|
December 17th, 2010 | #1 |
Wutta maroon!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
|
Select passages from Mein Kampf
Some of my personal favorites.
from p. 96 of the Ralph Manheim translation: If, by the the instrument of governmental power, a nationality is led toward its destruction, then rebellion is not only the right of every member of such a people -- it is his duty. And the question -- when is this the case? -- is decided not by theoretical dissertations, but by force -- and results. Since as a matter of course, all governmental power claims the duty of preserving state authority -- regardless how vicious it is, betraying the interests of a people a thousandfold -- the national instinct of self-preservation, in overthrowing such a power and achieving freedom of independence, will have to employ the same weapons by means of which the enemy tries to maintain his power. Consequently, the struggle will be carried on with "legal" means as long as the power to be overthrown employs such means; but it will not shun illegal means if the oppressor uses them. In general it should not be forgotten that the highest aim of human existence is not the preservation of the state, let alone a government, but the preservation of the species. And if the species itself is in danger of being oppressed or utterly eliminated, the question of legality is reduced to a subordinate role. Then, even if the methods of the ruling power are alleged to be legal a thousand times over, nonetheless the oppressed people's instinct of self-preservation remains the loftiest justification of their struggle with every weapon. Only through recognition of this principle have wars of liberation against internal and external enslavement of nations on this earth come down to us in such majestic examples. Human law cancels out state law. And if a people is defeated in its struggle for human rights, this merely means that it has been found too light in the scale of destiny for the happiness of survival on this earth. For when a people is not willing or able to fight for its existence, Providence in its eternal justice has decreed that people's end. The world is not for cowardly peoples. p.s. I just noticed something. This sub-forum has more stickies than the pages of a hasidic jew's latest copy of National Geographic. Would it be possible to eliminate one or two?
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope. - Bugs |
December 17th, 2010 | #2 | ||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
It truly is amazing that such basics have to be pointed out, but they do. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
December 20th, 2010 | #3 | ||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 381
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
“...when their evil machinations have become too obvious for the general public to stomach.”
|
||
December 20th, 2010 | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 722
|
Our Common Enemy
Many of you are here because you know "something is wrong" and you're looking for answers. Some of you think "the problem" is negroes. Some of you think "the problem" is illegal immigration. Some of you think "the problem" is liberals. Some of you think "the problem" is "racists". Some of you think even think "the problem" is "Jews". But none of those things are the REAL problem We ALL Face a Common Enemy Our enemy has already considered the outcomes of several different eventualities. Their war-gaming of various scenarios has prepared them with alternative action plans. I don’t know what they are, of course – but I do understand their prime motive. And that is to remain in a position enabling them to have control over your National currency and all of the wonderful things they were able to buy with your money. They will try to put up as many smokescreens as possible to distract from their central motive. Smokescreens such as: Race conflict, Class conflict, Religious conflict, War, Economic disturbance, etc. 9/11 was just a tool to enable a specific strategy. Take Their Power Away We, as a people – must abolish this present money system, by any means necessary. But abolishing it isn’t enough. We need to replace is with a money system that helps our people. This is possible to do – and has been done in Germany. In Germany, Hitler based his currency on “Domestic Production”. German money was NOT based on Gold. German money was NOT based on Silver. German money was NOT based on any precious metal commodity that the Jews could purchase and therefore price-manipulate. German money was NOT based on debt to private Jewish bankers….as United States currency is today. Arbeit Macht Frei Hitler based his currency on “Work”. Each dollar placed into circulation had to be “backed” by a dollars worth of domestically produced goods, or services. The phrase "ARBIET MACHT FREI" means "WORK FREES", or "WORK SHALL SET YOU FREE". "Arbeit Macht Frei" meant that a money system based on "work" (Domestic Prodution) shall set you free from the Jews. Now, you know why the Jews attempted to transform "Arbeit Macht Frei" into some sort of slur aimed at imaginary "Holocaust" victims. That is how Hitler resurrected the Germany economy. “International Capital” a.k.a “The Jewish Money Conspiracy” knew that Hitler’s MONEY POLICY was a direct assault on their ability to enslave nations. And that is the “WHY” behind WW2. We Need Change Perhaps there are things about National Socialism that some find distasteful. Many “opinions” about National Socialism are not based on factual analysis – but on Steven Spielberg movies and Jewish textbooks. I’m not saying that National Socialism is the answer – but I am saying that we should study it – because it worked. I think we could use some of the principles of National Socialism within the framework of our Constitutional Republic. But the core issue here is the role that money plays in society. Most of us take “money” as a given…without really thinking about the system behind it. The system we have today is totally corrupt and is working against us for the enrichment and empowerment of our Jewish enemies. Let’s go kick some Jew ass. We don't buy The9/11Lie BUT, Our Money System is the Problem LET'S FIX IT |
