Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 12th, 2011 #2521
Bill Wassner
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Just like I expected, Retardo had another of Its copy-and-past freakouts.

As concerns Retardo's hysterical whimpering, we're still waiting for It to make the following statements:


"I'm the mentally retarded, emotionally disturbed and mentally ill Roberto Muehlenkamp and I post on Shermers forum as Mathew Ellard.

and

"It is a historical fact that not one of the 54 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka has ever been proven to contain so much as - 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the alleged buried bodies, and not so much as one single person has ever been proven to have died by means of poison gas in a homicidal gas chamber at Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor or Treblinka. NOT ONE!"


Retardo:


Quote:
...Shermer eventually endorsing my submissions of proof

On what date will this endorsement take place Retardo?
 
Old March 12th, 2011 #2522
Bill Wassner
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Retardo:

Quote:
The reward money being already available in some special account... Is that supposed to impress me?

Says Gerdes' squirming little bitch.

Isn't it fun watching the little bitch try to pretend that Its not kicking Itself for shooting Itself in the foot?

Hey Retardo, what's it like being Gerdes' bitch?



Retardo:

Quote:
So the following 14 threads are now up on the Skeptics Society Forum

So here's the countdown on all 14 of the little bitch's fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves."


Quote:
Belzec's fraudulently alleged "huge mass grave" # 3/3 rejection date:

April 29th

The other 9 Belzec fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" rejection date:

April 30th

Sobibor's 4 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" rejection date:

May 3rd

What do you think Shermer is going to do?

Place your bets ladies and gentlemen!


Hey Retardo:

Has Shermer sent Gerdes an email endorsing any of your "proofs" yet?


A simple "YES" or "NO" will do, thanks.

YES or NO, Retardo?



Quote:
Gerdes:

So Nancy Boy, as of today, I have $14,000.00 in a special account that will be used to pay out any reward money for these 14 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves", should you decide to bring your posts / threads into compliance of the Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules. YOU HAVE UNTIL 12:00 MIDNIGHT, SAT. MARCH 5TH (U.S. MOUNTAIN TIME) to bring said posts into compliance. It's up to you Nancy Boy, if you want to be eligible for the reward money or not.

Please note Nancy Boy, if you chose not to bring your posts / threads into compliance and Shermer does endorse your "proofs" in full compliance with the Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules, the reward money will still be available to anyone who subsequently uses your very own endorsed "proofs" that Shermer subsequently endorses in full compliance with said Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules.

The money is there for the taking IF all Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules are followed to the letter.

The choice is yours Nancy Boy if you want to be eligible for said $14,000.00.

Also, if you deny the fact that I have put $14,000.00 into a special account, you can bet me, dollar for dollar that I have not.

Do you want to make the bet Nancy Boy?

Just post on the VNN forum that you wish to bet me, dollar for dollar that I haven't and we can work out the particulars of the bet from there.

What do you say Nancy Boy?

Hey Retardo, are you going to accept Gerdes' bet?

What are you waiting for?

What are you so afraid of?
 
Old March 12th, 2011 #2523
Bill Wassner
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Retardo:

Quote:
Of course I’m going to post in strict compliance with the NAFH rules, one thread for each grave and whatever else the rules require.

Yet MORE LIES from Roberto Muehlenkamp


Retardo:

Quote:
I refused to idiotically refer to the mass graves as "alleged" let alone "fraudulently alleged"... I did this because, elementary considerations of self-respect aside, I want Mr. Shermer to seriously consider endorsing my proof and not just tell me to fuck off, as he certainly would had I followed Gerdes "rules", especially as concerns the "alleged" and "fraudulently alleged" crap (he may tell me to fuck off anyway...

Retardo:

Quote:
The best thing Anders can manage is to make a fuss about the term "fraudulently" not having been included in the desired submittal text... Big fucking deal...

as if you had ever caught me lying? That's another of the lies I've caught you in

So Retardo gets caught telling the lie that It was required to use the phrase - fraudulently alleged:

Quote:
Retardo: I refused to idiotically refer to the mass graves as "alleged" let alone "fraudulently alleged"... I did this because, elementary considerations of self-respect aside, I want Mr. Shermer to seriously consider endorsing my proof and not just tell me to fuck off, as he certainly would had I followed Gerdes rules, especially as concerns the "alleged" and "fraudulently alleged" crap (he may tell me to fuck off anyway...

