Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 1st, 2013 #3141
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald E. Pauly View Post
Strom has pleaded guilty and done his time in prison. He also has mended his ways.I say leave him in peace. He never claimed that he was framed.

Um - yes he did. He claimed the porn pictures were put on his PC after he left the house. Unfortunately, the "contract" he signed with his wife in which he promised to get therapy would suggest that the habit was a frequent one.

How do you know he has mended his ways?

Leave a paedophile alone? In what reality do you expect that to happen?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald E. Pauly View Post
Bev will have to translate "nouncing" for us Colonials so we can make an intelligent replyy to her post. She doesn't have much of a sense of gratitude after I went to bat for her against Hadding.

Noncing - the actions of a nonce. Nonce mainly = paedophile.

What am I supposed to have a sense of gratitude for? This?
Quote:
It was not Christian of you to refer to my honey as a stupid cunt even when it is true.

Gee, I'm just plain ol' overflowin' with gratitude.

It wouldn't be very christian of me to refer to you as someone with an agenda, would it? Lucky I'm not a christian, then.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3142
Hadding
Senior Member
 
Hadding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Um - yes he did. He claimed the porn pictures were put on his PC after he left the house. Unfortunately, the "contract" he signed with his wife in which he promised to get therapy would suggest that the habit was a frequent one.
No, you stupid cunt, because as been explained in your presence repeatedly, the counselor who drafted that contract later clarified that the photos at issue in those counseling sessions were from Met-Art and that Elisha had misled him about the age of the girls. The "shockingly young girls" were over 18.

Elisha was prone to malicious exaggeration -- very much like you.

Look at the bitch turning this thread into yet another argument about Kevin Strom.

Last edited by Hadding; February 1st, 2013 at 01:07 PM.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3143
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadding View Post
No, you stupid cunt, because as been explained in your presence repeatedly, the counselor who drafted that contract later clarified that the photos at issue in those counseling sessions were from Met-Art and that Elisha had misled him about the age of the girls.

Elisha was prone to malicious exaggeration -- very much like you.
Yes, and as has been repeatedly explained to you, the girls on Met-Art are a non-issue. The Strom-paid-for counselor knew nothing of the love song to the nine year old girl, nothing of the photoshopping of the twins' heads onto nude females, nothing of hiding in the bushes outside a school, nothing of the contract or anything else, did he? Which part of that are you having trouble with, Hadding?

The report referred only to the legal site and the counsellor knew nothing of his other deviant activities.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3144
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadding View Post
Elisha was prone to malicious exaggeration -- very much like you.

Look at the bitch turning this thread into yet another argument about Kevin Strom.
Done editing now?

Elisha exaggerated the contract that Kevin signed, did she? Did she exaggerate the tape where we all heard him admit he was looking at "shockingly young girls"? Um, no.

I couldn't care less about Strom. I only mentioned it to outline the commonly held view that the reason people are trying to make out Steele is mad is because of Strom. Then, as those of us blessed with the ability to read can see, I entered into a debate with someone else about the definition of the word "pornographer". Don't try and claim I am trying to turn this thread into a Strom argument when your pal there is the one dragging it on.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3145
Hadding
Senior Member
 
Hadding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Done editing now?

Elisha exaggerated the contract that Kevin signed, did she? Did she exaggerate the tape where we all heard him admit he was looking at "shockingly young girls"? Um, no.
All this has been explained but you are too stupid/malevolent to take note.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev
I couldn't care less about Strom. I only mentioned it to outline the commonly held view that the reason people are trying to make out Steele is mad is because of Strom. Then, as those of us blessed with the ability to read can see, I entered into a debate with someone else about the definition of the word "pornographer". Don't try and claim I am trying to turn this thread into a Strom argument when your pal there is the one dragging it on.
I don't think that's a "commonly held view" at all, although you seem to be trying to make it into one. I never encountered it before yesterday, from you.

Find some support for that view in ANYTHING that I ever said about the Steele case. I don't think that I've ever commented on Steele's attitude toward Strom. Around the time when Steele made his statement I was tending toward the same view as Steele.

Then show Donald Pauly's allegiance to Strom.

And then explain Jim Giles and Mona Montgomery.

Was Jim Giles a big fan of Kevin Strom? No, I don't think so.

I have explained all along my reason for not believing Steele's frame-up story. It's because the story is extremely unlikely on its face. Anybody outside the WN milieu would immediately laugh at such a story.

Last edited by Hadding; February 1st, 2013 at 01:23 PM.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3146
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadding View Post
All this has been explained but you are too stupid/malevolent to take note.
Are you sure you don't mean:
Quote:
All this has been explained but you are not stupid enough to fall for it.


Quote:
I don't think that's a "commonly held view" at all
I do.



