of the jews but you don`t see the irony in that do you "Sean"?
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
January 7th, 2006 | #4 | |
......
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,397
|
You are a lying pervert who begs me for my personal information. Now answer my question, why do you continue to take the discussion away from the Jews? Also don’t you want to turn VNNF into a Christian debate forum?
And stop giving me negative rep you perv. Quote:
__________________
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...64&postcount=9 Doppelhaken, Draco, Richard H, ToddinFl, Augustus Sutter, Chain, Subrosa, Jarl, White Will, whose next? |
|
January 8th, 2006 | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
QUOTE=sean(doc)martin]You are a lying pervert who begs me for my personal information. Now answer my question, why do you continue to take the discussion away from the Jews? Also don’t you want to turn VNNF into a Christian debate forum?
"A lying pervert"? Rather emotional aren`t we? You display an inability to address the issues,preferring instead to libel me.Perhaps you are not male at all but female?Your behaviour is similar to that of a woman scorned. As you create threads at every opportunity with a "xtian" slant to them,pushing the xtian agenda I reserve my right to comment on the issues that you raise just as you cannot resist posting on my threads.It is a discussion board "Sean" which means exchanging views and opinions without maliciously calling people "perverts".Again you hide behind your anonymity to engage in vicious verbal abuse.I wonder what your "saviour" must think of you and even more importantly as others have asked,why you are still permitted to post here? And stop giving me negative rep you perv. That`s what the rep button is for my dear.
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ Last edited by Aryan Lord; January 8th, 2006 at 08:18 AM. |
January 8th, 2006 | #6 | ||||
......
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,397
|
Quote:
Quote:
Galatians 1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. Quote:
Quote:
On a totally unrelated note, I despise Jewish Pedophiles. :box:
__________________
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...64&postcount=9 Doppelhaken, Draco, Richard H, ToddinFl, Augustus Sutter, Chain, Subrosa, Jarl, White Will, whose next? Last edited by Sean Martin; January 8th, 2006 at 08:59 PM. |
||||
January 27th, 2006 | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Soon to be Oregon
Posts: 1,069
|
[QUOTE=sean(doc)martin] Why do you continue to take the discussion away from the Jews?
Because it is just as important if not more so to talk about those that broke trail for the Jews for the last 2000 years. The nigger problem was caused by the Jews and the Jew problem was caused by White Xtians. Eliminating or seperating from the White Xtians is essential to White survival. If a Aryan Nation ever comes about, the Xtians must be excluded for all times at any cost! |
January 27th, 2006 | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Soon to be Oregon
Posts: 1,069
|
Owain Glyndwr,
I read what you wrote about Chain. Your a defective, twisted piece of jew worshiping shit and at this time I can say that if your life ended now, we would be better off. Go drink some of that Xtain flavored Kool-aid. |
January 28th, 2006 | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
[QUOTE=Joe Snuffy]
Quote:
I agree with you 100%. You have a very clear insight into the jewish/xtian question which are basically 2 sides of the same semitic coin.
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
|
February 3rd, 2006 | #10 | |
Berserker for Wotan
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Midgard
Posts: 830
|
[QUOTE=Joe Snuffy]
Quote:
I have been dwelling on this thought for awhile: If white nations succeed in purging all of the non-whites, how can xtianity co-exist with an Aryan nation (or what I like to affectionatley call New Germania)? To me, it would be like performing surgery to remove a cancerous tumor, only to let some tumor particles escape into the bloodstream, and spread the cancer again! History repeats itself! I can only imagine where we would be, if the xtian plague had not descended upon our race, as Aryan Lord said - emasculating and effeminizing the majority of Aryan men! Turning all into pacifist, forgiving acceptors of what has happened, and continues to happen! |
|
January 7th, 2006 | #11 | |
Crazed Lone Gunman
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 103
|
Quote:
There is no such thing as a non-white born again christian. This is the lie of Judaism masquerading as the Judeo-Christian oxymoron also known secularly as egalitarianism. The lie that all races are equal and that God came to save everyone. He did not. he came for one quite specific race, the white western European race, the descendants of Jacob israel and no-one else. There may be a plan for the other races but two things as certain. they do not share in the kingdom, and I dont give a shit. Yahweh Bless.
