|
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
July 9th, 2012 | #81 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,145
|
|
July 9th, 2012 | #82 | |
professional critter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: under your bed
Posts: 1,618
|
Quote:
Pfft. That aside. It's true, everyone knows he can't have his cake and eat it, too. You're not reporting news. We beings exist in confliction between ideality and reality, but that conflict is irreconcilable. The internal division of the universe makes sure of that. But the loss of desire that results in closing the aesthetic distance is just a worldly thing. You make a mistake in conflating ordinary disillusionment with the disenchantment from intellectual growth and you draw a dreary dichotomy of being that withholds a certain soulfulness to the lover of knowledge, what you call 'vitality'. No. The lover has access to the pleasures of his 'vital' counterparts, but he mostly just doesn't care. He's too passionately preoccupied with his mind-puzzles. The temptation is to judge that a life of analysis is empty. Well... yes it is, and no it's not. For some men their logical systems are more real than the merely actual. Why? The paradox is that pure apollonian analysis is dionysian unity. |
|
July 10th, 2012 | #83 |
Geriatric Coalburner
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,826
|
|
July 10th, 2012 | #84 |
...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,744
|
Apparently you guys haven't listened to Deshawn's interview on the VNN Radio with Mark Faust. He's without a doubt black. Though I don't know if his account is one person or multiple people.
http://broadcasting.vanguardnewsnetw...ve20090414.mp3 - Starts at the 43 minute mark. |
July 10th, 2012 | #85 | |
Geriatric Coalburner
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,826
|
Quote:
Especially in that last statement, you can truly see how the life is sucked out of these people. They see themselves as just machines. And I'm making a generalization about the majority you meet. The professors in academia, engineers working in corporations. I doubt you've ever actually been in such a setting. I have. Have you ever taken a good look at the faces of actual google engineers? The mentality is "just throw coffee at your body, munch some power bars". These are google engineers: Why, on average, is such a 'smart' man, so unhealthy, by choice? You will not tell me "THAT IS OUT OF HIS CONTROL!", as it is not. This man is an example of an endomorph (gains fat easily) scientist, and there are plenty of scrawny flabby ectomorphs just like him. Why is it that these people are by and large such despisers of the body, much like the Christians? 99% of scientists I meet sound like they are Christian recruits in their ideology - in the practical sense - except for the God part. In short, the modern scientist, wrongly treats man as a machine, thus he becomes the automaton, and his influence to everyone else is that "we are all just machines"; L'homme Machine. A subtle, 'scientific' way, of making the lions turn into the lambs and lay down. He actually 'scientifically' backs-up the original Christian poisonous tripe of equality when his flawed 'science' and his ineffective microscopes cannot see on a cellular level what race is, what causes race, how it has been organically formed through the ages; he attempts to devise 'systems' out of everything he sees. As one man said though, the will to a system betrays a lack of integrity. By the way, I should point out and emphasize that I point to this modern scientist that has the lazy outlook I point out in the first paragraph. If you look at old photos of German engineers or even American ones from the early 20th century (particularly when those men still believed in race and being superior to other races), they actually carried themselves properly; they dressed well, they had decorum, they cared about their body, their posture, their energy, because they wanted to keep that line between themselves and the niggers/turd world. Last edited by P.E.; July 10th, 2012 at 03:00 PM. |
|
July 10th, 2012 | #86 | |
Geriatric Coalburner
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,826
|
Quote:
Last edited by P.E.; July 10th, 2012 at 10:02 AM. |
|
July 10th, 2012 | #87 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
Last edited by Steven L. Akins; July 10th, 2012 at 10:27 AM. |
|
July 10th, 2012 | #88 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
Personally I find the example shown above more attractive than the example shown below. |
|
July 10th, 2012 | #89 | |
Eternal Glory
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,670
|
Quote:
By the way, Juicy sweatsuits do cost hundreds of dollars. |
|
July 10th, 2012 | #90 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,705
|
Quote:
I'm a programmer myself, and I've struggled with this topic myself for years. when I started to learn how to program, it reduced all that magic down to nothing but a string of 1's and 0's and for a long time I lamented how I lost that magic and joy of how I viewed computers when I was a kid. P.E. you are on your A-game in this thread. I've enjoyed your writing on this topic. |
|
July 10th, 2012 | #91 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
Conversely, an ugly woman will still be unattractive no matter how much she dresses up. She might appear to be less ugly than she would be if she were wearing sweats and no makeup, but she still won't ever be able to compete with someone who is truly attractive. Let's use Susan Boyle as an example: Without makeup: With makeup and nicely dressed: I still don't know of a man alive who has any desire to have her share his bed. Last edited by Steven L. Akins; July 10th, 2012 at 10:41 AM. |
|
July 10th, 2012 | #92 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,705
|
Quote:
Last edited by Horseman; July 10th, 2012 at 10:41 AM. |
|
July 10th, 2012 | #93 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,705
|
Care to explain this in more detail? I remember you saying that you are studying physics. Can you explain the Higgs particle and what it does, or do you have no clue what you're talking about? I actually would like to understand it.
|
July 10th, 2012 | #94 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
|
|
July 10th, 2012 | #95 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,705
|
Quote:
André-Marie Ampère: Wernher von Braun: Thomas Edison: David Hilbert: Last edited by Horseman; July 10th, 2012 at 11:16 AM. |
|
July 10th, 2012 | #96 |
Geriatric Coalburner
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,826
|
Funny, I was going to point out Von Braun as an example of the scientific man (rather than machine) of the past.
Very good examples in those pictures though. We understand each other on this point. Thanks. |
July 10th, 2012 | #97 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
When I was a young lad in the late 1960's or very early 1970's I can remember my first doctor that I would see from time to time for the usual childhood checkups. His name was Dr. Phillips, I believe, but anyway, he actually dressed like this, in a smart, starched, white, immaculate, buttoned-up tunic: When was the last time any of us saw a doctor dressed like that? Nowadays, doctors usually go around looking like this, like they are all ready for beddy-bye in their pajamas: |
|
July 10th, 2012 | #98 | |
Geriatric Coalburner
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,826
|
Quote:
I'm sure you would agree we could fit into your examples photographs of the soldier of the past, in a dashing tailored uniform, and the soldier today in these mass-produced trash bags they wear. The military examples are the same as the modern doctor examples. Hell, even in academia, 'professors' walk around in flip-flops, and should you venture to the liberal arts department, you'll find a few whiteys here and there with Jamaican colors of nigger beads accessory to their cornrows. |
|
July 11th, 2012 | #99 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,093
|
It seems like this has a whole lot of relevance to the advancement of anti-gravity systems. And possibly anti-inertial systems. Both would be required for the future advancement of space flight. If they can understand what makes a particle have mass, then they are on track to developing a way to manipulate a particles mass, and how it is effected by gravity.
|
July 12th, 2012 | #100 |
Eternal Glory
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,670
|
Big boobs have a biological purpose. They make a woman able to feed her young lying down. Women with small breasts can't do that. Terribly inconvenient. When you have a new baby you need all the rest you can get, for the sake of good health.
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|