Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > The Personal Solution: Living White > Homeschooling
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

View Poll Results: You be the Judge! Who deserves to make the top 100
Alan Greenspan 4 66.67%
Ben Bernanke 3 50.00%
Paul Wolfowitz 4 66.67%
James Wolfensohn 3 50.00%
James Dimon 3 50.00%
Robert Rubin 3 50.00%
Lloyd Blankfein 3 50.00%
Roland Arnell 3 50.00%
Other, please identify and explain 1 16.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Display Modes Share
Old February 17th, 2007 #1
William Robert
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3
Default Jewish Bankers and War profiteers who are destroying our Economy.

This is a subset thread from
Seeking Nominations for the 100 most Destructive Jews in America!

7 Nominations Received so far!

Jewish Bankers and War profiteers

Alan Greenspan
Ex-Chairman of the Federal Reserve, the Biggest Counterfeiter of Worthless Jewish paper, the world has ever seen. He's Destroying the American economy as we speak.
Is Jewish money used to enslave you?

Ben Bernanke the current Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

Paul Wolfowitz the 10th President of the World Bank,00.html

James Wolfensohn KBE AO (born December 1, 1933) was the ninth president of the World Bank Group.

James Dimon Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of JPMorgan Chase

Mr. Dimon became Chairman of the Board on December 31, 2006, and has been Chief Executive Officer and President of JPMorgan Chase since December 31, 2005. He had been President and Chief Operating Officer since JPMorgan Chase ’s merger with Bank One Corporation in July 2004. At Bank One he had been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since March 2000. Prior to Bank One, he had held various senior executive positions at Citigroup Inc., its subsidiary, Salomon Smith Barney, and its predecessor company, Travelers Group, Inc. Mr. Dimon is a graduate of Tufts University and received an MBA from Harvard Business School. He is a director of The College Fund/UNCF and serves on the Board of Directors of The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, the University of Chicago and Harvard Business School and is on the Board of Trustees of New York University School of Medicine.

Robert Rubin is a Jewish banker who served as the 70th United States Secretary of the Treasury during both the first and second Clinton Administrations. Rubin left the Clinton Administration and joined Citigroup as an executive in October 1999 and remains there to this day.

Lloyd Blankfein Chairman & CEO of Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs acts as a financial adviser to some of the most important companies, largest governments, and wealthiest families in the world. Blankfein earned a total of $53.4 Million in 2006, making him the highest paid executive on Wall Street. His bonus reflected the performance of Goldman Sachs, which reported record net earnings of $9.5 billion. Blankfein's compensation included a cash bonus of $27.3 million, with the rest paid in stock and options.

Roland Arnell net worth $3.0 billion
Information About this Kike Compiled by Chain

Last edited by William Robert; February 22nd, 2007 at 11:41 PM.
Old April 30th, 2007 #2
William Robert
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3

Wolfowitz Resignation Deal in the Works

Behind the scenes of the gladiatorial battle that will take place between Paul Wolfowitz and the World Bank Board today are efforts by his lawyer, Robert Bennett, and the Bank staff to negotiate terms of Wolfowitz's departure.

According to some insiders, Wolfowitz wants "some acknowledgment" of the Bank Board's complicity in the messy circumstances surrounding his and Shaha Riza's situation.

Secondly, allegedly on June 1st, Wolfowitz becomes eligible for some large financial bonus -- for performance and time on the job. One estimate puts this figure at about $400,000. Wolfowitz wants to make sure those funds are credited to his private bank account before saying farewell to an institution that has come to despise him.

Both sides have threatened each other with slow, painful, drip-drip approach to the release of damaging information that each side has about the other.

One blast in the battle are revelations that it costs the Bank a whopping $5 million per year to pay for Wolfowitz's security detail. Others have told me of Wolfowitz's failure to discipline aide Kevin Kellems for equally whopping violations of Bank protocol -- particularly while traveling on Bank business.

