Exterminate the Jews - a Question Seeking Answers

[VanguardNewsNetwork]

You know that I believe the correct policy toward the jews is to exterminate them; I believe that is the only rational and effective response to their collective attempt to genocide our White race. My question here, though, is whether I am the first in European history to propose this solution. Answer the question if you can, and use quotations if possible



More...

[albion]

Hunter Wallace:
2.) I’ve done my share of condemning people. In this case, I would rather persuade. If Linder is to be condemned for anything, it should be for advocating extermination of the Jews. However, that subject wasn’t raised in the interview.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/200...ex-linder-iii/

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by albion

Hunter Wallace:
2.) I’ve done my share of condemning people. In this case, I would rather persuade. If Linder is to be condemned for anything, it should be for advocating extermination of the Jews. However, that subject wasn’t raised in the interview.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/200...ex-linder-iii/

Yeah, I've seen that. Condemnations don't interest me. The fact that neither Hunter nor anyone else even dare consider the option is the relevant point. There is no solid argument against extermination, but if they undertook to try to make one...they'd arrive at the same conclusion, which would threaten their status or some other personal interest. On some level they know that, so they take refuge in tut-tuttery. I'm dead serious: Hunter and the rest acknowledge the jews are doing things that will lead, and are intended to lead, to our genocide, so there's no reason, a priori, to write off an equally strong response, and every reason to think counter-genocide is simply bringing a gun to a gunfight. Then you have history, which is replete with failed attempts to deal with jews. Which leads directly to my conclusion. The jews intend our genocide. No matter what measure we employ to stop them, they will call it genocidal - so what the heck? Exterminating the jew is pure Brimley oatmeal: the right thing to do.

[McKinley]

It appears that this Wallace dude needs to get some stronger wrist.

[Mike Parker]

MacDonald traces out a nice scenario in which Jewish participation in media and culture is limited to their share of the population. What struck me is if we had the power to impose that on them, we'd also have the power to kill them. MacDonald's idea is inherently unstable: there have been quotas on Jews before, and Jews managed to appeal to philo-Semites and get them undone. Expulsion has the same problem: there will always be a Jared Taylor among us who says it's not the Jews, it's the racial egalitarians, or a Sam Francis who says it's not the Jews, it's the managerial elite, and the "good Jews" will be let back in, and they'll be on their best behavior for a month or two, and then it all starts over. They can't come back from the dead.

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by Mike Parker

MacDonald traces out a nice scenario in which Jewish participation in media and culture is limited to their share of the population. What struck me is if we had the power to impose that on them, we'd also have the power to kill them. MacDonald's idea is inherently unstable: there have been quotas on Jews before, and Jews managed to appeal to philo-Semites and get them undone. Expulsion has the same problem: there will always be a Jared Taylor among us who says it's not the Jews, it's the racial egalitarians, or a Sam Francis who says it's not the Jews, it's the managerial elite, and the "good Jews" will be let back in, and they'll be on their best behavior for a month or two, and then it all starts over. They can't come back from the dead.

You got it. MacDonald is going to receive some upbraiding in coming weeks. He chickened out of a debate on the Jim Giles show yesterday.

Mike, post a link to KM's scenario you mention, if you have it handy. I've only seen the OD thread on KM's interview w Giles.

[McKinley]

I have a filling that these book worms don't get that if you are fighting for your life you don't fight back half assed. If you don't put your whole ass into it you will perrish.

Look at how Germany is ran now. They held back on the Kikes and now the Kikes rule that country.

Our forefathers played softball with the Yids in this country now look at the mess we are in.

Maybe us dummies are not so dumb after all, if we can figure it out and the book worms soon to be bird food can't.

[Hunter Wallace]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

There is no solid argument against extermination, but if they undertook to try to make one...

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.

[John Cassidy]

Originally Posted by Hunter Wallace

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.

Innocent of what?

[McKinley]

Originally Posted by Hunter Wallace

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.

When did the jews become innocent? When they sicced the Niggers on us or when they told White girls that fucking Niggers is the coolest thing ever?

[Ze'ev]

Gas them all

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by McKinley

When did the jews become innocent? When they sicced the Niggers on us or when they told White girls that fucking Niggers is the coolest thing ever?

The conservatives, trapped by their bogus G_odd concept, can't get past treating the team attacking them as individuals. Strangely enough, though, they have no problem treating as collectively guilty those who fight back as a group against those outsiders. Double standard, itz. Loser standard, itz.

In-group good.

Out-group(s) bad.

That's the survival morality.

If you want to discuss what's immoral, as Hunter does, then look at the beam in your own eye. Look at the practices allowed on your own site. On OD, you can call someone an infomer, a jew, with no evidence. At VNN, our moral standard for in-groupers is higher. You have to stand behind your words here. We don't let known liars, child molesters and undercover Canadian cops post at will. Nor do we defend homosexuals. Our critics should consider raising their standards.

[MikeTodd]

Originally Posted by Hunter Wallace

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.

