Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > Uncensored Europe + > United Kingdom
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old January 7th, 2013 #61
Ghetto-Blaster
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 511
Default

Akins is a dumb ugly cuckold, ignored by everyone except child protection authorities.

But he's a rockstar on VNN.

Someone let me know when he posts the suicide thread.
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #62
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
I've forgotten its name - I'll shoot Yoder an email and see if he can tell me.




But don't you think that sometimes, social programming serves a good purpose? Not every time, obviously, but it prevents one from picking one's nose in a crowded restaurant, or letting one off in front of the boss/vicar or whatever.

In my opinion, this social programming that tells adult men to leave minor children alone is a good one.
Political correctness vs. authenticity.....which do you advocate?
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #63
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
penile plethysmography

Penile Plethysmograph - YouTube
Looks a bit out of date. When was that filmed? 1950's?
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #64
andy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Quite probably, but you know how UK newspapers and antis like to pick up select quotes from forums - at least if people e-slap him they'll see there's opposition to his views and it might make them think twice about using any quotes and spinning it as representative of British nationalism. Look how many hits SF got after a Sunday paper printed a few quotes from a Question Time (I think) thread.
Unfortunately for the reputation of the forum this forum has a tard coral and a nutzpah lounge which is where i understand deviants are supposed to be confined to.
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion

Chase them into the swamps
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #65
fossilator
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 388
Default

In the US, there is no national age of (sexual) consent. It varies from state to state, and is on average from 16 to 18 years old.

While at first glance, one might conclude that an older age of consent protects children from predators, this is not necessarily true and many states have actually lowered their age of consent, and the following is why.

After we tightened child predator, child pornography and human trafficking laws and imposed stricter penalties (many states began publishing names and addresses of offenders), a problem arose with high school age children who were involved in romantic relationships. Example: an 18 year old boy has a sexual relationship with 17 year old girl in a state where the age of consent is 18. Under the law, the boy is technically a sex offender, regardless of the closeness of their ages and fact that both parties willingly entered into the relationship.

This ended up sending innocent young men to prison (a place that is not molester friendly) and ruining their futures since they will be labeled a sex offender for life.

To accommodate this, many states lowered the age of sexual consent and also instituted caveats to the laws with consideration for the age difference between the parties. In some states, it is two years and in others, three or four or five years. Therefore, an 18 year old boy in certain states will not be charged as an offender if his girlfriend is only a year (or two or three, etc) younger. However, if a 40 year old man has sex with her either willingly or not, he would be a criminal.
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #66
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins View Post
Looks a bit out of date. When was that filmed? 1950's?
I think it's a piss take - I didn't watch it fully. But that is the name of the test.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy View Post
Unfortunately for the reputation of the forum this forum has a tard coral and a nutzpah lounge which is where i understand deviants are supposed to be confined to.
So take it up with Alex and varg - he posts in the other sections much more than he posts here and if they haven't 'tarded him yet, I don't see it as my place.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLA
Political correctness vs. authenticity.....which do you advocate?
Oh no you don't. You're not spinning opposition to paedophilia as political correctness.

But let me ask you - talking generally and not just about this topic - which do you advocate? Political correctness or authenticity?
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #67
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
I think it's a piss take - I didn't watch it fully. But that is the name of the test.



So take it up with Alex and varg - he posts in the other sections much more than he posts here and if they haven't 'tarded him yet, I don't see it as my place.



Oh no you don't. You're not spinning opposition to paedophilia as political correctness.

But let me ask you - talking generally and not just about this topic - which do you advocate? Political correctness or authenticity?
I'm generally not an advocate of political correctness, or hadn't you already guessed that?
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #68
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fossilator View Post
In the US, there is no national age of (sexual) consent. It varies from state to state, and is on average from 16 to 18 years old.

While at first glance, one might conclude that an older age of consent protects children from predators, this is not necessarily true and many states have actually lowered their age of consent, and the following is why.

