Edgar Steele

[Hell Raising Woman]

Mr. Donald, are you still trying to look for clues? Are you hoping to find them in a jewish media trash tribune?

Cyndi was personally interviewed today on a radio station. Sotka and Wheland and the federal judge will be going to jail for obstruction, suppression of evidence, false imprisonment, and the intent to do harm.

[Donald E. Pauly]

Originally Posted by Hell Raising Woman

Mr. Donald, are you still trying to look for clues? Are you hoping to find them in a jewish media trash tribune?

Cyndi was personally interviewed today on a radio station. Sotka and Wheland and the federal judge will be going to jail for obstruction, suppression of evidence, false imprisonment, and the intent to do harm.

If so, I am all excited. There is nothing that I love more than watching a lawyer led off in handcuffs.

[Alex Linder]

Was Edgar Steele framed?

An in-depth article and analysis relating to the possible framing of controversial American attorney Edgar J. Steele for the attempted murder of his wife.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/306634

[Cale Sparks]

Originally Posted by America First

Let me make it perfectly clear Huey P. Long knew who had gotten control of the central regime, as FDR had sent over 400 various Federal agents to LA. to try and get him.

Huey knew how wrong WW 1 and by 1935 already knew they were planning WAR.

All true. Had Long not been shot in '35 by the jew doctor (Carl Weiss), Roosevelt would not have been re-elected in '36.

[-JC]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

Was Edgar Steele framed?

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

An in-depth article and analysis relating to the possible framing of controversial American attorney Edgar J. Steele for the attempted murder of his wife.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/306634

jerrylynnb (signed in using Yahoo) wrote:

The original recording, a disc made by a small portable stealthy audio disc recorder, was ERASED immediately after creating a WAV file on a PC, by the FBI agent responsible for the recording. The device is used over and over again.

This was revealed by Cindy Steele in an interview shortly after the guilty verdict. All anyone was allowed to hear was a copy of a copy of a digital audio file. The "best evidence", the orignial disc and the device, were destroyed and corrupted, respectively, by the FBI - and the court accepted this inferior copy of the best evidence contrary to long standing traditions concerning best evidence. It seems that this is now a standard FBI practice and the courts assume, and instruct juries accordingly, that the correctness of government testimony, evidence, and practices are to be accepted without ...question. The defendant is expected to bring irrefutable proof to the contrary (to the judge with the jury absent), before the court will allow any reference disputing the "correctness" of the governments specifics. This is tantamount to assuming the defendant is guilty until he proves his innocence beyond any reasonable doubt, which is, of course, directly opposite our very old traditions of due process and trail procedings.

Even with the copy of a copy of a copy, which was found to be of very poor quality, two defense experts found glaring indications of audio "transients" peppered throughout those specific area of the recordings when the voice of the defendant allegedly talks about the "murder for hire". The other portions of these poor quality recordings are what you would expect - a homeowner (the defendant) walking around his grounds giving instructions to his grounds-worker (the snitch) as to various tasks that need to be done. The ONLY folks who claim they heard no problems with these substitute recordings were the government agents, and, apparently the jury. Since the defendant had earlier published a book specifically promoting a white racialist viewpoint ("Defensive Racism"), it is not surprising that any jurors who find this philosophy repugnant (typical in Idaho), would not take care to examine any exculpating aspects of the case, given the obvious leanings of both the prosecution and the trail judge.

During the months leading up to this trial, there were discussions on various internet sites about these kinds of show trials being practiced more and more recently, as if we are becoming like the old soviet union durng its show trial heyday.

Don't hold your breath hoping that somehow the government will allow the Steele's to get to the bottom of this injustice, nor will any exculpating evidence be made available (such as the original disc, in case the FBI didn't really destroy it - who can believe anything they say these days).

Apparently this was not the first example of a show trial, american style, nor will it probably be the last.

[Rounder]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

Was Edgar Steele framed?

An in-depth article and analysis relating to the possible framing of controversial American attorney Edgar J. Steele for the attempted murder of his wife.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/306634

Alex, your link stated this "hot stuff":

"to resolve this issue either way once and for all, is to have the original tapes analysed by independent experts such as the Idaho Innocence Project".

NOTE: Steele's expert wrote that the JOG's tapes are "unreliable". If the Idaho Innocence Project finds their own expert(s) who say the same about those same JOG tapes, and uses their considerable influence inside the judicial system and the media to expose the unreliable tapes, while raising some hell about them, Edgar will be vindicated and most likely receive a new trial and acquitted.

