Edgar Steele

[-JC]

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/101110_dictatorship.htm

[-JC]

The FBI must approve manuscripts of current or former agent's books prior to publication. This is therefore a fascinating glimpse "inside."

Listen carefully and you'll hear that, for reasons readers here may not find strange, the FBI's hostage negotiator who replaced Noesner after several weeks on-duty at Waco and was on-duty when the final assault and fire occurred, was also interviewed recently on Coast to Coast.

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2010/11/13

Hostage Negotiations

Show Audio
Real (High Bandwidth)


Win (High Bandwidth)


Real (Low Bandwidth)


Win (Low Bandwidth)


MP3 Downloads:Hour 1 Hour 2 Hour 3 Hour 4

Date:11-13-10Host:Ian PunnettGuests:Gary Noesner

Retired FBI hostage negotiator Gary Noesner joined Ian Punnett to discuss events from his 23-year career working in tense stand-off situations. Noesner first commented on the 1992 siege at Ruby Ridge, site of a deadly confrontation between separatist-survivalist [Noesner only used the term "survivalist" in the interview] Randy Weaver and his family, and federal agents. The mountaintop shootout ultimately claimed the lives of Weaver's wife and son, as well as a deputy U.S. marshal. Although he was not at the scene, Noesner believes the loss of life occurred primarily because the FBI's Hostage Rescue Team, empowered by past successes, sought to end the situation through tactics alone, instead of relying on negotiation.

A similar tragic circumstance played out in 1993 in Waco, Texas, when the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) attempted to execute an arrest warrant against David Koresh, cult leader of the Branch Davidians. During the initial shootout, four ATF agents and numerous people inside the compound were killed. Noesner said he was brought in to negotiate with Koresh, who he characterized as a con man and manipulator [a not atypically hypocritical, fundamentalist ("Branch Davidian") Seventh-day Adventist], and Noesner claims that it was he who personally] successfully secured the release of 35 followers, mostly children. As in Ruby Ridge, a tactical team enacted their own plan to force out the holed-up resisters. The Davidians, perceiving an aggressive act against them, took their own lives by setting their compound on fire [using fires inside they had prepared in advance for that purpose using "kerosene"], Noesner explained. [Some critics claim in documentary film that the FBI illegally assisted by the military introduced "CS" (a powder in a kerosene carrier) rather than aerosol tear gas ("CN") was introduced into the occupied buildings and it was the kerosene accompanying the CS that caused the fire. Forensics determined that kerosene was present.]

Noesner also reported on the account of a distraught father who took his two young children hostage, then killed them and himself because he was given five minutes surrender to police. According to Noesner, issuing time limits in hostage situations is not part of prevailing negotiation methodology.



Website(s):

• garynoesner.com

Book(s):

• Stalling for Time: My Life as an FBI Hostage Negotiator " target="_blank">Stalling for Time: My Life as an FBI Hostage Negotiator
  Stalling for Time: My Life as an FBI Hostage Negotiator ">Stalling for Time: My Life as an FBI Hostage Negotiator " /> Stalling for Time: My Life as an FBI Hostage Negotiator ">Stalling for Time: My Life as an FBI Hostage Negotiator

[America First]

Burma Needs Rule Of Law—But So Does U.S.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/101114_burma.htm

By Paul Craig Roberts

Ten years of rule by the Bush and Obama regimes have seen the collapse of the rule of law in the United States. Is the American media covering this ominous and extraordinary story? No the American media is preoccupied with the rule of law in Burma (Myanmar).

The military regime that rules Burma just released from house arrest the pro-democracy leader, Aung San Suu Kyi. The American media used the occasion of her release to get on Burma’s case for the absence of the rule of law. I’m all for the brave lady, but if truth be known, "freedom and democracy" America needs her far worse than does Burma.

I’m not an expert on Burma, but the way I see it the objection to a military government is that the government is not accountable to law. Instead, such a regime behaves as it sees fit and issues edicts that advance its agenda. Burma’s government can be criticized for not having a rule of law, but it cannot be criticized for ignoring its own laws. We might not like what the Burmese government does, but, precisely speaking, it is not behaving illegally.

In contrast, the United States government claims to be a government of laws, not of men, but when the executive branch violates the laws that constrain it, those responsible are not held accountable for their criminal actions. As accountability is the essence of the rule of law, the absence of accountability means the absence of the rule of law.

The list of criminal actions by presidents Bush and Obama, Vice President Cheney, the CIA, the NSA, the US military, and other branches of the government is long and growing.

For example, both President Bush and vice president Cheney violated US and international laws against torture. Amnesty International and the American Civil Liberties Union responded to Bush’s recent admission that he authorized torture with calls for a criminal investigation of Bush’s crime.

In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, the ACLU reminded the US Department of Justice (sic) that "a nation committed to the rule of law cannot simply ignore evidence that its most senior leaders authorized torture."

Rob Freer of Amnesty International said that Bush’s admission "to authorizing acts which constitute torture under international law" and which constitute "a crime under international law," puts the US government "under obligation to investigate and to bring those responsible to justice."

The ACLU and Amnesty International do not want to admit it, but the US government shed its commitment to the rule of law a decade ago when the US launched its naked aggression--war crimes under the Nuremberg standard--against Afghanistan and Iraq on the basis of lies and deception.

The US government’s contempt for the rule of law took another step when President Bush violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and had the National Security Agency bypass the FISA court and spy on Americans without warrants.

The New York Times is on its high horse about the rule of law in Burma, but when a patriot revealed to the Times that Bush was violating US law, the Times’ editors sat on the leak for one year until after Bush was safely re-elected.

Holder, of course, will not attempt to hold Bush accountable for the crime of torture.

Indeed, Assistant US Attorney John Durham has just cleared the CIA of accountability for its crime of destroying the videotape evidence of the US government’s illegal torture of detainees, a felony under US law.