Wolfowitz is angry at the Bank at all those other than his closest spear-carriers. At one level, he does not want to resign and wants to tear the World Bank apart by forcing escalation in this war. But others -- particularly Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson -- have made it clear behind the scenes that a negotiated outcome that saves some face for Wolfowitz will give all sides an opportunity to push what one Paulson insider calls "the reset button."
Old May 7th, 2007 #3
William Robert
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3
Default The Wolfowitz-World Bank Outcry: A Lack of Moral Proportion

The Wolfowitz-World Bank Outcry: A Lack of Moral Proportion

Amid charges of nepotism, calls for the resignation of Paul Wolfowitz from his current position as President of the World Bank are becoming louder and stronger. At the heart of it is an approximate $55,000 of increased salary that he secured for his girlfriend, Shaha Riza. This, claim his staff and media pundits, undermines his credibility and tarnishes the image of the World Bank.

Such reactions are preposterous, not because they miss the mark, but because Paul Wolfowitz’s history before heading the World Bank and during his tenure there includes evidence of espionage, warmongering, doctoring of intelligence, abuse of power, subversion of US laws and international law, inter alia. One is left marveling at the public’s sense of moral proportion.

It is now widely known that Wolfowitz was among the chief architects of the invasion of Iraq, conceived long before September 11 and advanced with subterfuge and lies. The plan goes back at least to 1996 when Wolfowitz, along with Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and other neocons co-authored a six-page document outlining a strategy for the destabilization of the Middle East to consolidate Israeli hegemony of the region. The plan, entitled “Clean Break,” included a war against Iraq, the overthrow of Saddam Hussein as well as the Syrian regime. They wrote “Israel can shape its strategic environment in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq-an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right-as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.” The plan also included complete rejection of the Oslo “land for peace” doctrine, a merciless reoccupation of Palestinian territories, and permanent annexation of prime lands in the West Bank and Gaza strip. Bill Clinton was reluctant when presented with the plan, but Wolfowitz found his opportunity in 9-11 to advance this agenda. According to insiders, investigative reporters, and George Tenet himself, it was he, Paul Wolfowitz, who rewrote the CIA intelligence on Iraq to include the infamous outright lie that Iraq was trying to obtain enriched uranium from Niger. In fact, an ad hoc committee called the Office of Special Plans (OSP), headed by Wolfowitz, Perle and Feith, presented the White House with intelligence information, which was often contrary to that obtained by the CIA and UN inspectors. Apparently, only Colin Powell questioned the accuracy of this information at the time. The speech he was to deliver to the UN prior to the invasion was largely written by the OSP, and after going through, deleting whole pages and passages, Powell was reported to have said “I’m not reading this. This is bullshit,” according to US News and World Report.

Despite the abysmal failure of the Iraq invasion, Wolfowitz continued his warmongering by pushing the Israeli agenda for tough measures by the US against Syria and Iran. But his office as Deputy Secretary of Defense became too hot during the FBI espionage investigation into evidence that an analyst under Feith and Wolfowitz, Larry Franklin, passed classified information onto the Israeli government through its US lobby, AIPAC, arguably the most powerful lobby in Washington. Of course, this isn’t the first time Wolfowitz was implicated in espionage against the US for Israel. He was investigated in 1978 for providing classified documents to Israel regarding sensitive US military sales. He has also never been too far from other investigations into Israeli spying that includes a tangled web spanning at least 30 years and encompassing names like Perle, Feith, Bryen, Libby, Indyke, Leeden, to name a few. But the American memory is short and all this became old news. The Larry Franklin-AIPAC-Israel espionage story was quickly put down by US media, with the Washington Post burying the story in its Metro section, as if a national spy case potentially involving high-ranking administration officials were a local news story.

But Paul Wolfowitz is a clever man and he would soon find another venue to advance the Israeli Likud ideology and agenda: The World Bank.

While the FBI probe was underway and intensifying, with subpoenas of top AIPAC staffers, Israel had asked the World Bank to fund elaborate checkpoints and crossings along the internationally condemned Wall it has been building on confiscated Palestinian land deep into the West Bank. However, Israel is not eligible for monetary assistance from the World Bank because its income per capita is too high. So the application was presented on behalf of the Palestinians and described as a humanitarian plan to ease travel restrictions for Palestinian goods and labor. Thus, the money was ostensibly for Palestinians, but to be held and used by Israel. In effect, Palestinians were being asked to get loans (and pay them back) to fund the very infrastructure that ghettoized them into Bantustans and confiscated their prime agricultural lands, rendering more Palestinian farmers as cheap labor for Israel! Of course, then President of the World Bank, James Wolfensohn, rejected the plan. The World Bank wasn’t about to contribute to the financing of an illegal occupation and a barrier that had been condemned by the International Court of Justice as illegal.