__________________
And in the Grove, by Gate and Hill, midst merry throng and market clatter stood the Hall of the Mountain Grill where table strain’d ‘neath loaded platter...... From the Legend of Beenzon Toaste. |
|
January 7th, 2006 | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
QUOTE=Owain_Glyndwr]At the risk of dragging this thread out in pointless fashion as per usual I will state the fact as clearly and succinctly as possible so there can be no misunderstanding.
There is no such thing as a non-white born again christian. This is the lie of Judaism masquerading as the Judeo-Christian oxymoron also known secularly as egalitarianism. The lie that all races are equal and that God came to save everyone. He did not. he came for one quite specific race, the white western European race, the descendants of Jacob israel and no-one else. Prove to me that a negro cannot be as sincere a xtian as a white! Also prove to me that the jew on a stick came to save the "white western European race"! You saying he did does not make it so! State your evidence and your argument! And just to remind you-"Salvation is of the Jews".[John 4:22] There may be a plan for the other races but two things as certain. they do not share in the kingdom, and I dont give a shit. Yahweh Bless.[/QUOTE] Yahweh is the name that the jews give to their "god".I do not require his blessing:I curse his name.Hate to disappoint you but in case you were not aware of it the "other races" do indeed share your kingdom.They are everywhere.
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
January 17th, 2006 | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 446
|
Only that you keep saying that christianity hijacked much paganism,I keep agreeing and saying that the whole story was hijacked,and you keep telling me about "my jewish god".The whole story of Jesus is a rewrite of the story of Horus,an Egyptian god,from the white race,while they were in a very advanced state of civilization.Just because the story has been hijacked does not change the fact the veracity of the core of the story.The story has been tainted so you seek to do away with it entirely.That would be fine but the only problem that I have with it is that god still exists.Comparitive religous studies would be beneficial.There is no doubt to me that Quetzacoatl is Thoth,Marduk is Amun/Ra,etc. These gods were not the fanciful writings of a man,but actual entities that demanded loyalty and respect.
You say we need no messiah,as our race is bred out,our enviroment is betraying us,and we are taxed on every move twice.I don't know about you,but I thank him for the wisdom he grants me in my life about every decision I must make.Futhermore,I look forward to the return of the greatest military leader that ever existed.(the reason the jews could not admit "jesus's supremacy is because they were awaiting a military messiah) In ancient Egypt, the pharaohs were anointed in the Mesopotamian tradition with the fat of the sacred crocodile, who was epitomized by the god Sobek and was called the Messeh. In Mesopotamia, the equivalent noble creature was the Mus-hus, a giant serpentine quadruped not unlike the great forked-tongued monitors still found in Africa, Arabia and the East, and the mighty 10-foot Komodo dragon of Indonesia It is from the words Messah and Mus-hus that the Hebrew stem MSSH derived - the stem which (with added vowels) formed the verb mashiach (to anoint) and the noun Messiah (Meschiach), which means ' Anointed One' - i.e. King or Christ (Greek: Kristos). You accuse Christians of being literalists when you are confronted with the eight legged horse thing(lol).Yet you seem unwilling to understand that even the bible is symbolic all the way through.It is told as a story to weed out those too dense to see the bigger picture,when one asks the right questions,then one finds the right answers.I have complaints about the bible myself,I keep telling you that.It has condensed the story of no less than 24 gods into One for the sake of form,to simplify it.That is why I believe religion is a secondary concern for a physical war.I believe you may win with your "magic"(you are kidding right?) if your magic is referring to the awakening of the white race to their predicament.If by magic you mean Kneeling in front of someone while they chant and give you a concotion to consume then I say you are as bad as what you seek to replace (priestcraft). Wotanists have not even agreed on a scripture have they?They complain it should remain oral dont they?That is why I keep saying it is too late in the game to try to convert the mass of whites to a cult,rather meet them where they are.Even the Muslims are defending christianity,war makes for strange bedfellows. But to answer your first question,IMO yes I will have blue gummed niggers picking my cotton in heaven.
__________________
Deo Vindice I plan on living forever,so far so good. |
January 17th, 2006 | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
[UOTE=Pale Horse]Only that you keep saying that christianity hijacked much paganism,I keep agreeing and saying that the whole story was hijacked,and you keep telling me about "my jewish god".