Then It admitted that It lied about being required to use the phrase - fraudulently alleged:

Quote:
Retardo: The best thing Anders can manage is to make a fuss about the term "fraudulently" not having been included in the desired submittal text... Big fucking deal.

Then It lied about being caught lying:

Quote:
Retardo: "Yet another" lie, as if you had ever caught me lying?

Then It told yet another lie:

Quote:
Retardo: That's another of the lies I've caught you in.

But that's not all. It also told yet another lie, by saying:

Quote:
Retardo: I refused to idiotically refer to the mass graves as "alleged"

But how did Retardo refer to the graves in Its posts?

Quote:
Proof that “alleged Bełżec grave # 28/28” contains the rem.

So Its two major pretexts for not complying with the rules were total bullshit as one of the pretexts It was not required to do and the other which It said it would / did refuse to do It did in fact do.

But that’s not all. There was another pretext that It used to not comply with the rules:

Quote:
Retardo: Mr. Shermer will accept no deadlines.
But what did It ask Shermer to do in Its posts?:

Quote:
Retardo: Michael Shermer is requested to, within 60 days from today, 1 March 2011, explicitly and legally certify that he endorses said posted proof.

What a fucking retard.


Retardo:

Quote:
Forget it. I don't give a fuck... you can stick that money up your ass... Gerdes will be free to invoke non-compliance... No money then? OK, so be it. I couldn't care less... My submission didn't comply with any of the posting rules that Gerdes sent me... If Gerdes wants to use my wording and/or procedure as a pretext to deny reward payment, that's OK with me... No, I didn't fully comply with the rules that Gerdes sent me... of course, Gerdes is going to make a big fuss about my not having followed his rules and thus not being entitled to the money even if Shermer should endorse my proof. And I couldn't care less.
It was as if It didn't want to be eligible for the reward money.

Poor Retardo, It was trying for some kind of moral victory and all It ended up doing was shooting Itself in the foot.
 
Old March 13th, 2011 #2524
Roberto Muehlenkamp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
Default

Why, looks like I was wrong about Gerdes having been forbidden to use the "Bill Wassner" sockpuppet in addition to the "Anders" sockpuppet. This forum's moderator is very tolerant indeed.

The difference between Gerdes' self-projecting "Anders" freakouts and Gerdes' self-projecting "Bill Wassner" freakouts seems to be that Gerdes is more drunk and/or stoned when copy-pasting the latter.

Anyway, here goes the 7th reference to my post 2495 (58th reference to my post 2201).

Let's see how many more "Anders" and/or "Bill Wassner" freakouts the cowardly creature will have before posting this simple statement:

"I'm Greg Gerdes and I post here as [insert name of chosen sockpuppet] because I'm only allowed to post under my own name in the Tard Corral of this forum."
 
Old March 13th, 2011 #2525
Anders
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 362
Default

Roberta:

Quote:
See you later, folks.

Look at the yellow egg sucking dog run away with her tail between her legs!

What a coward!



Roberta:

Quote:
The graves I can prove that contain the remains of over 19 people are ten Belzec graves and 4 Sobibór graves...

So here we have fourteen graves which together contain at least 15,977 bodies.

Liar. You haven't proven shit. (Other than you're a lying coward.)


It’s a historical fact that not one grave that contains so much as - 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the alleged buried bodies has ever been located / proven to exist at any of the four sites.

NOT ONE!



Quote:
THE 54 FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED “HUGE MASS GRAVES”

According to Michael Shermer, the so-called “world’s foremost skeptic” and shamelessly self-proclaimed “historical scientist,” the remains of - 1.902 million bodies are buried at the following 4 very small, precisely known locations; broken down as follows:

Treblinka - 900,000

Belzec - 600,000

Sobibor - 250,000

Chelmno - 152,000

* Total - 1,902,000

And, according to the official / orthodox version of the story, which is endorsed by Shermer, the remains of those fraudulently alleged - 1.902 million bodies are buried in - 54 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves.”

* Note: 1,902,000 bodies in 54 graves would equal an average of - 35,222 - in each alleged “huge mass grave.”

So the average fraudulently alleged "huge mass grave" would contain the remains of - 35,222 - bodies.


Yet Roberta admits that she can only "prove" - 15,977 - in a total of 14 graves!