Last February Cheney said on ABC’s This Week that "I was a big supporter of waterboarding."

US law has always regarded waterboarding as torture. The US government executed WW II Japanese for waterboarding American POWs. But Cheney has escaped accountability, which means that there is no rule of law.

Vice president Cheney’s office also presided over the outing of a covert CIA agent, a felony. Yet, nothing happened to Cheney, and the underling who took the fall had his sentence commuted by President Bush.

President Obama has made himself complicit in the crimes of his predecessor by refusing to enforce the rule of law.

In his criminality, Obama has actually surpassed Bush. Bush is the president of extra-judicial torture, extra-judicial detention, extra-judicial spying and invasions of privacy, but Obama has one-upped Bush. Obama is the president of extra-judicial murder.

Not only is Obama violating the sovereignty of an American ally, Pakistan, by sending in drones and Special Forces teams to murder Pakistani civilians, but in addition Obama has a list of American citizens whom he intends to murder without arrest, presentation of evidence, trial and conviction.

The most massive change brought by Obama is his assertion of the right of the executive branch to murder whomever it wishes without any interference from US and international law.

The world has not seen such a criminal government as Obama’s since Joseph Stalin’s and Hitler’s.

On November 8, the US Department of Justice (sic) told federal district court judge John Bates that president Obama’s decision to murder American citizens is one of "the very core powers of the president."

Moreover, declared the Justice (sic) Department, the murder of American citizens is a "political question" that is not subject to judicial review.

In other words, federal courts exist for one purpose only--to give a faux approval to executive branch actions.

If truth be known, there is more justice in Burma under the military regime than in the USA. The military regime put Aung San Suu Kyi under house arrest in her own home.

The military regime did not throw her into a dungeon and rape and torture her under cover of false allegations and indefinite detention without charges. Moreover, the military "tyrants" released her either as a sign of good will or under pressure from international human rights groups, or some combination of the two.

If only comparable good will existed in the US government or pressure from international human rights groups had equal force in America as in Burma.

But, alas, in America macho tough guys approve the virtual strip search of their wives and daughters by full body scanners and the groping by TSA thugs of three-year old children screaming in terror.

Unlike in Burma, where Aung San Suu Kyi fights for human rights, the sheeple in Amerika submit to the total invasion of their privacy and to the total destruction of their civil liberties for no other reason than they are brain dead and believe without any evidence that they are at the mercy of "terrorists" in far distant lands who have no armies, navies, or air forces and are armed only with AK-47s and improvised explosive devices.

The ignorant population of the "Great American Superpower," buried in fear propagated by a Ministry of Truth, has acquiesced in the total destruction of the US Constitution and their civil liberties.

Sheeple such as these have no respect anywhere on the face of the earth.

Paul Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand. He is the author of Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider's Account of Policymaking in Washington; Alienation and the Soviet Economy and Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy, and is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice.

[notmenomore]

If PCR keeps up this line of writing, it won't be much longer until he's naming the jew. Now that will be tolerated until he starts naming particular, specific jews. Once he gets to putting names with stories it won't be much longer 'til he's sharing quarters with Ed Steele.

Gulag West: the Kwa

[ZOG CONTROL]

Cyndi Steele with Jamie Kelso on VOR 11-15-2010
http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=9531

[-JC]

[QUOTE=America First;1193194]Burma Needs Rule Of Law—But So Does U.S. http://www.vdare.com/roberts/101114_burma.htm[/QUOTE]

United States Supreme Court Will Soon Issue a Landmark Decision on the Validity of the Constitution
Posted: 14 Nov 2010 10:02 PM PST

The United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution. The Supreme Court will consider three petitions filed by William M. Windsor, a retired Atlanta, Georgia grandfather. The decision should be rendered by the end of the year. Unless The Supreme Court acts, federal judges will be free to void the Constitution.

The Questions Presented to The Supreme Court by Grandfather Windsor are:

1. Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by federal judges?

2. Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants?

3. Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?

These questions are presented in three separate Petitions for Writ of Mandamus filed with The United States Supreme Court the first week of November 2010 (appeal numbers to-be-assigned).

Windsor has been involved in legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006. Windsor was named a defendant in a lawsuit (1:06-CV-0714-ODE) in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery. Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it all up and lied about absolutely everything that he swore. Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride in Niagara Falls, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against Windsor were not true.

Despite this undeniable proof, federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay over $400,000 in legal fees. Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay rubber-stamped Judge Evans’ ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration (certiori denied).

[O.H.]

Originally Posted by John Liberty

The Stormfront yid patrol was raising hell because we were saying Edgar was innocent from the git-go and that it was all a big farce, so Bjarni shut the thread down to silence us. (latter the SF anti-fa's just banned us outright)

Well I'm sure they refunded any of your membership dues after that since that is a very sincere and honest group over there..

[Hugh]

A Law professor and police officer agree with Tom above re do not talk to the police.

YouTube - Dont Talk to Police

YouTube - Dont Talk to Police

[Donald E. Pauly]

Cyndi is interviewed again on the Jamie Kelso show last night. Listen to part 3 at http://reasonradionetwork.com/_archi...-_20101116.mp3 . Her lawyer makes a most important point about the need for political pressure on Congress to rein in the out of control FBI .

[John Liberty]

Cyndi is interviewed again on the Jamie Kelso show last night. Listen to part 3 at http://reasonradionetwork.com/_archi...-_20101116.mp3 . Her lawyer makes a most important point about the need for political pressure on Congress to rein in the out of control FBI . Donald Pauly

The FBI is just the yids new reincarnation of the old NKVD, controlled by the ADL and the SPLC and sent out to hammer the goyim into submission.

