|
April 19th, 2015 | #41 |
...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,741
|
Jewess Says That Anti-Abortion Speech Should Be Outlawed in Australia as "Hate Speech"
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=260034 |
May 19th, 2015 | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Jews Continue Pressure for Internet Censorship
Quote:
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...ip/#more-27925 |
|
May 25th, 2015 | #43 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Australia: Jews rage over books exposing their retarded holocaust hoax
Quote:
Quote:
The B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission (ADC) has slammed Amazon for offering titles such as Did Six Million Really Die?, The Six Million: Fact or Fiction?, The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews and The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry. All these titles are available from the online provider through a simple Google search that takes readers to the Amazon site. ADC chair Dr Dvir Abramovich told The AJN this week that Amazon Australia could be in breach of Section 18C of the federal Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits material likely to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” on the basis race or ethnicity. He said Amazon Australia “should not be a hothouse and a cesspool of racism, xenophobia and bigotry and should not act as a gateway for young people to enter a world of hatred”. “It is inexcusable for Amazon Australia to serve as a vehicle and a platform for bigots to disseminate and propagate their toxic and harmful invective. Literature that promotes and incites hatred against the Jewish people by demonising and defaming them, that denies and trivialises the Holocaust, and which foments racial violence, should not be normalised and mainstreamed,” he stated. |
||
May 27th, 2015 | #44 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 7
|
I have noticed the same you are talking about
|
May 27th, 2015 | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
The Jewish version of “freedom of speech" – ADL letter, 1933
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/images/...orship_50p.jpg |
September 23rd, 2015 | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Ex-Stasi Jewish Activist Tasked with Eradicating “Xenophobia” on Facebook in Germany
Quote:
|
|
October 11th, 2015 | #47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
|
Ohio to pass legislation to punish entities who boycott Israel.
Quote:
|
|
November 8th, 2015 | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,673
|
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race ''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers |
March 14th, 2016 | #49 | ||
Senior Member
|
ADL Working With Leading Internet Giants, Top Social Media Outlets To Combat “Hate Speech”
March 13, 2016 Realist Report 6 comments The Anti-Defamation League, easily the most subversive, anti-American organization masquerading as a “civil rights” group operating on U.S. soil today, has a long history of combating “anti-Semitism” and “hate speech,” which in reality amounts to speech critical of Jews and their tyrannical, anti-White agenda. In short, the ADL (and the organized Jewish community generally) works tirelessly to shut down any sort of criticism or exposure of their subversive, destructive activities. Telling the truth about the Jews and making basic, factual statements about their agenda is fundamentally “anti-Semitic.” As we’ve previously reported, the ADL has partnered with Twitter, the social media giant, and other leading Internet companies in an effort to shut down speech they view as harmful to Jewish interests. The Israeli Foreign Ministry has even boldly demanded that governments around the world regulate social media platforms in an effort to combat and ultimately ban “anti-Semitism” and “incitement of violence,” which we also reported on here at The Realist Report. As I noted at the time: Quote:
Quote:
Notice how the ADL frames this issue – combating “online hate” – in moralistic terms, as if what they are doing is beneficial and indeed necessary for everyone’s safety and well-being. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth, as the ADL is primarily concerned with advancing Jewish interests and shutting down any form of opposition to their Marxist, anti-White agenda. In a sane world, this subversive organization would be shut down immediately, especially given the fact that the ADL blatantly violated their 501c3 status recently by attacking Donald Trump and interfering in the U.S. political process. http://therealistreport.com/adl-work...t-hate-speech/ |
||
June 2nd, 2016 | #50 |
Senior Member
|
WORLD JEWRY’S CRACKDOWN: SOCIAL MEDIA ORDERED TO CENSOR ALL DISSENT