That’s only 26 % of the fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves" and - LESS THAN 1 % - of the fraudulently alleged buried bodies!


But that's not all:


Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the other 23 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Belzec contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!

Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the other 6 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Sobibor contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!

Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the 5 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Chelmno contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!

Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the 6 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Treblinka contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!


And where are the other 1,886,023 bodies?


Huh Roberta?


No wonder the hysterical and incoherent self-projecting pathetic coward ran away!
 
Old March 13th, 2011 #2526
Anders
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 362
Default

Bill Wassner:

Quote:
Just like I expected, Retardo had another of Its copy-and-past freakouts.

As concerns Retardo's hysterical whimpering, we're still waiting for It to make the following statements:


"I'm the mentally retarded, emotionally disturbed and mentally ill Roberto Muehlenkamp

and I post on Shermers forum as Mathew Ellard
.

and

"It is a historical fact that not one of the 54 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka has ever been proven to contain so much as - 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the alleged buried bodies, and not so much as one single person has ever been proven to have died by means of poison gas in a homicidal gas chamber at Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor or Treblinka. NOT ONE!"


Retardo:



Quote:
...Shermer eventually endorsing my submissions of proof


On what date will this endorsement take place Retardo?

There is one more fact that Roberta refuses to acknowledge:


It’s an irrefutable fact that not one single fraudulently alleged huge mass grave “proof” ever submitted on Shermers forum has ever been endorsed by Shermer as meeting his own, skeptic magazine’s and the skeptics society’s standards of proof. NOT ONE!


Isn't that right Roberta?


Hey Roberta, who is the most prominent "skeptic" to endorse your "proofs?"


Now let's watch Roberta squirm and evade the simple questions with yet another copy and paste freak-out.
 
Old March 14th, 2011 #2527
Roberto Muehlenkamp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
Default

This time Gerdes had an "Anders" freakout. Looks like they alternate with the "Bill Wassner" freakouts.

8th reference to my post 2495 (59th reference to my post 2201).

Let's see how many more "Anders" and/or "Bill Wassner" freakouts the cowardly self-projecting creature (which has gone back to its lame and silly emulation of my comments about its behavior, duh!) will have before posting this simple statement:

"I'm Greg Gerdes and I post here as [insert name of chosen sockpuppet] because I'm only allowed to post under my own name in the Tard Corral of this forum."

Last edited by Roberto Muehlenkamp; March 14th, 2011 at 07:13 AM.
 
Old March 14th, 2011 #2528
Anders
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 362
Default

Roberta:

Quote:
See you later, folks.

Look at the yellow egg sucking dog run away with her tail between her legs!

What a coward!



Roberta:

Quote:
The graves I can prove that contain the remains of over 19 people are ten Belzec graves and 4 Sobibór graves...

So here we have fourteen graves which together contain at least 15,977 bodies.

Liar. You haven't proven shit. (Other than you're a lying coward.)


It’s a historical fact that not one grave that contains so much as - 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the alleged buried bodies has ever been located / proven to exist at any of the four sites.

NOT ONE!



Quote:
THE 54 FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED “HUGE MASS GRAVES”

According to Michael Shermer, the so-called “world’s foremost skeptic” and shamelessly self-proclaimed “historical scientist,” the remains of - 1.902 million bodies are buried at the following 4 very small, precisely known locations; broken down as follows:

Treblinka - 900,000

Belzec - 600,000

Sobibor - 250,000

Chelmno - 152,000

* Total - 1,902,000

And, according to the official / orthodox version of the story, which is endorsed by Shermer, the remains of those fraudulently alleged - 1.902 million bodies are buried in - 54 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves.”

* Note: 1,902,000 bodies in 54 graves would equal an average of - 35,222 - in each alleged “huge mass grave.”

So the average fraudulently alleged "huge mass grave" would contain the remains of - 35,222 - bodies.


Yet Roberta admits that she can only "prove" - 15,977 - in a total of 14 graves!


That’s only 26 % of the fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves" and - LESS THAN 1 % - of the fraudulently alleged buried bodies!


But that's not all:


Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the other 23 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Belzec contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!

Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the other 6 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Sobibor contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!

Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the 5 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Chelmno contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!

Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the 6 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Treblinka contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!


And where are the other 1,886,023 bodies?


Huh Roberta?


No wonder the hysterical and incoherent self-projecting pathetic coward ran away!
 