[Dale VanderMeer]

Tom also addresses this issue directly to his listeners.:

YouTube - DO NOT TALK TO THE COPS

YouTube - DO NOT TALK TO THE COPS

Originally Posted by Hugh

A Law professor and police officer agree with Tom above re do not talk to the police.

YouTube - Dont Talk to Police

[ZOG CONTROL]

Free Ed, FREE HIM NOW!




Cyndi Steele with Jamie Kelso 11/11/2010 MP3

Cyndi Steele with Jamie Kelso 11/15/2010 MP3

Cyndi Steele with Jamie Kelso 11/16/2010 MP3


Also hear Cyndi Steele with her attorney, Wesley Hoyt interviewed on the Rick Adams Show:
http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/otherfiles/Rick_Adams_2_11152010.mp3 (11/15 hour 2)
http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/otherfiles/Rick_Adams_1_11172010.mp3 (11/17 hour 1)
http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/otherfiles/Rick_Adams_2_11172010.mp3 (11/17 hour 2)

[America First]

Does Mr. Paul Craig Roberts know of Mr. Steels plight ?


If so is Mr. Roberts going to make a statement on this travesty ?

If Mr. Roberts knows of Mr. Steel then is he not writing because the case is pending ?

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/101123_stench.htm

[John Liberty]

I didn't think there was any new news, (because I watch this thread daily now). But, the Maher angle is a new motive to set Steele up, since Fairfax had already been stealing from Edgar's silver stash (but Fairfax seems to be a dim bulb). Bill Maher didn't even have to be aware. Fairfax could easily have been instructed by his neighborhood friend James Maher on the latest FBI frameup/informant techniques. He seems to be the mystery accomplice that the FBI has conveniently overlooked.

I smell a kike setup, with the Feds handed a star chamber case against a known anti-Zionist subversive. The FBI just setup that dump muzzie in Oregon who they said was going to blow up a menorah display. They gave him a dummy bomb (and probably a wad of cash) to pull it off and then busted him.

Roberts on FBI setups.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_SFpydA2Wk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_SFpydA2Wk

[Donald E. Pauly]

Cyndi Steele's lawyer has written a forward to a book on judicial corruption that is a classic.
=======
http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/?p=154

Hinkson book Foreword by Cyndi Steele attorney Wesley Hoyt
2010 NOVEMBER 21
by admin
An upcoming book entitled “A Cesspool of Judicial Corruption-The David Hinkson Story” addresses many parallels to Mr. Steele’s frame-up and incarceration as a political prisoner. Mr. Hoyt has authored a Foreword to that book, and it is released here to whet reader’s interest, as well as to provide an accessible summary of the Hinkson case for FES supporters.

FOREWORD by Wesley W. Hoyt

The Presumption of Innocence is the fundamental right, at the foundation of all personal freedoms in America which embodies the concept “it is better to free ten guilty men than to convict one who is innocent.”

For the last 30 years, the government has been using various techniques to replace basic, God-given Constitutional rights, such as the Presumption-of-Innocence, with various legal devices, such as the “Presumption of Governmental Regularity and Correctness.” An example of how this device is used is that judges proclaim they will “always believe the government witness over the accused” (in situations where all other factors are equal). Judges who follow the Presumption of Government Regularity and Correctness consider only the government’s witness to be an accurate reporter of events and consider the citizen not believable; hence, the evisceration of the Presumption of Innocence.

There are case law rulings creating this abomination of justice, which is contrary to the U.S. Constitution. What should happen under our Constitution is, when only the word of a citizen is pitted against the testimony of a government witness, without corroborating evidence, the Presumption of Innocence REQUIRES that judges accept the statements of the accused as
true. But this new device allows the judge to base his decision on something other than fundamental constitutional principles and to arbitrarily conclude that the government is right and the citizen wrong. The Presumption of Governmental Regularity and Correctness is a malicious tool, created as an alternative to Constitutional law, fashioned by the New World Order (NWO) movement, to defeat the Constitutional rights of the individual in America. It
is the chief technique that allows collaborating government and foreign private interests to transform this country into a police state.

Another technique used in transforming this nation from a free state into a police state, is the attack on the innocent; those “politically incorrect” people willing to speak out against tyranny and corruption. Against them the government uses false charges, manufactured by rogue government agents on behalf of the elite who deem themselves to be “politically
correct;” i.e., the NWO movement.

“They,” these rogue agents and the prosecutors and judges who support them, deliberately attack innocent individuals who criticize the NWO movement simply because of differing views of how governmental authority should be administered, managed and applied.

The tie-that-binds these entities is a form of peer pressure mixed with legalized bribery that encourages government employees to stick together, causing judges, prosecutors and government agents to feel obligated to support each other, even if their conscience tells them that they are prosecuting an innocent person on false charges. Legalized bribery comes in the form of “cash awards” for government employees from $10,000 to $25,000 per conviction to “recognize and reward” each official under 5 USC §§ 4502, 4503 & 4504 and 5 USC §4302 to enhance their “performance” or for so-called “superior accomplishment” or “a special act or service” or if the act “achieves a significant reduction in paperwork.” The criteria is so loose, any employee can be given a cash award for almost anything; consider the power this law gives the head of each agency to manipulate employees. In addition, the government employee can also receive “time off from duty without loss of pay” as a part of the reward for bringing down a politically incorrect person.

A politically incorrect person not only believes in the U.S. Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, but uses his freedom of speech to point out law violations by the government. Such was the case for David Hinkson who developed ionized minerals as a dietary supplement and started a business that went from zero to $4.0 million in sales in four years. Then he came under the scrutiny of Rogue agents at the IRS, FDA and FBI who were helped by cooperating private individuals all of whom wanted to put him in prison so they could steal his business. Because of something called the “Crony System,” a member of the government invariably refuses to challenge another government employee who is attacking a politically incorrect person; this part of the Crony System operates like a conspiracy of silence.

