|
January 7th, 2013 | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
|
Quote:
People who attach themselves to Powell as some lost hero of nationalism are deluding themselves. As a minister in the early 60s he brought many immigrants to Britain and was an admirer of Indian (including Pakistan) culture and history. He became alarmed after Asian immigrants began pouring into Wolverhampton and began upsetting his white constituents who in turn bore down on him. He was also a great admirer of the Jews and just prior to his death had been studying Hebrew with a view to translating Jewish scripture. When the SHTF over his speech he received enormous support in the country and from all sections of the community: full spectrum support from hardcore trade unionists, to Tory toffs, to Labour voters, to hardcore nationalists. He could have built a party of considerable force, but rather than take up the issue he'd raised that night, in 1968, he chose instead to join the bowler-hatted loons in Ulster . And we know how successful they were...Not! |
|
January 7th, 2013 | #42 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
Thank the non-existent deity of your choice that you said this 'cos I'm getting sick of saying it. Powell was no hero to the indigenous Brits. He started the influx of immigrants. He attended the Bilderberg shindig in the same year. He's as much to blame for the state of Britain as Blair or the basement dwellers or anyone else.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
January 8th, 2013 | #43 | |
Amor Patriae Nostra Lex
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: England
Posts: 1,382
|
Quote:
|
|
April 11th, 2013 | #44 | |||||
.
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,718
|
Kevin MacDonald - "Peter Hitchens’s Show of Guilt: Enoch Powell Was Right"
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...-show-of-guilt
Quote:
|
|||||
April 11th, 2013 | #45 |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Normally I agree with much of his writings but that very last line - oh dear. Enoch Powell might have been right, but why is it that the speech is all he is known for, and not his actually beginning the trend of opening arms to migrant workers?
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
April 11th, 2013 | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,093
|
Quote:
|
|
April 11th, 2013 | #47 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
List of Bilderberg participants contains such notables as - guess who?
Quote:
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
April 11th, 2013 | #48 | |
.
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,718
|
Quote:
Another factor is that "there is more joy in heaven over one lost sinner who repents and returns to God than over ninety-nine others who are righteous and haven't strayed away!". Should it be this way? Discuss. |
|
April 11th, 2013 | #49 | |
Hatespeaker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
__________________
"Surely people differ in their biologically determined qualities. But discovery of a correlation between some of these qualities is of no scientific interest and of no social significance, except to racists, sexists and the like." |
|
April 11th, 2013 | #50 | |||
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
.....and a week after making that speech he was off to the Bilderberg shindig in Canada, a fact actually noted elsewhere on the Occidental Observer. http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...-enoch-powell/ (warning - this link not suitable for those currently wailing over Maggie's death) Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|||
April 11th, 2013 | #51 |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Somewhere around, there's a thread that details Hitchens and his musing over planning on standing for election. Cynical? Me? It seems to be trendy to repent at the minute; David Goodhart has also seen the Daily Mail paycheque light. (ignore the strange and random bolding, that refers to the deconstruction job I did on his conversion.)
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
April 11th, 2013 | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
|
I find it amusing that the system are seeking to use their man of straw after he is dead,rather than invest in a new one.I expect the movement rubes encouraged by the touts to amen this and claim it as a victory.
Any privy Councillor as powell was who does not take a stand for the race,despite having all the inside information is a coward.Powell proved his cowardice in a different way he could have become Leader of the National Front that he did not was another victory for the system and proof of his insincerity.
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion Chase them into the swamps |
April 11th, 2013 | #53 | |||
.
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,718
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now, we could treat him in two different ways. (1) We could hold him in high esteem, as a heroic prophet who warned Britannia of her own destruction, or (2) we could question his motives and criticise his pre-speech record, and by questioning and criticism, we would deconstruct and destroy the reputation of a pro-White hero. A jew would choose option (2) obviously, but which will we choose? |
|||
April 11th, 2013 | #54 | ||||
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As andy said, he could have joined the NF when asked or even rode his wave of popularity all the way to the shores of his own, new party. Or he could have waited until the Tories were in in 1970 and then advised everyone to vote Labour. Which did he do?
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
||||
April 12th, 2013 | #55 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
Although to be fair, his Labour voting caper was in protest at the way the Tories performed a stitch up on the question of the Common Market. Of course, Labour later turned out to be as much in love with the EU as the 1970 Tories were but Enoch wasn't to know that. Perhaps we could grudgingly forgive his pro-Labour comments if looked at ONLY in the context of getting out of the EU.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
April 12th, 2013 | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
|
The whole Powell thing "Just does not look right",He lived next door to ted heath in eaton terrace he shared the same concealed alley exit that heath had his rent boys delivered at.He made anti immigrant speeches long before 68.It was if (The media presence proves it) it was a pre arranged stunt.I would have thought that you with your conspiracy mind would have looked at it.1968 The Nf getting going, til death us do part top tv show,paki bashing on a nightly basis, synagogues vandalised daily soccer hooligans having pitched battles involving thousands.There was plenty of "action" as it were.