So, in 2005, when the Franklin-AIPAC-Israel FBI investigation was getting closer to the office of the Deputy Secretary of Defense, Wolfowitz decided to leave his post for an appointment as President of the World Bank. Most of the world was aghast and few believed a man with his perfidious record (and looming spying allegations) would actually be confirmed to the position. But he was. Lo and behold, the World Bank changed its position on Israel’s application and began plans to fund a huge undertaking that would maintain “Jews only” roads, install state of the art checkpoint systems with new scanning technologies and build industrial zones which would take advantage of Palestinian desperation in the form of a cheap labor force and put the most environmentally damaging industries of the Israeli economy on Palestinian land. The Apartheid apparatus of occupation and subjugation would thus be firmly entrenched using loans from the World Bank, which, brilliantly, the Palestinians themselves would have to repay.

So there you have Wolfowitz, with a lifetime of treachery and subversion that has contributed to the hijacking of US foreign policy in the name of Israel, the devastation, killing and rape of Iraq and Palestine, and the loss of thousands of American lives and billions of taxpayer dollars. And this country is finally outraged because he showed favoritism to his girlfriend!

This case calls for a recalibration of the collective moral compass that provokes greater concern over romantic impropriety than what amounts to crimes against humanity.

Susan Abulhawa is the author of The Scar of David,, a work of historical fiction recently published by Journey Press. She is also the founder of Playgrounds for Palestine, She can be reached at: [email protected].
Old May 7th, 2007 #4
William Robert
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3
Default Wolfowitz aide resigns from World Bank

Wolfowitz aide resigns from World Bank

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - One of two close aides to World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz resigned on Monday, saying turmoil at the bank over its current leadership has made it difficult for him to do his job.

The departure of Kevin Kellems is a blow in a critical week for Wolfowitz, a key architect of the Iraq war who is now under fire for his handling of a lucrative promotion and pay raise for his companion, Shaha Riza, a Middle East expert at the bank.

Kellems, who served as an adviser to Wolfowitz from 2002 when he was U.S. deputy defense secretary and before he became World Bank president in 2005, told Reuters he was leaving to pursue other opportunities.

Kellems worked briefly for U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney as spokesman before he rejoined Wolfowitz at the World Bank in 2005 because of his experience in development issues.

"Given the current environment surrounding the leadership of the World Bank Group, it is very difficult to be effective in helping to advance the mission of the institution," Kellems said.

"I have tremendous respect and admiration for the bank staff and management and treasure the many friendships," he said.

Wolfowitz's two years as president of the bank also have been marred by criticism that he depended on a coterie of aides including Kellems and Robin Cleveland he brought from the Pentagon and White House. That worsened his standing among bank employees by isolating him from career staffers.

Meanwhile, a special bank panel appointed to look into whether Wolfowitz broke rules or abused his powers in the handling of Riza's transfer to the State Department and pay raise had completed its findings and presented the report to Wolfowitz, sources said on Monday.

The sources said the report would be submitted to the bank's board of shareholder governments on Tuesday, with a follow-up meeting later in the week, possibly on Wednesday, where Wolfowitz's future at the bank will be decided.

According to the sources, there is "widespread feeling" on among board directors that it is virtually impossible for Wolfowitz to stay on as president for the rest of his term because of the damage to the bank's credibility and its ability to be effective.

In Brussels, Dutch Finance Minister Wouter Bos stressed it was important that the bank's reputation was not undermined.

"The bank can only do a good job if there is a good and sound reputation," Bos told reporters. "I am concerned about this reputation at the moment."

Board sources said the key to whether Wolfowitz stays or goes is if the United States, the bank's biggest and most influential shareholder who nominated Wolfowitz for the job, puts pressure on the board, especially on European countries, to allow Wolfowitz to continue.