December 22nd, 2010 | #5 |
Wutta maroon!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
|
from pp. 302-3:
Hence the Jewish people, despite all apparent intellectual qualities, is without any true culture, and especially without any culture of its own. For what sham culture the Jew today possesses is the property of other peoples, and for the most part it is ruined in his hands. In judging the Jewish peoples's attitude on the question of culture, the most essential characteristic we must always bear in mind is that there has never been a Jewish art and accordingly there is none today either; that above all the two queens of all the arts, architecture and music, owe nothing original to the Jews. What they do accomplish in the field of art is either patchwork or intellectual theft. Thus, the Jew lacks those qualities which distinguish the races that are creative and hence culturally blessed. To what extent the Jew takes over foreign culture, imitating or rather ruining it, can be seen from the fact that he is mostly found in the art which seems to require least invention, the art of acting. But even here, in reality, he is only a "juggler," or rather an ape; for even here he lacks that last touch that is required for real greatness; even here he is not the creative genius, but a superficial imitator, and all the twists and tricks that he uses are powerless to conceal the inner lifelessness of his creative gift. Here the Jewish press most lovingly helps him along by raising such a roar of hosannahs about even the most mediocre bungler, just so long as he is a Jew, that the rest of the world actually ends up by thinking that they have an artist before them, while in truth it is only a pitiful comedian. No, the Jew possesses no culture-creating force of any sort, since the idealism, without which there is no true higher development of man, is not present in him and never was present. Hence his intellect will never have a constructive effect, but will be destructive, and in very rare cases perhaps will at most be stimulating, but then as the prototype of the "force which always wants evil and nevertheless creates good." Not through him does any progress of mankind occur, but in spite of him.
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope. - Bugs |
February 7th, 2011 | #6 |
Wutta maroon!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
|
Marxist equality vs. Folkish superiority
from pp. 382-3
Our present world view, current in Germany, is based in general on the idea that creative, culture-creating force must indeed be attributed to the state, but that it has nothing to do with racial considerations, but is rather a product of economic necessities, or, at best, the natural result of a political urge for power. This underlying view, if logically developed, leads not only to a mistaken conception of basic racial forces, but also to an underestimation of the individual. For a denial of a difference between the various races with regard to their general culture-creating forces must necessarily extend this greatest of all errors to the judgment of the individual. The assumption of the equality of the races then becomes a basis for a similar way of viewing peoples and finally individual men. And hence international Marxism itself is only the transference, by the Jew, Karl Marx, of a philosophical attitude and conception, which had actually long been in existence, into the form of a definite political creed. Without the subsoil of such generally existing poisoning, the amazing success of this doctrine would never have been posiible. Actually Karl Marx was only the one among millions who, with the sure eye of the prophet, recognized in the morass of a slowly decomposing world the most essential poisons, extracted them, and, like a wizard, prepared them into a concentrated solution for the swifter annihilation of the independent existence of free nations on this earth. And all this in the service of his race. In opposition to this, the folkish philosophy finds the importance of mankind in its basic racial elements. In the state it sees on principle only a means to an end and construes its end as the preservation of the racial existence of man. Thus, it by no means believes in an equality of the races, but along with their difference it recognizes their higher or lesser value and feels itself obligated, through this knowledge, to promote the victory of the better and stronger, and demand the subordination of the inferior and weaker in accordance with the eternal will that dominates this universe. Thus, in principle, it serves the basic aristocratic idea of Nature and believes in the validity of this law down to the last individual. It sees not only the different value of the races, but also the different value of individuals. From the mass it extracts the importance of the individual personality, and thus, in contrast to disorganizing Marxism, it has an organizing effect. It believes in the necessity of an idealization of humanity, in which alone it sees the premise for the existence of humanity. But it cannot grant the right to existence even to an ethical idea if this idea represents a danger for the racial life of the bearers of a higher ethics; for a bastardized and niggerized world all the concepts of the humanly beautiful and sublime, as well as all ideas of an idealized future of our humanity, would be lost forever.
