|
August 10th, 2012 | #181 | ||||||
Hrvatski Prijatelj
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SFV
Posts: 1,131
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
August 11th, 2012 | #182 | |||||||
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ah yes - a non sequitur about a man born in the Yemen and propelled to "stardom" by the United States in a film called Secret Agent. He then supported Robin Williams on some sort of US stand up tour and the Americans loved him and secured his place in the spotlight as a "star". I guess Americans like that kind of humour, We tend not to. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Non-"British" Whites integrating and defying the "state" political construct of Britain that you hate so much. A good thing, no? Quote:
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|||||||
August 12th, 2012 | #183 | |
Hrvatski Prijatelj
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SFV
Posts: 1,131
|
Quote:
A little less typographical flourish and a little more cognizability would help me to understand what you're asking. |
|
August 12th, 2012 | #184 |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
The question was perfectly simple.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
August 12th, 2012 | #185 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,411
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
The Bloodbath is Coming 7.6 billion savages multiplying and running wild over the earth, devouring everything in sight, trampling over every other lifeform without mercy or compassion. |
||
August 12th, 2012 | #186 | |||||||
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Post-Games plans for the Olympic stadium
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The aim is for it to be a digital hub which could use local east London talent but also with a community focus after the Games. A conference centre and a pedestrian square for broadcasting major sporting events, along with cafes, restaurants and bars, are among the plans. The LLDC claims it has set 'tough but achievable' requirements that must be met before any agreement for lease is formally signed. Quote:
Prediction: it will be packed solid for the first six months and then people will go back to using their cheaper local baths when the novelty has worn off. Quote:
Quote:
safe http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...don-Games.html normal Sounds great on paper, but experience suggests we should wait a few months before getting excited...... One year ago today, we were told: Quote:
http://www.standard.co.uk/olympics/olympic-news/olympic-village-sold-to-qatari-firm-for-557m-6432234.html safe http://www.standard.co.uk/olympics/o...m-6432234.html normal
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|||||||
August 12th, 2012 | #187 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...mber-USSR.html normal Another reasonable analysis from Hitchens.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
August 12th, 2012 | #188 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Olympics worker arrested over online child abuse charges as 200 paedophiles are tracked down on Twitter in just 2 hours
Quote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ust-hours.html normal
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
August 13th, 2012 | #189 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...p-careers.html normal
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
August 14th, 2012 | #190 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
And now the race to be first to claim asylum: Four members of Congo's Olympic team go missing
Quote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...y-Britain.html normal Did they really expect anything different?
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
August 14th, 2012 | #191 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,411
|
They are positively counting on it:
1/ keep funding for all their various and many orgs. alive and justify their existence 2/ rub the face of the native people in shit Some groups supporting gay male and female athletes and officials have openly encouraged them to take advantage of being in the UK to claim asylum and seek protection from persecution in their home country. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz23WaaUN00
__________________
The Bloodbath is Coming 7.6 billion savages multiplying and running wild over the earth, devouring everything in sight, trampling over every other lifeform without mercy or compassion. |
August 14th, 2012 | #192 | ||
Administrator
|
Olympic Requiem...
