Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 27th, 2008 #1
yankee jane
Mene, Mene, Tekel Upharsin
 
yankee jane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,588
Arrow More On Obongo's Ineligibility

Here's a good article from Devvy Kidd about the issue of Obongo's lack of eligibility and the status so far. Like, the order the judge signed appears to have been faxed to him from a former law clerk of his who now works at Sidley, Austin, Obongo's former law firm.

Quote:
FEDERAL JUDGE SLAPS VOTERS IN FACE, ENERGIZES PATRIOTS

By: Devvy
October 27, 2008

© 2008 - NewsWithViews.com

Before I cover the current status and action plan regarding Berg v. Obama, et al, I want to address the McCain-Palin Compliance Fund which I wrote about in my last column. A couple of people in denial emailed that it just isn't so, I made it all up or distorted the facts. You may verify for yourself that the McCain-Palin Compliance Fund was incorporated in the State of Delaware on February 25, 2008. Click on this link. It takes you to the official page. On left side, click on entity search and go from there. This is what the official records show:

File Number 4509524

MCCAIN-PALIN COMPLIANCE FUND
Entity Details
--------------------------------------------------

This is not a statement of good standing

File Number: 4509524

Incorporation Date / Formation Date: 02/25/2008

(mm/dd/yyyy) Entity Name: MCCAIN-PALIN COMPLIANCE FUND

Entity Kind: Corporation Entity Type: Non-Profit or Religious

Residency: Domestic State: DE

Registered Agent Information: Name: THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY
Address: Corporation Trust Center 1209 Orange Street
City: Wilmington County: New Castle State: DE Postal Code: 19801 Phone: (302) 658-7581

The registered agent information is defined here. Who or what is The Corporation Trust Company? Please bear with me as this gets a bit convoluted as you extract each thread. First, let me take you to a posting two days ago on Larry Sinclair's web site; he is the man who has accused Obama of cocaine use and a sexual encounter. Please note the statement Sinclair makes at that link questioning who actually wrote the Berg decision for Judge Surrick:

"The original faxed decision from the Clerk of the US District Court for the Eastern District of PA to attorney Philip J Berg appears to have been faxed to Judge Surrick for him to sign. But if this is the case, the questions becomes who wrote the decision and faxed it for the Judges signature?...What is interesting is not at the TOP of the fax pages; it is at the bottom. The ruling issued by Judge Surrick (?) was actually faxed to the Judge by someone (?) at 4:55 pm and the question is who? Did the Obama Attorney's or Surricks old Law Clerk, Christopher Seaman, (who just happens to be employed by Sidley-Austin, the former employer of Barack & Michelle Obama, et al.) write the ruling dismissing the Berg suit?"

What immediately jumped out at me is the name Sidley-Austin. You see, when I did a search for The Corporation Trust Company on Orange Street, Wilmington, DE., this came up (SEC is Security and Exchange Commission):

SEC Info - Ais Futures Fund IV LP - 10-12G - On 4/30/07 - EX-3.1

"... in the State of Delaware is The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County. Delaware 19801. ..." [Read]

Proceeding to the SEC web site, what did I see?

2. Registered Office. The address of the registered office of the Partnership in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801.

3. Registered Agent. The name and address of the registered agent for service of proceae on the Partnership in the State of Delaware is The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County. Delaware 19801.

And, who is the agent listed at the top? Sidley-Austin LLP/FA. AIS Futures Fund's registered agent is Sidley-Austin. The McCain-Palin Compliance fund incorporated in the State of Delaware on February 25, 2008, shows their registered agent is The Corporation Trust Company whose registered agent is Sidley-Austin tied through AIS. Whew. Obama met wife, Michelle, at Sidley-Austin where she was employed. This web site has the Obama, Ayers and Sidley-Austin, LLP mega diagram of affiliations.

McCain announces on August 29, 2008, after months of searching and all the hoopla over his short list for VP, Gov. Sarah Palin of the great State of Alaska is his final choice. The McCain-Palin Compliance Fund is incorporated on February 25, 2008, six months prior to that announcement. Obviously, McCain didn't call Palin on February 24, 2008, and ask her if she'd consider being his VP and file incorporation papers the next day. Talks had to have been underway for some time before the filing date. The registered agent of the newly formed corporation via the trust corporation for the McCain-Palin Compliance Fund, is a law firm deeply involved with Democrats, their causes and Obama. Just one, big, happy coterie of players.