Morality...?
The elimination of kikenvermin is solely a matter of hygiene.

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by MikeTodd

Morality...?
The elimination of kikenvermin is solely a matter of hygiene.

Bingo!, we have a winner.

[PeterKramer]

The strongest case for exterminating the jews can be made by pointing out what the jews did to the White nations after they were driven out of Germany by the Nazis. If the jews had been killed, if they hadn't fled to the United States, it's possible that jewry would have been just a little bit weaker here and Whites wouldn't be approaching minority status today.

The Nazi policy failed to neutralize the power of German jewry, which was able to attack Germany from exile.

Is extermination the only method that can prevent this? I can think of three approaches that would work at least as well.

1. External exile. Not to Israel, which is very dangerous having nuclear missiles and submarines, but to a protectorate of the new White nation, an island where their access to technology can be limited.

2. Internal exile. Create a jewish reservation within the White nation, a very large ghetto, again with limited access to technology.

3. Sterilization. Because jews can be expected to strongly resist this approach it would have to be combined with some form of exile, but it would be effective. Sterilizing all jews capable of reproducing would lead to their eventual elimination.

As a practical matter there's not much chance that jews can be exterminated all over the world. Even if every majority White nation became a Alex Linder inspired White state there would still be a couple of million jews and scattered around the world outside Israel and the White sphere of influence. With their trillions of dollars in stolen loot those jews would be able to make deals with their host countries to protect them.

In that world jews would probably be eliminated from the White nations for at least another thousand years. Maybe Alex could leave behind a time capsule with his instructions for future generations considering letting the plague back in the house.

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by Hunter Wallace

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.

Morality is for the in-group, not enemy vermin.

[Rounder]

Originally Posted by Hunter Wallace

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.

Look at it this way, Hunter. There are parasites among insects, plants, fish, and 4-legged mammals. Right ?? Who then, can say scientifically, parasites don't exist among bipeds ??

Jews can't help being parasites any more than dog ticks can. Therefore, the only questions for us to entertain, are do we want to (1) ignore the jew parasites, (2) treat the diseases they cause while those diseases wipe us out, or (3) Kill all the GD parasites so we can live and never again suffer their diseases ??

What's your choice ??

[Mark van Schaik]

Is Hunter Wallace Denzel Washington in disguise? One of those sci-fi ‘ah gotsta beez moral 'n' shit’ ‘hero’ niggers.

[Tintin]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

There is no solid argument against extermination, but if they undertook to try to make one...they'd arrive at the same conclusion, which would threaten their status or some other personal interest.

There is "no solid argument" because it would violate Darwin's Theory of Evolution. In his book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life Darwin repeatedly states that if two sub-species, or whatever terms he was using, try to occupy the same territory and compete for the same resources, one will be exterminated. And Darwin does use the word "exterminated". Darwin leaves no room for sharing or compromise. So, yes, to compete for the same resource is to "threaten" "their status" and "other personal interest". Either the Whites or the jew will adapt and gain an advantage in this battle for resources and the other will be exterminated.

Utopian Creationist (believers that all humans were "created" equal) would say that Darwin's Theories do not apply to "humans". Utopians Creationist would claim that "humans" are somehow beyond the forces of Evolutions.

The obvious response to the Utopians Creationist would be one like Darwin made to the Creationist critics of his time. "If the jew used or attempted to use its evolutionary advantages to slow or stop the measurable decline and observable approaching extermination of the White sub-species, my [Darwin's] theory would be proven false, or at least no apply to humans. But no one has been able to provide an example that I [Darwin] know of".

[AlexanderHaynes]

Originally Posted by Tintin

There is "no solid argument" because it would violate Darwin's Theory of Evolution. In his book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life Darwin repeatedly states that if two sub-species, or whatever terms he was using, try to occupy the same territory and compete for the same resources, one will be exterminated. And Darwin does use the word "exterminated". Darwin leaves no room for sharing or compromise. So, yes, to compete for the same resource is to "threaten" "their status" and "other personal interest". Either the Whites or the jew will adapt and gain an advantage in this battle for resources and the other will be exterminated.

Utopian Creationist (believers that all humans were "created" equal) would say that Darwin's Theories do not apply to "humans". Utopians Creationist would claim that "humans" are somehow beyond the forces of Evolutions.

The obvious response to the Utopians Creationist would be one like Darwin made to the Creationist critics of his time. "If the jew used or attempted to use its evolutionary advantages to slow or stop the measurable decline and observable approaching extermination of the White sub-species, my [Darwin's] theory would be proven false, or at least no apply to humans. But no one has been able to provide an example that I [Darwin] know of".

There are also the racialist shabbat-goys, numerous in the so-called "HBD" and "Game" blogospheres, who think jews are white and part of our own community or just love jews (for whatever reason; ordinarily a bluntly incorrect one, such as "Jews gave us our moral code" or "Jews can be great scientists and inventors").

OneSTDV and Mangan used to be a great example of this, though my instinct tells me the first one became far more radical before closing his blog.