Anders Breivik: Not a Hero

[The Bobster]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...t+Science+News)

Minority Rules: Scientists Discover Tipping Point for the Spread of Ideas

ScienceDaily (July 26, 2011) — Scientists at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have found that when just 10 percent of the population holds an unshakable belief, their belief will always be adopted by the majority of the society. The scientists, who are members of the Social Cognitive Networks Academic Research Center (SCNARC) at Rensselaer, used computational and analytical methods to discover the tipping point where a minority belief becomes the majority opinion. The finding has implications for the study and influence of societal interactions ranging from the spread of innovations to the movement of political ideals.

"When the number of committed opinion holders is below 10 percent, there is no visible progress in the spread of ideas. It would literally take the amount of time comparable to the age of the universe for this size group to reach the majority," said SCNARC Director Boleslaw Szymanski, the Claire and Roland Schmitt Distinguished Professor at Rensselaer. "Once that number grows above 10 percent, the idea spreads like flame."

As an example, the ongoing events in Tunisia and Egypt appear to exhibit a similar process, according to Szymanski. "In those countries, dictators who were in power for decades were suddenly overthrown in just a few weeks."

The findings were published in the July 22, 2011, early online edition of the journal Physical Review E in an article titled "Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities."

An important aspect of the finding is that the percent of committed opinion holders required to shift majority opinion does not change significantly regardless of the type of network in which the opinion holders are working. In other words, the percentage of committed opinion holders required to influence a society remains at approximately 10 percent, regardless of how or where that opinion starts and spreads in the society.

To reach their conclusion, the scientists developed computer models of various types of social networks. One of the networks had each person connect to every other person in the network. The second model included certain individuals who were connected to a large number of people, making them opinion hubs or leaders. The final model gave every person in the model roughly the same number of connections. The initial state of each of the models was a sea of traditional-view holders. Each of these individuals held a view, but were also, importantly, open minded to other views.

Once the networks were built, the scientists then "sprinkled" in some true believers throughout each of the networks. These people were completely set in their views and unflappable in modifying those beliefs. As those true believers began to converse with those who held the traditional belief system, the tides gradually and then very abruptly began to shift.

"In general, people do not like to have an unpopular opinion and are always seeking to try locally to come to consensus. We set up this dynamic in each of our models," said SCNARC Research Associate and corresponding paper author Sameet Sreenivasan. To accomplish this, each of the individuals in the models "talked" to each other about their opinion. If the listener held the same opinions as the speaker, it reinforced the listener's belief. If the opinion was different, the listener considered it and moved on to talk to another person. If that person also held this new belief, the listener then adopted that belief.

"As agents of change start to convince more and more people, the situation begins to change," Sreenivasan said. "People begin to question their own views at first and then completely adopt the new view to spread it even further. If the true believers just influenced their neighbors, that wouldn't change anything within the larger system, as we saw with percentages less than 10."

The research has broad implications for understanding how opinion spreads. "There are clearly situations in which it helps to know how to efficiently spread some opinion or how to suppress a developing opinion," said Associate Professor of Physics and co-author of the paper Gyorgy Korniss. "Some examples might be the need to quickly convince a town to move before a hurricane or spread new information on the prevention of disease in a rural village."

The researchers are now looking for partners within the social sciences and other fields to compare their computational models to historical examples. They are also looking to study how the percentage might change when input into a model where the society is polarized. Instead of simply holding one traditional view, the society would instead hold two opposing viewpoints. An example of this polarization would be Democrat versus Republican.

[Fred O'Malley]

Bob, if that is true, then why are WNs so fucking dense when it comes to the Tea party?

They are shaking their fists in the face of the jewish neo-cons and communist liberals alike.

They are against open borders, the rape of our finances, the destruction of our freedoms, and a myriad of other positions we claim to hold. Yet, they let these jewish hasbara punks & bitches come onto WN sites and condemn them.

The way I see it, and I'm familiar with all the bullshit lies, the Tea Party is the only viable chance the white race has at this time.

Fuck it man, I'm done trying to save a bunch of assholes too fucking stupid to see what's right in front of them.

SHOW ME THE FUCKING NIGGERS OR MEXICANS

Rally Gallery http://www.sacbee.com/2010/09/12/302...y-rallies.html

[Fred O'Malley]

[Fred O'Malley]

In this country, you can't win a goddamn thing by dropping out, show that you have a white man's spine.

