|
July 19th, 2008 | #741 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
July 19th, 2008 | #742 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
July 19th, 2008 | #743 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
"It’s true that the NAFCASH challenge is bulletproof and foolproof. It’s also true that the challenge is utter simplicity – that’s what this NAFCASH challenge is." Well thank you for the kind words Roberta. Roberta: "If lies and cowardice make one a Jew, then I'm certainly qualified." Gosh you're being honest today, aren't you? Roberta: "One thing are the rules and standards of evidence that apply in historical research, as I have often explained. By those rules and standards, everything that Gerdes demands proof of can be proven. Another thing are the rules and standards of the NAFCASH challenge. Those rules and standards are reasonable (what part of proof do you not understand). Whoever wants to earn the reward money must simply comply with reasonable rules and standards." Yes Roberta, I would say the same thing. Roberta: "I’m the one who must be grateful, for being allowed to parade yet another demonstration of my stupidity, mendacity and cowardice. As I said before, you're a godsend for me, Mr. Gerdes. If intellectual dishonesty makes one a Jew, then I'm a caricature Jew right out of Der Stürmer." Yes, I couldn't agree with you more Roberta. Roberta: "No, asshole, I’m just pointing out that you are showing the world what a stinking coward I am, desperately trying to save face by misrepresenting her opponent’s words in order to make believe I'm not "looking for a way out", which actually is what I want more than anything in the world right now. (With the possible exception of having sex with Elton John.) Thanks for yet another opportunity to demonstrate my stupidity, mendacity and cowardice. As I said before, you are a godsend." Your welcome Roberta. Roberta: "I think that was my beloved Führer, and his description fits me like a glove." Yes it was and yes it does Roberta. Roberta: “As putting the money in an escrow account at some time during the process – say, when the applicant has published proof meeting the challenge requirements in SKEPTIC and ARCHAEOLOGY magazine – is the only way I see to make this challenge a fair and honest challenge, then I'm challenging the worldwide jewish community to match the nafcash reward amount and put it into an escrow account to guarantee payment." Now you're talking Roberta. Just how hard would it be for just one filthy rich greasy jew to guarantee that, should any supporter of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE not pay his legally binding amount of $5,000.00 to the winner of said challenge, said filthy rich greasy jew would cover the reward amount until said supporter is forced to pay up. Just one filthy rich greasy jew. Just one hundred grand. Why can't one single jew put his money where his foul mouth is and match the nafcash reward amount? Just one Roberta. One. Roberta: "Thank you, Gerdes, for making it so obvious how easy it would be for the richest people of the world to match what your simple little 501 (c)(3)(exempt) nonprofit organization has done." No Roberta, thank you. Roberta: "And his accurately accusing me of "two-faced machinations", when I’m obviously doing nothing to meet the challenge conditions proves what a transparent lying coward I am." I couldn't have said it better myself Roberta. Thanks for your honesty today Roberta. Let’s see if you can keep it up. |
July 19th, 2008 | #744 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
"What made me decide to accept your challenge was a big mistake you made in one of your posts, one that considerably improved my chances of having access to the very evidence that is required to meet the challenge requirements... If you don’t want to accept my suggestions... that’s just fine with me. It won’t dissuade me from trying to obtain, publish and present to NAFCASH the required proof, for as you well know the money issue is secondary to me." Are you talking about your suggestion to challenge to the worldwide jewish and homosexual communities to match the reward amount that the supporters of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE have come up with and put it in escrow to guarantee payment to the reward recipient in the miniscule chance that a challenge supporter doesn't pay his legally binding promised amount? Well, OK - fine. What are we going to call this holocaust controversies challenge to the jewish and homosexual communities? |
July 19th, 2008 | #745 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
AIDS activist challenges homosexual / jewish people of the world!