If you worshipped Horus I would have no problem with that but you follow a false jewish "god" and promote him on this forum. The whole story of Jesus is a rewrite of the story of Horus,an Egyptian god,from the white race,while they were in a very advanced state of civilization Why don`t you just simply worship Horus and acknowledge him by name? Surely his name is more worthy than jewsus? .Just because the story has been hijacked does not change the fact the veracity of the core of the story.The story has been tainted so you seek to do away with it entirely.That would be fine but the only problem that I have with it is that god still exists.Comparitive religous studies would be beneficial.There is no doubt to me that Quetzacoatl is Thoth,Marduk is Amun/Ra,etc. These gods were not the fanciful writings of a man,but actual entities that demanded loyalty and respect. I agree. You say we need no messiah,as our race is bred out,our enviroment is betraying us,and we are taxed on every move twice.I don't know about you,but I thank him for the wisdom he grants me in my life about every decision I must make. But who is the "he"? Jesus or Horus? Futhermore,I look forward to the return of the greatest military leader that ever existed.(the reason the jews could not admit "jesus's supremacy is because they were awaiting a military messiah) Alexander the Great? Why not worship him? At least he was real and not a fictional character and just as important,ARYAN. In ancient Egypt, the pharaohs were anointed in the Mesopotamian tradition with the fat of the sacred crocodile, who was epitomized by the god Sobek and was called the Messeh. In Mesopotamia, the equivalent noble creature was the Mus-hus, a giant serpentine quadruped not unlike the great forked-tongued monitors still found in Africa, Arabia and the East, and the mighty 10-foot Komodo dragon of Indonesia It is from the words Messah and Mus-hus that the Hebrew stem MSSH derived - the stem which (with added vowels) formed the verb mashiach (to anoint) and the noun Messiah (Meschiach), which means ' Anointed One' - i.e. King or Christ (Greek: Kristos). You accuse Christians of being literalists when you are confronted with the eight legged horse thing(lol). I regard my Wotanism as being a spirituality of symbolism,not literalism. Yet you seem unwilling to understand that even the bible is symbolic all the way through.It is told as a story to weed out those too dense to see the bigger picture,when one asks the right questions,then one finds the right answers.I have complaints about the bible myself,I keep telling you that. I realise that some do regard it in a symbolic way but why give any credence at all to the crazed writings of psychotic jews? It has condensed the story of no less than 24 gods into One for the sake of form,to simplify it. No it has not "condensed 24 gods into one for simplicity" as you state.That is a falsehood.The bible constantly repeats the one god mantra which is also the teaching of the 1st commandment or have you forgotten that? That is why I believe religion is a secondary concern for a physical war.I believe you may win with your "magic"(you are kidding right?) if your magic is referring to the awakening of the white race to their predicament.If by magic you mean Kneeling in front of someone while they chant and give you a concotion to consume then I say you are as bad as what you seek to replace (priestcraft). You completely misunderstand my arguments.I am saying as I have always said that this war can only be won on a spiritual plane as we are fighting a struggle of cosmic proportions.Spiritual forces are at hand.I believe that unless our reasons for fighting for racial survival are noble and right that we are fighting a lost cause.It is insufficient to fight for racial survival for racial survival`s sake.We must have a higher aim.That aim for me is the manifestation of the Aryan superman,the son of the gods.We are the raw material for this manifestation.Man will become god,the plan of the ages. Wotanists have not even agreed on a scripture have they?They complain it should remain oral dont they?That is why I keep saying it is too late in the game to try to convert the mass of whites to a cult,rather meet them where they are.Even the Muslims are defending christianity,war makes for strange bedfellows. My friend I am trying hard not to be rude and impatient with you.The concept of "scriptures" is an entirely semitic one confined to judaism,islam and xtianity.Aryan man requires no scripture for as a child of the gods he is able through higher states of consciousness to commune with that which we commonly refer to as "god".We are the arbiters of our own "right and wrong". There is no absolute right,wrong,good,evil or truth. I do not recognise the semitic and childish concepts of "good and evil" per se. Nothing is inherently good or evil.Why should we need "scriptures"? I am not trying to "convert" anyone.That is the obsession[and obsession it is] of the xtians and moslems.I am totally unconcerned about the masses,only the elite.The masses will always believe what they are told to believe anyway. But to answer your first question,IMO yes I will have blue gummed niggers picking my cotton in heaven. [/QUOTE] Good for you!
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
January 17th, 2006 | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 446
|
I do not promote any god on this forum,rather promoting a freedom and choice of religion.