Anyway, I'm mailing Edgar directions on how to "submit a case" and other pertinent info. The Innocence Project states they prefer receiving requests from defendants.

A contact person at The Project is Richard Visser, tel: 208-426-4207. He's out for the weekend, but I left him a lengthy message, including my phone number, and advised him to google: "Edgar Steele" via news for details about Edgar's trial.

[Donald E. Pauly]

If the recorder was in fact a digital recorder, all copies are equally good. There is no reason to preserve the original. With a digital recorder, the 100th generation copy is IDENTICAL to the original. This is not true with the old fashioned analog tape recorders but they were not used here.

[Donald E. Pauly]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

Was Edgar Steele framed?

An in-depth article and analysis relating to the possible framing of controversial American attorney Edgar J. Steele for the attempted murder of his wife.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/306634

I just posted this in full on the previous page with comments.

[Donald E. Pauly]

http://www.americanfreepress.net/pod...iSteele128.mp3
Put your mouse in the middle of the screen and the playbar will appear. The entire screen may be dark gray otherwise.

[8Man]

Originally Posted by Donald E. Pauly

http://www.americanfreepress.net/pod...iSteele128.mp3

.. doesn't seem to be a working URL. Do you know if it's been copied to any other site?

[8Man]

Originally Posted by Donald E. Pauly

If the recorder was in fact a digital recorder, all copies are equally good.

In a technical context that's true, but the argument and complaint is that what was presented in court was a tampered (re-constructed) recording.

There is no reason to preserve the original.

.. only true if you have means and motive to alter the original and then present the result in court as 'original'.

With a digital recorder, the 100th generation copy is IDENTICAL to the original.

.. depends on whether or not the metadata is stored with the content or seperately. The metadata describes how and when and by whom a particular set of data was collected, and how the data is formatted.

This is not true with the old fashioned analog tape recorders but they were not used here.

[America First]

"Defensive Racism" A book written by Edgar J. Steel is a powerful work, and he sent it to the USAG who happens to be non White. After reading twenty pages I say it is a book That TPTB do not want to upper half of Whites reading.

That book alone had him on the enemy alien hit list IMO.

From Huey P. Long, Joseph P. McCarthy, Douglas MacArthur, to J.F.K. all who could possibly lead White's to resist the cabal were assaulted by out right murder or by other various means to nullify their paths to lead White folks to freedom and safety from Genocide IMO.

YouTube - Part 6 Eustace Mullins talks about the New World Order

YouTube - Part 6 Eustace Mullins talks about the New World Order

Valdimir Putin released NKVD/KGB archives proving that Joe McCarthy was exactly correct.

quote
At a time when America was being infiltrated by agents of the most murderous empire in human history, McCarthy was the lone voice who stood against tyranny. The VENONA Project files, declassified in 1995, provided indisputable evidence that nearly all of those McCarthy accused were traitors to America. No critic has ever brought forth a single documented case of someone being wrongly accused by McCarthy.

YouTube - Joseph McCarthy Speech

YouTube - Joseph McCarthy Speech

Philip Jessup was chairman of the Institute for Pacific Relations, a communist agent-infested policy group that advocated strongly against Chiang Kai-Shek and in favor of Mao in the late 40's and early 50's when the future of China was still in doubt. He bears some responsibility along with the outright Stalin agents in the institute, for Mao's mass murders that followed.

IPR members such as Owen Lattimore defended Stalin's purges in the 30's.

RuflessRecords 3 months ago
@SinnFein4ever I don't think so, McCarthy was right but the Communists were more powerful than one man, now it has gone down in history as a "scare" and "Witch hunt." They killed 30 million plus people in Russia, that is a scare. Then they went to xsrael and are killing off the Palestinians, so there ya go, frightful. They now own the US.

[Donald E. Pauly]

Originally Posted by 8Man

.. doesn't seem to be a working URL. Do you know if it's been copied to any other site?

Put your mouse in the middle of the screen and the playbar will appear. I should have posted this warning.

[Donald E. Pauly]

http://realitybloger.files.wordpress...r-j-steele.mp3

Interview starts at about 8 minutes into the file. Charlie Fuller was present at the trial and is also interviewed. Ingri Cassel mentions for the first time that the third recording never played in court was of the actual arrest of Steele. Cyndi reports that her husband is still having headaches from his last aneurysm. She also reports that he is having nose bleeds. Cyndi uses the term "public pretender" to describe her husbands first scum sucking lawyer.

