Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 18th, 2020 #1
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,170
Default The first man in space could have been British

__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Old October 18th, 2020 #2
Nikola Bijeliti
fluxmaster
 
Nikola Bijeliti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Parallel Flux Universe
Posts: 1,491
Blog Entries: 32
Default

It doesn't matter who was the first man in space; what matters is who designed the rocket. In both the American and Soviet space programs, the rockets were designed by Germans. Even the British Megarock was based on a German design.
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler
 
Old October 19th, 2020 #3
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Space exploration should never take precedence over British racial preservation! Anyone who says otherwise is saying something very disgusting and disgraceful!

I say let the extraterrestrials come to us. Even if aliens are found, what are the chances they will be sentient beings? It is more than likely they will be useless blobs or something, totally incapable of meaningful communication. Many people seem to be expecting the first extraterrestrial encounter to be some grand meeting of sentient beings, but I think the reality would be very anti-climactic. In such a situation, do you think many will take the attitude that the billions invested in space exploration efforts were worth the results?

Leave the space exporation endeavours to the relevant Americans. It feeds their fragile patriotic egos. The United States, that extremely malignant and faulty construct that is doomed, has a new military branch now, the... (in a mockingly epic voice) Space Force! (Normal voice) I think the people involved in the branch's founding want non-Americans to be envious of them and America, but no enlightened and mentally advanced people care. Relevant Britons should not pay serious attention to space-related scientific advancements, unless they are very important to something very important or essential!

No one should be concerning themselves with the rest of the universe, while there are so many extremely dangerous threats and vulnerabilities on Earth!
 
Old October 19th, 2020 #4
Nikola Bijeliti
fluxmaster
 
Nikola Bijeliti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Parallel Flux Universe
Posts: 1,491
Blog Entries: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
Space exploration should never take precedence over British racial preservation! Anyone who says otherwise is saying something very disgusting and disgraceful!

I say let the extraterrestrials come to us. Even if aliens are found, what are the chances they will be sentient beings? It is more than likely they will be useless blobs or something, totally incapable of meaningful communication. Many people seem to be expecting the first extraterrestrial encounter to be some grand meeting of sentient beings, but I think the reality would be very anti-climactic. In such a situation, do you think many will take the attitude that the billions invested in space exploration efforts were worth the results?

Leave the space exporation endeavours to the relevant Americans. It feeds their fragile patriotic egos. The United States, that extremely malignant and faulty construct that is doomed, has a new military branch now, the... (in a mockingly epic voice) Space Force! (Normal voice) I think the people involved in the branch's founding want non-Americans to be envious of them and America, but no enlightened and mentally advanced people care. Relevant Britons should not pay serious attention to space-related scientific advancements, unless they are very important to something very important or essential!

No one should be concerning themselves with the rest of the universe, while there are so many extremely dangerous threats and vulnerabilities on Earth!
Quite the contrary, space exploration contributes to our racial survival by providing more lands for White people to colonize and spread our seed.

Using your same argument, one could say that the Anglo-Saxons should never have explored and settled in Albion; rather, let the Albionians come to Angeln and Saxony. What would be the state of British racial preservation today if the Anglo-Saxons had never ventured forth and set foot in Britain?
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler
 
Old October 19th, 2020 #5
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikola Bijeliti View Post
Quite the contrary, space exploration contributes to our racial survival by providing more lands for White people to colonize and spread our seed.

Using your same argument, one could say that the Anglo-Saxons should never have explored and settled in Albion; rather, let the Albionians come to Angeln and Saxony. What would be the state of British racial preservation today if the Anglo-Saxons had never ventured forth and set foot in Britain?
More territory would be nice, but that should be further down on the agenda. The current situation is far too dangerous right now to even think about space colonisation.

The British people would actually be in a better demographic state had the people you are referring to had not set foot in Britain. See this page: https://survivalist-information-site...ing-composites

Two questions for you:

1) What is your nationality?
2) What is your racial type / ethnic background?
 