Also, rogue agents are given wide latitude to vindictively pursue their own personal agenda, such as when an agent feels insulted by someone who challenges their authority, as happened in David Hinkson’s case. The rogue agents are allowed to pursue their own agenda because they are supposed to be the protectors of the judges and prosecutors who supervise them.

These agents create a “bunker” mentality among the judges and prosecutors in a paranoid atmosphere with a pretense of constant danger. These rogue agents are in a symbiotic relationship with both judges and prosecutors that leaves the ordinary citizen “out of the loop” and creates conditions ripe for victimizing the innocent politically incorrect person. *

The attacks by rogue agents are not limited to dissenters who make "politically incorrect" statements. Sometimes such agents are directed by NWO leaders to attack creative individuals, such as inventors who develop products that might compete with the private interests of big-pharma or the oil and gas industry or other industries that provide profit to the NWO bankers. Once falsely charged with a crime, the innocent person’s prosecution will be supported by members of the Crony System, which ultimately relies upon the Presumption of Governmental Regularity and Correctness in order to bind these different techniques
together to ensure a conviction. Convicting as many dissidents as possible not only silences the opposition, it provides funding to the American Prison Industry (API), another creation of the NWO bankers. The API depends upon Revenue Bonds for funding which have been sold in regional and world markets and must be repaid by taxes that support prisoners; the more
prisoners, the more tax dollars to repay Revenue Bonds. In order to obtain a conviction, not only is the Presumption of Innocence defeated, but evidence of other defenses a politically incorrect individual might have, such as alibi or self defense, are simply excluded by a cooperating activist judge, who is receiving some form of payoff.

In some cases, such as in the Hinkson case, the judge would not allow the jury to hear evidence crucial to his alibi defense which could have resulted in his acquittal. For example, when the government failed to produce David’s U.S. Passport, the judge also refused to order it produced which would have proved that David was in Ukraine and Russia when he supposedly was soliciting Elvin Joe Swisher to murder federal officials. Also, the judge excluded from the jury’s consideration Swisher’s official military file which absolutely proved that Swisher was a liar as he had not received military awards or decorations, had not killed anyone in combat and had not served in Korea; in fact, Swisher was court-martialed for misconduct and busted from a Corporal to a PFC without ever having traveled to Korea or served in a conflict.

Failure to produce David’s Passport by the government and exclusion of Swisher’s military file by the trial judge, who lied from the bench when he ruled that the file contained information that supported Swisher’s service in Korea is nothing less than prosecutorial and judicial misconduct – however, there is no one to prosecute them. When there is no physical evidence that a crime occurred, such as the accusation that David Hinkson tried to hire Swisher to murder federal officials, then the only evidence is “hearsay” from the lying mouth of a government witness such as Swisher upon which to base the conviction. When Swisher made the claim that the accused said he wanted to hire him to murder federal officials, other than a flat denial, which he did, there was no other way to rebut such testimony than to show that the informant was lying about his other in-court statements, i.e., about faked military heroism and awards.

When Swisher bragged to the jury about his fake status as a decorated Korean combat veteran, he clothed himself with unassailable credibility because everybody loves and believes a war hero! He said that David wanted to hire him as a hit man because Swisher had killed “many” in combat. If the jury had learned that Swisher was lying about being a war hero, in
combat and serving in Korea and never received any decorations, awards or medals, his credibility would have been stripped from him. Thus, the government was able to use two fraudulent stories to convict David of crimes he did not commit and which never happened. The first story was that Swisher was credible because he was the equivalent of a super-hero injured war veteran and the second was that David Hinkson tried to solicit him to murder federal officials. Take out the first lie with the military record and the second lie also fails.

The failure of the judge to allow David to show that Swisher was lying about his military record, which the government went to great pains to make the center piece of its case, denied David the chance to prove that he was not guilty, or at least prove there was reasonable doubt as to his guilt.

The judge applied the Presumption of Government Regularity and Correctness when he excluded Swisher’s military file from the evidence that could be considered by the jury by saying that if admitted, it would only “confuse” the jury. Applying that precedent to future cases, one can see that the government will convict every innocent person who is falsely accused until the Presumption of Governmental Regularity and Correctness has been overturned.

Bearing false witness was prohibited under Biblical law. In addition, the eternal Law of Witnesses requires that at least two witnesses must testify as to the same set of facts if the accused is charged with a hearsay crime (remember that in the trial of Christ, the Sanhedrin went looking for two witnesses who would testify to the same false charge and couldn’t find
any liars to tell the same story, so finally, the Savior Himself had to supply the “crime” by stating that He was divine, which supposedly was blasphemy). Congress must pass a law to require at least two witnesses in the case of hearsay crimes.

Consider, if someone testifies: “You did it,” that there is no way to overcome such a statement because a mere denial, such as “No, I didn’t,” is merely what we commonly call “he said/she said.” Under the pre-1980 system the accused would win if it was just his word against the government witness, but under the present system, the government wins every time because the Presumption of Governmental Regularity and Correctness. In such a situation, the only choice for the accused is to prove that, for a variety of reasons, circumstances show that he didn’t do it. At that point it is up to a third party, such as a
judge or a jury to “weigh” the evidence and decide who is believable and whether there is reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant. That is why the Presumption of Government Regularity and Correctness damages the rights of the individual, because it virtually insures a conviction in every case by mandating acceptance of the government’s version. Another technique used by the U.S. Department of Justice is to provide news releases, at the outset of the case, filled with false accusations in order to demonize the accused by mounting community disdain against him. This is a form of jury-tampering based on attempts by the government to mold the minds of prospective jurors against the accused. There is no mechanism to prevent the government from leaking false information to the media which is damaging to the reputation of the accused because there is no one to prosecute the prosecutors unless Congress should make such conduct illegal.