...in the ‘Indigenocidal’ State By Colin Liddell Here in the UK the London Olympic Games have been considered a great success. After two weeks of competition, the British Olympic team has won an astounding 29 gold medals and has finished third in the medals table, above the mighty Russians and below only the USA and China. One of the most mentioned facts in recent days is the single gold medal we won at the 1996 Olympics. On the naïve level of simple, uncomplicated sporting enthusiasm it has been a resounding success, and an easy sell to the sporting inclinations of the UK public. But looking at the bigger picture, the hidden agendas, and the crunched numbers, a different picture starts to emerge; one that suggests Britain’s Olympic success is merely the phosphorescent glow of an entity walking in death’s shadow. When London won the ‘privilege’ of hosting the Olympics back in 2005, the British public were assured that the Games would boost the UK economy. As we entered the period of economic turbulence and prolonged recession that followed the Subprime Crash, the idea of the Olympics as an economic panacea became ever more entrenched. This was despite the fact that the last four Olympics all saw dramatic downturns in tourist revenues in the countries that hosted them. The present Olympics have revealed a similar pattern, with reports of the number of normal tourists driven away by security and congestion fears far outweighing the number of sports enthusiasts popping into town for their particular obsessions. The bean counters in London – and London is a city that is mainly famous for its bean counters – certainly had more than an inkling that this would be the effect, especially as the UK has long been oversold as a tourist destination. But the Olympic spectacle, despite the excesses of sponsorship and corporate hijacking, is not about profit so much as propaganda for the nation that hosts the event. With Beijing 2008 the intent was clear: China wanted to fluff up its image from being a giant, totalitarian sweatshop to something a little cuddlier for its Western trading receptors. In the case of London 2012 the propaganda agenda was more subtle, but obvious to anyone watching the multi-cultural-friendly, multi-channel coverage from the BBC from an un-brainwashed state. So, why did Britain shoot itself in the foot economically by pumping billions of pounds to put on an Olympic Games that actually harmed tourist revenue? The answer is because it has become an “indigenocidal state,” that is a state in which the demographic trends lead inexorably towards the destruction of the racial character of the nation’s original inhabitants. There are several stages in this process, and Britain is probably in the early middle phase, where the original inhabitants have been culturally and politically disarmed, and in which minority groups and mixed race groups are growing fast. At this stage the indigenocidal state has two main concerns: Quote:
The propaganda needs of the UK indigenocidal state explains why London pulled out all the stops to be selected as host city. The intention behind the Olympics became clear in the opening ceremony. To placate Britain’s Muslims the design for Team GB’s tracksuits and sportswear incorporated a blue cross of Saint George in the Union Jack pattern instead of a red one because the red cross was once a well-known crusading symbol. Most viewers were impressed by the opening ceremony pageant. This presented a potted history of Britain that devalued past ages and was heavily weighted in favour of the multicultural present. It reduced thousands of years of British history to three simplistic stages: Quote:
The content and tone of the pageant and the Olympic coverage that followed it focused disproportionately on Blacks. In the context of what happened in London last summer, when the city was shaken by riots, this could be viewed as abject appeasement. During the pageant, there was a section that prominently featured race mixing as a positive and a thing to be taken entirely for granted. We saw a household with a Black father and White mother and their mulatto daughter, who lost her mobile phone which was then returned to her by a Black youth whom she then rewarded by kissing. The presumption was that they would then raise the next generation of even blacker Britons. In addition to acclimatizing White Britons to having their daughters seduced and impregnated by Blacks, this segment seemed designed to send out a strong message to young Black males that they were not excluded, but are in fact valued and privileged members of society. This is certainly the case for the British Olympic Committee, which goes out of its way to promote non-White athletes. The most obvious case of this was selection of Lutalo Mohammed (Black) instead the World number one Aaron Cook (White) to represent Britain in the under-80kg Taekwondo competition. Mohammed being Black and having a Muslim name was just too great a temptation for the box-ticking Team GB selectors to resist. But why is it important for non-White and especially Black athletes to do well for Britain? The real answer is of course completely taboo. It is because, despite the best efforts of British society, Blacks are not the same as Whites and even with incessant affirmative action still find it difficult to achieve “equality.” Their lack of ability in most areas of society drives them to focus on those few areas where their abilities can count or which are allocated to them by the wider society as part of a kind of caste system. As in other Western countries this is usually low-grade crime, music entertainment, and some sports. Having Black athletes winning gold medals for the UK is perhaps the easiest way to create an illusion of positive, high-profile social inclusion. In these Olympics Britain’s Black athletes did reasonably well. There were two boxing golds from Afro-Caribbeans – one male and one female – while Mohamed Farar, a refugee from