Old March 14th, 2011 #2529
Anders
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 362
Default

Bill Wassner:

Quote:
Just like I expected, Retardo had another of Its copy-and-past freakouts.

As concerns Retardo's hysterical whimpering, we're still waiting for It to make the following statements:


"I'm the mentally retarded, emotionally disturbed and mentally ill Roberto Muehlenkamp

and I post on Shermers forum as Mathew Ellard
.

and

"It is a historical fact that not one of the 54 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka has ever been proven to contain so much as - 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the alleged buried bodies, and not so much as one single person has ever been proven to have died by means of poison gas in a homicidal gas chamber at Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor or Treblinka. NOT ONE!"


Retardo:



Quote:
...Shermer eventually endorsing my submissions of proof


On what date will this endorsement take place Retardo?

There is one more fact that Roberta refuses to acknowledge:


It’s an irrefutable fact that not one single fraudulently alleged huge mass grave “proof” ever submitted on Shermers forum has ever been endorsed by Shermer as meeting his own, skeptic magazine’s and the skeptics society’s standards of proof. NOT ONE!


Isn't that right Roberta?


Hey Roberta, who is the most prominent "skeptic" to endorse your "proofs?"


Now let's watch Roberta squirm and evade the simple questions with yet another copy and paste freak-out.
 
Old March 14th, 2011 #2530
Roberto Muehlenkamp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
Default

This time Gerdes had his "Anders" freakout real early - TWC tells me it's 06:41 in Montana.

9th reference to my post 2495 (60th reference to my post 2201).

Let's see how many more "Anders" and/or "Bill Wassner" freakouts the cowardly self-projecting creature (which has gone back to its lame and silly emulation of my comments about its behavior, besides displaying its customary mendacity and/or paranoid hallucinations) will have before posting this simple statement:

"I'm Greg Gerdes and I post here as [insert name of chosen sockpuppet] because I'm only allowed to post under my own name in the Tard Corral of this forum."
 
Old March 14th, 2011 #2531
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roberto Muehlenkamp View Post
This time Gerdes had his "Anders" freakout real early - TWC tells me it's 06:41 in Montana.

9th reference to my post 2495 (60th reference to my post 2201).

Let's see how many more "Anders" and/or "Bill Wassner" freakouts the cowardly self-projecting creature (which has gone back to its lame and silly emulation of my comments about its behavior, besides displaying its customary mendacity and/or paranoid hallucinations) will have before posting this simple statement:

"I'm Greg Gerdes and I h here as [insert name of chosen sockpuppet] because I'm only allowed to post under my own name in the Tard Corral of this forum."
The strange case of Roberto Muehlencamp.
 
Old March 15th, 2011 #2532
Bill Wassner
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Retardo:

Quote:
The reward money being already available in some special account... Is that supposed to impress me?

Says Gerdes' squirming little bitch.

Isn't it fun watching the little bitch try to pretend that Its not kicking Itself for shooting Itself in the foot?

Hey Retardo, what's it like being Gerdes' bitch?



Retardo:

Quote:
So the following 14 threads are now up on the Skeptics Society Forum

So here's the countdown on all 14 of the little bitch's fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves."


Quote:
Belzec's fraudulently alleged "huge mass grave" # 3/3 rejection date:

April 29th

The other 9 Belzec fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" rejection date:

April 30th

Sobibor's 4 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" rejection date:

May 3rd

What do you think Shermer is going to do?

Place your bets ladies and gentlemen!


Hey Retardo:

Has Shermer sent Gerdes an email endorsing any of your "proofs" yet?


A simple "YES" or "NO" will do, thanks.

YES or NO, Retardo?



Quote:
Gerdes:

So Nancy Boy, as of today, I have $14,000.00 in a special account that will be used to pay out any reward money for these 14 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves", should you decide to bring your posts / threads into compliance of the Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules. YOU HAVE UNTIL 12:00 MIDNIGHT, SAT. MARCH 5TH (U.S. MOUNTAIN TIME) to bring said posts into compliance. It's up to you Nancy Boy, if you want to be eligible for the reward money or not.

Please note Nancy Boy, if you chose not to bring your posts / threads into compliance and Shermer does endorse your "proofs" in full compliance with the Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules, the reward money will still be available to anyone who subsequently uses your very own endorsed "proofs" that Shermer subsequently endorses in full compliance with said Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules.