Another technique is to hold the accused in jail, so that he cannot participate in his own defense. By presenting false accusations of additional criminal activity that never existed, which activity has been fabricated specifically for the detention hearing, the accused is denied a bond and, thus, cannot get out of jail before trial. Typically, in order to be in
a position to have the court deny bond in a murder for hire case, the government will falsely claim that the accused has a “list” of persons he is planning to kill. This makes the defendant appear to be very dangerous and thus, justifies holding him in pre-trial detention. Note: There is no mechanism for holding the government accountable or responsible for bringing
false allegations against the accused at a bond hearing, so those false allegations which held the person in jail before trial are quickly forgotten; nonetheless, they served the purpose of holding the accused in detention and denying him the opportunity to participate in his own defense. Thus, by these techniques, the innocent politically incorrect individual becomes a political prisoner of the U.S. Government.

The techniques described above are only a few of those used by the government against the politically incorrect; but all such techniques appear to have come from a KGB-style play book on how to destroy political dissenters. Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Ronald Regan and Stephen F. Downs, who lectures at New York University Law School both have isolated a problem with the prosecution for “fake” terrorist related crimes of almost a thousand innocent persons by the U.S. Government. These are referred to by Professor Downs as “Preemptive Prosecutions” based on a government assessment that the accused is likely to commit a crime in the future (or is just a general nuisance to the current
administration) so therefore, he/she is indicted, tried, convicted and imprisoned in a modern Kangaroo Court now, in a Soviet style purge, in the name of public safety.

The government’s motivation to prosecute fabricated cases is multi-fold, but includes:

1. justification of agency budgets (e.g., FBI $8.3 Billion);
2. advancement of the police state in Amerika (e.g., Patriot Act approved snooping -- Military Commissions Act eliminating Habeas Corpus, etc.);
3. profits from goods and services that supposedly promote public safety (e.g., sales and proliferation of total body scanners); and
4. pretense-justification of U.S. aggression in countries that support terrorism (e.g. it is okay to murder civilians in Somalia because that nation has supporters in the USA who have or might commit acts of terrorism).

The bottom line is that the War on Terrorism is big business and the ultimate winners are the Bilderbergs (see below) who finance and profit from all industries that feed on the management of the purported threat of terrorism, which needs to publicly prosecute the politically incorrect who challenge the underlying assumptions of the government and this all
consuming mantra.

Once convicted, a politically incorrect person likely will serve a lengthy sentence and be forgotten in the Gulag of the American Prison Industry; and probably will die in prison for crimes he did not commit and which never occurred in the first place, such as in the David Hinkson case; although there are thousands of examples of others who were innocent or severely overcharged in order to give them lengthy sentences that exceed their life span.
Over the years, laws identifying so-called "hearsay crimes" have foolishly been enacted by Congress with assurances from the Department of Justice that these laws would “never be used” to target innocent individuals (for instance, see minutes of the Congressional Hearings where members of the Congressional Committee were concerned that the new structuring law they were approving might be applied to them when they withdrew or deposited more than $10,000 in cash in two or more transactions on more than one day). In fact, these laws have become the primary weapons used by the DOJ to prosecute the politically incorrect.

Hearsay crimes, such as murder-for-hire, are enhanced by the government’s ability to make phony tapes and videos that imitate the voice of the accused appearing to threaten some ghastly deed; as in the case of Edgar Steele, a First Amendment lawyer who stood up for the rights of the politically incorrect. Steele also is from North Idaho and the fraudulent attacks on him emanate from the same office of the FBI as the David Hinkson case. This office has been known to liberally use the false testimony of government informants as the basis for prosecutions.

It is important to remember that government informants always have something very significant to gain by acting as a cooperating witness. In years past, government informants were paid for their testimony, which made juries suspicious. When the paid witness was not believed because he has little or no credibility, the government would lose cases. Today however, informants are allowed to keep the “booty” stolen from the politically incorrect individual as their fee for testifying for the government in lieu of direct payment as happened in both the Hinkson and Steele cases (Hinkson had $6,600 in cash stolen by government informant Marianna Raff and Steele had $45,000 in silver coins stolen by government informant Larry Fairfax).

Significant to both cases is that the federal government did not prosecute either of these informants for theft and discouraged the state of Idaho from doing so. In fact, the federal government wields great influence with its state law enforcement counterparts and easily can get them not to prosecute a government informant (see the case of John Connelly, former Boston Mass. FBI chief, about whom it is said, “he tarnished the badge”). Thus, these informants who stole from the accused got off “scot-free” for the theft, which turns out to be the payment for cooperation. (Note: the FBI insisted that Raff, who was a felony habitual offender, be set free from county jail to testify for the government even though she had
committed multiple serious offences and Fairfax, will likely spend about a year in prison and never have to be accountable for the theft of Edgar Steele’s silver savings.)

It is interesting to note that in David Hinkson’s case, the*government's informant, Swisher, was convicted*of felonies including forgery, perjury and theft of approximately $200,000 of government property arising out of earlier fraudulent representations that he had made to the Veterans Administration. His false presentation to the VA in June 2004 allowed him to fraudulently obtain disability and medical benefits by presenting false testimony of heroism with medals and forged military documents. Swisher used the exact same fraudulent statements about heroism, etc. six months later, in January 2005, to gain credibility with the jury when he presented fictitious allegations in the murder-for-hire prosecution of David.