JUNE 1, 2016 THE SOCIAL NATIONALIST LEAVE A COMMENT Many on the Alt-Right believe their “memes” are enough to change the discourse. To an extent, they are correct in that the intelligent use of social media has been instrumental in the growth and empowerment of the national dissident movement. The huge bind spot in the thesis of the people who dismiss traditional political organizing for internet activism shows one thing: all of the platforms we use to disseminate are message are run by Jews, or answer to them. Once your free speech starts to make difference, it will be taken away…and then what? I have been closely monitoring the transition of Jewish propaganda power from increasingly irrelevant traditional media to social media. In the last five years or so, the situation has become alarming, and the right to free expression on these public goods (regardless of what libertarians argue) has its days numbered–whatever last remnants of free speech exist on these platforms is solely due to the logistical problems of policing different views. The Zionist monopoly of Google (Larry Page, Sergey Brin) , whose subsidiaries have no tolerance for different political or historical views, as well as CEO Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg’s Facebook , are two of the worst offenders. Reddit and Twitter, the only two Gentile run social media networks of note, continue to be the freest, but at least in the case of Reddit, major investment from Jewish co-owned financial firms like Andreesen-Horowitz coincided with attempts to crackdown on Semitically Incorrect sub-Reddits that thankfully sparked outcry and resistance from the community. Twitter, which has also gone public, has similarly become increasingly hostile to criticisms of Jews. As Jews pour and more money into buying up or becoming shareholders in the biggest social media entities, free expression for anyone outside of political minorities using force to impose themselves on the majority will decline just as quickly. European Jewry Makes Its Move A coalition of Jewish and homosexual activist organization led by France’s “Union of Jewish Students” NGO has succeeded in litigating for highly restrictive new speech regulations on Twitter, Facebook, Microsoft and Google affiliates, etc in order to operate in the European Union. These corporations of course claim they simply have to follow the law of the nations in which they operate (including censoring criticism of Erdogan in Turkey), though curiously enough don’t do so in Iran . The new EU rules will call on social media platforms to be able to shut down satire (such as Dieudonne’s comedy), silence discourse about the Second World War, eliminate meaningful criticism of Israel, and put an end to complaints of Europeans being raped or beaten by immigrants in the historically unprecedented “refugee crisis” that have undermined the mass media’s propaganda narrative. Most of these things are already banned by Facebook and YouTube (including in the United States, where it is legal), but because of the scope and volume of content uploaded, the European Union will be demanding a task force–almost certainly composed of tyrannical Jews–in order to censor speech Jews find threatening to their political power in under 24 hours, in fear that someone might see it. Of course the stated motive is to “combat terrorism” so as to get it under the radar, but reading the details of the lawsuit and the examples the Jewish plaintiffs have given, we see what the real intention is. So post your final Pepe’s and pretend Sweden’s 68 IQ Somalis are on the brink of imposing Sharia law, because if you think things are bad now, wait for Judah to fully transition from orthodox press to social media. It is Talmudic law, and no other kind, that you need to fear, and the only way to combat it is by marching in the streets and pressuring the system to respect our civil liberties–or else. But hey, if you still think the “internet struggle” and “dank memes” should be the ends rather than the means, they will happily trot out Glenn Beck to speak on your, and all “right-wingers”, behalf. Choose wisely. https://thesocialnationalist.wordpre...r-all-dissent/ |
June 2nd, 2016 | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,632
|
...so what will they do with Linder?
__________________
No way out but through the jews. |
June 3rd, 2016 | #52 |
Senior Member
|
Dreams of Control: Israel, Global Censorship, and the Internet
By Dr. Binoy Kampmark Global Research, June 02, 2016 Region: Middle East & North Africa “Under the cover of darkness, there is no limit to the expansion of Big Brother.” Ilan Gilon, Meretz Party (Israel), Times of Israel, Feb 4, 2016 While Israel’s central justification for its often reactionary policies is couched in hyper-exceptionalist rhetoric, current interest in censoring the Internet is far from exceptional. Like a machine of justification against its critics and its enemies, Israel enlists various projects under the banner of the remarkable and precious, when it is simply accomplishing what other states have done before or since: the banal and ordinary. All states want to limit expression, control criticism and marginalise the sceptics. Some do it more savagely, and roughly, than others. Israel’s military censor, Col. Ariella Ben Avraham, who is part of the IDF’s Directorate of Military Intelligence, gave a good example of this in February by insisting that social media activists and bloggers submit material relevant to security matters for approval prior to posting.