(Reuters) LISBON - Roberto/a Muehlenkamp, transvestite, AIDS activist and holocaust industry shill, has challenged the worldwide homosexual / jewish communities to match the reward amount offered by The National Association of Forensic Criminologists, Archeologists, Skeptics and Historians ( http://www.nafcash.com/ ) for proving the existence of just one percent of the alleged mass murder at the alleged "pure extermination centers." "As a member of both communities, and a spokesperson for HC (homosexual creeps), I challenge all homosexuals and/or jews to help me raise just $100,000.00 to match what some simple little 501 (c)(3)(exempt) nonprofit organization has done in the U.S." Roberta said. Adding: "It's inconceivable to me that the world’s richest people can't do what one person with just 20 supporters has done. The fact is, if we can't match nafcash's reward amount, we will look like we don't really want to put an end to holocaust denial. After all, if there's any two groups in the world who should want to put an end to holocaust denial, it would be the jews and homosexuals, right?" At this point Roberta broke down crying and had to be helped off stage by fellow HC freak Sirgayboy Sucksmenov, who refused to be interviewed. Sucksmenov's only comment was: "If you want to help stop holocaust denial, and help Roberta to stop crying, then help HC raise a measly hundred grand to match nafcash's reward amount. It's the least we can do to stop being shown up by nafcash." |
July 19th, 2008 | #746 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Gerdes’ posts nos. 743 and 744:
First of all, thanks for again showing what a sorry piece of self-projecting scum you are. You are as instructive a demonstration object of "Revisionist" imbecility as I could ever have wished for. Your foul mouthing is so self-defeating that one might suspect you’re actually an undercover agent from the ADL or so. If I were any of your White buddies here, I would do some checking on you. Second, what part of what I wrote in posts # 709 under http://206.41.117.128/showpost.php?p...&postcount=709 and 711 under http://206.41.117.128/showpost.php?p...&postcount=711 is too hard for your limited intellect to grasp? Please tell me and I’ll explain it again very slowly, so that even a retard like you gets the idea. Third, I still see no comment from you under the HC article Update on Gerdes & NAFCASH under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...s-nafcash.html . What are you waiting for, chicken-shit? Fourth, thanks for the instructively self-portraying out-of-context quotes/distortions in post # 743. I especially liked how you made what I wrote in post # 729 under http://206.41.117.128/showpost.php?p...&postcount=729 : Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Sixth, please keep showing you nervous you are by making a fuss and jumping up and down like the hysterical chimp you are. It’s amusing to watch, I can assure you. Seventh, read my latest HC article, which you find under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...challenge.html . Especially the last part: Quote:
|
||||
July 19th, 2008 | #747 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
My request in the last sentence of post # 746:
Quote:
Thank you, Gerdes, and please let's have more of that! The more you contribute to my collection of self-projecting Gerdian imbecility, the better. |
|
July 19th, 2008 | #748 | |||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|||
July 20th, 2008 | #749 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I keep wondering if he even understands the meaning and implications of these terms. |
||||
July 20th, 2008 | #750 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Meanwhile, on the CODOH thread under http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=5059 , Gerdes is continuing to do what I described in my article "Muehlenkamp accepts nafcash's challenge" under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/ :
Quote:
I’ll transcribe Gerdes’ recent posts on the CODOH thread under http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=5059 , also because posts on CODOH tend to disappear when Hargis gets scared: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:33 pm Quote:
Quote:
If so, congratulations, Mr. Gerdes! Acknowledging one’s mistakes is the first step towards improvement, as a German saying goes. As to what I’m waiting for, I have already told you in my post # 730 under http://206.41.117.128/showpost.php?p...&postcount=730 . Why don’t you read my posts, Mr. Gerdes? Talk about waiting, you still haven’t addressed my fellow bloggers about the challenge in a comment below the HC article Update on Gerdes & NAFCASH under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...s-nafcash.html , as I suggested you do. What are you waiting for, Mr. Gerdes? |
|||
July 20th, 2008 | #751 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 660
|
Still no gassed jew, huh? No surprise there.
|
July 20th, 2008 | #752 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Do you even have the time to meet Gregs' challenge? If so, get on with it!
