Vanguard News Network
Pieville
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Broadcasts

Old January 16th, 2016 #41
NewsFeed
News Bot
 
Post Jack Buckby Of Liberty GB Has A Hissy Fit When I Ask About Policies On The Banking System

Brexit won't matter unless Brit politics accepts problem w Islamisation, 3rd world immigration, & rabid communists controlling institutions.

@jackbuckby What about the banking system? Liberty GB seems to be ignoring that issue...

@PatriotPopulism Not at the top of our list of priorities right now but we will be releasing a new and updated manifesto soon.

@jackbuckby is it even a priority?

@PatriotPopulism Lots on our plate, we won't rush out policies willy nilly.

@jackbuckby ahhh I see, not wanting to bite the hand that feeds you.

@PatriotPopulism Ohhhhh right, so you're one of those people who thinks we're financed by Jew gold? Christ alive.

@jackbuckby I don't think I said anything about Jew gold. You wanting to tell me something?

@PatriotPopulism Oh, and if you really have some retarded problem with me, take my picture off your Twitter header you creep.

@jackbuckby dont have to be financed to be influenced, you dont want to be in the hall of fame. Whats with the hissy fit?

@jackbuckby Hahahaha, Zionism is now a magical force? explains the Israel flags surrounding PEGIDA. Concentrate On Islam but ignore banks

@PatriotPopulism Belief in the right of Jewish people (and all people) to have their own homeland has nothing to do with the banks.

@PatriotPopulism If I'm so terrible, why do you post my videos and have a picture of me on your Twitter header? Huh? Sort your life out.

@jackbuckby So the Majority of central bankers aren't Zionist Jews. I have no beef with you personally. I just think you're mislead

@PatriotPopulism I don't know if a 'majority' of them are. Jews are successful, because they're an intelligent people. Big whoop.

@PatriotPopulism I have no further interest in talking to you, or any other conspiracy theorists for that matter. Good night.

@jackbuckby That's Okay we'll shut down this debate, the islamification of Europe is classed as an conspiracy. Selective, Good Night.

read full article at source: http://twitter.com/jackbuckby/status/688165967998750720
 
Old April 14th, 2016 #42
NewsFeed
News Bot
 
Post Paul Weston: How to Destroy a Country - TRANSCRIPT

[NOTES: In this good 30 min video (with the provisos given) Paul Weston describes what organized jewry has done to destroy Britain. Yet he doesn’t name the jew, the real cause, only content to name jewish proxies that carry out the destruction. Eventually he will have to confront and tell the truth of jewish power and their central role in causing all the symptoms he describes.

The solution to the problems that Weston describes is very plain. He needs to name the cause, the root cause behind our on-going racial and social destruction: organized jewry.

If he truly has the best interest of White people at heart, he, like all such like-minded people, needs to stand up and name the JEW! — KATANA ]

[DISCLAIMER: This site has NO affiliation whatsoever with Paul Weston or his Liberty GB Party. I created this transcript because Weston’s view are useful for understanding what is going on despite the fact that he, for whatever reason, is unable to go the whole distance and figure out that 2 + 2 = 4 and not the politically correct and “safe” answer of 5 — KATANA]

Click here or copy link to view (in new window): >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkjLcq0yvmM

Paul Weston : How to Destroy a Country

So what Paul [previous speaker] is saying about this real genuine threat that is coming from the Left today is absolutely right. It’s been going on for a long time. I’m going to open with a quote from a chap called, Charles Reich who was Marxist communist in the 1970s. And he said that:

Now Charles Reich said that in the 1970s and we today are living pretty much in the end of their revolution. Their long march through the institutions. And it is all around us. We think we are going to the dogs, that this country is not what it was.

Well it isn’t, this country is going to the dogs. And it’s not only going to the dogs, it going to a literal end of Western civilization in Britain and all across Europe and now in America as well.

What was once immoral is now moral and what was once moral is now immoral. This is the whole inversion of morality. It what drove their revolution. And there is another guy, Georg Lukacs who was part of the Frankfurt School. I won’t bore you with the Frankfurt School as I’m sure you all know about it. But Lukacs said, quote:

And this again is what we are living through today. Herbert Marcuse, another one of these professors over in, I can’t remember which University, was asked, who was going to be the revolutionary people who would drive their revolution here, rather than the Soviet workers. And he replied it will be the oppressed, the blacks, the homos, the feminist militants, even Che Guevara. This was before Islam reared its head. Islam is absolute manna from heaven for these people because this really seriously drives their revolution.