Somalia, won two more gold medals in long distance running. The mulatto athlete Jessica Ennis also won the high-profile Heptathlon. This meant that five of the UK’s 29 gold medals were won by Non-Whites, or around one sixth. But this proportion was still much lower than expected or hoped for. The script was for Blacks to feature much more prominently. The actual results meant that the media had to work harder to magnify the Black contribution to Britain’s medal tally and to the Olympics in general (Bolt mania) while subtly downplaying White success. The proportion of Black medal winners in the UK’s tally was limited by two factors: Black failures and White successes. Because Black British athletes enjoy a degree of favouritism, they can often under-perform in competition. Lutalo Mohammed, the Taekwondo fighter, for example, ended up winning only a bronze. But a more significant and interesting factor was the success of Britain’s White athletes. But this success is not what it seems. Any Olympic success is built on a mountain of training as well as a heap of also-rans who found out the hard way they didn’t have what it takes to succeed at a particular sport. Quite simply, sport is a losing game for most people. If you come from a minority that has shown little aptitude for anything else, then it makes sense to dedicate years of your life to the possibility of winning Olympic gold, as you have nothing to lose and nothing to gain elsewhere, especially if the society you live in supports this. This is quite opposite from the situation traditionally faced by bright young Whites. In the past, the large number of careers and opportunities offering a much more reliable chance of success and demanding less in the way of sacrifice meant that there was little temptation to get deeply involved in sport. Britain’s impressively high medal tally suggests that this is no longer the case. A combination of recession, austerity, outsourcing, cheap immigrant labour, affirmative action (a.k.a. anti-White racism), and the rise of short-term contract work over permanent employment is now putting the squeeze on the kind of people who would never have dedicated their lives to sport before. For these people sport has now becoming the same kind of low-chance escape that it has always been for Blacks. In other words, intelligent and driven young White people have now been pushed by our society into the position once occupied by ethnic minorities. Gold medals won by Whites are now also tickets out of the ghetto. Celebrate that Britain! http://www.alternativeright.com/main...enocial-state/ |
||
August 14th, 2012 | #193 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...gers-plug.html normal Explains why Cliff Richard was rumoured to have performed at the opening ceremony for a quid.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
August 14th, 2012 | #194 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,145
|
Winning a gold medal brings a $9,000 tax bill
By Chris Chase | Fourth-Place Medal – Wed, Aug 1, 2012 1:15 PM EDT.. . (Getty Images)When Olympic medalists return to the United States, they're in high demand. Everyone, from Michael Phelps to a bronze medalist in judo will be sitting for television interviews, talking to newspapers, going to assemblies at local schools and celebrating with friends, family and young athletes. They'll also draw some unwanted interest from everyone's favorite bureaucrats: the IRS. Medalists will have to pay hefty taxes for standing on the podium in London. It's not the value of the medal itself that will require a separate line on this years tax returns, it's the tax on the prize money that comes with a gold, silver or bronze. The United States Olympic Committee rewards Olympic medalists with honorariums. A gold medal brings $25,000. Silver medals get you $15,000. And a bronze is worth $10,000. The Weekly Standard, a conservative news magazine, ran the numbers and tabulated that the tax bill on a gold is $8,986, silver is $5,385 and bronze is $3,500. They note that Missy Franklin, an amateur who has yet to cash in on her fame with endorsements, already owes $14,000 in taxes from her gold and silver medal. By the time the Games are finished, Franklin's tax bill could reach $30,000. Come on, government. I know you're as inflexible as the IOC and couldn't decide on pizza toppings unless a bipartisan commission deliberated for 13 days, but you can't make an exception to athletes representing our country in the biggest event in the world? It's not unheard of: Military members are exempt from taxes when they're deployed in a combat zone. UPDATE: Florida senator Marco Rubio (R) reacted to the story on Wednesday, proposing a bill that would leave athletes exempt from the federal tax. ""Our tax code is a complicated and burdensome mess that too often punishes success, and the tax imposed on Olympic medal winners is a classic example of this madness," he told reporters. http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/olympi...5961--oly.html |
August 15th, 2012 | #196 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2188496/Fears-asylum-claims-Olympic-athletes-missing-meant-home.html safe http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...eant-home.html normal
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
August 15th, 2012 | #197 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pound land
Posts: 2,846
|
Quote.See you Jimmy McQuade.British 'humor' is rife with crossdressing. Just ask your boy Eddie Izzard. .Eddie Izzard is actually a fucking Paddy.....News just in.The Irish water polo team has lost its funding for the next Olympics.Seamus O Bjesus of the Olympic committee Na Eiren said.This was due to the extortionate cost of replacement horses.In the three months running up to the Olympics.The Irish water polo team lost nine thoroughbreds due to drowning..........News Flash...Three members of team GB athletics.Have reportedly applied for asylum in England.
