Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old June 24th, 2019 #1
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,170
Default An Audience with Neil Armstrong (2011 interview)

Given not long before he died. Thought I would post it in honor of Apollo 11's 50th anniversary.

__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Old June 24th, 2019 #2
Nikola Bijeliti
fluxmaster
 
Nikola Bijeliti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Parallel Flux Universe
Posts: 1,491
Blog Entries: 32
Default

It's interesting that he died on the same day that Voyager I left the solar system and entered interstellar space.
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler
 
Old July 4th, 2019 #3
Freddy Ford
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 114
Default

1. ZOG never lies to us.
2. ZOG always lies to us.

Which is more nearly true?

ZOG (NASA) tells us that on the moon, stars cannot be seen. In reality, on the moon (with no atmosphere), the stars would be blazingly visible.

ZOG (NASA) showed us that on the moon, in a vacuum, when you drive a golf ball, you may slice it. In reality, no air means no curving.

ZOG (NASA) tells us that the radiation in the Van Allen belts and on the moon didn't harm the astronauts. Do you believe that?

The crew of a space shuttle that was 650 miles below the lowest Van Allen belt said that the radiaton was so strong that they could see sparks of light with their eyes closed. CNN reported: "The radiation belt surrounding the earth is more dangerous than previously believed." Why didn't the 6 Apollo missions reveal this radiation danger?

ZOG (NASA) tells us that the radiation on the moon didn't have the slightest effect on the film in the cameras (which had no lead shielding).

ZOG (NASA) tells us that the exhaust from the rocket engines of the lunar landers never dug even a shallow crater---didn't even kick up any dust.

ZOG (NASA) tells us that astronauts wearing pressurized gloves could manipulate the controls of their cameras.

We have video footage of the Apollo 11 astronauts, in low Earth orbit, filming (in the darkened interior of the craft) a portion of the Earth's surface through one of the round windows, in order to pretend that the disk seen through the window was the complete globe as seen from a location halfway to the moon.

Armstrong was almost killed in the only test flight in a lunar-lander-type craft. And yet none of the Apollo missions had trouble landing on the moon.

Armstrong refused to swear that he had walked on the moon.

Astronaut James Irwin called Bill Kaysing (Apollo debunker) to say that he wanted to talk to him about Apollo. Three days later Irwin died of a heart attack.

And so forth.

Think of the useful, pacifying effect that the moon-landing spectacle had on Whites in America. They were dismayed and appalled by school-busing, integration, "civil rights" for negroes, "affirmative action", negro crime and rioting, race-mixing, etc. NASA's extravaganza made Whites say, "Yes, our society is being ruined, but at least we are on our way to the stars! There is hope for the future. We put a man on the moon! We're so proud to be Americans!"

https://archive.org/details/DidWeLandOnTheMoon
https://archive.org/details/BartSibrelMoonMyths
http://archive.org/details/BillKaysingRawInterview
http://archive.org/details/RalphReneRawInterview
https://archive.org/details/DidWeReallyLandMenOnTheMoon
http://archive.org/details/WasItOnly...sM.Collier1997
 
Old July 4th, 2019 #4
Nikola Bijeliti
fluxmaster
 
Nikola Bijeliti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Parallel Flux Universe
Posts: 1,491
Blog Entries: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy Ford View Post
. . .
NASA at the time was dominated by Werner von Braun and his team of Nazi rocket scientists:


All of the objections you raise have been answered many times, and the answers are quite simple. I'll touch on a few of them:

Stars are generally only visible at night, not in the daytime, when the missions took place. Nevertheless, even at night, stars are extremely difficult to photograph. Take any camera and shoot an outdoor photo without a tripod on a star-filled night. I guarantee you will not see any stars in the photo. Stars appear dim to us, not blazingly bright. The only way to photograph stars is with a tripod and a time exposure.

The Van Allen radiation belts are shaped like a donut, with openings at the North and South pole. The astronauts passed through the openings very quickly. Nonetheless, they did suffer radiation damage.

The descent engine did kick up dust, as can plainly be seen in the descent videos.

The cameras had extra-large controls so they could be operated with gloves on.

There were many test flights of the LLTV, only one of which crashed. That is the point of practicing, to get better. There is wind on earth, which made flying the LLTV more difficult than flying the LM.

To answer your other questions or objections, please take a look at this page by the Bad Astonomer:

Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy: Bad TV

In it, he answers all the common questions, so he can probably answer your question. You may also want to check out this page as well:

Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings - Wikipedia

All of the objections to the moon landings have been answered ad nauseum, and none of them have any merit whatsoever.

EDIT: You are posting the exact same text on multiple threads. Please confine your posts to one thread.
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler

Last edited by Nikola Bijeliti; July 4th, 2019 at 10:47 PM.
 
Old July 5th, 2019 #5
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,170
Default

Neil Armstrong was always cordial and soft-spoken. Buzz Aldrin wasn't quite so, as shown by this video of him punching Moon hoax theorist and filmmaker Bart Sibrel in 2002.

__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Old July 31st, 2019 #6
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,170
Default

__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Old August 1st, 2019 #7
Stronza
Senior Member
 
Stronza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,498
Default

Neil Armstrong was always cordial and soft-spoken. Buzz Aldrin wasn't quite so, as shown by this video of him punching Moon hoax theorist and filmmaker Bart Sibrel in 2002.

Being a big drinker, he was called "Buzzed" Aldrin for a reason.
 
Old August 2nd, 2019 #8
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stronza View Post
Neil Armstrong was always cordial and soft-spoken. Buzz Aldrin wasn't quite so, as shown by this video of him punching Moon hoax theorist and filmmaker Bart Sibrel in 2002.

Being a big drinker, he was called "Buzzed" Aldrin for a reason.
Edwin Aldrin got the nickname "Buzz" from his two older sisters when he was a baby. They were calling him "little brother"-- it came out as "buzzer" then got shortened to "Buzz." He legally changed his name from Edwin to Buzz Aldrin. It's true he became depressed and had a drinking problem after he came back to Earth after Apollo 11, as detailed in his book Return To Earth.
__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Old August 2nd, 2019 #9
Gladiatrix
Senior Member
 
Gladiatrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: In a dystopian nightmare
Posts: 4,808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Allan View Post
Edwin Aldrin got the nickname "Buzz" from his two older sisters when he was a baby. They were calling him "little brother"-- it came out as "buzzer" then got shortened to "Buzz." He legally changed his name from Edwin to Buzz Aldrin. It's true he became depressed and had a drinking problem after he came back to Earth after Apollo 11, as detailed in his book Return To Earth.
I met Buzz Aldrin 11 or 12 years ago at the Greek embassy. No idea why he was there, but he was a rascal. Fun guy.
__________________
Political correctness is oppression disguised as good manners.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM.
Page generated in 0.11926 seconds.