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope. - Bugs |
February 10th, 2011 | #7 |
Wutta maroon!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
|
from pp. 313-16:
He begins his career as the "benefactor" of mankind. Since his new benevolence has a practical foundation, he cannot very well adhere to the old biblical recommendation, that the left hand should not know what the right hand giveth; no...he must reconcile himself to letting as many people as possible know how deeply he feels the suffering of the masses and all the sacrifices that he himself is making to combat them. With this "modesty" which is inborn in him, he blares out his merits to the rest of the world until people really begin to believe him. Anyone who does not believe in them is doing him a bitter injustice. In a short time he begins to twist things around to make it look as if all the injustice in the world had always been done to him and not the other way around. The very stupid believe this and then they just can't help but pity the poor "unfortunate." In addition, it should be remarked here that the Jew, despite all his love of sacrifice, naturally never becomes personally impoverished. He knows how to manage; sometimes, indeed, his charity is comparable to fertilizer, which is not strewn on the field for love of the field, but with a view to the farmer's own future benefit. In any case, everyone knows in a comparatively short time that the Jew has become a "benefactor and friend of mankind." But even more: all at once the Jew also becomes liberal and begins to rant about the necessary progress of mankind. Slowly he makes himself the spokesman of a new era... To strengthen his political position he tries to tear down the racial and civil barriers which for a time continue to restrain him at every step... With all his perseverance and dexterity he seizes possession of it (the press; media - MH). With it he slowly begins to grip and ensnare, to guide and push all public life, since he is in a position to create and direct all public life, since he is in a position to create and direct that power which, under the name of "public opinion," is better known today than a few decades ago. In this he always represents himself personally as having an infinite thirst for knowledge, praises all progress, mostly, to be sure, the progress that leads to the ruin of others; for he judges all knowledge and all development only according to its possibilities for advancing his nation, and where this is lacking, he is the inexorable mortal enemy of all light, a hater of all true culture. He uses all the knowledge he acquires in the schools of other peoples, exclusively for the benefit of his race. While he seems to overflow with "enlightenment," "progress," "freedom," "humanity," etc., he himself practices the severest segregation of his race...He poisons the blood of others, but preserves his own...In order to mask his activity and lull his victims, however, he talks more and more of the equality of men without regard to race and color. The fools begin to believe him. Now I ask you: Did Der Fuehrer nail it or what?
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope. - Bugs Last edited by Matthaus Hetzenauer; February 10th, 2011 at 11:48 AM. |
February 12th, 2011 | #8 |
Wutta maroon!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
|
Cruelty...or kindness?
from pp. 403-4:
It would be more in keeping with the intentions of the noblest man in this world if our two Christian churches, instead of annoying Negroes with missions which they neither desire or understand, would kindly, but in all seriousness, teach our European humanity that where the parents are not healthy it is a deed pleasing to God to take pity on a poor little healthy orphan child and give him father and mother, than themselves to give birth to a sick child who will only bring unhappiness and suffering on himself and the rest of the world... Those who are physically and mentally unhealthy and unworthy must not perpetuate their suffering in the body of their children. In this the folkish state must perform the most gigantic educational task. And some day this will seem to be a greater deed than the most victorious wars of our present bourgeois era. By education it must teach the individual that it is no disgrace, but only a misfortune deserving of pity, to be sick and weakly, but that it is a crime and hence at the same time a disgrace to dishonor one's misfortune by one's own egotism in burdening innocent creatures with it; that by comparison it bespeaks a nobility of highest idealism and the most admirable humanity if the innocently sick, renouncing a child of his own, bestows his love and tenderness upon a poor, unknown scion of his own nationality, who with his health promises to become some day a powerful member of a powerful community.