Old October 19th, 2020 #6
Nikola Bijeliti
fluxmaster
 
Nikola Bijeliti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Parallel Flux Universe
Posts: 1,491
Blog Entries: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
More territory would be nice, but that should be further down on the agenda. The current situation is far too dangerous right now to even think about space colonisation.
I'm not saying that now is the right time for interplanetary colonization, but it is hugely important that we do so in the not-too-distant future. And if China has plans to colonize Mars, it would be good if White people got there first.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
The British people would actually be in a better demographic state had the people you are referring to had not set foot in Britain. See this page: https://survivalist-information-site...ing-composites
That was an interesting article. Its thesis is that the English are a Celtic people, not a Germanic people. I had never heard that before, although I'm certainly open to that idea. Nonetheless, the English language is definitely a Germanic and not a Celtic language.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
Two questions for you:

1) What is your nationality?
2) What is your racial type / ethnic background?
I am a citizen of the United States of 100% White European ancestry. I prefer not to go into more detail in a public forum.
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler
 
Old October 20th, 2020 #7
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,170
Default

Quote:
The United States, that extremely malignant and faulty construct that is doomed, has a new military branch now, the... (in a mockingly epic voice) Space Force!
The u.s. has the Space Farce, but Britain had SHADO.

__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Old October 20th, 2020 #8
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikola Bijeliti View Post
I'm not saying that now is the right time for interplanetary colonization, but it is hugely important that we do so in the not-too-distant future. And if China has plans to colonize Mars, it would be good if White people got there first.

That was an interesting article. Its thesis is that the English are a Celtic people, not a Germanic people. I had never heard that before, although I'm certainly open to that idea. Nonetheless, the English language is definitely a Germanic and not a Celtic language.

I am a citizen of the United States of 100% White European ancestry. I prefer not to go into more detail in a public forum.
I expect China will soon have severe economic sanctions imposed on it by various countries, in retaliation for negligence regarding handling of the spread of COVID-19, so that may at least temporarily thwart the space exploration aspirations of the relevant Chinese people.

Technically, the page is not an article, but regardless, the information it shows is very important. As I am someone with highly advanced racial awareness, who has very extensively observed the various European peoples, it is very obvious to me that the English are not Germanic. British people have very distinctive racial features, and most of the time, I can spot them immediately. At least the vast majority of people who are not fully British have some feature of their face that is not consistent with British racial appearance, and aesthetic inferiority is an effect usually suffered to some degree. Unfortunate for them.

I do not care about the English language's origins, and I do not care which broader racial class the British fall under. The racial group is exceptionally desirable (the English part especially), as well as very tactically useful, and this is all I need to know.

The reason I asked about your nationality and racial make-up was because I was not sure of your dispostion and intentions. Your name led me to believe you are some kind of Serbian or Croatian type, not that I would take any issue with that.

Last edited by John Trent; October 20th, 2020 at 07:57 AM.
 
Old October 20th, 2020 #9
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Allan View Post
The u.s. has the Space Farce, but Britain had SHADO.

Gerry Anderson's UFO: Opening Titles (1080p HD)
I never saw that programme. I am a younger millennial, so I was never immersed in very much of the older media. I do know that the people of previous generations had the luxury of not having multiracialist propaganda constantly shoved down their throats, while being constantly demonised as racists and racism enablers.
 
Old October 20th, 2020 #10
Nikola Bijeliti
fluxmaster
 
Nikola Bijeliti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Parallel Flux Universe
Posts: 1,491
Blog Entries: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
I never saw that programme. I am a younger millennial, so I was never immersed in very much of the older media. I do know that the people of previous generations had the luxury of not having multiracialist propaganda constantly shoved down their throats, while being constantly demonised as racists and racism enablers.
It is a common misconception among Millennials that Boomers didn't have anti-White propaganda shoved down their throats. In fact, we were inundated with propaganda, although it wasn't the same propaganda as today.

My sixth grade teacher, an Irishman, was a fanatical devotee of Martin Luther King. He would pontificate about the struggles of the Negro and glorify King as a Savior. We were subjected to more propaganda in junior high and high school. Television programming was more or less all left-wing propaganda. Hogan's Heroes portrayed Germans as autocratic incompetents. All in the Family ridiculed pro-White sentiment as bigotry. The Jeffersons promoted miscegenation. The Mary Tyler Moore Show promoted feminism and childlessness. You couldn't turn on the television without being saturated with anti-racist, pro-feminist propaganda.

One thing that was not promoted at the time was multiculturalism; that did not come till later. It was taken for granted that Whites were the majority, Blacks were the minority, and other races weren't considered. We lived in largely all-White areas and almost never interacted with other races. My elementary school was all-White. My junior high and high school were nearly all-White; there was only one Black in any of my classes in all of junior high and high school, and that was in gym class.