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|
July 20th, 2008 | #753 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
"Why don’t you read my posts, Mr. Gerdes?" Well, let me count the why's - They're idiotic. Childish, Full of lies. Sophomoric. Retarded. Did I mention full of lies? Nonsensical. Stupid. I could go on and on, but I think you get the idea. Oh, and did I mention that they were full of lies? Roberta: "What are you waiting for, Mr. Gerdes?" Well, let's see, I'm waiting for stupid to: Show us just one "huge mass grave" that contains just one percent of the alleged mass murder at Treblinka. Just one body in a "wax-fat transformation" at Belzec. Just one pound of crushed bone at Chelmno. Just one ounce of human ash at Sobibor. Just one gassed jew from the entire "holocaust." Just one filthy rich greasy jew to match nafcash’s reward amount – i.e. - $100,000.00 and put it in an escrow account. And of course I'm waiting for Roberta to, in Ceds words - get on with it. Are you too chicken-shit to show us the above Rertado? Are you too much of a coward to - get on with it? What are you waiting for Roberta? What a cowardly lying little faggot you are Roberta. Can't even prove / do just one of the above. Just one Roberta. One. BTW Roberta, the nafcash update should be online by Fri., maybe sooner. And rest your little damaged mind, the Sobibor bonus reward that you insited be included in the update will in fact be included in the update. Just for you Roberta. Oh, and one more thing Roberta: Thank you. |
July 20th, 2008 | #754 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
"Notice how CS tries to impress by throwing terms like "non sequitur" and "stochastic ability" around? I keep wondering if he even understands the meaning and implications of these terms." Well, it's obvious the retarded Roberta doesn't understand their meanings. In fact, she's so stupid, she doesn't even know the meaning of the word exempt. Roberta: "What could be more cowardly than that?" Your not challenging the richest people in the world to match the reward amount that one man with just one little non-profit, 501 (c) (3) (exempt), Scientific / Historical Educational Organization and twenty supporters has come up with to reward the person who proves the provable. Just think about that. Just one man with just one little non-profit, 501 (c) (3) (exempt), Scientific / Historical Educational Organization is showing the world that the billion dollar a year holocaust industry is a fraud and proving that the whole holocaust myth is just a hoax. Just one man with just one little non-profit, 501 (c) (3) (exempt), Scientific / Historical Educational Organization and twenty supporters has the holocaust industry and it's spurious shills in a hysterical tizzy. Nothing could be more cowardly than Roberta's continued attempts at trying to back out of her commitment of accepting THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE and her craven refusal to challenge the richest people in the world to come up with a measly hundred grand and put it in an escrow account. Just one filthy rich greasy jew Roberta. Just $100,000.00. Just one Roberta. One. What are you waiting for you cowardly queer? |
July 20th, 2008 | #755 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
“As putting the money in an escrow account at some time during the process – say, when the applicant has published proof meeting the challenge requirements in SKEPTIC and ARCHAEOLOGY magazine – is the only way I see to make this challenge a fair and honest challenge, then I'm challenging the worldwide jewish community to match the nafcash reward amount and put it into an escrow account to guarantee payment." Now you're talking Roberta. Just how hard would it be for just one filthy rich greasy jew to guarantee that, should any supporter of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE not pay his legally binding amount of $5,000.00 to the winner of said challenge, said filthy rich greasy jew would cover the reward amount until said supporter is forced to pay up? Just one filthy rich greasy jew. Just one hundred grand. Why can't one single jew put his money where his foul mouth is and match the nafcash reward amount? Just one Roberta. One. Roberta: "Thank you, Gerdes, for making it so obvious how easy it would be for the richest people of the world to match what your simple little 501 (c)(3)(exempt) nonprofit organization has done." No Roberta, thank you. Roberta: "And his accurately accusing me of "two-faced machinations", when I’m obviously doing nothing to meet the challenge conditions proves what a transparent lying coward I am." I couldn't have said it better myself Roberta. BTW Roberta, what is holocaust controversies / homosexual creeps calling this challenge to the worldwide jewish / homosexual communites to match / guarantee nafcash's reward amount? How about the homo-holo-jebo challenge? |
July 21st, 2008 | #756 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
I have all the time in the world, for I just have to watch and follow what archaeological work is being done on site. And the longer it takes, the longer I will also enjoy watching Gerdes' nervous squirming. |
||
July 21st, 2008 | #757 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