[Fred O'Malley]

[Fred O'Malley]

[Fred O'Malley]

On a final note, fuck you lemming motherfuckers!

[Ravening Wolf]

Originally Posted by ernst blofeld

I don't have a clue about the legal system in Norway but if Breivik is allowed to speak in his own defense at his trial he could change a lot of minds, provided he gives a tour de force argument.
I wouldn't be surprised if some accident befalls him in prison before he is given the chance.
The powers that be know he is highly intelligent and articulate and may see he doesn't get a trial at all.

I think he has already done that with his manifesto. I just came across the following interesting article, mostly for the quoting of key portions of Anders Behring Breivik's manifesto. He was, it seems, trying to unite all cultural Europeans to fight for their survival, including: atheists, agnostics, and Christians. After reading the following article, see if you don't think, as I now do, that Breivik was more of a National Socialist than he was willing to admit.

MSM Ignores How Oslo Shooter’s Own Manifesto Completely Destroys “Christian Conservative” Label

On Christianity, true religion, and morality

The Judeo-Christian religions played an important and influential role in building the once mighty West but we also discovered that these religions contained a serious flaw that has sewed the seeds of the suicidal demise of the indigenous peoples of Western Europe and our cultures. This flaw was identified by the brilliant German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche who described it as “an inversion of morality” whereby the weak, the poor, the meek, the oppressed and the wretched are virtuous and blessed by God whereas the strong, the wealthy, the noble and the powerful are the immoral and damned by the vengeful almighty Yahweh for eternity. (p. 391)

Should any person have the temerity to criticise any one of these “victim” groups, they will be viciously smeared and deemed guilty of numerous hate-crimes, the new heresy of the Liberal-Multicultural religion. The plain fact that this situation is destroying the west because it flies in the face of Mother nature – a catastrophic mistake only the native Europeans are committing – matters not a jot to these new pious inquisitors. (p. 391)

I have been storing three bottles of Château Kirwan 1979 (French red wine) which I purchased at an auction 10 years ago with the intention of enjoying them at a very special occasion. Considering the fact that my martyrdom operation draws ever closer I decided to bring one to enjoy with my extended family…

It was an absolutely exquisite experience that will not be forgotten. My thought was to save the last flask for my last martyrdom celebration and enjoy it with the two high class model whores I intend to rent prior to the mission. My interpretation of being a “Perfect Knight” does not and should not include celibacy, although some of my KT peers might disagree with me on this point.

I believe that in order to strengthen the resolve, morale and motivation prior to a martyrdom operation, the Justiciar Knight should be encouraged to embrace and take advantage of a significant reward system designed to increase focus and remove any last doubts. A pragmatic approach, which involves acknowledging the primal aspects of man for the purpose of preparing him for a martyrdom operation, should always take precedence over misguided piety, which only increases the chance of jeopardizing the execution of the operation. And I believe the majority of war strategy analysts will agree with me on this. (p. 1434)

Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers -already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity! -then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so. [quoting Hitler's Table Talk, by Adolf Hitler] (p. 231)

Today, [Christendom's] pastors are the most fervent pleaders for the rights of Islam. Muslims in Europe are for them a substitute for the disappearing parish members. Separate Christian institutions, whose reason of existence is being questioned, find a new legitimacy in the fact that Islam in its turn is also opening separate schools, charities and even political parties. Islam has become a sister religion regularly praised as a religion of peace. (p. 48)

In the U.S., Christian fundamentalists and Islamic organisations are increasingly creating common platforms to speak out
against trends of moral decay (abortion, pornography, etc.). Some of these phenomena of traditionalist alliance-building are quite respectable, but they are nevertheless conducive to Islam negationism.(p. 49)

I’m not going to pretend I’m a very religious person as that would be a lie. (p. 1344)

Myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God. We do however believe in Christianity as a cultural, social, identity and moral platform. This makes us Christian. (p. 1307, 3.139)

If you want to fight for the cross and die under the “cross of the martyrs” it’s required that you are a practising Christian, a Christian agnostic or a Christian atheist (cultural Christian). The cultural factors are more important than your personal relationship with God, Jesus or the holy spirit. Even Odinists can fight with us or by our side as brothers in this fight as long as they accept the founding principles of PCCTS, Knights Templar and agree to fight under the cross of the martyrs. The essence of our struggle is to defeat the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe before the we are completely demographically overwhelmed by Muslims. I have studied Norse Mythology and have a lot of respect for the Odinist traditions. I consider myself to be a Christian, but Odinism is still and will always be an important part of my culture and identity. (p. 1360)