[Donald E. Pauly]

It is curious that Steele's website is soliciting new ideas for his defense. His lawyers made a laughing stock of the case when their supposed audio expert was on vacation in Bora Bora. Then they wanted a delay in the trial so he could be flown back to testify. They had known for weeks that his testimony was on again/off again. I could go on for several pages about their other incompetence. They squandered over $108,000 which could have been used to help Cyndi. The public defender would have gotten the same result much quicker for free.
========
http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/?p=352#more-352

Seeking legal advisory information
2011 MAY 15
by admin

In any adversarial conflict, one side might be heard to say, “we lost that battle, but we’re going to win the war”. The Boise verdict on 5/5/2011 – convicting Mr. Steele on all 4 counts – can be likened to a lost battle. Have no misunderstanding; Mrs. Steele has sent a crystal clear message that an appeal will happen. Come August, at Edgar’s sentencing, the full measure of a haphazard albeit successful railroad job will be shown publicly.

This posting will serve as an invitation to those who wish to see Mr. Steele freed, to submit advisory information that has as its focus extricating him from incarceration. This is NOT a request for armchair lawyers to say “darn it, Edgar’s attorneys should have filed a particular writ” of one kind or another – or the like.

This invitation expects well reasoned legal briefing, as well as provable factual information any submissions to be referenced and elaborated with supporting documentation. Complete contact details of the individual or group submitting must be included, as well as effective or actual credentials. Legal cases which have succeeded – based on the submitted advisory – are needed to corroborate the advisory.

The following points must not escape those reading this announcement:

This invitation in no way suggests loss of faith, criticism or disrespect for Mr. Steele’s current attorney representation,
This invitation does not constitute “grasping at straws”… It constitutes assembling every possible means of achieving our goal,
It is entirely possible the advice submitted may not be embraced, utilized in part or in total,
The identity of the individual or organization submitting legal or factual advisory may be made public in connection with submitted materials.
We all understand this is a serious matter that directly, significantly impacts a man’s reputation, his future, his family. This is “real life”, not a game. The one and only consideration is moving towards Freeing Edgar Steele. Please contact FES Admins via [email protected] or use the Contact page to notify us of your submission, so we can provide an address that will receive your hard-copy materials.

[Donald E. Pauly]

Why this motion is under seal is not explained.
========
http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/siren...sts-new-trial/

Edgar Steele requests new trial
Share
Posted by Meghann
May 13, 2011 6:18 p.m.

A North Idaho attorney convicted last week of hiring his handyman to kill his wife and mother-in-law has requested a new trial. Lawyers for Edgar J. Steele, 65, filed a motion for a new trial Thursday in U.S. District Court in Coeur d'Alene.

The motion is sealed. Lawyer Robert McAllister, of Colorado, declined to discuss its contents, and Gary Amendola did not return a phone call seeking comment. Steele faces at least 30 years in prison when he's sentenced in August.

A jury convicted him May 5 of use of interstate commerce to commission murder for hire, use of explosive material to commit a federal felony and tampering with a victim after a week-long trial in Boise. The hitman-turned FBI informant, Larry Fairfax, was sentenced to 27 months in prison Wednesday for a pipe bomb he attached to Cyndi Steele's SUV.

Cyndi Steele believes her husband was framed because of his defense of clients like the late Richard Butler, founder of the Aryan Nations.

[Donald E. Pauly]

This article makes a good point. If the Feds were going to frame Steele, it would be far easier to plant some cocaine in his car.
========
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/201...e-new-reality/

May 10, 2011 in City
Near-victim takes devotion to a whole new reality
Doug Clark The Spokesman-Review

Edgar Steele, former Aryan Nations shyster, was found guilty late last week of hiring some thug to blow his wife, Cyndi, (and her mother) to smithereens.
Can’t say I didn’t see that train a’coming. I was a tad disappointed, however, to learn that the federal jurors in Boise didn’t also find Cyndi guilty of being the thickest brick on the planet. Far be it from me to pick on the victim of record.

But Mrs. Steele’s misguided faith in her hubby is not just dumb, it’s Larry the Cable Guy dumb. Don’t get me wrong. I’m a firm believer in the concept of blind, unquestioning loyalty. It is the foundation of some of our most successful criminal institutions, after all. The Mafia, say. Or Wall Street.

I couldn’t believe Mrs. Steele’s halting, emotional defense of Edgar after the verdict rolled in. She’s still singing the same old Tammy Wynette tune.