After we tightened child predator, child pornography and human trafficking laws and imposed stricter penalties (many states began publishing names and addresses of offenders), a problem arose with high school age children who were involved in romantic relationships. Example: an 18 year old boy has a sexual relationship with 17 year old girl in a state where the age of consent is 18. Under the law, the boy is technically a sex offender, regardless of the closeness of their ages and fact that both parties willingly entered into the relationship.

This ended up sending innocent young men to prison (a place that is not molester friendly) and ruining their futures since they will be labeled a sex offender for life.

To accommodate this, many states lowered the age of sexual consent and also instituted caveats to the laws with consideration for the age difference between the parties. In some states, it is two years and in others, three or four or five years. Therefore, an 18 year old boy in certain states will not be charged as an offender if his girlfriend is only a year (or two or three, etc) younger. However, if a 40 year old man has sex with her either willingly or not, he would be a criminal.
It's 16 over the whole country here, but the rest of your post sort of applies here too. You don't hear of 17 year olds getting nicked for sleeping with their long term 15 year old girlfriends but a recent case saw a 30-something teacher who began seeing a 14 year old pupil and then ran off with her to France when she was 15 find himself in jail awaiting trial for kidnap and possible sexual offences. I think it's a fair system.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #69
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins View Post
I'm generally not an advocate of political correctness, or hadn't you already guessed that?
So you prefer authentic over doing what society expects?
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #70
andy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fossilator View Post

Example: an 18 year old boy has a sexual relationship with 17 year old girl in a state where the age of consent is 18. Under the law, the boy is technically a sex offender, regardless of the closeness of their ages and fact that both parties willingly entered into the relationship.

This ended up sending innocent young men to prison (a place that is not molester friendly) and ruining their futures since they will be labeled a sex offender for life.

By definition not innocent or technically but actually.In the UK sexual deviants such as Who member Pete Townsend are removed from the sex offenders register after five years.They say that five million British men have been on the sex register so far.I favour tattooing them across the forehead NONCE so that decent people can see what they are living among or dealing with.The Dutch and Scandinavian have always had an age differential and gaol predatory adult nonces.
The bottom line in countries with universal suffrage is that no one should be fucked who cannot vote fullstop no caveats or exceptions
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion

Chase them into the swamps
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #71
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
So you prefer authentic over doing what society expects?
In cases where society is clearly promoting something that deviates from the norm, yes.

A lot of political correctness (polite society) is just that - promoting deviance (i.e. - that which deviates from the natural inclinations of the majority).
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #72
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins View Post
In cases where society is clearly promoting something that deviates from the norm, yes.

A lot of political correctness (polite society) is just that - promoting deviance (i.e. - that which deviates from the natural inclinations of the majority).
Yet you still ritually mutilated circumcised your two sons. You did exactly what society has been trying to promote ever since 1945 and you deviated from the natural inclinations - the normal - of the majority.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #73
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Yet you still ritually mutilated circumcised your two sons. You did exactly what society has been trying to promote ever since 1945 and you deviated from the natural inclinations - the normal - of the majority.
Their mothers and I felt it was best since it is the cultural norm in the area where we live, as well as the fact that I did not want them to be at a disadvantage when it comes to girls, since most American females (when asked) prefer men that have no superfluous tissue hanging off the end of their members. That along with the hygienic aspect.

There was no ritual involved; just a standard medical procedure routinely performed in the hospital within 48 hours of delivery.
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #74
andy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Yet you still ritually mutilated circumcised your two sons. You did exactly what society has been trying to promote ever since 1945 and you deviated from the natural inclinations - the normal - of the majority.
In my experience if a blighter is in deviant one area of his life he is likely to be deviant in all spheres of life.This mahdikakins is self evidently a bogus white nationalist.He is the very caricature of a white nationalist promoted of late as a nonce case,bloated,without a woman or job and living off of the government.It is incredible that his commentary is taken seriously even as a PR exercise.I suggest those replying to mahdikakins preface their replies with : ATTENTION YOU NONCE AKINS: then state reply
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion

Chase them into the swamps
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #75
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Yet you still ritually mutilated circumcised your two sons. You did exactly what society has been trying to promote ever since 1945 and you deviated from the natural inclinations - the normal - of the majority.
I should state that I also am a staunch advocate of women removing all body hair from their neck down - that's another man-made aesthetic that I find imminently preferable to nature's design.
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #76
Bruce Howard
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 196
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins View Post
I should state that I also am a staunch advocate of women removing all body hair from their neck down - that's another man-made aesthetic that I find imminently preferable to nature's design.
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #77
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins View Post
Their mothers and I felt it was best since it is the cultural norm in the area where we live, as well as the fact that I did not want them to be at a disadvantage when it comes to girls, since most American females (when asked) prefer men that have no superfluous tissue hanging off the end of their members. That along with the hygienic aspect.

There was no ritual involved; just a standard medical procedure routinely performed in the hospital within 48 hours of delivery.
There you are you see? You obeyed the cultural norm and did exactly what your neighbours expect. I'm not sure why or how your neighbours would twig whether or not you had been a good little American and jumped when told to.

You keep mentioning the hygiene aspect. Can any other American reading this tell me: Do they sell something called "soap" in your country? And also, when you go in the bathroom, have you a little silver thing sticking out of the wall that magically pumps out hot water when it is turned?


The tissue is not superfluous. It serves a purpose. It - I can see steam coming out of a certain person's ears even before I type this - apparently offers more feeling and more sensitivity.

You've tried to pull the "most girls prefer" line before and the link you provided to back it up failed.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins View Post
I should state that I also am a staunch advocate of women removing all body hair from their neck down - that's another man-made aesthetic that I find imminently preferable to nature's design.
I have nothing to say to this but I'm quoting it for andy's benefit. I want to see his reply.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #78
emilyrose
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 112
Default

are pedophiles ordinary citizens who need our support? no, they need to either be castrated or confined to prison until they are very very old..
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #79
andy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post




I have nothing to say to this but I'm quoting it for andy's benefit. I want to see his reply.
My initial reaction is surpisingly Scottish.British readers will recall Rab C Nesbit in that show the first actor who played his son committed suicide over his use as a sex slave by paedophiles.In the last interview he gave before he committed suicide he said because he seemed young the paedophiles insisted that he shaved all his body hair off so that he appeared more child like for their edification.No doubt it is the same principle that has made this an important issue for mahdikvirginakins.He wants them smooth as a three year old to fuel his paedophillic fantasy.He does not even consider why he thinks as he does and it is obvious that he has never had any contact with a decent woman of any kind.I suspect a virgin unless his mother obliged as no one but a mother would oblige the swine.
This whole business of using his "real name" and having teenage children is bullshit.All my teenage relations look in here now and again.If I was prancing about like mahdikvirginakins they would raise the issue off line.And if not satisfied with my explanation would be taking issue right here in the forum
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion

Chase them into the swamps
 
Old January 7th, 2013 #80
Angel Ramsey
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins View Post
I should state that I also am a staunch advocate of women removing all body hair from their neck down - that's another man-made aesthetic that I find imminently preferable to nature's design.
Quote:
Originally Posted by andy View Post
My initial reaction is surpisingly Scottish.British readers will recall Rab C Nesbit in that show the first actor who played his son committed suicide over his use as a sex slave by paedophiles.In the last interview he gave before he committed suicide he said because he seemed young the paedophiles insisted that he shaved all his body hair off so that he appeared more child like for their edification.No doubt it is the same principle that has made this an important issue for mahdikvirginakins.He wants them smooth as a three year old to fuel his paedophillic fantasy.He does not even consider why he thinks as he does and it is obvious that he has never had any contact with a decent woman of any kind.I suspect a virgin unless his mother obliged as no one but a mother would oblige the swine.
This whole business of using his "real name" and having teenage children is bullshit.All my teenage relations look in here now and again.If I was prancing about like mahdikvirginakins they would raise the issue off line.And if not satisfied with my explanation would be taking issue right here in the forum
Interesting connection.
 
Reply

Tags
britian, paedophile, paedophiles, progress

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.
Page generated in 0.29967 seconds.