|
August 15th, 2012 | #198 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Olympic Requiem......in the ‘Indigenocidal’ State
Quote
"Here in the UK the London Olympic Games have been considered a great success. After two weeks of competition, the British Olympic team has won an astounding 29 gold medals and has finished third in the medals table, above the mighty Russians and below only the USA and China. One of the most mentioned facts in recent days is the single gold medal we won at the 1996 Olympics. On the naïve level of simple, uncomplicated sporting enthusiasm it has been a resounding success, and an easy sell to the sporting inclinations of the UK public. But looking at the bigger picture, the hidden agendas, and the crunched numbers, a different picture starts to emerge; one that suggests Britain’s Olympic success is merely the phosphorescent glow of an entity walking in death’s shadow. When London won the ‘privilege’ of hosting the Olympics back in 2005, the British public were assured that the Games would boost the UK economy. As we entered the period of economic turbulence and prolonged recession that followed the Subprime Crash, the idea of the Olympics as an economic panacea became ever more entrenched. This was despite the fact that the last four Olympics all saw dramatic downturns in tourist revenues in the countries that hosted them. The present Olympics have revealed a similar pattern, with reports of the number of normal tourists driven away by security and congestion fears far outweighing the number of sports enthusiasts popping into town for their particular obsessions. The bean counters in London – and London is a city that is mainly famous for its bean counters – certainly had more than an inkling that this would be the effect, especially as the UK has long been oversold as a tourist destination. But the Olympic spectacle, despite the excesses of sponsorship and corporate hijacking, is not about profit so much as propaganda for the nation that hosts the event. With Beijing 2008 the intent was clear: China wanted to fluff up its image from being a giant, totalitarian sweatshop to something a little cuddlier for its Western trading receptors. In the case of London 2012 the propaganda agenda was more subtle, but obvious to anyone watching the multi-cultural-friendly, multi-channel coverage from the BBC from an un-brainwashed state.So, why did Britain shoot itself in the foot economically by pumping billions of pounds to put on an Olympic Games that actually harmed tourist revenue? The answer is because it has become an “indigenocidal state,” that is a state in which the demographic trends lead inexorably towards the destruction of the racial character of the nation’s original inhabitants. There are several stages in this process, and Britain is probably in the early middle phase, where the original inhabitants have been culturally and politically disarmed, and in which minority groups and mixed race groups are growing fast. At this stage the indigenocidal state has two main concerns: (1) It must prevent the indigenous inhabitants perceiving their gradual genocide or prevent them seeing this in negative terms. (2) It must prevent the colonizing ethnic minorities from being alienated to such an extent that their behaviour triggers off strong racial awareness among the indigenous group. The engine driving this can either be a traitorous elite that feels contempt for its common people, which in a British context may be related to the class system as well as to the influence of globalist elements. Alternatively it could simply be driven by a ratchet effect that stems from economic factors, as any attempt to reverse the indigenocidal state would involve serious economic and political costs in the short-term. The propaganda needs of the UK indigenocidal state explains why London pulled out all the stops to be selected as host city. The intention behind the Olympics became clear in the opening ceremony. To placate Britain’s Muslims the design for Team GB’s tracksuits and sportswear incorporated a blue cross of Saint George in the Union Jack pattern instead of a red one because the red cross was once a crusading symbol. Most viewers were impressed by the opening ceremony pageant. This presented a potted history of Britain that devalued past ages and was heavily weighted in favour of the multicultural present. It reduced thousands of years of British history to three simplistic stages: 1) Idyllic peasant society (2) Industrialization scarring the landscape and oppressing the people (3) Post-industrial healing through socialized medicine and multiculturalism By highlighting the large number of non-White immigrants employed in the National Health Service, the pageant skilfully linked something the British public have deep misgivings about with something they have a great deal of belief in. The content and tone of the pageant and the Olympic coverage that followed it focused disproportionately on Blacks. In the context of what happened in London last summer, when the city was shaken by riots, this could be viewed as abject appeasement. During the pageant, there was a section that prominently featured race mixing as a positive and a thing to be taken entirely for granted. We saw a household with a Black father and White mother and their mulatto daughter, who lost