The money is there for the taking IF all Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules are followed to the letter.

The choice is yours Nancy Boy if you want to be eligible for said $14,000.00.

Also, if you deny the fact that I have put $14,000.00 into a special account, you can bet me, dollar for dollar that I have not.

Do you want to make the bet Nancy Boy?

Just post on the VNN forum that you wish to bet me, dollar for dollar that I haven't and we can work out the particulars of the bet from there.

What do you say Nancy Boy?

Hey Retardo, are you going to accept Gerdes' bet?

What are you waiting for?

What are you so afraid of?
 
Old March 15th, 2011 #2533
Bill Wassner
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Retardo:

Quote:
Of course I’m going to post in strict compliance with the NAFH rules, one thread for each grave and whatever else the rules require.

Yet MORE LIES from Roberto Muehlenkamp


Retardo:

Quote:
I refused to idiotically refer to the mass graves as "alleged" let alone "fraudulently alleged"... I did this because, elementary considerations of self-respect aside, I want Mr. Shermer to seriously consider endorsing my proof and not just tell me to fuck off, as he certainly would had I followed Gerdes "rules", especially as concerns the "alleged" and "fraudulently alleged" crap (he may tell me to fuck off anyway...

Retardo:

Quote:
The best thing Anders can manage is to make a fuss about the term "fraudulently" not having been included in the desired submittal text... Big fucking deal...

as if you had ever caught me lying? That's another of the lies I've caught you in

So Retardo gets caught telling the lie that It was required to use the phrase - fraudulently alleged:

Quote:
Retardo: I refused to idiotically refer to the mass graves as "alleged" let alone "fraudulently alleged"... I did this because, elementary considerations of self-respect aside, I want Mr. Shermer to seriously consider endorsing my proof and not just tell me to fuck off, as he certainly would had I followed Gerdes rules, especially as concerns the "alleged" and "fraudulently alleged" crap (he may tell me to fuck off anyway...

Then It admitted that It lied about being required to use the phrase - fraudulently alleged:

Quote:
Retardo: The best thing Anders can manage is to make a fuss about the term "fraudulently" not having been included in the desired submittal text... Big fucking deal.

Then It lied about being caught lying:

Quote:
Retardo: "Yet another" lie, as if you had ever caught me lying?

Then It told yet another lie:

Quote:
Retardo: That's another of the lies I've caught you in.

But that's not all. It also told yet another lie, by saying:

Quote:
Retardo: I refused to idiotically refer to the mass graves as "alleged"

But how did Retardo refer to the graves in Its posts?

Quote:
Proof that “alleged Bełżec grave # 28/28” contains the rem.

So Its two major pretexts for not complying with the rules were total bullshit as one of the pretexts It was not required to do and the other which It said it would / did refuse to do It did in fact do.

But that’s not all. There was another pretext that It used to not comply with the rules:

Quote:
Retardo: Mr. Shermer will accept no deadlines.
But what did It ask Shermer to do in Its posts?:

Quote:
Retardo: Michael Shermer is requested to, within 60 days from today, 1 March 2011, explicitly and legally certify that he endorses said posted proof.

What a fucking retard.


Retardo:

Quote:
Forget it. I don't give a fuck... you can stick that money up your ass... Gerdes will be free to invoke non-compliance... No money then? OK, so be it. I couldn't care less... My submission didn't comply with any of the posting rules that Gerdes sent me... If Gerdes wants to use my wording and/or procedure as a pretext to deny reward payment, that's OK with me... No, I didn't fully comply with the rules that Gerdes sent me... of course, Gerdes is going to make a big fuss about my not having followed his rules and thus not being entitled to the money even if Shermer should endorse my proof. And I couldn't care less.
It was as if It didn't want to be eligible for the reward money.

Poor Retardo, It was trying for some kind of moral victory and all It ended up doing was shooting Itself in the foot.


It’s an irrefutable fact that not one single fraudulently alleged huge mass grave “proof” ever submitted on Shermers forum has ever been endorsed by Shermer as meeting his own, skeptic magazine’s and the skeptics society’s standards of proof.

NOT ONE!


Isn't that right Retardo?
 
Old March 16th, 2011 #2534
Roberto Muehlenkamp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by littlefieldjohn View Post
The strange case of Roberto Muehlencamp.
Poor lfj, a silly quip and an emoticon are the best argument he can come up with.