The corrupt Idaho Office of the U.S. Attorney shielded Swisher from prosecution for his fraud on the VA until an honest prosecutor from Montana was assigned to the case by the U.S. Inspector General’s Office; otherwise, he never would have been caught. It took over two years to indict, prosecute and sentence Swisher to prison. Although David was innocent, he was sentenced to 43 years in prison (which means that David will be almost age 90 when he is eligible for parole, or he will die in prison) Swisher, for all his lies and fraud received less than a year in a “country club” prison. In subsequent appellate proceedings, attorneys representing the government have admitted that Swisher lied to the Court and the jury in the Hinkson case, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals would not reverse David's conviction because that would have embarrassed one of their colleagues who acted as David’s trial judge. It was more important to the Ninth Circuit to protect a colleague under the Crony System than to allow an innocent man to go free. David’s case now awaits Certiorari before the U.S. Supreme Court.

There are many political prisoners in America today because people are beginning to resist the grand socialist scheme developed by NWO groups. The chief power brokers of the world are in a NWO group of bankers known as the Bilderbergs, a non-government organization (NGO) manipulating various government agencies to achieve their devious purpose, which is to form a “One World Order” with their own puppet as the dictator. Part of their agenda is to silence all opposition, especially those politically incorrect Americans who have the unmitigated temerity to criticize the NWO or say anything they feel any time they want.

The former U. S. Secretary of Agriculture under Dwight Eisenhower, Ezra Taft Benson, a man revered by many as a true prophet in our day, warned that such power groups would infiltrate our agencies (e.g., the CIA, FBI, FDA, IRS, DOJ and the Courts) with the intent to take away personal freedoms. In 1988 he testified of a secret combination that "seeks to overthrow the
freedom of all lands, nations, and countries [that] is increasing its evil influence and control over America and the entire world.”

This book, A Cesspool of Judicial Corruption-The David Hinkson Story, provides an anatomy of the government’s investigation, indictment, trials, sentencing and appeal*in the David Hinkson case and shows the connection between the malicious prosecution of David and the Bilderberg-NWO agenda. It gives the reader a blow-by-blow account of the secret combinations at work and the pragmatics of how it is possible, in a free society, for police state tactics to operate in tandem with what has been termed:*the greatest experiment in personal liberty*in the history of mankind, i.e., The United States of America under The U.S. Constitution. This book is a classic example of Preemptive Prosecution. Below is a list of how these secret New World Order forces have been and will continue to obliterate the U.S. Constitution unless they are stopped:

First, they influence Congress and state legislatures to adopt new laws which subvert personal freedom in the name of enhanced security; second, they manipulate government workers to implement the new progressive socialism and blind them to the fact that it will be the same kind of tyranny like Hitler’s Nazi Germany and Stalin’s Communist Russia; and third, the very ones who should be protecting and enforcing individual liberties, the judges have sold out to the NWO, and these are the ones who interpret and apply the new laws used to override the Constitutional rights of the individual. The judges then pretend that they cannot see the injustice and therefore claim they are simply enforcing these new rigid,*wooden and
inflexible rules as if it is the will of the people–all of which defies both common sense and our Constitutional rights, but the net effect is that it silences the politically incorrect.

Prior to becoming involved in the movement to “take America back” before it becomes Amerika, the question that each of us should answer is: "Is it worth becoming involved when my expression of opinion*may be considered politically incorrect and I may become the target of false accusations?"

My hope for all who read this work is that they will protect themselves by*banning together with like-minded individuals as a force for good to overcome government corruption. May we ban together with people who believe in the U.S. Constitution and who desire to expose those who enforce this twisted revision of our precious God-given form of government that our Founding Fathers shaped for us. Remember, “exposure is the only cure for corruption.”

It is also my hope that those with good intentions will speak up and demand, en masse, the repeal of laws that defile our freedoms; demand the elimination of false prosecutions; and demand the release of all political prisoners, such as David R. Hinkson and Edgar J. Steele. Otherwise, the evils of bearing false witness against those who exercise Freedom of Speech will be at our doors with machine guns at-the-ready just as they were at David Hinkson’s door on November 21, 2002, with no one left to stop it.
*
Wesley W. Hoyt, former prosecuting attorney
November 21, 2010 (Eight years later)

[Alexander M.]

Thursday, December 02, 2010

Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades. December the 2nd, 2010, I’m Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.

Interesting Edgar Steele update this week. Some major holes are starting to appear in the prosecution’s case, such as it was. I’d like to thank Mr. James Buchanan for putting this out on the internet, and this comes from his report.

According to Larry Fairfax, Edgar Steele was going to have Fairfax murder Cyndi Steele and then Edgar was going to pay Fairfax with money from an insurance policy on Cyndi’s life. In a recent interview of Cyndi Steele by Jamie Kelso, Cyndi has revealed that the Steeles had canceled their insurance policies. This pretty much demolishes the government case against Edgar Steele. If anyone other than Edgar Steele were being accused, he would be released from prison by now.

A little over a year ago, Edgar Steele suffered a ruptured heart aorta. He was rushed to the hospital and escaped death by the narrowest of margins. After weeks in the hospital, Steele was able to return home in a greatly weakened condition. Cyndi Steele hired a handyman, Larry Fairfax to fix some pipes that been damaged by freezing water. The Steeles retained Fairfax to do work around their ranch while Edgar Steele was convalescing. Unknown to the Steeles, Larry Fairfax had previously worked as an informant for the FBI. Over the next six months, Larry Fairfax spied on the Steeles as a government informant.

Years earlier, Edgar Steele had defended the Aryan Nations from a civil lawsuit which ultimately took away the Aryan Nations compound from its owner, Richard Butler. Since that trial, Steele has defended a number of pro-White activists (often at no charge). Edgar Steele has also written a series of articles on his “conspiracypenpal.com” website exposing various government conspiracies and criticizing the state of Israel and its undue influence on our government.

