|
August 16th, 2013 | #681 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
I've said it before, and I'll say it again.
I don't know if Breivik's action was productive, or not. However, one thing that he did undeniably achieve, was to put a real and terrifying consequence into the head of every single Norwegian 'liberal' and 'radical'. They'll have to think about what he did, and have to think that it could happen to them too, every time they want to continue the multi-cultural destruction of their own country. Every time they want to continue this process, they will have to think, 'If I do this, that could happen to me, too. There could be more Breiviks out there, ready to do exactly what he did - and worse!!!' Because, as the Tommies and Diggers used to say during the "Great War": 'they don't like it up 'em'. No-one does. |
August 16th, 2013 | #682 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,611
|
Quote:
<sarcasm>Yeah, they are really shaking in their boots.</sarcasm> Dumbo everyone knows a terrorist attack can happen at anything. It's easy to kill people. It's easy to build bombs. It's easy to get guns. Especially a person with a little brains and money. In America, killing sprees happen all the time. People are not scared any more then they were. You like the other losers are too obtuse to realize how stupid terrorist acts accomplish nothing, but actually are used against the political goals of the terrorists. Terrorism as a political tool can only ever succeed with the backing of an organization like a mafia, or a nation state. It's a fiction that lone wolves can do anything worthwhile. It's a fiction that's needed so that certain White Nationalists can still hold to the idea, "we don't need no allies." So tards in White Nationalism can fantasize about lone wolf operations to the end of their days, with few exceptional tards that actually go through with it. |
|
August 16th, 2013 | #683 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Yeah, because polite book clubs, conferences, and talking wank on the Internet has been really effective; right, procopius?
I said I don't know if his actions are going to be effective in the long-run, but they have put a lot of fear into Norwegian leftists and other scummy types, which is more than all the Internet bullshit in the world has achieved. Quote:
These are not 'cause and effect' type actions, which is what Breivik first wrote about, and then did - 'If you participate in wrecking my country, this will happen to you, too.' I guess you just don't understand the difference, because you just don't want to. But keep on fighting the good fight, anyway. Your moral rectitude is most impressive. Last edited by M.N. Dalvez; August 16th, 2013 at 02:45 PM. |
|
August 16th, 2013 | #684 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
Oh and terrorism was a real fact of life in Norway before Breivik... And when has the mafia backed a successful terror campaign? lol "the mafia," I study OC so I love it when people make stupid statements about it. Organized crime actually has a very hard time launching a successful terror campaign because it is fighting for nothing but it's own personal profit. Look what terror campaigns did for Toto Riina and Pablo Escobar. |
|
August 21st, 2013 | #685 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6
|
Breivik, however you want to put it, was a fan of the biggest enemy of the white race; the jews! He's said it in his manifest plenty of times! He's a jew lover, he can NEVER be a WN! As for the killing, killing white brainwashed children, I hope they did die for a cause. I hope the Norwegian government will stop mass immigration and lock Breivik up forever. Two birds with one stone is what I would like to call it.
|
August 22nd, 2013 | #686 |
.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,923
|
This is exactly it. At my last job there was this liberal girl and she had just read or watched some video about him and she was practically in tears talking about it. When libtards hear the name Anders Breivik they cower in fear.
|
August 22nd, 2013 | #687 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,611
|
Quote:
|
|
August 22nd, 2013 | #688 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
As I said before I think he is even moving away from that position based on prison communications, but it is hard to tell since he has been silenced. A song for Breivik... |
|
August 22nd, 2013 | #689 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Quote:
|
|
August 22nd, 2013 | #690 | ||||||
Randomly mutated kveldúlfr
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,095
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Hans Norling; August 22nd, 2013 at 11:59 AM. |
||||||
August 22nd, 2013 | #691 | |
Randomly mutated kveldúlfr
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,095
|
Quote:
Basically, he is as WN as the Dalai Lama. And... he specifically stated that his deeds were to make the life and struggle harder for scandinavian racialists in order for them to become more wacko cooky like him (who was a man, like any schizo-psycho, flying ideologically all over the board). What's worse, hardly anyone here bothered to catch any of the above. They got so excited (Linder included) at the pointless deaths of white children that they almost came in their pants. As a scandinavian race-nationalist, I can think for very few other things more disturbing than that. Last edited by Hans Norling; August 22nd, 2013 at 12:18 PM. |
|
August 22nd, 2013 | #692 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
the Unabomber is Jewish? There is literally like one sentence similar to something Ted K. said... |
|
August 22nd, 2013 | #693 |
.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,923
|
>>>directly related to Breivik's diseased (and pointless) insanity
Provide evidence. The authorities desperately tried to find anything no matter how remote, to prove that he was insane. They couldn't find any. |
August 23rd, 2013 | #694 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Filthydelphia
Posts: 10,095
|
The only diseased (or truly evil) people are the ones overseeing the demographic destruction of Norway. Their spawn would've turned out just like them. Look at the Kennedy and Clinton crotch fruit.
