|
July 24th, 2008 | #821 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Muehlenkamp hints that Shermer is a faggot!
Roberta: "What could it be that Shermer did to poor little Gerdes? Could it be that he left Gerdes for a Jewish woman and that this is how Gerdes’ pathological hatred against Jews came into being?" Oh that's a good one Roberta. You're intimating that your new partner is a faggot! Calling the person who's going to have THE major say in whether or not what you present to "SKEPTIC" magazine about Sobibor / Treblinka gets published or not a faggot wouldn't be the wisest thing to do at this point in the game. See folks, she can't go one single post without bringing up the homo thing. |
July 24th, 2008 | #822 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
"Any other idea what those light grey, black and white substances in the light-brown soil of Sobibor might be, Mr. Gerdes? Let’s hear." How about ashes of human bone and tissue for the light gray stuff, wood ashes for the black stuff and pure bone ashes for the white stuff? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! What does Shermer think about those photos Roberta? That's what really matters, because he's going to have to give the OK on anything you submitt for publication. What did Shermer say to you about your intimating that he's a faggot? |
July 24th, 2008 | #823 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
BTW Roberta, could you please tell us how the Germans reduced the bodies of 250,000 greasy jews to "pure bone ashes?"
I know it's been alleged that the Germans had "bone crushing machines," but I didn't know they had "bone ashing machines." Oh wait, they must have reduced all those jews to "pure bone ash" with "plugs," right? Here it is folks, jews being forced to turn their fellow grease spots into "pure bone ashes" and "tooth meal:" http://s27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...neGrinders.jpg Which one of those layers in those photos is comprised of "teeth meal" anyway Roberta? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! You are priceless Retardo. Simply priceless. BTW Roberta, In what months issue of "SKEPTIC" magazine are we going to see your submittal? |
July 25th, 2008 | #824 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
July 25th, 2008 | #825 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
What I actually wrote in the second quoted paragraph was the following (emphasis added): Quote:
Quote:
But then, Gerdes has done little throughout this discussion besides clearly showing that he is all he accuses his opponent of being. As to my question, I don’t want to know right now what Shermer says. I will only contact Shermer, if at all, when I have collected what I consider sufficient evidence to meet the challenge requirements. Right now I want to know what Gerdes says, and it’s amusing to see how the chimp jumps up and down trying to dodge my question. |
|||
July 25th, 2008 | #826 | |||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now back to my questions: Quote:
The black substance on the second photo looks like wood ash to me. There’s a gray streak in the middle of the black suggesting that some human ashes may be there as well. The white substances on the third photo could be either bone ash or the lime that was poured upon the dead bodies in the mass graves. Now let’s see what alternative possibilities you come up with, Gerdes. Instead of seeking refuge in infantile derision and silly laughter, tell us what other than human ashes, wood ashes or lime the substances on these photos of Sobibor core drill samples, clearly distinguishable from the light-brown soil, could possibly be. Quote:
|
|||||||||
July 25th, 2008 | #827 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
By the way, Gerdes, I just noticed another shifting of the goalposts.
Previously the applicant had the choice between SKEPTIC and ARCHAEOLOGY magazine, and you made a big bloody fuss concerning that magazine (emphases added): Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for showing once more what a miserable coward you are, Mr. Gerdes. And please tell us, what was it that made you get cold feet regarding ARCHAEOLOGY magazine? Did Mrs. Golden accept the NAFCASH challenge and announce that she would submit evidence about the exact location and exact contents of a Chelmno mass grave as well the amount of human remains contained therein? Or did you just decide that it was better not to take chances that she or someone else might do that? Of course if you removed Chelmno and the howling about ARCHAEOLOGY magazine you also had to remove Belzec, otherwise it would have been too obvious what and who you are afraid of. Or then someone let you know that a court of law might consider Prof. Kola’s Belzec report sufficient proof to meet your challenge requirements. Or then it was both. |
||
July 25th, 2008 | #828 | |||||||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|||||||
July 25th, 2008 | #829 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
If there is going to be an archeological dig at Treblinka or any of the alleged scenes of mass murder, there should also be an independant television crew to follow the proceedings. I mean, this is big, the kind of event that has the potential to alter the course of history.
Given the extemes of relative experience, the chasm that exists between Jews' and Whites' interpretation of ultimate reality, it would be a waste of a wonderful chance to rid the world of this injurious lie.
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
July 25th, 2008 | #830 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
And better remind your friend Gerdes to shift the goalposts by including that "independent television crew" crap in his challenge requirements. It's not there yet. |
|
July 25th, 2008 | #831 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
You don't object, surely?
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|
July 25th, 2008 | #832 | ||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
As I said before, your babblings are becoming increasingly incoherent. And accordingly instructive for demonstration purposes. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||
July 25th, 2008 | #833 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
|
July 25th, 2008 | #834 | |||||||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Independent needs no hairsplitting definitions.