Quote:
Find some support for that view in ANYTHING that I ever said about the Steele case. I don't think that I've ever commented on Steele's attitude toward Strom. Around the time when Steele made his statement I was tending toward the same view as Steele.

Then show Donald Pauly's allegiance to Strom.

And then explain Jim Giles and Mona Montgomery.

Was Jim Giles a big fan of Kevin Strom? No, I don't think so.
So what is the reason then? Why do you all despise him so much? I mean, you can paint it as concern all you like, but this doesn't seem to be the face of concern, does it?




Seems more like downright glee to me, not concern.


Quote:
I have explained all along my reason for not believing Steele's frame-up story. It's because the story is extremely unlikely on its face. Anybody outside the WN milieu would immediately laugh at such a story.
As I have repeatedly said, most people are unsure if he was framed or if he did it. Those are the only choices. The insanity from a heart attack rigmarole is plain bullshit.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3147
Hadding
Senior Member
 
Hadding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
As I have repeatedly said, most people are unsure if he was framed or if he did it.
You can "repeatedly say" anything but that doesn't make it true.

It just makes you a pest.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3148
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadding View Post
You can "repeatedly say" anything but that doesn't make it true.

It just makes you a pest.
Or it makes me cognizant of the poll results and the posts from other people throughout the various threads. I'll let others make their own minds up on that.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3149
Hadding
Senior Member
 
Hadding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Or it makes me cognizant of the poll results and the posts from other people throughout the various threads. I'll let others make their own minds up on that.
Try a scientific poll of the general public, not a VNN Forum poll that shows which way the participants voted so that they have to take shit from the likes of you and the other psychos afterward.

I can't believe that more than a tiny minority of the general public would find Steele's story credible. Giving them more details about it wouldn't help, either.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3150
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadding View Post
Try a scientific poll of the general public, not a VNN Forum poll that shows which way the participants voted so that they have to take shit from the likes of you and the other psychos afterward.
I never said a word to you about your voting that he was "crazy", did I? Donald made the poll; take it up with him if you don't like the fact that votes were visible.

Quote:
I can't believe that more than a tiny minority of the general public would find Steele's story credible. Giving them more details about it wouldn't help, either.
Let me see if I can make it just a little bit easier for you to understand what I am saying, rather than presenting your spin on what I am saying.
Quote:
most people are unsure if he was framed or if he did it.

Once again for the wilfully ignorant: I am not saying he was framed. I do not know whether he was framed or whether he did it. What I do know is that he is not mad and that the diagnosis you invented has no solid ground.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3151
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadding View Post
No, you stupid cunt, because as been explained in your presence repeatedly, the counselor who drafted that contract later clarified that the photos at issue in those counseling sessions were from Met-Art and that Elisha had misled him about the age of the girls. The "shockingly young girls" were over 18.

Elisha was prone to malicious exaggeration -- very much like you.

Look at the bitch turning this thread into yet another argument about Kevin Strom.
Uh - no, Yoder didn't draft the contract, did he?
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3152
Leonard Rouse
Celebrating My Diversity
 
Leonard Rouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: With The Creepy-Ass Crackahs
Posts: 8,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Anyway, I think we're going to have to agree to disagree or we're going to get moaned at for disrupting the thread with semantics. Shall we just leave it at "he's a nonce"?
Agreed.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3153
Donald E. Pauly
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,130
Smile Race Traitor Wife

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post
This is the third time you've brought up Steele's ruthless attitude towards Strom.

You say his wife is not supporting him, but massively conning him.

As for courtesy, you have insulted Steele's legal career, his wife and the relationship between them.
Let me be clear. Cyndi knows that her husband is crazy and tried to kill her with a plot that reads like it was thought up by a six-year-old. She has been bribed and/or blackmailed by the government to play the loyal wife. In return she got to pocket most of the loot and give the lawyers a pittance.

She has made her crazy husband believe that she has bought his lies about being framed. He thinks that all White Nationalists believe that he was framed. Only a few fools in that community still believe that he was framed. It is unknown whether he got my Amicus Curiae motion that I sent to him when he was in Moscow awaiting sentencing. It is unknown if he is aware of all the money collected for his sake. I have only two letters from him written just after he was arrested.

The government can easily jail Cyndi for life at any time for perjury and probably tax fraud. It is a typical Mafia type bargain. Cyndi is the worst race traitor in the history of White Nationalism.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3154
Donald E. Pauly
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,130
Angry Did He Do It?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post

.......
As I have repeatedly said, most people are unsure if he was framed or if he did it.
......
I will admit that I am not sure that Steele tried to blow his wife up with a pipe bomb. I am sure that he is 10 times crazier that he had to be to do something like this. He had the motive and the opportunity. All the government's pieces of the puzzle fit together. All of Steele's version are full of hundreds of lies. There is a chance in a billion that he was framed. This case is as close to certainty as you can get. The only other possibility that I can think of is that the Tooth Fairy did it.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3155
Donald E. Pauly
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,130
Angry Where Is the Barf Alert?