And the whole point of that, I’ll just dwell briefly on Frankfurt School, was the idea that it was going to destroy us through their, through making us think or believe in certain ways. And thi

----- snip -----


read full article at source: http://katana17.wordpress.com/2015/0...roy-a-country/
 
Old June 27th, 2016 #43
NewsFeed
News Bot
 
Post The Future of British Nationalism After Brexit

Brexit has come and gone, and like Wellington said of the Battle of Waterloo it was a “damn close run thing.” Indeed, that was one of the reasons I supported Scottish independence two years ago — to stop Scotland dragging England to the left on important issues like this. (My other reason was so that Scotland could discover on its own — and rather painfully I suspect — the limits of leftism when not buttressed by a larger non-socialist entity). But what about the fallout from Brexit and its effect on British nationalism? Yes, it gets us out of the EU and shakes the foundations of the still incomplete Tower of Babel. But what lessons can we learn from it, and what directions should nationalists take?


Perhaps the most interesting point about the Brexit Referendum is the political vacuum it revealed. All the main parties, except UKIP, officially backed the defeated cause. That’s right — the Conservative Party, Labour Party, and Lib Dems, as well as the SNP and Plaid Cymru, supported REMAIN. But, even with a higher turnout than in a general election, they failed to get their way.

What does this mean? It means that practically the entire British political establishment was not aligned with the wishes of the majority of the British voting public.


eral nationalist cause. Also, a glass-half-full attitude like this will provide the groundwork for greater unification efforts, because, with the awkward situation that UKIP now find themselves in, the time is clearly ripe for the rise of a strong nationalist party that can exploit the massive disconnect between the British political establishment and the British people.

In order to do this effectively, additional issues beyond Brexit must be identified and agreed on. These issues should (a) have popular appeal, (b) not be seen as being too “cruel,” and (c) be issues which the political elite and the old parties find difficult to exploit. There are several issues that fit this category. Here are a few that spring to mind, some of them obvious, some less so:

a moratorium on all immigration to the UK for a specified or indefinite time;
the deportation of all illegal immigrants in the UK, or their incarceration if we are unable to deport them for whatever reason;
changing the refugee policy with an emphasis on helping people in the countries adjacent to their own rather than bringing them in;
a moratorium on the building of new mosques;
the banning of head coverings like the nijab and burka;
the banning of polygamy;
the return of the death penalty;
the reform of education, especially history education, to remove all traces of White guilt and to instill pride and a respect for traditional British values in children;
closing down the leftist BBC and ending the licence fee.

James Lawrence also offers an interesting idea in his recent article, “You’re Next,” suggesting that the break-up of the UK into its constituent nations could help push politics away from transnational elements and ideals towards more identitarian ones, which is yet another reason I supported Scottish independence two years ago.

Even if Scottish — and therefore English — independence is kept off the table, a similar effect could be achieved by campaigning for an English parliament within the UK.

If the Brexit vote proved one thing more than any other, it was the degree to which the political establishment is out of step with the North of England, which we should always remember was the one area to vote for two BNP members of the European Parliament. Because of the evident alienation of the North, any English parliament should of course not be based in London like the Westminster Parliament, but rather in a Northern city.

But while Nationalists consider what issues to follow up Brexit with, they must be careful to avoid issues that strongly appeal to them but which the mass of the people are less ready to follow. I would include the following:

repatriation of non-Whites;
an outright ban on Islam;
repealing gay marriage.

While these are essentially good policies, they are also problematic. Repatriation could occur sometime in the future, but it has a strong connotation of racial purism that many ordinary Britons would find disturbing, and which could be used to revive Nazi comparisons. Associating this too closely with less problematic issues, like a ban on further immigration and repatriating illegal immigrants, might drag those issues down with it.

Banning Islam has an obvious appeal, but it also cuts across British values of religious freedom. Better to chip away at Islam, or only attack it directly in the wake of a particularly bad terrorist atrocity, when public support would be much more likely.

Repealing gay marriage is not a suitable issue, as it has all the characteristics of a distraction — plenty of sound and fury but very little actual effect, as the numbers of gays who wish to marry are an infinitesimal minority of the population.

The Brexit vote has already become a pivotal moment in British politics. If nationalists play their cards right, it could also become a pivotal moment in the rise of British nationalism and help finish the work that Brexit has begun.



http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...-after-brexit/
 
Old June 27th, 2016 #44
Henry.
Senior Member
 
Henry.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
Default

Oily creep, Paul Weston, keeping Jews "safe on his watch"...

 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 AM.
Page generated in 0.06813 seconds.