her mobile phone which was then returned to her by a Black youth whom she then rewarded by kissing. The presumption was that they would then raise the next generation of even blacker Britons. In addition to acclimatizing White Britons to having their daughters seduced and impregnated by Blacks, this segment seemed designed to send out a strong message to young Black males that they were not excluded, but are in fact valued and privileged members of society. This is certainly the case for the British Olympic Committee, which goes out of its way to promote non-White athletes. The most obvious case of this was selection of Lutalo Mohammed (Black) instead the World number one Aaron Cook (White) to represent Britain in the under-80kg Taekwondo competition. Mohammed being Black and having a Muslim name was just too great a temptation for the box-ticking Team GB selectors to resist. But why is it important for non-White and especially Black athletes to do well for Britain? The real answer is of course completely taboo. It is because, despite the best efforts of British society, Blacks are not the same as Whites and even with incessant affirmative action still find it difficult to achieve “equality.” Their lack of ability in most areas of expertise drives them to focus on those activities where their abilities can count or which are allocated to them by the wider society as part of a kind of caste system. As in other Western countries this is usually low-grade crime, music entertainment, and some sports. Having Black athletes winning gold medals for the UK is perhaps the easiest way to create an illusion of positive, high-profile social inclusion. In these Olympics Britain’s Black athletes did reasonably well. There were two boxing golds from Afro-Caribbeans – one male and one female – while Mohamed Farar, a refugee from Somalia, won two more gold medals in long distance running. The mulatto athlete Jessica Ennis also won the high-profile Heptathlon. This meant that five of the UK’s 29 gold medals were won by Non-Whites, or around one sixth. But this proportion was still much lower than expected or hoped for. The script was for Blacks to feature much more prominently. The actual results meant that the media had to work harder to magnify the Black contribution to Britain’s medal tally and to the Olympics in general (Bolt mania) while subtly downplaying White success. The proportion of Black medal winners in the UK’s tally was limited by two factors: Black failures and White successes. Because Black British athletes enjoy a degree of favouritism, they can often under-perform in competition. Lutalo Mohammed, the Taekwondo fighter, for example, ended up winning only a bronze. But a more significant and interesting factor was the success of Britain’s White athletes. But this success is not what it seems. Any Olympic success is built on a mountain of training as well as a heap of also-rans who found out the hard way they didn’t have what it takes to succeed at a particular sport. Quite simply, sport is a losing game for most people. If you come from a minority that has shown little aptitude for anything else, then it makes sense to dedicate years of your life to the possibility of winning Olympic gold, as you have nothing to lose and nothing to gain elsewhere, especially if the society you live in supports this. This is quite opposite from the situation traditionally faced by bright young Whites. In the past, the large number of careers and opportunities offering a much more reliable chance of success and demanding less in the way of sacrifice meant that there was little temptation to get deeply involved in sport. Britain’s impressively high medal tally suggests that this is no longer the case. A combination of recession, austerity, outsourcing, cheap immigrant labour, affirmative action (a.k.a. anti-White racism), and the rise of short-term contract work over permanent employment is now putting the squeeze on the kind of people who would never have dedicated their lives to sport before. For these people sport has now becoming the same kind of low-chance escape that it has always been for Blacks. In other words, intelligent and driven young White people have now been pushed by our society into the position once occupied by ethnic minorities. Gold medals won by Whites are now also tickets out of the ghetto. Celebrate that, Britain! http://www.alternativeright.com/main...enocial-state/ |
March 22nd, 2013 | #199 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
The "feel-good" factor was never real in the first place, you moron. It was temporary artificial patriotardism, brought on by being in the spotlight. Now we get to sit back and see how much it cost us. (btw - did they ever catch any of those athletes who disappeared the minute their feet touched? )
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
March 22nd, 2013 | #200 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
|
Quote:
The only feel good factor the Olympics created was for boyle and his circle of out of touch system drones as they counted up the money they made for themselves and their relations
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion Chase them into the swamps |
|
Tags |
femen, islam, london, london2012, olympiad, olympics, protest, sharia |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|