For G-d's sake, the least that you can do is give us a barf alert before posting videos of that worthless hag Mona Montgomery. She was shooting her mouth off in wild speculation long before the evidence was in. She is also a full blooded lawyer. Cyndi is the husband abuser, Steele is not the wife abuser.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3156
Donald E. Pauly
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,130
Smile Un-Christian Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadding View Post
All this has been explained but you are too stupid/malevolent to take note.
.........
It is most un-Christian of you to say this to my honey even though this is also true. I gave you a thumbs up for it.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3157
Hadding
Senior Member
 
Hadding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Donald made the poll; take it up with him if you don't like the fact that votes were visible.
You stupid fat sow, you are the one that relied on a VNN Forum poll as a source for what "most people" think.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
As I have repeatedly said, most people are unsure if he was framed or if he did it.
You are now walking away from the foundation for this statement, with no mention of the fact that this means that you were wrong to make claims based on it. Surely this is about as transparently flippant and irresponsible as rhetoric gets.

Last edited by Hadding; February 1st, 2013 at 06:29 PM.
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3158
Donald E. Pauly
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,130
Smile Almost Correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katy View Post
All this is fine, Donald, but you can't wage this crusade without Steele's consent. Surely, you're not going to just waltz into that court room with the doctors you intend to hire and make your case. It doesn't work that way, Donald.

Furthermore, aren't you concerned that these people might find your letters, phone calls, inquiries and unsolicited legal presentations somewhat intrusive?

I don't want to be impolite by using the word "obsessed." But I think it is fair to say that you have a preoccupation with -- and passion for -- the Steele case.

I'm just a little concerned that, in your eagerness to rescue a victim who doesn't want to be rescued, you might become a victim yourself. You already express your disgruntlement about having wasted money on this case.

Katy
First I am not the slightest concerned what Steele's race traitor wife, family and scum sucking lawyers think. They are a worse enemy than the Federal government. I don't worry about being called names. This poor crazy man doesn't know what he is doing and needs medical help. I am the only one with the capability to do anything about it who doesn't want him in prison for life.

It is not strictly true that Steele has to want to be rescued. If you read my motion you will see that it resembles a ticking time bomb. Every where it goes, people get in more trouble for ignoring it. I can get a court order to have Steele's head examined. If I do, heads will roll for what they did to him. There is a good reason for my APPARENT inactivity for the last few months. Things are going on below the surface. I won't even go into the possibility of bar complaints. I have got enough to disbar a half dozen lawyers. One of those is now in Federal prison and already disbarred.

It was quite a discovery yesterday that Steele sued his own wife just before she started going to a shrink. After a year with that shrink, she tried to take him for everything but the shirt on his back. Could that shrink have been a Jew working for Abbie Foxman? One third of all shrinks are Jews. I am working on getting the details. The more that I study this case, the more Negroes that I find in the woodpile.

I have spent about 200 hours of my time on this case and perhaps $200. It is being done for the sake of White Nationalism and the fact that a poor helpless crazy man is locked up for life. The real victim is White Nationalism.

Last edited by Donald E. Pauly; February 1st, 2013 at 06:14 PM. Reason: typo
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3159
Donald E. Pauly
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,130
Smile Another Un-Christian Remark

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadding View Post
You stupid fat sow, you are the one that relied on a VNN Forum poll as a source for what "most people" think.
We don't know that my sweetheart is fat. She has never posted a photo. My guess is that she is a fox. I do know that she does not like riding to hounds. I can't give you any praise for this accusation.

Last edited by Donald E. Pauly; February 1st, 2013 at 06:24 PM. Reason: typo
 
Old February 1st, 2013 #3160
M. Gerard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katy View Post
All this is fine, Donald, but you can't wage this crusade without Steele's consent. Surely, you're not going to just waltz into that court room with the doctors you intend to hire and make your case. It doesn't work that way, Donald.
Furthermore, aren't you concerned that these people might find your letters, phone calls, inquiries and unsolicited legal presentations somewhat intrusive?

I don't want to be impolite by using the word "obsessed." But I think it is fair to say that you have a preoccupation with -- and passion for -- the Steele case.
I'm just a little concerned that, in your eagerness to rescue a victim who doesn't want to be rescued, you might become a victim yourself. You already express your disgruntlement about having wasted money on this case.

Katy
Pauly gets sadistic pleasure from tormenting these people. That's why he does it.
 
Reply

Tags
edgar steele

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 PM.
Page generated in 0.36592 seconds.