As a cultural Christian, I believe Christendom is essential for cultural reasons. After all, Christianity is the ONLY cultural platform that can unite all Europeans, which will be needed in the coming period during the third expulsion of the Muslims. (p. 361)

The European cultural heritage, our norms (moral codes and social structures included), our traditions and our modern political systems are based on Christianity – Protestantism, Catholicism, Orthodox Christianity and the legacy of the European enlightenment (reason is the primary source and legitimacy for authority).

It is not required that you have a personal relationship with God or Jesus in order to fight for our Christian cultural heritage and the European way. In many ways, our modern societies and European secularism is a result of European Christendom and the enlightenment. It is therefore essential to understand the difference between a “Christian fundamentalist theocracy” (everything we do not want) and a secular European society based on our Christian cultural heritage (what we do want). (p. 361)

The PCCTS, Knights Templar [the name of his anti-Muslim school of thought) is therefore not a religious organisation but rather a Christian “culturalist” military order. (p. 361) [my emphasis]

There we have it. He clearly frames his opposition to “Marxism” in terms of “cultural Marxism”– that is, the equal validity of all ethnic and cultural groups’ values and practices– certainly not economic Marxism, which he eagerly espouses. In the same way, his use of “Christian” is in a purely cultural, not a religious sense. One’s relationship to Jesus, the Christ, is not a factor in his version of Christianity...

Breivik doesn't want a Christian theocracy, but, he does want to use cultural Christianity to unite Europe to defend itself from cultural Marxists/multiculturalists (fathered by the Jews). That is, essentially what Hitler was attempting to do, defend Germany and Europe from the Jew. Of course, Hitler's National Socialism used Christians, atheists, Odinists, agnostics, Muslims, and even some Jews, to fight the rest of the world, especially the scheming, eternal, international Jew! Also, Breivik is hardly an economic Marxist; he is more of a middle path National Socialist, believing in neither communism nor capitalism.

Source: http://bigjournalism.com/edulis/2011...rvative-label/

[Rounder]

Good posting, R. Wolf. Lots of deep insights. Thanks.

[Fred O'Malley]

I agree, Ravening Wolf's post is a great piece of information.

Likewise, I would like to point out to Alex in particular, that in the South, religion is a social-cultural construct, not the mindless multiculti bible-thumping bullshit which you believe it is. While most Southern Baptists and evangelicals claim a "personal" experience with God/Jesus, in 99% of the cases it is merely to gain a higher rung on the social ladder which causes them to make such a claim.

Church is better defined down here as a social club than a mystic cesspool of brain-dead freaks. They really do leave it all behind after church. Mainly they keep going to teach their kids how to behave within Southern society, right from wrong. They use it this way because just like their northern counterparts, they lack the family leadership skills to define right & wrong without the support of an outside higher power.

True, that some crap uplifting universality also bleeds through. However, they can undo that part at home, when they encounter black assholes in public and say under their breath, "goddamned nigger bastards." The kids pick that lesson up very well.

[Rounder]

Originally Posted by Fred O'Malley

I agree, Ravening Wolf's post is a great piece of information.

Likewise, I would like to point out to Alex in particular, that in the South, religion is a social-cultural construct, not the mindless multiculti bible-thumping bullshit which you believe it is. While most Southern Baptists and evangelicals claim a "personal" experience with God/Jesus, in 99% of the cases it is merely to gain a higher rung on the social ladder which causes them to make such a claim.

Church is better defined down here as a social club than a mystic cesspool of brain-dead freaks. They really do leave it all behind after church. Mainly they keep going to teach their kids how to behave within Southern society, right from wrong. They use it this way because just like their northern counterparts, they lack the family leadership skills to define right & wrong without the support of an outside higher power.

True, that some crap uplifting universality also bleeds through. However, they can undo that part at home, when they encounter black assholes in public and say under their breath, "goddamned nigger bastards." The kids pick that lesson up very well.

Don't take Alex's Southron bashing too personally, Fred. He's only echoing my own strategy of using SHAME as a poking stick to get southern men to get up off their knees and become part of the solution.