I can translate the name in my own head,if I seek to promote either it usually ends up in a long drawn out talk about that instead of more dire issues at hand. "He" is the spirit of guidance within me that unifies my ass with my mind. I'm not going to worship Alexander because he did not travel the world leaving messages of prophecy,claiming sonship,and declaring as he is I shall be. I consider the majority of religions to be symbolism and not literalism. Psychotic jewishish lies that were retranslated by cunning Greeks and again by the English are not even accepted by the jews?I dunno why not give a little credence to it? I dont know ,the purity and lives of my line are pretty damn important to me,if you need a crutch to put you into action,I understand. Do you not believe that your All-Father demands a soul that will fight?I believe "god" made me to fight for what I am,just as he made the jew to fight me.He made the "Tree of Life" as well as "Tree of the Knowledge" and called them both good.I agree there is no good nor evil in the sight of eternity. I have not forgotten the ten commandments,only I see it diffrently from you I presume?You see "there shall be no other gods before me" as" do not place a god in between you and me" I guess?I see it as"Since I have assumed command forget those other gods".The god that issued those commands was also known as Marduk,or Ra,about the time those commandments were issued he became known as Amun-Ra("hidden"-Ra).The correct question you should be asking yourself is why did he become hidden? The word 'jehovah' was concocted or invented long ago by transposing the vowels of the word 'adonai' into the 'YHWH' - the tetragramma. In ancient Phoenician-Babylonian cultic communities, the idol 'Adonis' was most popular among the pagan masses, and it was from the name of this idol that the word 'Adonai' was taken from. The vowels of the word 'Adonai' were transposed into the tetragramma (YHWH) and the resultant word was 'jehovah.' Even the word 'Adonai' was not in the original Hebrew Holy Scriptures (Tanakh). This was also an adulteration, an addition. The real meaning of the word 'yehovah' is destruction, desolation, perdition (remember there is no letter 'j' in Hebrew, both archaic and modern). A simple research into the meanings and etymologies of these words will clearly reveal this. 'How can you say that you are wise, even if you have the Tanakh, when the lying pens of the scribes have altered them?' - Jeremiah 8:8, putting it in a clearer sense Why not call the Creator plainly as 'god'? The origin of this word is the root word: 'KHUDA' - which was an ancient (skull) idol of the Persians and Babylonians. This can also be easily checked out by checking out the name of the cultic idol 'Baal Gad' mentioned in the Holy Scriptures several times Another word given as a clue in the Holy Writ is the retained word 'gol-GOT-tha' - which means 'place of the skull.' The word 'got' refers to the skeletal remains of the human head, commonly used by mediums and witches! So when anyone prays to 'god' - you now know whom he is really, actually praying to. By tradition, men have adopted a proper name of an idol to be used as a generic or common name for supernatural beings; like using a famous name brand, and making it the common name for other similar products. Why not 'Ha-Shem' or 'Adonai? Again, the root words of these are idolatrous, to wit: 'Shem' - from the root word 'Shemiramis' the Babylonian goddess 'Adonai - from the root word 'Adonis' - the ancient Phoenician-Greek idol of male fertility, notorious for phallic worship. Why not call the Messiah 'Jesus'? This word is the Greek translation from the original Hebrew - used by human translators for easier acceptance in the Greek-speaking world during earlier times; also, the Greeks at that time were so fond of their mythological, pagan worship of 'Zeus' and also 'Dionysius'; so the genuine Name of the Messiah was translated into a more familiar and palatable version, 'Iesous,' from which the very popular 'Jesus' was taken. A simple research into the true person of 'El' in Babylonian and Chaldee mythology, will reveal that 'El' was a very popular pagan idol in the early history of these people. He was an idol associated with incest, lust, immorality and treachery. The word 'Shaddai' refers to seducing spirits of the wicked realm. Using this title activates seducing spirits with the immoral characteristics of 'El' - luring many people into slavery to pagan idolatry. Even witches know this and use this specific title in their incantations, faith healing sessions, and satanic worship. “For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,) But TO US THERE IS BUT ONE GOD, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.” I Cor 8:5-6 “Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness...” Gen 1:26 And the Lord God said, behold, the man is to become as one of US, to know good and evil.” Gen 3:22 In Ecclesiates 12:1 in the King James and most other Bibles the word “creator” is singular. This shows a definite bias for in the Hebrew it reads: “Remember now thy CREATORS in the days of thy youth.” “And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob by the name of God Almighty, but by my name Jehovah was I not known to them.” Ex 6:3 Book of Psalms Chapter 82 82:1 God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods. 82:2 How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked? Selah. 82:3 Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy. 82:4 Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked. 82:5 They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course. 82:6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. 82:7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes. 82:8 Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations What plant do you call this?Earth?What was the root for that name? EA The ones in control know this whole story man.The real story,that is why they are kicking our asses.