What I wrote in my post 2520 also applies to you, by the way, as you don't seem to be a Gerdes sockpuppet.

So what are you waiting for?

As to Gerdes, I'll just continue counting his "Anders" and "Bill Wassner" freakouts until the cowardly creature gets drunk enough to find the modest amount of courage and honesty required for this simple statement:

"I'm Greg Gerdes and I post here as [insert name of chosen sockpuppet] because I'm only allowed to post under my own name in the Tard Corral of this forum."

10th reference to my post 2495 (61st reference to my post 2201).

Last edited by Roberto Muehlenkamp; March 16th, 2011 at 08:52 AM.
 
Old March 16th, 2011 #2535
Anders
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 362
Default

Roberta:

Quote:
See you later, folks.

Look at the yellow egg sucking dog run away with her tail between her legs!

What a coward!



Roberta:

Quote:
The graves I can prove that contain the remains of over 19 people are ten Belzec graves and 4 Sobibór graves...

So here we have fourteen graves which together contain at least 15,977 bodies.

Liar. You haven't proven shit. (Other than you're a lying coward.)


It’s a historical fact that not one grave that contains so much as - 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the alleged buried bodies has ever been located / proven to exist at any of the four sites.

NOT ONE!



Quote:
THE 54 FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED “HUGE MASS GRAVES”

According to Michael Shermer, the so-called “world’s foremost skeptic” and shamelessly self-proclaimed “historical scientist,” the remains of - 1.902 million bodies are buried at the following 4 very small, precisely known locations; broken down as follows:

Treblinka - 900,000

Belzec - 600,000

Sobibor - 250,000

Chelmno - 152,000

* Total - 1,902,000

And, according to the official / orthodox version of the story, which is endorsed by Shermer, the remains of those fraudulently alleged - 1.902 million bodies are buried in - 54 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves.”

* Note: 1,902,000 bodies in 54 graves would equal an average of - 35,222 - in each alleged “huge mass grave.”

So the average fraudulently alleged "huge mass grave" would contain the remains of - 35,222 - bodies.


Yet Roberta admits that she can only "prove" - 15,977 - in a total of 14 graves!


That’s only 26 % of the fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves" and - LESS THAN 1 % - of the fraudulently alleged buried bodies!


But that's not all:


Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the other 23 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Belzec contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!

Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the other 6 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Sobibor contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!

Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the 5 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Chelmno contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!

Roberta also admits that:

She can't prove that the 6 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Treblinka contain the remains of at least 19 bodies!


And where are the other 1,886,023 bodies?


Huh Roberta?


No wonder the hysterical and incoherent self-projecting pathetic coward ran away!
 
Old March 16th, 2011 #2536
Anders
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 362
Default

Just like I expected, Roberta had another of her copy-and-past freakouts.

As to Roberta, I'll just continue counting her freakouts until the cowardly creature gets drunk enough to find the modest amount of courage and honesty required for this simple statement:


"I'm the mentally retarded, emotionally disturbed and mentally ill Roberto Muehlenkamp

and I post on Shermers forum as Mathew Ellard."




Roberta:


Quote:
...Shermer eventually endorsing my submissions of proof

On what date will this endorsement take place Roberta?


There is one more fact that Roberta refuses to acknowledge:


It’s an irrefutable fact that not one single fraudulently alleged huge mass grave “proof” ever submitted on Shermers forum has ever been endorsed by Shermer as meeting his own, skeptic magazine’s and the skeptics society’s standards of proof.

NOT ONE!



Isn't that right Roberta?


Hey Roberta, who is the most prominent "skeptic" to endorse your "proofs?"


Now let's watch Roberta squirm and evade the simple questions with yet another copy and paste freak-out.
 
Old March 17th, 2011 #2537
Roberto Muehlenkamp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
Default

This time it was the turn of another of Gerdes' "Anders" freakouts (I just scanned the part where the infantile emulator claims that I write as Matthew Ellard on the Skeptics Society Forum - poor Gerdes seems to be so barking mad that he should quickly be put into a straitjacket lest he hurts himself).

11th reference to my post 2495 (62nd reference to my post 2201).