Shame can work, where everything else fails. We just need to use the "Shame Stick" more often and more extensively. And against all white men, everywhere. But most especially, perhaps, against those damn yankees.

Shame all GD, fat, drugged, yellow, apathetic, defeatist, weaklings so their women will cross their legs and keep them crossed until their mates start acting like men.

Cowardice has become the white man's survival strategy. And christianity, his crutch.

[Baldy]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

...
To use tactical violence with impunity mostly requires keeping your mouth shut. Watch "First 48." Very few niggers, even, could be convicted if they stopped talking. The real danger of the age to the political assassin is ubiquitous tracking devices - video cameras, computers in everything, GPS devices, etc.

Sorry to cut up a brilliant post, but dang, youse guys talk more in one post than I do all fucking year.

The new technology being used to control the masses will force reactionaries to evolve. For example, hard hitting actions would have to be planned and executed in a very short time frame. The longer the planning, the higher the risk of discovery...nothing new there, except the time frame is far shorter.

I wonder if the average American realizes how little freedom he has? Look at all the freedom fighters around the world doing their things reasonably successfully. I cannot imagine that happening here with our Fucking Big Idiots watching every bowel movement of every citizen.

[The Bobster]

Originally Posted by Fred O'Malley

Bob, if that is true, then why are WNs so fucking dense when it comes to the Tea party?

They are shaking their fists in the face of the jewish neo-cons and communist liberals alike.

They are against open borders, the rape of our finances, the destruction of our freedoms, and a myriad of other positions we claim to hold. Yet, they let these jewish hasbara punks & bitches come onto WN sites and condemn them.

The way I see it, and I'm familiar with all the bullshit lies, the Tea Party is the only viable chance the white race has at this time.

Fuck it man, I'm done trying to save a bunch of assholes too fucking stupid to see what's right in front of them.

Ah, but these movements take time. The Tea Party members I've met are very jew-wise, but they need something big to finally push them into serious action. Unfortunately, too many of them fear that big jew will shit on them if their actions are too overt.

[Ravening Wolf]

Originally Posted by Starr

http://blogs.forward.com/forward-thi...#ixzz1Tif9ayMY

Those "wonderful" human beings, the Jews, on the Norway incident, in their own words:

392. We’re more unfortunate: Enough demagoguery! The Norwegians and Europe generally are super-anti-Semitic. So 100 people were killed there are 7 billion more people in the world. I don’t pity them they’re my enemies they hate Israel so they have it coming!!!
393. The whole world dances on Jewish blood.
Europe is the same Europe and even more anti-Semitic. The killer is right!!! Europe is defeated, Norwegians are becoming a minority.

Read more: http://blogs.forward.com/forward-thi...#ixzz1TmdowEe6

[Heather Blue]

If Breivik turns out to be a fag (they can be highly intelligent) who hates the Muslims because they are intolerant of homosexualty (Muslims tend to cut off the heads of homosexuals or do other drastic things) then regardless what he says it is not going to mean much. That would also explain why he is a Zionist - his way of showing his support for homosexual-promoting Jews. That was one of the things I found out before I got banned from that Jew owned forum - Gays love the Jews.

[William North]

Originally Posted by Leonard Rouse

I originally posted this in a thread I later realized to be in the UK forum. I didn't want it there, so I deleted it immediately after originally posting.

I'm very interested in comments. I want to read where and why my reasoning is considered wrong or incomplete. I want alternatives and additions.



Nice.

My interest in Breivik is similar to my interest in the Third Reich. I'm interested in learning from his successes and failures, where there is overlap with our situation. I'm not interested in making him out to be a hero or genius because he killed some adults that, frankly, deserved it. I'm not running from him, but neither am I running to him.

And that's a big part of my beef with Breivik and other similar stunts. There's nothing to run to.

It's not scary if it's a one-off. Anybody can be gotten to. That's not news.

It's not enough to kick somebody in the nuts today. You've got to be able to do it tomorrow, and the next day.

To get to the point where you can use tactical political violence with (relative) impunity, you must first have won the hearts and minds of some people. It doesn't have to be the entire populace--maybe 5%, maybe 10%--some threshold. Within that percentage, you are recognized as legitimate, despite the shit hurled against you by your opponent. You can't win hearts and minds by first blowing people away--even people who deserve it. You haven't at that point established any accepted opposition.