Hey, speaking of which. This would be a swell time to give another listen to “Stand By Your Klan.” That’s the parody song I released last summer in honor of Cyndi. Give it a tumble at www.spokesman.com. Cyndi swears she’s not suffering from the Stockholm syndrome and I believe her. It’s more like Lock-Stock-and- Blockhead syndrome.

This, of course, is not the proper venue to rehash all of the evidence and preposterous defense theories. This is your improper venue for cheap laughs, snarky asides and one-liners.

Suffice it to say that Mrs. Steele believes her poor Edgar – who bears an uncanny resemblance to Klaus Kinski’s 1979 movie portrayal of the vampire Nosferatu – was framed due to his aforementioned legal work for those Hitler-loving Aryan ass clowns. Wake up, Cyndi!

Cops aren’t that creative. If the feds want to frame someone they don’t go around hatching complicated plots involving hit men and homemade pipe bombs. They follow the playbook and plant a pound-a coke in the patsy’s car trunk. This should tell you all you need to know about Cyndi’s dysfunctional allegiance to Edgar.

We learned in the trial that, prior to his arrest, Mr. Steele had sent more than 14,000 computer messages to women he met through an online dating service. Steele told one of the women, 25-year-old Tatyana Loginova, that he would “never have another American woman, never again.” Now, any normal, rational human being would peg Steele as the smarmy old philanderer he most certainly is.

Cyndi, however, is not normal. She testified that her spouse of 25 years was merely conducting research into the Russian mail order bride business. OK. I’d like to take a moment to say a few words to all the women who might be reading this. Ladies, if you catch your man using the computer to conduct research into a Russian mail order business, here are the steps you should take.

1. Find a phonebook.

2. Open Yellow Pages to “Attorneys.”

3. Begin conducting your own research project into the section marked “Divorce & Family.”

If, however, you discover that your man has sent 14,000-plus emails to available foreign women and that one of them is a 25-year-old Ukrainian named Tatyana, please put the above three steps on hold until after you check into a motel under an assumed name.

But whatever you do, just don’t start your car without first checking the wheel wells and undercarriage for things that go “BOOM!!!”

Doug Clark is a columnist for The Spokesman-Review. He can be reached at (509) 459-5432 or by email at [email protected].

[America First]

Russia sentences Israeli to 18 years for sex trafficking

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
An Israeli citizen was sentenced yesterday to 18 years in prison by the Moscow military court, for organizing a vast network of sex trafficking. According to the court, from 1999 to 2007, when most of the network's agents were arrested, Avi Yanai and his accomplices sold hundreds of women for prostitution to Israel, Italy, Spain, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, the United Arab Emirates and other countries. The minimal official estimate stands at 129 women, but some of the states still investigating the network put the number at several hundred. The women were lured from Moldova, Ukraine, Russia, Belarus and Uzbekistan.

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition...cking-1.358278
__________________

[-JC]

Frankly, if I considered the Northwest my home, I'd resent not only what has infested government generally and the criminal justice system specifically but might "get" what's behind what passes for so called news and what they take-me-for based upon what they produce for my consumption.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Clark_and_the_Hot_Nuts" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Clark_and_the_Hot_Nuts

Doug_Clark_and_the_Hot_Nuts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG0xZBKcAMo" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG0xZBKcAMo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG0xZBKcAMo" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG0xZBKcAMo

[H.B.]

Originally Posted by Donald E. Pauly

This article makes a good point. If the Feds were going to frame Steele, it would be far easier to plant some cocaine in his car.
========
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/201...e-new-reality/

The author, Doug Clark, has clearly shown himself to be trash and a bully. It takes a lot of courage to denounce supporters of a critic of the establishment as that critic is likely being put away the rest of his life.

That being said, I think it is important that we choose our battles carefully. There have been clear cases when people who advocate politically incorrect views have been unjustly put away. Matt Hale, Bill White and Chester Doles are examples. You can even argue that the scumbag and FBI snitch Hal Turner was unjustly locked up for opining on a blog.

If the Edgar Steele tapes were faked, then what about the 14K e-mails? That's pretty obsessive; many of us have not sent 14K e-mails in our lives. What about the testimony of the state trooper delivering the false news of Mrs. Steele's death? The testimony of the 25-year old woman?

Over $100K was wasted on a crap defense that produced no different result than what could have been obtained through a public defender. I would have nothing against anyone who wants to keep throwing money at this, but I would strongly advise in favor of analyzing the salient facts of the case before doing so.