Let's see how many more "Anders" and/or "Bill Wassner" freakouts the cowardly self-projecting creature (which goes on with its lame and silly emulation of my comments about its behavior, besides displaying its customary mendacity and/or paranoid hallucinations) will have before posting this simple statement:

"I'm Greg Gerdes and I post here as [insert name of chosen sockpuppet] because I'm only allowed to post under my own name in the Tard Corral of this forum."

Last edited by Roberto Muehlenkamp; March 17th, 2011 at 08:22 AM.
 
Old March 17th, 2011 #2538
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
Default

Problems at Treblinka

A detailed forensic examination of the site of the wartime Treblinka camp, using sophisticated electronic ground radar, has found no evidence of mass graves there.

For six days in October 1999, an Australian team headed by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer, carried out an examination of the soil at the site of the former Treblinka II camp in Poland, where, Holocaust historians say, more than half a million Jews were put to death in gas chambers and then buried in mass graves.

According to the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust (1997), for example, "a total of 870,000 people" were killed and buried at Treblinka between July 1942 and April 1943. Then, between April and July 1943, the hundreds of thousands of corpses were allegedly dug up and burned in batches of 2,000 or 2,500 on large grids made of railway ties.

Krege's team used an $80,000 Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) device, which sends out vertical radar signals that are visible on a computer monitor. GPR detects any large-scale disturbances in the soil structure to a normal effective depth of four or five meters, and sometimes up to ten meters. (GPR devices are routinely used around the world by geologists, archeologists, and police.) In its Treblinka investigation, Krege's team also carried out visual soil inspections, and used an auger to take numerous soil core samples.

The team carefully examined the entire Treblinka II site, especially the alleged "mass graves" portion, and carried out control examinations of the surrounding area. They found no soil disturbance consistent with the burial of hundreds of thousands of bodies, or even evidence that the ground had ever been disturbed. In addition, Krege and his team found no evidence of individual graves, bone remains, human ashes, or wood ashes.

"From these scans we could clearly identify the largely undisturbed horizontal stratigraphic layering, better known as horizons, of the soil under the camp site," says the 30-year old Krege, who lives in Canberra. "We know from scans of grave sites, and other sites with known soil disturbances, such as quarries, when this natural layering is massively disrupted or missing altogether." Because normal geological processes are very slow acting, disruption of the soil structure would have been detectable even after 60 years, Krege noted.

While his initial investigation suggests that there were never any mass graves at the Treblinka camp site, Krege believes that further work is still called for.

"Historians say that the bodies were exhumed and cremated toward the end of the Treblinka camp's use in 1943, but we found no indication that any mass graves ever existed," he says. "Personally, I don't think there was a mass extermination camp there at all."

Krege prepared a detailed report on his Treblinka investigation. He says that he would welcome the formation, possibly under United Nations auspices, of an international team of neutral, qualified specialists, to carry out similar investigations at the sites of all the wartime German camps.
 
Old March 17th, 2011 #2539
Bill Wassner
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Retardo:

Quote:
The reward money being already available in some special account... Is that supposed to impress me?

Says Gerdes' squirming little bitch.

Isn't it fun watching the little bitch try to pretend that Its not kicking Itself for shooting Itself in the foot?

Hey Retardo, what's it like being Gerdes' bitch?



Retardo:

Quote:
So the following 14 threads are now up on the Skeptics Society Forum

So here's the countdown on all 14 of the little bitch's fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves."


Quote:
Belzec's fraudulently alleged "huge mass grave" # 3/3 rejection date:

April 29th

The other 9 Belzec fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" rejection date:

April 30th

Sobibor's 4 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" rejection date:

May 3rd

What do you think Shermer is going to do?

Place your bets ladies and gentlemen!


Hey Retardo:

Has Shermer sent Gerdes an email endorsing any of your "proofs" yet?


A simple "YES" or "NO" will do, thanks.

YES or NO, Retardo?



Quote:
Gerdes:

So Nancy Boy, as of today, I have $14,000.00 in a special account that will be used to pay out any reward money for these 14 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves", should you decide to bring your posts / threads into compliance of the Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules. YOU HAVE UNTIL 12:00 MIDNIGHT, SAT. MARCH 5TH (U.S. MOUNTAIN TIME) to bring said posts into compliance. It's up to you Nancy Boy, if you want to be eligible for the reward money or not.

Please note Nancy Boy, if you chose not to bring your posts / threads into compliance and Shermer does endorse your "proofs" in full compliance with the Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules, the reward money will still be available to anyone who subsequently uses your very own endorsed "proofs" that Shermer subsequently endorses in full compliance with said Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules.