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|||||||
July 25th, 2008 | #835 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Originally Posted by Gerdes
Muehlenkamp hints that Shermer is a faggot! Roberta: "Don’t make such a fuss, Gerdes... If Shermer has a sense of humor, he’ll just chuckle about my remark." Do you think he'll also "just chuckle about your remark" that you made in topix post #796? Gerdes: Is it for the same reason you didn't bring up Shermer alleged investigations? Roberta: "What would that reason be, Gerdes? I don’t think much of Shermer as a researcher, as I have told you." Yes Roberta, no one does, as I told you in my reply of post #797. You remember that post, don't you Robert? Of course you do, because you censored my reply in post 797 by cowardly reporting it to the cowardly moderator at topix and it was deleted. Roberta: "By the way, Gerdes, I just noticed another shifting of the goalposts." Only a jew would call my simplifying and clarifying, at the jews own insistence, as "shifting the goalposts." Roberta: "you are no longer giving the applicant the choice between publishing in SKEPTIC magazine and publishing in ARCHAEOLOGY magazine. Now SKEPTIC magazine must be the applicant’s first choice for publication, and if SKEPTIC magazine rejects the applicant’s submittal, then NAFCASH may (or may not) accept publication in Archaeology Magazine instead." Just for you Roberta. Of course your failure to notice sooner further illustrates what a retard you are. And of course, since there is no conceivable reason why Shermer / "SKEPTIC" magazine wouldn't publish legitimate proof, there's nothing for you to be worried about, now it there Retardo? Thank you Roberta. Roberta: "Did Mrs. Golden accept the NAFCASH challenge and announce that she would submit evidence about the exact location and exact contents of a Chelmno mass grave as well the amount of human remains contained therein?" If jew-lie Golden wants to accept THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE the way it was previously, which included Chelmno and Archaeology Magazine, I, and all twenty supporters will make any and all special accommodations for such an announcement. We will bend over backwards to make sure it happens. We will set up a new challenge independent of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE, just for her. Just like we modified the FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE just to make it easier for you retardo. In fact, nafcash challenges jew-lie golden and ARCHAEOLOGY magazine to accept a Chelmno / Archaeology Magazine challenge. Perhaps you and your fellow funny boy freaks over at HC (Hysterical and Cowardly HIV Contagious Homosexual Creeps espousing Holocaust Claptrap and other Historical Canards) can help nafcash make it happen. After all, you do want to help stop holocaust denial - don't you retardo? Thank you Roberta. You are priceless. BTW Roberta, just how much "human remains contained therein" have been located at Chelmno? |
July 25th, 2008 | #836 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
“What is visible in these samples is quite interesting. The color of the soil, judging by the soil surface visible on these photographs, is a light brown. Yet these samples show layers underground that are light gray and black: The light gray substance on the first two photos looks like ashes of human bone and tissue to me. I’ve seen such ashes elsewhere, hence the association. The black substance on the second photo looks like wood ash to me. There’s a gray streak in the middle of the black suggesting that some human ashes may be there as well. The white substances on the third photo could be either bone ash or the lime that was poured upon the dead bodies in the mass graves.” 1 - http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F5.html 2 - http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F6.html 3 - http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F7.html Roberta continues: “How about ashes of human bone and tissue for the light gray stuff, wood ashes for the black stuff and pure bone ashes or lime for the white stuff, Mr. Gerdes? Any other idea what those light grey, black and white substances in the light-brown soil of Sobibor might be, Mr. Gerdes? Let’s hear. Try explaining why charred human remains and remains in a state of decay should be visible on any given core-drilling sample from mass graves that can be expected to largely or mostly contain cremains. Bone ashes, ashes of soft tissue and crushed remains of ashed teeth were probably mixed with each other in most cases, but where larger calcinated bones were crushed the result would have been the substance known as bone ash. Distinguishable layers made up only of the crushed remains of ashed teeth are far less likely for obvious reasons than layers consisting mostly or only of crushed calcinated bones.” Thanks for that Roberta. Have I ever told you you are priceless? Now, let’s remind everyone what the mentally ill jewbitch wrote earlier: Quote: Originally Posted by Gerdes She hasn't been able to even prove that the "huge mass grave" of Sobibor exists; Roberta: “Actually I’m able to prove the existence of all of these mass graves by simply referring to Prof. Kola’s description.” Yes Roberta, could you tell us again what Kola “described” finding in the “huge mass graves” of Sobibor? Roberta: “Proof is contained in Prof. Kola’s published report about his findings on site, and in the documentary and eyewitness evidence about the mass killings at Sobibor, which is compatible with Kola’s findings.” And what were Kola’s findings again Roberta? Roberta: “This proof is and has been accepted by historians and criminal investigators, Gerdes. So unless you can show relevant rules or standards of evidence that these people did not comply with or strong indications of evidence manipulation, it is proof for the purpose of our discussion as well (and may even be considered proof for the purpose of meeting your "challenge" by a court of law, so better be more specific about what kind of proof you want – that’s well meaning advice)... Because Prof. Kola said so and there’s no reason to doubt the statements of this renowned archeologist, especially as they are also in line with what all other known evidence tells us about Sobibor… And the reason to doubt the archeologist’s public statement that would support this "allegedly" is? None? I thought so.” And what did Kola say again Roberta? Roberta: IV. Sobibor IV.2 Physical evidence IV.2.1 Physical evidence described in a public statement by Prof. Kola about an archaeological excavation conducted at Sobibor in 2001, mentioned in a Reuters press release. And tell us again what Kola claims he found in that press release Roberta? Roberta: “Any other idea what those light grey, black and white substances in the light-brown soil of Sobibor might be, Mr. Gerdes? Let’s hear.” Better yet Roberta - why waste time talking about what my ideas might be? What do the frauds at the Sobibor Archaeology Project say it is? They’re the ones who analysed the core samples – right? They DID analyse the core samples – DID THEY NOT – Roberta? Thank you Roberta. |
July 25th, 2008 | #837 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
OK Roberta, time to get down to business.