Clearly Edgar Steele was not popular with Zionists or the many pro-Zionist Congressmen in our federal government. In an earlier case in Idaho, the federal government sent an informant to spy on Randy Weaver. After a year of spying, the federal informant eventually talked Randy Weaver into cutting off a shotgun barrel a quarter inch too short. After entrapping Mr. Weaver for a technical firearms violation, the Feds then tried to pressure him to become a government informant against the Aryan Nations. The federal government reportedly spent a million dollars and a year’s effort trying to turn Randy Weaver into a government informant. Weaver refused to go along with the government and the Feds responded by executing a raid and siege of Randy Weaver’s home in Ruby Ridge, Idaho in which federal agents murdered Randy Weaver’s son and wife.

If the federal government was willing to go to that kind of extreme measure against someone, whom they wanted to turn against the Aryan Nations, how would the federal government feel about a lawyer who actually defended the Aryans Nations? The federal government was willing to break the law and even murder people in the past over the Aryan Nations. This means that the federal government is capable of ANYTHING based on their past behavior.

The government informant, Larry Fairfax was employed as a handyman at Steele’s ranch for six months. Apparently Fairfax was unable to discover ANY illegal behavior by Edgar Steele during this time. In April of 2010, Larry Fairfax declared bankruptcy as his main business failed with $600,000 in debt. Fairfax was behind on his mortgage payments and in danger of having his home foreclosed. It was at this time that Fairfax is believed to have stolen $45,000 in silver from secret hiding places on the Steele estate, some of which Fairfax had built as a handyman.

To cover up the theft of $45,000, Larry Fairfax hatched a plan to murder Edgar and Cyndi Steele with a massive car bomb. When the bomb failed to go off, Fairfax fell back on a second plan to claim that Edgar Steele was plotting to murder his wife. Someone, presumably the apparently helped Fairfax fabricate fake tapes that used a simulation of Edgar Steele’s voice. Cyndi Steele listened to these alleged tapes of her husband (which were played to her by the Feds) and noted that whenever the conversation turned from what chores Fairfax was supposed to do to the alleged murder plot, the inflection in Edgar’s voice would disappear and the background noise would change, strongly suggesting that the tapes were fabricated.

In a series of interviews with Jamie Kelso of the WhiteNewsNow web site, Cyndi Steele revealed that the Feds tried to bully her into confessing that she was cheating on her husband. They claimed to have pictures of her with another man (which they didn’t). When Cyndi insisted that there was absolutely no truth to that, the Feds tried to claim that a Ukrainian client of Edgar Steele was an illicit girlfriend of his (even though Edgar was still recovering and required additional surgeries in spring of 2010). It was glaringly obvious that there was no reason for Edgar Steele to kill his wife and the Feds were trying to fish around to find a reason that would make a murder plot more believable.

Cyndi also revealed that they caught Larry Fairfax snooping around underneath their house one day, and after that they kept a very close eye on him. In May of 2010, Larry Fairfax borrowed the Steele’s pick up truck and swapped the relatively new tires off it for his truck.

Edgar Steele was arrested on June 11th for plotting to murder his wife. The bomb on Cyndi Steele’s car however was not found until June 15th when Cyndi took her vehicle to a Quick Lube for an oil change. Larry Fairfax was arrested June 15th for possession of an explosive device. Fairfax was questioned and admitted to putting that bomb on Cyndi’s car. A judge at Larry Fairfax’s preliminary hearing asked why he hadn’t filled up the pipe bomb with sand instead of gun powder. That of course assumes that Fairfax was acting as a police informant and not trying to murder Cyndi Steele to cover up his theft of a large quantity of silver.

According to the government, Steele was going to pay Fairfax for the murder of his wife with the money from an insurance policy. The policy reportedly covered accidental death, but no one has ever explained how an enormous pipe bomb exploding could possibly be considered an accidental death. An attorney such as Edgar Steele would know that a homicide does not count as an accidental death.

Even more important is the fact that the Steeles had canceled their insurance policies. Apparently Larry Fairfax was ignorant of this critically important piece of information. Clearly it’s time for the government to release Edgar Steele from prison and to charge Larry Fairfax with grand theft of $45,000 in silver and the attempted murder of both Edgar and Cyndi Steele.

Oh, while I’m thinking about it, you folks might want to go to the Edgar Steele website at http://www.conspiracypenpal.com and download as many of Edgar’s articles and podcasts as you can. There is no telling how long this site is going to remain up and we don’t want Ed’s internet work to be lost to the rest of us.

http://northwestfront.org/2010/12/ra...mber-2nd-2010/

http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/

[8Man]

Would it be helpful for educating the potential jury pool to have even more publicity for the recent Britney Spears - Jason Alexander audio tape?

Audio experts claim the audio is faked...

Audio expert Tom Own of OWL Investigations and Chairman of the Audio Engineering Society Standards Committee of Forensic Audio told TMZ that the audio was “doctored” so much it was impossible to verify that it was actually Spears’ voice on the tape.

Arlo West, a forensic audio expert, also told them that “[l]istening to the phonetics, it doesn’t appear to be authentic.” He adds, “the mannerisms in her voice just don’t match up.

but...

According to Star, however, Alexander took a polygraph and passed
"Alexander passed a polygraph test administered on Nov. 19 in which the examiner determined Alexander showed absolutely no signs of deception."

[America First]

This case is a glaring Travisity of abuse of governement power.

All the honest people IMO who are involved as federal employee's in this case should ask for all of the the Idaho congressional representatives and Senator's to investigate this crime against an ex U.S.C.G. Officer and gentleman.

My quess is those who know what this case is are afraid, because perhaps they know the who and what the political force's are that went after Ed.

Remember when his children recieved death threats years ago Mr. Steel did make documented Police Complaints.


P.S. this thread will also archive the NKVD trolls who tried spewing filthy lies and insanity back in June and July, and their post truly show their own insanity and mindless hatred.

[H.B.]