Federal judge slaps the face of voters; spits on the U.S. Constitution

Phil Berg's lawsuit to force production of Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate is not a political game, it's a constitutional issue. The most cogent narrative, including excerpts from Judge Surrick's decision is found here. To say millions of us are outraged is putting it mildly. Enraged is more appropriate. If one reads the dishonorable Surrick's words, it becomes apparent this judge, if he is the one who actually wrote the decision, thinks we the people are too stupid to understand his outrageous remarks:

"…regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact. To reiterate: a candidate's ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters. By extension, the theoretical constitutional harm experienced by voters does not change as the candidacy of an allegedly ineligible candidate progresses from the primaries to the general election."

According to this bench warmer, a candidates INELIGIBILITY to run for office doesn't present an injury to voters! We just accept fraud as eligibility! "Theoretical constitutional harm" experienced by we the people doesn't change as the fraud passes from one phase of the election cycle to another! Surrick is lost in purple haze. Typical of these weenie federal judges, when they can't find the guts to do the right thing, they take the cheap way out and try to pass the buck to the other incompetents, Congress:

"So, who does have standing? According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that's completely up to Congress to decide.

"If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution's eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint."

In other words, we the people are supposed to sit back and allow a candidate who doesn't meet constitutional requirements for eligibility go ahead, run, get elected via massive vote fraud and hope that down the line Congress might decide to pass some law giving we the people some say in OUR government and election process? Surrick's words must have given Arnold Schwarzenegger a nocturnal emission.

REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE
 
Old October 27th, 2008 #2
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,632
Default

Regardless of what he may cite, I think this Judge Surrick is out of his mind. The question of "standing" is so far removed from the issues brought to bar, that the need to rule on such a point at all is clear demonstration of the defendant's inability to simply and clearly refute all of plaintiff's allegations.

Were there no credibility to the allegations of ineligibilty on the part of Obama, there would be no issue of standing at all. Obama would simply introduce the necessary certified documents into the record, a summary judgment would issue with a dismissal without prejudice.

Obviously, it is not within the power of the defendant to refute plaintiff's allegations, hence the resort to the issue of standing.

The Judge errs when he raises the question of "damage," since the motion for judgement is not made in tort. Damage, therefore, is not germain to the issues at hand.

What do I think SCOTUS will do? I think SCOTUS will refuse to hear the appeal without comment.
__________________
No way out but through the jews.
 
Old October 27th, 2008 #3
yankee jane
Mene, Mene, Tekel Upharsin
 
yankee jane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,588
Default

But this entire thing is such a perfect example of how far down things have gone. Forget about justice or right, judges don't care about law or even appearing to perform their function properly - not even in such a serious and high profile matter. As long as they can throw out an official document that says something, all signed off and recorded, then that is that. They have accomplished what their masters wanted done - time to move on. Same for the SCOTUS.

Last edited by yankee jane; October 27th, 2008 at 01:08 PM.
 
Old October 27th, 2008 #4
MikeTodd
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
 
MikeTodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
Default

Federal judges are experts at playing major league Tegwar!
The Exciting Game Without Any Rules
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together.
 
Old October 27th, 2008 #5
Jett Rink
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Squaresville
Posts: 7,502
Default

Obama was more than eligible for government money. Obama was more than eligible for dating your daughter. Obama was more than eligible for your job. Obama was more than eligible to take your spot at Harvard.

But the moment the masses want to hand one of the glorious negros we see so much of portrayed night and day, month after month, year after year on teevee the keys to the White House, suddenly this nigger has found something he might be deemed ineligible for.

Imagine that!

He was more than eligible for all that other shit, but when he gets near the steering wheel someone tries to slap this circus monkeys hands away. Bad monkey!!! You need a license and more training to steer the 'Kwa!

Last edited by Jett Rink; October 27th, 2008 at 03:02 PM.
 
Old October 27th, 2008 #6
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jett Rink View Post
...when he gets near the steering wheel someone tries to slap this circus monkeys hands away. Bad monkey!!! You need a license and more training to steer the 'Kwa!

Not to worry, Jett, Hizzoner just slid up in the shotgun seat and put dat monkey's hands right back on dat wheel "n shit.
__________________
No way out but through the jews.
 
Old October 27th, 2008 #7
MikeTodd
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
 
MikeTodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
Cool Though You May Not Drive a Great Big Kwa-dilac

Diamond in the back,
sun-roof top.
Diggin' the scene
with a gansta lean,
gansta whitewalls, TeeVee-ators in the back...
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 PM.
Page generated in 0.10078 seconds.