The White House has repeatedly said that U.S. President George W. Bush has confidence in Wolfowitz.

Wolfowitz has said he is the victim of a smear campaign designed to discredit his leadership and undermine his campaign to position the bank at the forefront of fighting corruption in developing countries.

Wolfowitz said he followed that guidance, but the former head of the ethics committee complained Wolfowitz improperly handled the arrangement and never notified the panel of his actions. In response, Wolfowitz called such criticism "grossly unfair and wrong" by suggesting he intended to mislead anyone.

The controversy also has raised questions about the bank's traditional management procedures, especially the selection of its president and the transparency of the board.

Since the bank's inception after World War Two, the United States has always nominated the president without objection while the head of its sister institution, the International Monetary Fund, has always been a European.
Old July 29th, 2007 #5
William Robert
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3
Default Should Alan Greenspan be investigated for criminal corruption?

Should Alan Greenspan be investigated for criminal corruption?

It's pretty obvious his incompetence caused the housing bubble (note - that quote above was from LAST fall). But like Mike Brown and Alberto Gonzalez, you don't go to jail for being a boob.

But corruption, that's another thing. For Alan Greenspan to call in 2004 for the creation and use of Option ARMs and Liar's Loans, and for Americans to rush into adjustable rate mortgages, right before a record string of interest rate hikes, is beyond incompetence, and most likely $$$ from the Mortgage Brokers Association. And the Fed, who is supposed to oversee banks and lenders, let things spin totally out of control during the bubble. Oversight? Regulations? Guidance? Nah!

You would think something funny was going on behind the scenes. Or payments or promises of future payments (like speaking fees to groups like the the corrupt mortgage bankers) being made. Follow the money.

So, should Alan Greenspan be investigated for criminal corruption?

Alan Greenspan played a major role in the housing boondoggle.

On February 26 2004, he said, "American consumers might benefit if lenders provide greater mortgage product alternatives to the traditional fixed rate mortgage. To the degree that households are driven by fears of payment shocks but willing to manage their own interest-rate risks, the traditional fixed-rate mortgage may be an expensive method of financing a home."

Greenspan tacitly approved the whacky financing which produced all manner of untested loans - including ARMs, piggyback loans, "no doc" loans, "interest only" loans et cetera. These loans are a break from traditional financing and have contributed to the increase in bankruptcies.

Millions of people who were hoodwinked into buying homes with "interest-only", "no down" loans will now either lose their homes or be shackled to an asset of decreasing value for the next thirty years.

They've been tricked into a life of indentured servitude.

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal revealed the extent of Greenspan's involvement in the housing fiasco. Here's an excerpt from the article:

"Edward Gramlich, who was Fed governor from 1997 to 2005, said he proposed to Mr Greenspan in or around 2000, when predatory lending was a growing concern, that the Fed use its discretionary authority to send examiners into the offices of consumer-finance lenders that were units of Fed-regulated bank holding companies.

"I would have liked the Fed to be a leader" in cracking down on predatory lending, Mr Gramlich, now a scholar at the Urban Institute, said in an interview this past week. Knowing it would be controversial with Mr Greenspan, whose deregulatory philosophy is well known, Mr Gramlich broached it to him personally rather than take it to the full board.

"He was opposed to it, so I didn't really pursue it", says Mr Gramlich. Still, Mr Greenspan's views did color the regulatory environment, facilitating growing concentration in banking and a hands-off approach to derivatives and hedge funds. That approach, broadly shared by both the Clinton and Bush administrations, is coming under increased scrutiny." (Wall Street Journal)
Old September 23rd, 2007 #6
William Robert
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3
Default Protocols of Zion = PROTOCOL VI

Protocols of Zion = PROTOCOL VI

Monopolies; upon them depend the fortunes of the goyim. Taking of the land out of the hands of the aristocracy. Trade, Industry and Speculation. Luxury. Rise of wages and increase of price in the articles of primary necessity. Anarchism and drunkeness. Secret meaning of the propaganda of economic theories.

We shall soon begin to establish huge monopolies, reservoirs of colossal riches, upon which even large fortunes of the goyim will depend to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of the States on the day after the political smash....