As to your "show us" - baloney, you know very well what my position is: I can prove the existence of whatever quantity of any of the exhibits you mention corresponds to the mass murder, body disposal and robbery digging at any of the camps under discussion by proving the mass murder, body disposal and robbery digging at the respective camp through eyewitness, documentary and physical evidence, and what evidence of these categories I have shown leaves no room for reasonable doubt (unreasonable doubt is always possible, just as it is possible to unreasonably doubt the existence of the moon) that these camps were killing sites and large-scale mass murder happened at each of them. This is true independently of what specific individual physical exhibits I have access to and can "show" to you, as even a numb nut like you should be able to understand. Your yelling for individual presentation of specific physical exhibits has no relevance from the point of view of criminal investigation or historical research. It has no relevance whatsoever except insofar as you have offered reward money for it and for the purpose of becoming entitled to that reward money. This means that, except insofar as presenting a specific physical exhibit makes an applicant become entitled to the reward money (and «one body in a "wax-fat transformation" at Belzec», «one pound of crushed bone at Chelmno», «one ounce of human ash at Sobibor» or «one gassed jew from the entire "holocaust"» surely don't fulfill the requirements of the NAFCASH challenge), you can take all your infantile "show me" demands and shove them up your fat Nazi ass. And as to the "coward", you should really refrain from using the term, after you sought refuge here in the cozy circle of your fellow Jew-haters, ignored most of the evidence I showed to you, dodged most of my questions, refused to even specify the contents of your challenge requirements (easy though I made it for you to do that) and didn't even dare to address my fellow HC bloggers directly after mouthing off about them here. Anyone with half a brain should by now have realized that you are a sorry piece of chicken-shit, and that your calling "coward" an opponent who not only entered the wolf's lair on his own but also addressed all your contentions and requests and patiently slapped your BS around your ears and exposed your lies again and again, is a classic example of the pot calling the kettle black - tantamount, to use the parallel that CS is so fond of (), to Elton John calling Brad Pitt a faggot. |
|
July 21st, 2008 | #758 | |||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Ah, and thanks for confirming that your chatting about me with "Hannover" Hargis on a forum to which I have no access (have you already invited the fellow over here, Mr. Gerdes?) is a very cowardly attitude. So is refusing to directly address persons you have been mouthing off about here, by the way (under the HC article Update on Gerdes & NAFCASH under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...s-nafcash.html there’s still nothing from chicken-shit Gerdes). So is having chosen as main debating arena not an equal-opportunity forum like RODOH, but a forum run and frequented by fellow Jew-hating fanatics. As is … (shall I go on, Mr. Gerdes?) Quote:
Quote:
As to your "one filthy rich greasy jew": This is your challenge, Gerdes. It was set up by you and your – to use one of the self-projecting terms you like to throw around – butt-buddies. So the only ones who are responsible for financing this challenge are Gerdes and his but-buddies. If they cannot finance this challenge in the manner required for it to be a fair and honest challenge, that’s their problem. They must then live with the fact that their challenge is a hoax. Quote:
And while that happens (it’s not me who takes care of it), I’m also waiting for Gerdes to keep showing the reasonable world (people are looking in from HC and RODOH through the links to this thread that I posted there, and I’m sure they are enjoying the show) what a lowly piece of self-projecting scum he is. As he is obviously looking in the mirror when he calls me "cowardly", it seems reasonable to assume that this applies to the "queer" as well. |
|||||||
July 21st, 2008 | #759 | ||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Always compliant with my requests, Gerdes now sinks to the depth of openly distorting my statements.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Why is an applicant or potential applicant to the reward money supposed to secure the financing of that money? Please tell me, Mr. Gerdes. Has there ever been a challenge in the world where it is up the applicant and not to the challenger to secure financing of the reward money? I don’t think so. So here’s what you will do now, as you opened your big mouth so wide: In your upcoming update of the NAFCASH challenge, you will state that under the conditions that the current supporters can offer, a winning applicant must run after x number of persons for the part of the reward amount that each of these persons has committed two, meaning that if there are, say, 20 supporters with a commitment of 5,000 dollars each, he may have to call upon and possibly suit 20 different people at probably 20 different places throughout the US in order to collect his reward. Then, my dear Gerdes, you will state that the only way of solving this problem and make sure that a winning applicant has prompt and easy access to the reward money is the financing of the entire reward amount by "one filthy rich greasy jew", and you will challenge such "filthy rich greasy jew" or "the worldwide jewish community" to finance the reward amount. So what you will be doing is beg those "filthy rich greasy" Jews to put up the money required for supporting the challenge that you set up, in such a way as to grant a winning applicant prompt and easy access to the reward money and thus make the challenge a fair challenge. This is your job as the organizer of the NAFCASH challenge, Mr. Gerdes. You will either do your job or humbly admit that you are too much a coward to do your job. Get cracking, Gerdes. Quote:
Quote:
The choice is yours, Mr. Gerdes. Quote:
Quote:
And just to make it clear once more, I intend to publish proof meeting the requirements in ARCHAEOLOGY or SKEPTIC magazine and submit such proof to NAFCASH as soon as I have it in my hands, independently of what my chances are of ever actually seeing any reward money. If I meet the challenge requirements but cannot obtain payment from Gerdes’ characterless butt-buddies, that’s fine. If I can obtain payment, that’s even better. Quote:
|
||||||||
July 21st, 2008 | #760 | ||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
||
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|