Anti-racism was presented, not in the form of diversity, but in the form of justice. Since we practically didn't know any Black people, except on television, it was all very theoretical and abstract, so it was hard to disagree. Once we started getting to know more Blacks, most of us started to take a more realistic view of race, but only in very recent years did it become apparent to me that we were in danger of being replaced by other races.

The program was presented gradually but incessantly, so that most of us didn't see where it was leading until it was too late to change it peacefully.
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler
 
Old October 21st, 2020 #11
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikola Bijeliti View Post
It is a common misconception among Millennials that Boomers didn't have anti-White propaganda shoved down their throats. In fact, we were inundated with propaganda, although it wasn't the same propaganda as today.

My sixth grade teacher, an Irishman, was a fanatical devotee of Martin Luther King. He would pontificate about the struggles of the Negro and glorify King as a Savior. We were subjected to more propaganda in junior high and high school. Television programming was more or less all left-wing propaganda. Hogan's Heroes portrayed Germans as autocratic incompetents. All in the Family ridiculed pro-White sentiment as bigotry. The Jeffersons promoted miscegenation. The Mary Tyler Moore Show promoted feminism and childlessness. You couldn't turn on the television without being saturated with anti-racist, pro-feminist propaganda.

One thing that was not promoted at the time was multiculturalism; that did not come till later. It was taken for granted that Whites were the majority, Blacks were the minority, and other races weren't considered. We lived in largely all-White areas and almost never interacted with other races. My elementary school was all-White. My junior high and high school were nearly all-White; there was only one Black in any of my classes in all of junior high and high school, and that was in gym class.

Anti-racism was presented, not in the form of diversity, but in the form of justice. Since we practically didn't know any Black people, except on television, it was all very theoretical and abstract, so it was hard to disagree. Once we started getting to know more Blacks, most of us started to take a more realistic view of race, but only in very recent years did it become apparent to me that we were in danger of being replaced by other races.

The program was presented gradually but incessantly, so that most of us didn't see where it was leading until it was too late to change it peacefully.
I am guessing the propaganda volume was more intense in the United States, in the early stages. I grew up absorbing a lot of American media, mainly action films and Disney productions, and while much of the media did contain some non-Europeans, there was nothing I saw that seriously indicated an agenda.

To me, it seems the mass diversity nonsense in U.K. media did not start until the late 2000s or early 2010s. All of the the British films and television programmes of the 1990s and before, that I saw (e.g. Fawlty Towers, One Foot in The Grave, Blackadder, Wallace and Gromit), overwhelmingly or entirely featured British people.

Last edited by John Trent; October 22nd, 2020 at 03:08 PM.
 
Old October 21st, 2020 #12
Nikola Bijeliti
fluxmaster
 
Nikola Bijeliti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Parallel Flux Universe
Posts: 1,491
Blog Entries: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
I a guessing the propaganda volume was more intense in the United States, in the early stages. I grew up absorbing a lot of American media, mainly action films and Disney productions, and while much of the media did contain some non-Europeans, there was nothing I saw that seriously indicated an agenda.

To me, it seems the mass diversity nonsense in U.K. media did not start until the late 2000s or early 2010s. All of the the British films and television programmes of the 1990s and before, that I saw (e.g. Fawlty Towers, One Foot in The Grave, Blackadder, Wallace and Gromit), overwhelmingly or entirely featured British people.
As I was saying, the propaganda in the 1960's and 70's wasn't about diversity; it was about justice. No one suggested that the United States should be more diverse, or that "diversity is our strength"; rather, that Blacks were being discriminated against, and that that was unjust. In the UK and the rest of Europe, you didn't have a sizable population of descendants of slaves, so the same approach couldn't have been used to the same effect.

Are the terms Boomer, GenX, and Millennial used in the UK the way they are in the US? I've always thought of those as American distinctions. There were certain events that happened in the United States, such as the lifting of quotas on Jews entering universities, which resulted in Jewish-led student protests, and the Vietnam War, which may not have exact parallels in Europe. For example, did the Hippy movement exist in the UK? Also, the program All in the Family was based on the British program Till Death Do Us Part, which, to my understanding, was not about White prejudice against Blacks but about the prejudice of certain classes of British against certain other classes of British, is that correct? I've never watched the program, so I know little about it.
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler
 
Old October 21st, 2020 #13
Gladiatrix
Senior Member
 
Gladiatrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: In a dystopian nightmare
Posts: 4,808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikola Bijeliti View Post
As I was saying, the propaganda in the 1960's and 70's wasn't about diversity; it was about justice. No one suggested that the United States should be more diverse, or that "diversity is our strength"; rather, that Blacks were being discriminated against, and that that was unjust. In the UK and the rest of Europe, you didn't have a sizable population of descendants of slaves, so the same approach couldn't have been used to the same effect.