First you establish your core. It's unassailable. Then, perhaps, one could use political violence--to establish among the fence sitters that you do in fact mean business. But you can't do that until you can't be quashed, until your core is large enough to withstand the blowback. Surviving that, you expand the core with the influx of fence-sitters who are now believers. It's a feedback loop to your favor.

And Breivik's target. . .

How was that helpful?

Imagine the electorate. Cow-like. Obtuse. That's who votes. That's who you're winning over.

Now you go out and blow away a bunch of sitting ducks on an island.

What connection does Bjorg dipshit, out on his fjord, make of that? Nothing positive. "But they were the new cadre of destroyers!" Yes they were. "They deserved it!" Can't argue with you.

But the vast majority of the white public does not and will never understand that. It's intangible. It's too intellectual. The crowd doesn't get that, and never will.

Now, sink a ship of dusky invaders crossing the Skagerrak, and simultaneously blow away the immigration ministry where these "liberal" kids are working--even Bjorg can figure that out, and almost certainly applaud.

What I've just outlined is the easy part. It's fantasy football. The gameplan writes itself. Hell, we've got nature itself on our side. Once the ball begins to roll, it won't stop.

The hard part is building the core. You can't begin to think of anything serious on the macro scale before you've accomplished this. You must win hearts and minds. There's no equation (that I'm aware of). Maybe there will be after we're through. It's chaotic.

Stuff like a homeschool curriculum feeds into this. Not sexy. But part of it. Winning hearts and minds. Winning women. Winning children.

Local level. . .er. . "private business". . . feeds into this. Not glamorous. Street stuff. Dealing with people you hate/can't stand--of all races. Taking care of your shit. Building your local network. Establishing yourself.

We need professionals on our side. That doesn't mean they have some goofy flag hanging out. It just means. . .they're on our side. The right thinks you do this by kissing ass to the powerless. I think you do it by establishing camaraderie between conscious Whites, who don't imagine themselves to live in some ivory tower, like conservative losers, to be redundant.

How do you go about establishing that camaraderie? That's what needs to be worked on.

Questions like this can go on.

The first 5%: It's a meat grinder. It isn't pretty. For the vast majority who lead in this period, who play a role that will have been pivotal later on, there will be no glory, no accolades. That's just the way it is.

So I really don't wan't to read about Breivik being a hero or a genius. He isn't. Smart guy? Generally. . .apparently. He gets a big mark for having balls, that I grant.

But so what? What base has he built? Don't give me any braindead "starting a fire" crap. He wouldn't have had occasion to recognize (to his immense credit) the imminent danger posed to Norway by non-white immigration if his society were amenable to righting itself by the act he committed.

That's because a society poised to right itself in such a fashion would never have become so fucked in the first place.

Of course not. Of course not, Leonard.

Andres Breivik, was a nutcase killer, pro-zionist. And who knows, he may be working for the Mossad.

[Kennewickman]

Originally Posted by Heather Blue

If Breivik turns out to be a fag (they can be highly intelligent) who hates the Muslims because they are intolerant of homosexualty (Muslims tend to cut off the heads of homosexuals or do other drastic things) then regardless what he says it is not going to mean much. That would also explain why he is a Zionist - his way of showing his support for homosexual-promoting Jews. That was one of the things I found out before I got banned from that Jew owned forum - Gays love the Jews.

Breivik’s half baked Masonic triple speak is paying lip service to all who is looking for comfort. Christians, Zionists, White Nationalists will all find elements incorporated there to identify with. It sounds like the guy was trying to write a bible for all and to start a cult this way.

Therefore we really have to focus on the facts as words are meaningless in our world anymore.

No evidence of long-term relationships with the opposite sex has emerged in his life – to my knowledge - and at his age this is not normal for a man. He is telling us that he paid big money for two whores but those are only words.

It seems it is a verified fact now that: “Breivik traveled to the US for a complete facial reconstruction at age 21” see the VNN thread on this subject hidden in the steamy rainforest at: http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=130927

The above two clues strongly point toward a fagot hiding in the closet and you can be sure that if he is one there are a bunch of joo faggots in Oslo discussing him as their hero, very quietly and privately.