[1] The move also revealed an increasing interest to police the digital realm, previously considered an anarchic jungle incapable of effective policing. Up to 32 Israeli bloggers and social media activists were informed about the directive, one of the first being Yossi Gurvitz, a left-wing activist running the “Friends of George” Facebook page. In rather unceremonious fashion, he was informed via Ben Avraham’s private Facebook account that he was obligated to run future submissions by her office. To his credit, he promises to defy the order. Internal censorship is but one aspect of this policy. Israel Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan has dipped into the discourse of censorship to convince others that limiting various social media platforms on a global scale is the way to go. In January, he revealed the inner ambition of Israel’s security establishment to internationalise the censorship effort. To achieve that goal, Erdan speaks of an “international coalition” that would make limiting criticism of Israel its primary objective. The central aim is hardly imaginative: making such providers as YouTube, Twitter and Facebook face up to responsibility as to what they host on their sites. The Erdan plan suggests that various countries would form a “loose coalition that would keep an eye on content and where it is being posted, and members of the coalition would work to demand that the platforms remove the content that was posted in any of their countries at the request of members.” The simple idea behind this collusion is extra-territorial cooperation, effectively circumventing the global nature of such platforms. As for the scurrilous subject matter itself, the issues are universal fare for states keen to control matters that supposedly stimulate the darker side of human nature. (Read: contrary to state interests.) Erdan’s office gives the example of material from a Palestinian (of course) disclosing the best locations on the body to inflict fatal stab wounds. This begs that grand question about how far such an effort goes: control the more sordidly violent sides of the Old Testament because it encourages various unsavoury practices? Limit suggestive literature being discussed in the whirl of social media, buzzing away with malicious promise? The mind is an untidy place filled with remarkable things, and not all of them necessarily make it to actual perpetration. This is a point that continues to elude the mighty warriors of the security state. Another justification is being thrown in: they, the social media giants, rake in the proceeds, and should therefore man the barricades. “We are planning to put a stop to this irresponsibility,” claimed Erdan’s office, “and we are going to do it as part of an international coalition that has had enough of this behaviour as well.” Other governments have also done their bit to limit the internet and content available to their citizens. Most famously, Beijing runs its own “Great Firewall of China”, overseen by the Ministry of Information Industry (MII), while the State Council Information Office and the Chinese Communist Party’s Propaganda Department examine content. In recent times, countries of a supposedly democratic character have taken to the blinds and endeavoured to do what Erdan dreams about. Dangerous thoughts are seen as the reason for dangerous actions. To that end, the country that gave Europe the Enlightenment has been busy forging its own vision of global internet censorship, using a mixture of security and privacy concerns. The latter has proven to have potentially pernicious consequences, framed largely as an effort to protect the privacy of the French citizen. From that vantage point, a vision of global control has been built on a premise forged in European law: the right to be forgotten. The Court of Justice of the European ruling of May 13, 2014 (Google Spain v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González) has supplied the subject matter for the latest enlargement of censorship powers. The French response has been intrusively enthusiastic, with the privacy regulator, CNIL, fining Google 100,000 Euros in March for not applying the right to be forgotten across the global network. In the chilling words of the regulator, “For people residing in France to effectively exercise their right to be delisted, it must be applied to the entire processing operation.”[2] Erdan may well be irritated he did not come up with that one. http://www.globalresearch.ca/dreams-...ternet/5528564 |
November 12th, 2016 | #53 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
The Secret Evils Behind "Political Correctness"
Quote:
Last edited by littlefieldjohn; November 12th, 2016 at 06:31 PM. |
|
February 11th, 2017 | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Quote:
|
|
April 8th, 2017 | #55 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
The New Observer is currently offline
Quote:
|
|
September 19th, 2017 | #56 |
Senior Member
|
Fighting ‘Hate,’ Killing Free Speech
September 16, 2017 Realist Report 7 comments Anti-Defamation League undercutting free expression by indoctrinating mayors, police The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), an organization openly hostile to the First Amendment that seeks to advance pro-Israel interests and shut down free expression with often baseless charges of “anti-Semitism,” has partnered with the United States Conference of Mayors in the wake of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Va. in an effort to combat “hate” and “extremism,” Marxist buzzwords that are applied to patriotic Americans willing to buck the tyrannical system of political correctness plaguing the West. The United States Conference of Mayors is an official, non-partisan organization representing American cities with populations exceeding 30,000. More than 300 mayors from major American cities across the nation have collaborated with the ADL on the project, and have pledged to implement the 10-point Mayors’ Compact to Combat Hate, Extremism, and Bigotry, developed