Are the terms Boomer, GenX, and Millennial used in the UK the way they are in the US? I've always thought of those as American distinctions. There were certain events that happened in the United States, such as the lifting of quotas on Jews entering universities, which resulted in Jewish-led student protests, and the Vietnam War, which may not have exact parallels in Europe. For example, did the Hippy movement exist in the UK? Also, the program All in the Family was based on the British program Till Death Do Us Part, which, to my understanding, was not about White prejudice against Blacks but about the prejudice of certain classes of British against certain other classes of British, is that correct? I've never watched the program, so I know little about it.
Didn't Billy Bob Clinton ride out the Vietnam draft on a Fulbright scholarship in the UK?

Mother Europa had this:

__________________
Political correctness is oppression disguised as good manners.
 
Old October 21st, 2020 #14
Nikola Bijeliti
fluxmaster
 
Nikola Bijeliti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Parallel Flux Universe
Posts: 1,491
Blog Entries: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gladiatrix View Post
Didn't Billy Bob Clinton ride out the Vietnam draft on a Fulbright scholarship in the UK?

Mother Europa had this:
Paris Riots (1968)

"All Power to the Imagination": Paris, May 1968: The Student Revolt
I didn't watch them in their entirety, but, from what I watched, it appears that the protests in Europe were not about injustice against Blacks but were ostensibly about better conditions for White Europeans, albeit using communist tactics. And I'd be willing to bet that the leaders were Jewish.
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler
 
Old October 21st, 2020 #15
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,170
Default

Back to the space topic--another interesting program was Black Arrow, which lasted from 1969 to 1971 comprising four launches, the last of which was successful, placing the Prospero satellite into orbit. John Trent may disagree, but I think it was unfortunate this program was cancelled, as it had good potential, i.e., not relying on NASA for launchers. Rather short-sighted decision on the British government's part back then, in my opinion.

__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Old October 24th, 2020 #16
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikola Bijeliti View Post
As I was saying, the propaganda in the 1960's and 70's wasn't about diversity; it was about justice. No one suggested that the United States should be more diverse, or that "diversity is our strength"; rather, that Blacks were being discriminated against, and that that was unjust. In the UK and the rest of Europe, you didn't have a sizable population of descendants of slaves, so the same approach couldn't have been used to the same effect.

Are the terms Boomer, GenX, and Millennial used in the UK the way they are in the US? I've always thought of those as American distinctions. There were certain events that happened in the United States, such as the lifting of quotas on Jews entering universities, which resulted in Jewish-led student protests, and the Vietnam War, which may not have exact parallels in Europe. For example, did the Hippy movement exist in the UK? Also, the program All in the Family was based on the British program Till Death Do Us Part, which, to my understanding, was not about White prejudice against Blacks but about the prejudice of certain classes of British against certain other classes of British, is that correct? I've never watched the program, so I know little about it.
I understand what you mean about justice promotion. I was merely remarking on what I had experienced with American media.

The generational terms seem to be universal in application, and no other prominent generational identifications exist at this time, so it is most practical to use those.

In the 1960s, there was a "liberal revolution" (an enemy subversion) in Britain. The highly formal and traditional aspects of society started to diminish rapidly, and decadence started to become significant in scale, what with hippie-like types, punks, disorderly types, and so on. The scale was smaller than what occurred in the United States though.

I have not watched the television programming to which you are referring, so I am unable to answer your question.
 
Old October 24th, 2020 #17
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Allan View Post
Back to the space topic--another interesting program was Black Arrow, which lasted from 1969 to 1971 comprising four launches, the last of which was successful, placing the Prospero satellite into orbit. John Trent may disagree, but I think it was unfortunate this program was cancelled, as it had good potential, i.e., not relying on NASA for launchers. Rather short-sighted decision on the British government's part back then, in my opinion.

Black Arrow : The Lipstick Rocket - A Very British Space Program
I cannot ever advocate the prioritisation of vanity projects or projects with insufficient utility to eliminating an extreme threat over the British / English demographic's well-being and continuity.

I cannot remember the last time I paid any significant level of attention to space exploration events. I have been too distracted with problems and events of more significant scale.

Last edited by John Trent; October 25th, 2020 at 03:36 AM.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 PM.
Page generated in 0.79245 seconds.