White Nationalism Is Not "Right-Wing"

[Taliesen]

I consider myself neither "left" nor "right".

I'm a centrist. I hold old-fashioned ideas, long held by every group of people on the planet, throughout history. And still held by ever group of people on the planet except for Whites, who are forbidden to believe in them, precisely because they are centrist, normal, organic, and beneficial:

I believe that:

* Family, folk, faith, freedom, and a future for our children are all good things.

* White people have the same right as all other people to advocate for their perceived collective interests.

* The relationship between men and women is naturally complementary, not adversarial.

* Polymorphous perversity is destructive to both the individual's soul and to the folk soul of the people whose individuals practice it.

* White men are the rightful rulers of White nations, and that anyone who says otherwise is a genocidal maniac.

These beliefs are all natural and reasonable. They are not "right-wing" as our enemies would have us believe, and they are certainly not "far-right" or "extremist".

They are the traditional, organic, rational beliefs of all those they came before us. They are fundamentally centrist and balanced.

[Johan]

I agree with your points, but it also has to do with people's nationalism, a people is defined by people's nationalists as a group of people with a common language, culture, ethnic background and history.

So I am a White Dutch People's Nationalist, and that indeed has nothing to do with left or right.

[Taliesen]

Originally Posted by Johan

So I am a White Dutch People's Nationalist, and that indeed has nothing to do with left or right.

I agree.

[Major Sharpe]

The terms, "Left", "Right", & "Center" are widely interpreted, depending on whom you ask. For instance, take Point 1 of the Centrist View. Is there any government on earth which is opposed to a "future for their country's children"? China? Russia? Botswana? I've seen no such documentation. And in regard to Point 4: what does that even mean? So, on these 5 Points, how does the Leftist and the Rightist viewpoint differ from the Centrist? Now, I'm referring specifically to the Left and the Right - and not "Democrats or Republicans" (US) or "Labour or Conservatives (UK) since none of these political parties accurately reflect those two ideological opposites.

• •• CENTRIST VIEW OF SOCIETY ••
  
  
• 1 - Family, folk, faith, freedom, and a future for our children are all good things.
  
• 2 - White people have the same right as all other people to advocate for their perceived collective interests.
  
• 3 - The relationship between men and women is naturally complementary, not adversarial.
  
• 4 - Polymorphous perversity is destructive to both the individual's soul and to the folk soul of the people whose individuals practice it.
  
• 5 - White men are the rightful rulers of White nations, and that anyone who says otherwise is a genocidal maniac.

• •• LEFTIST VIEW OF SOCIETY (?) ••
  
  
• 1 - Family, folk, faith, freedom, and a future for our children are all good things.
  
• 2 - White people have the same right as all other people to advocate for their perceived collective interests.
  
• 3 - The relationship between men and women is naturally complementary, not adversarial.
  
• 4 - Polymorphous perversity is destructive to both the individual's soul and to the folk soul of the people whose individuals practice it.
  
• 5 - White men are the rightful rulers of White nations, and that anyone who says otherwise is a genocidal maniac.

• •• RIGHTIST VIEW OF SOCIETY (?) ••
  
  
• 1 - Family, folk, faith, freedom, and a future for our children are all good things.
  
• 2 - White people have the same right as all other people to advocate for their perceived collective interests.
  
• 3 - The relationship between men and women is naturally complementary, not adversarial.
  
• 4 - Polymorphous perversity is destructive to both the individual's soul and to the folk soul of the people whose individuals practice it.
  
• 5 - White men are the rightful rulers of White nations, and that anyone who says otherwise is a genocidal maniac.

[Taliesen]

The problem is that the Jewsual suspects and their Cultural Marxist collaborators have dragged the Overton Window so far to "the Left" that what has traditionally been viewed as normal and centrist, is now seen as ultra-extremism.

That window has been dragged so far to the "left", that what we think of as "Right-wing", today, was considered "extreme LEFT-wing" just a few decades ago, and that which we consider mainstream "Left-wing" is actually "ultra-extreme Left-wing".

[Taliesen]

I've given a lot of support to NS groups and promoted a lot of NS media over the years, because I agree with 99% of what they say. The only part I disagree with is that the locus of political power should be at the national level.

Because I believe that people are more clannish than tribal, I think the locus of power should be lower--closer to the people--at the community level--in other words, in the clan. I like to call my approach Klan Socialism.

This was exactly the understanding of the Aryan founding fathers of the United States. It's true, the Jews were there from the beginning, bribing, cajoling, and whispering in ears, and using their influence to pervert the process, but the founders' vision was the ultimate Aryan way of governing.

The U.S. Constitution is it's greatest written expression. It's unfortunate that because of deliberate misinterpretation (disinterpretation?) by Jew-know-who, few people understand this.

I expand a little on this premise in my blog post, "The Aryan-American Freedom Papers". (I don't know the etiquette here, but this is a Stormfront blog, I hope that's okay.)

[Johan]

Originally Posted by Taliesen

I've given a lot of support to NS groups and promoted a lot of NS media over the years, because I agree with 99% of what they say. The only part I disagree with is that the locus of political power should be at the national level.

Did you know that People's Nationalism was the basis for National Socialism, the condition was that 'political' matters had to be decided through a People's Council .

National Socialism should therefore not be seen as a political matter, but as a matter for the people.

Whoever interprets this differently, distorts things, and thus deviates from the main principles.

[Duitsebloed]

What constitutes left or right, would surely change if we all lived in a racially homogenous society, one where everyone in the society spoke the same language and had the same customs.

[Johan]

I am for animal rights, they call me left.

I am for my own people, the call me right.

I am for responsible organic farming and livestock, the call me left.

I am for nuclear energy, the call me right.

I am against an invasion of aliens in my country, the call me extreme right.

Etc etc etc

Left and right is nothing more than divide and rule/conquer in a demo(N)cratic system, invented and in the interest of the jew.

[Nikola Bijeliti]

I am a Third Positionist, neither left nor right.

[Taliesen]

Originally Posted by Johan

Left and right is nothing more than divide and rule/conquer in a demo(N)cratic system, invented and in the interest of the jew.

Bingo!

(padding)