almost entirely by the subversive, anti-American organization. Some of the 10 key initiatives outlined in the compact include “rejecting extremism, white supremacy, and all forms of bigotry,” as well as prioritizing and promoting “anti-bias” and “anti-hate” programs—which are also developed by the ADL—in America’s public and private schools. Additionally, the compact encourages local residents and community members to report “hate incidents”; seeks to strengthen “hate crime” laws; and promotes training for law enforcement officials across the country to respond to and deal with “hate.” The compact represents an attempt by the ADL to institutionalize its subversive, anti-free speech agenda, a major and long-running goal of the anti-American organization. The Unite the Right rally, which was legally organized by leading members of the alt-right, a burgeoning, loose-knit, right-wing movement that embraces racial identity and populism while rejecting globalism, multiculturalism, and massive non-white immigration to America and the wider Western world, has been used as an excuse to advance a number of blatantly anti-free speech agendas, including the censoring of some alt-right commentators on the Internet. The rally was legally permitted, yet faced enormous obstacles from local political leaders in Charlottesville. The entirely distorted narrative spun by the political and media establishment portrayed the alt-right organizers and supporters as hateful, racist bigots who were determined to violently confront and attack the counterprotesters who showed up to peacefully demonstrate against the rally. The fake news media and establishment political and media pundits hysterically condemned everyone in the alt-right as violent extremists and terrorists, white supremacists, neo-nazis, and even Ku Klux Klansmen. Meanwhile, Antifa and other leftist extremists who engaged in physical confrontations and violence against the alt-right were portrayed as righteous and honorable protesters simply attempting to exercise their First Amendment rights. Needless to say, the concept of “hate” will be defined by the ADL and will, of course, encompass any form of criticism or resistance to its subversive, anti-American agenda. “What happened in Charlottesville . . . reminds us all that violent hate and racism are very much alive in America in 2017,” Tom Cochran, the CEO and executive director of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, said when the compact was announced. “For decades, America’s mayors have taken a strong position in support of civil rights and in opposition to racism and discrimination of all kinds. At this critical time mayors are doing so again through this compact in an effort to combathate, extremism, and bigotry in their cities and in our nation.” The ADL has played a key role in politicizing and militarizing law enforcement in the United States for decades, and routinely offers training courses for local, state, and federal law enforcement officials and entities across the country. The ADL openly describes itself as “the foremost non-governmental organization in the United States that offers law enforcement training on terrorism, extremism, and hate crimes” and boasts that it has “trained well over 100,000 federal, state, local, and military law enforcement officers.” Law enforcement officials at all levels of government also regularly travel to Israel to receive training and advice from their Israeli counterparts, particularly in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, which many prominent researchers believe the Zionist state played a central role in carrying out, further militarizing American law enforcement, as is the case in Israel. This often involves U.S. law enforcement working closely with the Israeli military and police, both of which have been accused of carrying out war crimes against Muslims and Christians in the Holy Land. Interestingly, Anita Gray, a regional director for the ADL in Cleveland, Ohio, admitted in a revealing interview with Cleveland Jewish News shortly after the rally that her organization had been “working on the ground and behind the scenes leading up to, during, and after the rally” in Charlottesville. “We remain in close contact with law enforcement, elected officials, community leaders, and others and continue to provide critical research, resources, and community support,” Ms. Gray went on to explain. “All of our offices have been working around the clock to respond, inform, and take action.” The insidious agenda of the ADL could not be clearer in the aftermath of the Unite the Right rally, i.e., to stamp out criticism of Israel. http://therealistreport.com/fighting...g-free-speech/ |
October 13th, 2017 | #57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Has the Israel Lobby Destroyed Americans’ First Amendment Rights?
Quote:
Last edited by littlefieldjohn; October 13th, 2017 at 08:46 PM. |
|
March 3rd, 2018 | #58 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Jewish Lobby Demands Google, Twitter, and Yahoo Internet Censorship—or Face Lawsuits
Quote:
http://newobserveronline.com/jewish-...face-lawsuits/ |
|
March 16th, 2018 | #59 |
Bread and Circuses
|
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H. |
May 16th, 2018 | #60 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Jews Force 11,000 Pro-Israel Changes to US School Textbooks
4/29/18
Quote:
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|