The money is there for the taking IF all Official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. Challenge - Posting Rules are followed to the letter.

The choice is yours Nancy Boy if you want to be eligible for said $14,000.00.

Also, if you deny the fact that I have put $14,000.00 into a special account, you can bet me, dollar for dollar that I have not.

Do you want to make the bet Nancy Boy?

Just post on the VNN forum that you wish to bet me, dollar for dollar that I haven't and we can work out the particulars of the bet from there.

What do you say Nancy Boy?

Hey Retardo, are you going to accept Gerdes' bet?

What are you waiting for?

What are you so afraid of?
 
Old March 17th, 2011 #2540
Bill Wassner
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Retardo:

Quote:
Of course I’m going to post in strict compliance with the NAFH rules, one thread for each grave and whatever else the rules require.

Yet MORE LIES from Roberto Muehlenkamp


Retardo:

Quote:
I refused to idiotically refer to the mass graves as "alleged" let alone "fraudulently alleged"... I did this because, elementary considerations of self-respect aside, I want Mr. Shermer to seriously consider endorsing my proof and not just tell me to fuck off, as he certainly would had I followed Gerdes "rules", especially as concerns the "alleged" and "fraudulently alleged" crap (he may tell me to fuck off anyway...

Retardo:

Quote:
The best thing Anders can manage is to make a fuss about the term "fraudulently" not having been included in the desired submittal text... Big fucking deal...

as if you had ever caught me lying? That's another of the lies I've caught you in

So Retardo gets caught telling the lie that It was required to use the phrase - fraudulently alleged:

Quote:
Retardo: I refused to idiotically refer to the mass graves as "alleged" let alone "fraudulently alleged"... I did this because, elementary considerations of self-respect aside, I want Mr. Shermer to seriously consider endorsing my proof and not just tell me to fuck off, as he certainly would had I followed Gerdes rules, especially as concerns the "alleged" and "fraudulently alleged" crap (he may tell me to fuck off anyway...

Then It admitted that It lied about being required to use the phrase - fraudulently alleged:

Quote:
Retardo: The best thing Anders can manage is to make a fuss about the term "fraudulently" not having been included in the desired submittal text... Big fucking deal.

Then It lied about being caught lying:

Quote:
Retardo: "Yet another" lie, as if you had ever caught me lying?

Then It told yet another lie:

Quote:
Retardo: That's another of the lies I've caught you in.

But that's not all. It also told yet another lie, by saying:

Quote:
Retardo: I refused to idiotically refer to the mass graves as "alleged"

But how did Retardo refer to the graves in Its posts?

Quote:
Proof that “alleged Bełżec grave # 28/28” contains the rem.

So Its two major pretexts for not complying with the rules were total bullshit as one of the pretexts It was not required to do and the other which It said it would / did refuse to do It did in fact do.

But that’s not all. There was another pretext that It used to not comply with the rules:

Quote:
Retardo: Mr. Shermer will accept no deadlines.
But what did It ask Shermer to do in Its posts?:

Quote:
Retardo: Michael Shermer is requested to, within 60 days from today, 1 March 2011, explicitly and legally certify that he endorses said posted proof.

What a fucking retard.


Retardo:

Quote:
Forget it. I don't give a fuck... you can stick that money up your ass... Gerdes will be free to invoke non-compliance... No money then? OK, so be it. I couldn't care less... My submission didn't comply with any of the posting rules that Gerdes sent me... If Gerdes wants to use my wording and/or procedure as a pretext to deny reward payment, that's OK with me... No, I didn't fully comply with the rules that Gerdes sent me... of course, Gerdes is going to make a big fuss about my not having followed his rules and thus not being entitled to the money even if Shermer should endorse my proof. And I couldn't care less.
It was as if It didn't want to be eligible for the reward money.

Poor Retardo, It was trying for some kind of moral victory and all It ended up doing was shooting Itself in the foot.


It’s an irrefutable fact that not one single fraudulently alleged huge mass grave “proof” ever submitted on Shermers forum has ever been endorsed by Shermer as meeting his own, skeptic magazine’s and the skeptics society’s standards of proof.

NOT ONE!


Isn't that right Retardo?
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM.
Page generated in 0.81490 seconds.