Originally Posted by John Liberty

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_SFpydA2Wk

I love it how people who think like us have pretty much taken over the comment sections on YouTube.

[Alexander M.]

Friday, December 10, 2010

Normally I start the week with an Edgar Steele update, but there isn’t much shaking and moving on the legal front in Ed’s case this week. However, while I was digging around in some of my old recovered e-mails in my Eudora, I found an article that Edgar Steele wrote over eight years ago and sent out to his e-mail list . It’s not one of his more famous Nickel Rants, but it gives a good idea of what Mr. Steele was facing even back then, and why he may be the target of such terrible victimization by the régime now.


So although I normally don’t like reading things out on this program, either my own articles or other people’s, what I’m going to do to kick off this week’s show is I’m going to read this column by Edgar Steel dated October 16, 2002, entitled The Synagogue of Satan

He begins by quoting the famous Bible verse from the Book of Revelation Chapter 2, Verse 9: "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."

Then Ed goes on to refer to a book he was planning on writing which I believe eventually became his well-known work Defensive Racism. But in this early stage, he says:
"My original intent for this list was gradually to develop the thesis of a book I am working on, publishing bits and pieces of it in column form as I went along. The Unified Conspiracy Theory is the book's working title, but I am seriously considering a change to "The Synagogue of Satan." This is due to the disproportionate representation among the New World Order people by Jews who aren't really Jews (you see, only Sephardic Jews can lay claim to the name and they are but a small - about 10% - minority of all those who go by the label).

"I planned to work from commonly-recognized conspiracy theories, such as the fomenting of World Wars I and II and the JFK assassination, through some considerably more obscure events (obscure as to causation only), to an indictment of the current ruling class of the world.

"Problem is, I have run out of time. It appears that we are on the verge of some very big doings. Doesn't matter, because the book could never be published, anyway. And, if published, would quickly join the slender pantheon of books that literally have been banned in America.

"Because of the impending war on Iraq, I have decided it is time to pull out the stops and really pin the tail on the Jew. I started that 8 days ago, with It's the Jews, Stupid!!! I added In Defense of Terrorism 2 days ago. Both were pretty solid indictments of Zionism in particular and Jews in general.

"The man behind the curtain does not like having the spotlight fall upon his wizened little hook-nosed self. It isn't enough that they own all the media outlets and can more than shout down those of us who are telling others about them. They have to shut us down completely.

"Thus, in the past 48 hours, my main ISP has deactivated my service twice for 'spamming,' though I don't even have email service through it. My domain hoster has threatened to shut down my web sites. A large number of ISPs have blacklisted my domain. So much for free speech on the Internet.

"Funny thing is that Jews are not even the ultimate boogeymen, simply the most visible aspects of the NWO empire. Wonder what will happen when I start saying Rothschild, Carnegie, Rockefeller and so on.

"This morning, I got up to find over 700 unread emails awaiting, via my secondary ISP, virtually all of them spam. Some of them were from me! Some were failure returns to an email address that I have never used for outgoing mail. No, I didn't send them. No, I don't have a virus (they cured me of penny ante firewall and virus protection some time ago).

"I also received a couple of interesting emailed threats from some Jews I hadn't heard from in quite a while (including one who threatened me and my family three years ago for daring to represent the Aryan Nations in that bullshit lawsuit brought by Dees and company).

"They hijacked my domain name, were forging headers and spamming a select list of several hundred people, many with Arabic names, most of whom I had never heard.

"It occurred to me that this represented some Zionist's enemies list, so I added all the addressees to this list. Welcome to you - herein you find kindred spirits, if for no other reason than we seem to possess an enemy in common. For the time being, anyway, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Thanks to the phantom Jew spammers for bringing us together! If you want off, just click on "unsubscribe" down below.

"I probably will be scrambling for new ISPs to provide service and/or host my domains. These reports might become a bit spotty, rather than the once-weekly pattern into which I have fallen. This is the price for telling the truth these days. So much for the internet being the last bastion of free speech.

"Oh, I got hate mail, too...in droves. But, I'm used to that. It is simply amazing how vulgar, even pornographic, Jews can be when they are feeling self righteous. And morally relativistic (the end justifies any means).

"I got tons of support mail, too, which provides my solace in storms such as this. I was particularly gratified to see new subscribers signing on, right and left. There are now just shy of 10,000 list members, so I am starting to get some serious exposure for the message about the New World Order now unfolding from the heart of America.

"There is an awakening taking place in America just now, with lots of people sitting still and listening to the message about Israel and zionism. Will it be enough? Will it be in time? I don't know.

"I can't answer all the email, even in a token fashion. Know, however, that I read it all and that it buoys me up. Thank you.

"By the way, the weekend bomb blast in Bali is beginning to look more and more like it was what is known as a micronuke. Pictures are starting to seep through the government censors' fingers, pictures showing a mushroom cloud and a huge crater that could never have been dug with anything else.

"Some have smuggled out soil samples for testing, to confirm reports of high radiation in the area. If you think Arabs have this cutting-edge technology, about which most have not yet even heard, then you need a serious information adjustment.

"Regarding the stock market, can you say, 'sell into the rallies?' This may be the last one you will see at this level.

"Those who live in large cities really should be earnest about packing a bugout kit and keeping it in the trunk. Fill up at the halfway mark. Pretend it's Y2K all over again.

"What was it that Chinese dude said about interesting times?

Signed,

Ed"

I think what I may do in future is actually to read out selected short works by Mr. Steele on this program, so that all of you can get to know the man and his work, and when he goes on trial for his life in March you will understand who the government is trying to destroy. And make no mistake: this is a trial for Ed Steele’s life. We’re talking about a 65 year old man who has just undergone open heart surgery and whose health can’t be robust. Any prison sentence for him is an effective death sentence.

http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/...-of-satan.html