You see if we are to believe that Thatcher stole the NF's vote in 79 how many did Powell steal ? How many of the respectable electorate said to themselves "We don't need the NF we have Powell the tories will see us alright " Remember Heaths leadership was always shaky many thought he would be replaces many ordinary voters wanted Powell as he had made many anti immigrant speeches. I can see the reasoning behind using him as a well known personality for political campaigning but even then when one encounters such a bogus poseur one is entitled to ask what was going on behind the scenes ? No political party wants to promote him as their lost leader then find out he was enjoying a spit roast with Heath and Hendrix
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion Chase them into the swamps |
April 12th, 2013 | #57 |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Absolutely, but don't you think that if he was and if they knew, this would have been out long ago? I mean, rumours about Cyril Smith and Savile have been around for years and turned out to be true - there's never been one such rumour about Powell and if there had, Blair's Labour would have made sure it got leaked.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
April 12th, 2013 | #58 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
|
Quote:
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion Chase them into the swamps |
|
March 5th, 2014 | #59 |
News Bot
|
Enoch Powell Rivers of Blood/The Great Betrayal
Enoch Powell Rivers of Blood/The Great Betrayal by: Tanstaafl This month’s special program is a reading of the momentous speech delivered by Enoch Powell at the Midland Hotel in Birmingham on 20 April 1968. It will be broadcast each Wednesday and Friday starting at 9PM ET, streaming continuously until the next scheduled program. Though is has been described as “the most controversial speech in modern British history”, there is apparently no complete recording available on the internet. A BBC documentary ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ), produced circa 2008, starts with a reporter, Reg Harcourt, describing how he was there with a camera team. The BBC documentary intersperses snippets of the black and white film of the speech with “anti-racist” spin attempting to explain that Powell was wrong. Powell’s speech serves as a reminder and lesson to Whites: However bad you may believe the situation is, or may yet become, you are likely underestimating. Looking back, we find many sober expressions of fear and foreboding such as Powell’s. Always they are countered with the same fraud and trickery. What our enemies initially deride and dismiss as a stupid, crazy, or evil vision invariably metastasizes into an even more disgustingly degenerate reality, which they then celebrate. Our program was transcoded from “Rivers of Blood” The Great Betrayal. Full speech. , read and posted by Martin Willett. The description attached to the video reads: Published on Oct 14, 2011 The 1968 speech given by Enoch Powell known as The Rivers of Blood speech. In full. No editing, cuts, omissions, spin, commentary, propaganda or tricky sound effects. Just the speech. These are words written in 1968, and not by me. Don’t shoot the messenger, just listen to the message and judge for yourself. The FULL TEXT of this speech can be found here: http://right2think.org/index.php/politics-main/68-rivers-of-blood-speech If you want to debate this matter in depth join my debate forum: http://right2think.org/index.php/forum/ Total runtime: 20:09 Podcast: Download read full article at source: http://thewhitenetwork.com/2014/03/0...reat-betrayal/ |
March 9th, 2014 | #60 |
News Bot
|
Enoch Powell: Rivers of Blood/The Great Betrayal
Enoch Powell: Rivers of Blood/The Great Betrayal DailyStormer.com Tanstaafl The White Network March 9, 2014 This month’s special program is a reading of the momentous speech delivered by Enoch Powell at the Midland Hotel in Birmingham on 20 April 1968. It will be broadcast each Wednesday and Friday starting at 9PM ET, streaming continuously until the next scheduled program. Though is has been described as “the most controversial speech in modern British history”, there is apparently no complete recording available on the internet. A BBC documentary ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ), produced circa 2008, starts with a reporter, Reg Harcourt, describing how he was there with a camera team. The BBC documentary intersperses snippets of the black and white film of the speech with “anti-racist” spin attempting to explain that Powell was wrong. Powell’s speech serves as a reminder and lesson to Whites: However bad you may believe the situation is, or may yet become, you are likely underestimating. Looking back, we find many sober expressions of fear and foreboding such as Powell’s. Always they are countered with the same fraud and trickery. What our enemies initially deride and dismiss as a stupid, crazy, or evil vision invariably metastasizes into an even more disgustingly degenerate reality, which they then celebrate. Our program was transcoded from “Rivers of Blood” The Great Betrayal. Full speech. , read and posted by Martin Willett. The description attached to the video reads: Published on Oct 14, 2011 The 1968 speech given by Enoch Powell known as The Rivers of Blood speech. In full. No editing, cuts, omissions, spin, commentary, propaganda or tricky sound effects. Just the speech. These are words written in 1968, and not by me. Don’t shoot the messenger, just listen to the message and judge for yourself. The FULL TEXT of this speech can be found here: http://right2think.org/index.php/politics-main/68-rivers-of-blood-speech If you want to debate this matter in depth join my debate forum: http://right2think.org/index.php/forum/ Total runtime: 20:09 Download read full article at source: http://www.dailystormer.com/enoch-po...reat-betrayal/ |
Tags |
enoch powell, rivers of blood |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|