__________________
Deo Vindice I plan on living forever,so far so good. |
January 18th, 2006 | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
QUOTE=Pale Horse]I do not promote any god on this forum,rather promoting a freedom and choice of religion.
I can translate the name in my own head,if I seek to promote either it usually ends up in a long drawn out talk about that instead of more dire issues at hand. The spiritual aspect and dimension of our struggle is no less important than any other aspect of our "movement"/struggle. "He" is the spirit of guidance within me that unifies my ass with my mind. I'm not going to worship Alexander because he did not travel the world leaving messages of prophecy,claiming sonship,and declaring as he is I shall be. Alexander not only "travelled" but conquered the known world,the greatest conqueror of all time.He is worthy of worship and indeed was reckoned to be a son of Zeus.In fact Achilles was one of his ancestors.Alexander not only recognised his divine "sonship" but encouraged others to recognise it. I consider the majority of religions to be symbolism and not literalism. Psychotic jewishish lies that were retranslated by cunning Greeks and again by the English are not even accepted by the jews?I dunno why not give a little credence to it? I cannot give any credence to teh scriptures.Not only are they jewish ramblings but they reflect a semitic and not an Aryan mode of thinking and behaving. I dont know ,the purity and lives of my line are pretty damn important to me,if you need a crutch to put you into action,I understand. Do you not believe that your All-Father demands a soul that will fight?I believe "god" made me to fight for what I am,just as he made the jew to fight me.He made the "Tree of Life" as well as "Tree of the Knowledge" and called them both good.I agree there is no good nor evil in the sight of eternity. I have not forgotten the ten commandments,only I see it diffrently from you I presume?You see "there shall be no other gods before me" as" do not place a god in between you and me" I guess?I see it as"Since I have assumed command forget those other gods".The god that issued those commands was also known as Marduk,or Ra,about the time those commandments were issued he became known as Amun-Ra("hidden"-Ra).The correct question you should be asking yourself is why did he become hidden? There is evidence in the Old Testament for the plurality of god and that the jews were originally a polytheistic people. How and why they became monotheists is open to speculation. There may be a connection with ancient Egypt,indeed as you will be aware the jews were nororious plagiarists who stole their mythology from other peoples putting their own slant on it. The word 'jehovah' was concocted or invented long ago by transposing the vowels of the word 'adonai' into the 'YHWH' - the tetragramma. In ancient Phoenician-Babylonian cultic communities, the idol 'Adonis' was most popular among the pagan masses, and it was from the name of this idol that the word 'Adonai' was taken from. The vowels of the word 'Adonai' were transposed into the tetragramma (YHWH) and the resultant word was 'jehovah.' Even the word 'Adonai' was not in the original Hebrew Holy Scriptures (Tanakh). This was also an adulteration, an addition. The real meaning of the word 'yehovah' is destruction, desolation, perdition (remember there is no letter 'j' in Hebrew, both archaic and modern). A simple research into the meanings and etymologies of these words will clearly reveal this. 'How can you say that you are wise, even if you have the Tanakh, when the lying pens of the scribes have altered them?' - Jeremiah 8:8, putting it in a clearer sense Why not call the Creator plainly as 'god'? The origin of this word is the root word: 'KHUDA' - which was an ancient (skull) idol of the Persians and Babylonians. This can also be easily checked out by checking out the name of the cultic idol 'Baal Gad' mentioned in the Holy Scriptures several times I have no problem with the word "god" as a term of address.I would distinguish however between the xtian Der Gott and the more pagan Germanic Das Gott or Gottos.Hitler often spoke about the Creator,the Almighty etc but this must not be confused with any reference to the xtian god.The "Das" definite pronoun indicates a more neutral force or "absolute" to use the Hindu term,not a personal transcendant god as in the judeo-xtian tradition.
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
January 7th, 2006 | #17 | ||
Kindly Hearted
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ether
Posts: 534
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
June 15th, 2006 | #18 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
LOL. hmm. Well, maybe since its heaven, they are all turned white. '-) (Yes, it was a joke, a brief attempt at levity, idiots piss off..) |
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|