Now that you and your "not much of a researcher" partner are team members, it's time for you to answer the one simple question that has been on everyone’s mind since day one. And it is a very very simple question - On what dates did Shermer carry out his alleged Sobibor and Treblinka "investigations?" Do I have to make it simpler for you retardo? On what day did Shermer first step foot in Sobibor and on what date did he leave Sobibor for good? On what day did Shermer first step foot in Treblinka and on what date did he leave Treblinka for good? No more excuses Roberta. Shermer is part of your team. This information is a major part of the alleged "investigations" of these two camps. The answer is an exchange of emails by two team members away. On what dates did Shermer carry out his alleged Sobibor and Treblinka "investigations?" Answer the question jew. |
July 26th, 2008 | #838 | |||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Come on, CS, independent from whom or from what? And what existing institutions would qualify, as we’re at it? Name a few, please. |
|||||||||
July 26th, 2008 | #839 | |||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Actually, you stinking filthy liar, Topix # 797 was one of my posts. It is now gone, but is was still there on 16.07.2008, when I took a screenshot of that Topix page. The text of post # 797 was the following: Quote:
Quote:
Thanks again for making it so clear what you’re all about, you sorry piece of dog-shit. As to your harking back to what I said about Shermer, your intention is obvious to anyone with half a brain: after altering your NAFCASH site so as to limit an applicant’s publishing options to SKEPTIC magazine alone (previously the applicant could choose between SKEPTIC and ARCHAEOLOGY magazine, now ARCHAEOLOGY magazine "MAY" be accepted by NAFCASH if SKEPTIC refuses to publish the applicant’s article, and it’s clear to who has been dealing with slime-ball players like you that this "MAY" means "WILL NOT"), you are now trying to make sure that Mr. Shermer gets angry at me and refuses publication of my future article for this reason alone. Isn’t that so, you miserable piece of chicken-shit? Ah, and of course this limitation of an applicant’s publication choices (requiring that an applicant publish in either of two specific magazines and not be free to choose his publisher was bad enough already), followed by your obvious attempt to hinder the applicant’s access to the only publisher you left him, is a clear sign that you got cold feet and are scared shitless that proof meeting your challenge requirements may actually be forthcoming. Thanks also for that, Mr. Gerdes. You are making my day today. Quote:
And I am supposed to have insisted that you scratch ARCHAEOLOGY and leave SKEPTIC alone as the applicant’s choice for publication of his proof? Come on, Gerdes, do yourself the favor of not telling such obvious lies. Quote:
This, my dear Gerdes, only shows how fucking scared you are that proof meeting your challenge requirements might actually be presented. Your transparent attempt to leave this potential applicant without a publisher and thus without a possibility of even qualifying for the challenge clearly shows your cowardice, once more. And it also shows how well you are aware of how full of shit you are and that your "Revisionist" articles of faith are but a sack full of mendacious bullshit. As I said before, you are really making my day today. Quote:
Quote:
Again, thanks for thus showing what a fraud, charlatan and coward you are. And how scared you are of what evidence I might be able to obtain. Quote:
Quote:
A whimpering coward’s lame and transparent attempt to avoid answering the questions I asked him in post # 827 under http://206.41.117.128/showpost.php?p...&postcount=827 about his reasons for scratching ARCHAEOLOGY magazine as a first publishing option (and in practice scratching it as a publishing option at all). But the whimpering coward need no longer reply to this question. The answer, see above, is already as clear as it could be. |
|||||||||||
July 26th, 2008 | #840 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Meanwhile, I take note of and appreciate your admission that you have no alternative explanation for the light-gray substance suggesting ashes of human bone and tissue, the black substance suggesting wood ash and the white substance suggesting either bone ash or lime, that are clearly distinguishable from the light-brown soil one one or more of those three photographs. |
|||||
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|