|
August 23rd, 2013 | #695 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,093
|
Breivik is not easy to understand. I think he is too crafty for most. If he really brought that bombing off all by himself, he is more brilliant and hard working than anyone here. (Personally, I doubt he did bring it off by himself, but that only means other, more clever minds were behind the whole thing.) What he is working for or who was working for is not clear. Would take a Breivik-ologist to figure out the big picture.
I suspect he didn't "hate jews" right up front was because that would get him written off as a nut right up front. He didn't give them that opportunity. Seems like Breivik studied what went before and everything he said, wrote or did was for effect based on what he had seen happen before. Personally, I would like to know how much, if at all, the MLK parade backpack bomb attempt by VNN's own Snuffy Smith influenced his choice of target. But he said he wanted to kill the Prime Minister and the ex-Prime Minister that day and that would have made his actions unequivocal, if he had done that. If he had handlers, they perhaps misled Breivik/protected the Prime Ministers. |
August 23rd, 2013 | #696 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,611
|
Hans you make good points, but you don't understand that certain White Nationalists, especially Americans, have 'violence fantasies.' They believe that they and all their fat-ass, beer-drinking, gun-collecting, friends are going to actually leave their the houses one day and go to war against the most powerful military in history. So when they hear of someone, who resembles a White Nationalist kinda, and goes out shooting people and blowing things up, It gets their dick hard.
It seems to me, that they just don't understand that the MSM would love a American Breivik. Replacing the image of Terrorism with a White man's face, instead of an Arab face would be a gift to Jews that would keep on giving for years. Every magazine in America would have his face on the cover with the scariest picture they could find. As a bonus this also help justify the police state we are currently engaged in. |
August 23rd, 2013 | #697 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,093
|
Quote:
|
|
August 24th, 2013 | #698 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,611
|
The reason why they stopped talking about it, is that no one in America even knows where Norway is on a map. It's a non-issue for football fans here.
|
August 24th, 2013 | #699 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
procopius, Hans, you're both so in love with the sound of your own voice, anything that seems to be even vaguely at odds with it, is 'insanity', 'fantasy', et cetera, et cetera ...
You say Breivik was insane, a 'schizo-psycho' (very scientific term, that, by the way ). The fact is, they would have loved to have found anything they could use to diagnose him as schizophrenic, or as having some other form of mental illness). That way, they could have thrown him in a mental institution for an indeterminate length of time, and completely discredited what he did and why he did it - two birds with one stone. But they didn't find a thing about the man himself to support such a thesis. That would have been the best-case scenario for the prosecution and the Norwegian state in his case, and even with that considered, they could not prove, or find anything, to show that he was legally insane. So saying he was a psycho is dumb. Yes, he did something absolutely horrific (simply put, his actions were calculated to inspire fear and terror, and they did). But that in itself is not a proper diagnosis of mental illness, and you'd admit that if you weren't so keen to believe that he was insane. Procopius, you say his actions didn't inspire any fear in leftists and multiculturalists - and that's complete bullshit on the face of it, a child-like attempt at a 'nuh-uh, no he didn't, that's not true, nuh-uh!!!' in response to something which very mildly contradicts what you believe about him. 'Violence fantasies' have nothing to do with it - at least, not for me. I never did things things like that, not in my 20-odd years of activism, and I don't fancy myself a 'tough guy'. It's clear to me that what is needed is more clear thinking, more organisation, and much more activism of all sorts. But to deny Breivik hasn't terrified our enemies? That's just stupid. And thinking he has terrified our enemies is necessarily down to some sort of fetish for violence? That's even more stupid. Last edited by M.N. Dalvez; August 24th, 2013 at 05:08 AM. |
August 24th, 2013 | #700 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Quote:
It's also beside the point: the media (for ideological reasons, for the most part) obsessively, excessively, covers things that 'football fans' don't give a fuck about, have never given a fuck about, and never will give a fuck about. That's why they're ignorant, beer-swilling proles, by definition - they don't give a fuck about anything. |
|
Tags |
#1, anders breivik, anti-genocide rage, norway, white rage |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|