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by Heather Blue

If Breivik turns out to be a fag (they can be highly intelligent) who hates the Muslims because they are intolerant of homosexualty (Muslims tend to cut off the heads of homosexuals or do other drastic things) then regardless what he says it is not going to mean much. That would also explain why he is a Zionist - his way of showing his support for homosexual-promoting Jews. That was one of the things I found out before I got banned from that Jew owned forum - Gays love the Jews.

Gays love the catholic church too - check any seminary. You can even find a few queers in Nazism, because it's very, very butch.

Not all queers are effeminate. Some queers are hypermasculine.

Itz a weird, weird world. You gotta look all five ways or get run over.

[Roy Albrecht]

1) Without Spiritual Enlightenment, one is left to the mercy of Intellectualization..., a process inherently filled with doubt.
So in order to get rid of doubt, one must first go "...beyond the white light..." and understand that death is a fallacy and truth is intuitively knowable.

"...Lone Wolves..." can know truth by achieving Spiritual Enlightenment which in turn can best be achieved in the most arduous conditions imaginable...., often in complete deprivation and isolation..., should you have the balls to accept this mission.
Yet..., through "lone-ness" we who have Achieved can act as ONE!

2) These days the Jews have to worry about two fronts;
(a) The Sheite Islamics, who speak openly about the Satanic Jews. Sunnis and Ishmaelis are Semitic and suck Jewish cock whenever they get the chance just like White Freemasons and other traitorous Aristocratsic Whites.
(b) The Large frontal lobed WHITES who speak openly about or have the ability to comprehend the threat of the Satanic/Perverse/Genetically-deformed etc... Jew.

3) Brevik, an openly confessed Zionist, killed mostly Whites, even though there were a few mixed breeds amongst them and, he said he did it to stop the influx of Islamics/N. Africans, etc..., the bottom line is mostly Whites were killed.
In the Jew owned and controlled mass media however, his Zionist leanings were downplayed or omitted completely.
So in the eyes of the WHITE MASSES his act of CHILD mass murder became the act of a White, Racist, Male who killed White, Pro-Multi-Cult, Peace-loving, CHILDREN!
In the eyes of the Islamic Masses, Brevik's act of the Mass-Murder of mostly WHITE CHILDREN became the act of a WHITE, RACIST, ISLAMIC HATING, NATIONALIST.

RESULT: ISLAMIC HATRED FOR WHITE NATIONALISTS GROWS and "WHITE-PSYCOPATHS-BY-JEWISH-INDUCTION" dislike of White Nationalists grows.

NOW HERE IS WHAT A REAL WHITE NATIONALIST BENT ON KILLING PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE DONE..., IF HE REALLY WAS DEAD SET ON KILLING SOMEONE...;

1) PLANNED A CONSECUTIVE TARGETING OF INFLUENTIAL JEWISH LEADERS. (i.e. Jewish moguls, Jewish tactical planners [AKA RELIGIOUS LEADERS, JUDGES, POLITICIANS, ETC...] ). Because to kill JUST ONE ZIONIST KING-PIN IS THE EQUIVALENT TO KILLING HUNDREDS OF THEIR HANGERS ON..., WIPING OUT JUST ONE FAMILY LINE OF RICH JEWSIH KILLERS IS THE EQIVALENT TO KILLING HUNDREDS IF NOT THOUSANDS OF HANGERS ON.

2) LOCATED AND FIRE BOMED JEWISH INSTITUTIONS AND FREEMASONIC LODGES WHEN THEY WERE EMPTY SO THEY COULD COMPLETELY BURN TO THE GROUND BEFORE THE PUBLIC SAFETY APPARATUS COULD BRING THEM UNDER CONTROL.

____________________________________________________________

To kill "Psychotic-by-Jewish-Induction-Whites" is counter productive for several reasons:

1) Their (psychotic White's) psychosis is completely curable given the chance to be re-educated in a labour camps on a nutritionally superior, low calorie diets with correct physical training and proper physical beatings administered in correct doses at appropriate moments.

2) Even if Brevik killed 1000's of these "by-Jewish-Proxy" induced Psychotic Whites, there are literally 100's of thousands of them waiting in the wings to take their place.
AND not one single thing has been done to eliminate the mechanism that brings them into being...,
in fact, the psychosis generating mechanism has been strengthened, if anything, by the malignant Kike's ability to wield/manipulate Brevik-like-acts into increases in the amount of sympathy for their genocidal plans.

[quorthon]

Yes,he should've bombed the nearest Synagogue instead.