"Dutch" Shrink Exposed as Long-Time Fraud

[N.B. Forrest]

LONDON, Nov. 2, 2011 (Reuters) — A Dutch psychologist has admitted making up data and faking research over many years in studies which were then published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Diederik Stapel, a psychologist working at Tilburg University in the Netherlands, said he had "failed as a scientist" and was ashamed of what he had done, but had been driven to falsifying research by constant pressure to perform.

http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre...ientist-fraud/

I looked around to see if this distinctly tapirish specimen is a zhid; One site, (Dass Torah - Issues of jewish Identity) covers it, so he must be.

Scratch a kike, find a krook/wait for it to write a book...

[C. Grady Tucker]

Too bad he wasn't working for the Climatologists in England. Here's an article about his "findings" on meat eaters:

http://www.dutchdailynews.com/meat-e...h-less-social/

"Think of driving a Hummer or a Panda. With both you’ll get to your destination, but a Hummer is tougher. Like the Hummer meat is bad for the environment and climate. It is also bad for animals, the third world and our own health. But people can get quite upset when you tell them that. They are obviously very attached to their steak."

From Boas to Stapel, the hoaxes never stop. Pitful. Pittteeful.

[N.B. Forrest]

Originally Posted by C. Grady Tucker

Too bad he wasn't working for the Climatologists in England. Here's an article about his "findings" on meat eaters:

http://www.dutchdailynews.com/meat-e...h-less-social/




From Boas to Stapel, the hoaxes never stop. Pitful. Pittteeful.

Yeah - found it in his hairy jew ass.

"Ehhh, a living, it was. On to the next schwindle...."

[David Langdon]

Good find!

[Armstrong]

There was a rash of faked research on psych drugs, in the favor of the drug maker, about a year or two ago.....all done at major universities....

[C. Grady Tucker]

Dr. MacDonald writes about this incident and others:

Here the NYTimes article adds that a recent study found that in an anonymous survey around 70% of psychologists admitted ”cutting corners” in reporting their data and 1% acknowledged falsification; statistical errors favoring the hypothesis occurred in around 15% of a random sample of papers in high-end psychology journals.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...ch/#more-11337