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope. - Bugs |
February 14th, 2011 | #9 |
Legionary of Truth
|
“Jewry has always been a nation of a definite racial character and never differentiated merely by the fact of belonging to a certain religion. At a very early date, urged on by the desire to make their way in the world, the Jews began to cast about for a means whereby they might distract such attention as might prove inconvenient for them. What could be more effective and at the same time more above suspicion than to borrow and utilize the idea of the religious community? Here also everything is copied, or rather stolen; for the Jew could not possess any religious institution which had developed out of his own consciousness, seeing that he lacks every kind of idealism; which means that belief in a life beyond this terrestrial existence is foreign to him. In the Aryan mind no religion can ever be imagined unless it embodies the conviction that life in some form or other will continue after death. As a matter of fact, the Talmud is not a book that lays down principles according to which the individual should prepare for the life to come. It only furnishes rules for a practical and convenient life in this world.
The religious teaching of the Jews is principally a collection of instructions for maintaining the Jewish blood pure and for regulating intercourse between Jews and the rest of the world: that is to say, their relation with non-Jews. But the Jewish religious teaching is not concerned with moral problems. It is rather concerned with economic problems, and very petty ones at that. In regard to the moral value of the religious teaching of the Jews there exist and always have existed quite exhaustive studies (not from the Jewish side; for whatever the Jews have written on this question has naturally always been of a tendentious character) which show up the kind of religion that the Jews have in a light that makes it look very uncanny to the Aryan mind. The Jew himself is the best example of the kind of product which this religious training evolves. His life is of this world only and his mentality is as foreign to the true spirit of Christianity as his character was foreign to the great Founder of this new creed two thousand years ago. And the Founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of His estimation of the Jewish people. When He found it necessary He drove those enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God; because then, as always, they used religion as a means of advancing their commercial interests. But at that time Christ was nailed to the Cross for his attitude towards the Jews; whereas our modern Christians enter into party politics and when elections are being held they debase themselves to beg for Jewish votes. They even enter into political intrigues with the atheistic Jewish parties against the interests of their own Christian nation.” - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Volume I: Chapter 11 “That is why the Jew systematically endeavours to lower the racial quality of a people by permanently adulterating the blood of the individuals who make up that people. In the field of politics he now begins to replace the idea of democracy by introducing the dictatorship of the proletariat. In the masses organized under the Marxist banners he has found a weapon which makes it possible for him to discard democracy, so as to subjugate and rule in a dictatorial fashion by the aid of brute force. He is systematically working in two ways to bring about this revolution. These ways are the economic and the political respectively. Aided by international influences, he forms a ring of enemies around those nations which have proved themselves too sturdy for him in withstanding attacks from within. He would like to force them into war and then, if it should be necessary to his plans, he will unfurl the banners of revolt even while the troops are actually fighting at the front. Economically he brings about the destruction of the State by a systematic method of sabotaging social enterprises until these become so costly that they are taken out of the hands of the State and then submitted to the control of Jewish finance. Politically he works to withdraw from the State its means of subsistence, inasmuch as he undermines the foundations of national resistance and defence, destroys the confidence which the people have in their Government, reviles the past and its history and drags everything national down into the gutter. Culturally his activity consists in bowdlerizing art, literature and the theatre, holding the expressions of national sentiment up to scorn, overturning all concepts of the sublime and beautiful, the worthy and the good, finally dragging the people to the level of his own low mentality. Of religion he makes a mockery. Morality and decency are described as antiquated prejudices and thus a systematic attack is made to undermine those last foundations on which the national being must rest if the nation is to struggle for its existence in this world.” - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Volume I: Chapter 11 |
February 23rd, 2011 | #10 |
Wutta maroon!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
|
from pp. 57-9:
In a short time I was made more thoughtful than ever by my slowly rising insight into the type of activity carried on by the Jews in certain fields. Was there any form of filth or profligacy, particularly in cultural life, without at least one Jew involved in it? If you cut even cautiously into such an abscess, you find, like a maggot in a rotting body, often dazzled by the sudden light -- a kike! What had to be reckoned heavily against the Jews in my eyes was when I became acquainted with their activity in the press, art, literature, and the theater. All the unctous reassurances helped little or nothing. It sufficed to look at a billboard, to study the names of the men behind the horrible trash they advertised, to make you hard for a long time to come. This was pestilence, spiritual pestilence, worse than the Black Death of olden times, and the people were being infected with it! I now began to examine carefully the names of all the creators of unclean products in public artistic life. The result was less and less favorable for my previous attitude toward the Jews. Regardless how my sentiment might resist, my reason was forced to draw its conclusions. The fact that nine-tenths of all literary filth, artistic trash, and theatrical idiocy can be set to the account of a people, constituting hardly one-hundreth of all the country's inhabitants, could simply not be talked away; it was the plain truth. And I now began to examine my beloved "world press" from this point of view. And the deeper I probed, the more the object of my former admiration shriveled. The style became more and more unbearable; I could not help rejecting the content as inwardly shallow and banal; the objectivity of exposition now seemed to me more akin to lies than honest truth; and the writers were -- Jews. A thousand things which I had hardly seen before now struck my notice, and others, which had previously given me food for thought, I now learned to grasp and understand. I now saw the liberal attitude of this press in a different light; the lofty tone in which it answered attacks and its method of killing them with silence now revealed itself to me as a trick as clever as it was treacherous; the transfigured raptures of their critics were always directed at Jewish writers, and their disapproval never struck anyone but Germans.
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope. - Bugs |
April 9th, 2011 | #11 |
Wutta maroon!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
|
Sound all too familiar? I'm sure it does...
from pp. 322-3:
It is in this press, above all, which wages a positively fanatical and slanderous struggle, tearing down everything which can be regarded as a support of national independence, cultural elevation, and the economic independence of the nation. Above all, it hammers away at the character of all those who will not bow down to the Jewish presumption to dominate, or whose ability and genius in themselves seems a danger to the Jew. For to be hated by the Jews it is not necessary to combat him; no, it suffices if he suspects that someone might even conceive the idea of combating him some time or that on the strength of his superior genius he is an augmenter of the power and greatness of a nationality hostile to the Jew. His unfailing instincts in such things scents the original soul in everyone, and his hostility is assured to anyone who is not spirit of his spirit. Since the Jew is not the attacked but the attacker, not only anyone who attacks passes as his enemy, but also anyone who resists him. But the means with which he seeks to break such reckless but upright souls is not honest warfare, but lies and slander. Hence he stops at nothing, and in his vileness he becomes so gigantic that no one need be surprised if among our people the personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the shape of the Jew. The ignorance of the broad masses about the inner nature of the Jew, the lack of instinct and narrow-mindedness of our upper classes, make the people an easy victim for this Jewish campaign of lies. While from innate cowardice the upper classes turn away from a man the Jew attacks with lies and slander, the broad masses from stupidity or simplicity believe everything. The state authorities either cloak themselves in silence or, what usually happens, in order to put an end to the Jewish press campaign, they persecute the unjustly attacked, which, in the eyes of such an official ass, passes as the preservation of state authority and the safeguarding of law and order.
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope. - Bugs |
April 17th, 2011 | #12 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
May 13th, 2011 | #13 | |
Bread and Circuses
|
Passage from Chapter VII: The Struggle with the Red Front
Quote:
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H. |
|
May 14th, 2011 | #14 | |
Bread and Circuses
|
In this passage from Mein Kampf, Hitler described the patriotic bourgeois meetings.
Chapter VII: The Struggle with the Red Front Quote:
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H. |
|
February 6th, 2012 | #15 |
Wutta maroon!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
|
Just thought I'd dust off this geezer of a thread and breathe some new life into it; hope you don't mind. (And if you do, then I've got just two words for you, Buster -- and they ain't "Heil Hitler.")
A couple days ago while referencing The Book, I ran across a passage that tickles the hell out of me whenever I read it. From page 52 of the Ralph Manheim translation: "There were few Jews in Linz. In the course of the centuries their outward appearance had become Europeanized and had taken on a human look; in fact, I even took them for Germans." (emphasis mine) Now, who says AH didn't have a damn fine sense of humor? Hm?...Who says so?
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope. - Bugs |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|