You gentlemen here present who are economists, just strike an estimate of the significance of this combination!

In every possible way we must develop the significance of our Super-Government by representing it as the Protector and Benefactor of all those who voluntarily submit to us.

The aristocracy of the goyim as a political force, is dead we need not take it into account; but as landed proprietors they can still be harmful to us from the fact that they are selfsufficing in the resources upon which they live. It is essential therefore for us at whatever cost to deprive them of their land. This object will be best attained by increasing the burdens upon landed property -in loading lands with debt. These measures will check land-holding and keep it in a state of humble and unconditional submission.

The aristocrats of the goyim, being hereditarily incapable of contenting themselves with little, will rapidly burn up and fizzle out.

At the same time we must intensively patronize trade and industry, but, first and foremost, speculation, the part played by which is to provide a counterpoise to industry: the absence of speculative industry will multiply capital in private hands and will serve to restore agriculture by freeing the land from indebtedness to the land banks. What we want is that industry should drain off from the land both labour and capital and by means of speculation transfer into our hands all the money of the world, and thereby throw all the goyim into the ranks of the proletariat. Then the goyim will bow down before us, if for no other reason but to get the right to exist.

To complete the ruin of the industry of the goyim we shall bring to the assistance of speculation the luxury which we have developed among the goyim, that greedy demand for luxury which is swallowing up everything. We shall raise the rate of wages which, however, will not bring any advantage to the workers, for at the same time, we shall produce a rise in prices of the first necessaries of life, alleging that it arises from the decline of agriculture and cattle breeding: we shall further undermine artfully and deeply sources of production, by accustoming the workers to anarchy and to drunkenness and side by side therewith taking all measure to extirpate from the fact of the earth all the educated forces of the GOYIM.

In order that the true meaning of things may not strike the GOYIM before the proper time we shall mask it under an alleged ardent desire to serve the working classes and the great principles of political economy about which our economic theories are carrying on an energetic propaganda.
Old December 3rd, 2007 #7
William Robert
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3
Default The Turd that won't flush!

Arch Zionist neocon Paul Wofowitz has slithered back into the Bush regime.

In 2005 Wolfowitz resigned in disgrace as Deputy Secretary of Defense, so Bush made him president of the World Bank.

In 2007 he resigned in disgrace from the World Bank.

As president of the World Bank, Wolfowitz was paid an after-tax salary of $391,440, (nearly $33,000 per month) but was so cheap that he wore socks with holes in them during official functions.

Now Condoleezza Rice has made him chairman of the International Security Advisory Board, a prestigious State Department panel with 18 members that have access to the USA’s most sensitive and classified intelligence.

The appointment does not require Senate confirmation.

How'd you like to be on a state department team, and suddenly be told this thing is your boss?

Israel will be pleased. (Sorry John Bolton, but you're not Jewish. You'll have to stay where you are.)

Old January 25th, 2008 #8
William Robert
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3
Default The Turd that won't Flush

Wolfowitz Returns to U.S. Government as Adviser

Paul D. Wolfowitz, who resigned as World Bank chief after serving as second-in-command at the Pentagon, has returned to the Bush administration, albeit in an advisory role. From a short news release put out this afternoon:

The Department of State is pleased to announce the appointment of Dr. Paul Wolfowitz as the Chairman of the Secretary of State’s International Security Advisory Board.

As we said when the job offer was reported in December, the board meets quarterly to provide advice to the secretary of state and one of her deputies based on classified intelligence on some of the most important issues in United States foreign policy today, from Iran to North Korea.
Old February 14th, 2008 #9
Robert Bandanza
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: JUDEAware, originally MassaJEWsetts
Posts: 8,901
jewsign Bernanke warns economy worsening

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress Thursday that the country's economic outlook has deteriorated and signaled that the central bank is ready to keep on lowering a key interest rate — as needed — to shore things up.

In remarks to the Senate Banking Committee, Bernanke said the one-two punch of the housing and credit crises has greatly strained the economy. Hiring has slowed and people are likely to tighten their belts further, as they are pinched by high energy prices and watch the value of their single biggest asset — their homes — weaken, he warned.


Display Modes

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.
Page generated in 0.15413 seconds.