Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > Political Thought
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

View Poll Results: Porn As Free Speech: Do You Agree?
Yes 3 18.75%
No 13 81.25%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old March 6th, 2009 #1
Tommy Vercetti
Junior Member
 
Tommy Vercetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
Default Porn As Free Speech: Do You Agree?

The US Supreme Court, in its interpretation of the Freemason Constitution of the United States, has ruled consistently in favour of "porn as free speech". It hasn't always been put this simply and transparently, of course, but that's what it amounts to.

As the Internet age unfolded, "porn as free speech" led to the creation of a high-revenue, ubiquitous, ever-expanding industry.

One of the more recent cases is from 2004 where the Supreme Court considered a law that would fine websites for making explicit material available to kids. The result of this for the industry would be that new restrictive regitration and identification procedures would be required. The law was deemed unconstitutional. I am not fully au fait with the specifics of the case, but this was perhaps related to the .xxx domain, which was predictably abandoned also.

Now I see see porn, especially mass porn, as Judaic and deterimental to our people - not simply by virtue of the fact that most porn businesses are run by Jews. As Alex Linder has argued often, Jews prefer a loose sexual regime - the masses are easier to control in this regime. They are distracted from the machinations of the Jew. It also leads to a hypersexualisation of culture where freedom becomes defined in simply sexual terms.

To that end, I disagree with the Supreme Court's sequentially pro-mass porn decisions. What do you think?
 
Old March 6th, 2009 #2
Summer
WN Mother
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,469
Default

Isn't it already? How much further can it get, seriously? Porn stars doing it in the middle of the streets? It is almost there. FFS, you can't even walk into any store here without the flipping lesbian/interracial bs being thrown in your face right when you walk in the door. Porn is not in any way hidden here. In some stupid british newspaper on the second page every week, or whenever it is published, is some porn whore who is naked. And people buy this shit. At least it is somewhat hidden in America. As for the internet, are you kidding. Go to any website and there's some ad for porn, or soft core porn or whatever you call it. Like *meet singles* bs with some broad half pulling her shirt off. Shouldn't it be *meet whores.*

This topic pisses me off too much so I am stopping here. Fuck porn, fuck jews, fuck white people who condone this crap, fuck anyone wasting their time and money on it. Twits. It is ruining our kids, our women and our men. (Sorry for the language, sometimes we need to vent.)
__________________
jews do NOT deserve to have the letter 'j' capitalized, not even if it is the first word of a sentence.
 
Old March 6th, 2009 #3
Tommy Vercetti
Junior Member
 
Tommy Vercetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
Default

It's a serious issue, and one worth venting about.

Quote:
Isn't it already? How much further can it get, seriously? Porn stars doing it in the middle of the streets? It is almost there. As for the internet, are you kidding. Go to any website and there's some ad for porn, or soft core porn or whatever you call it.
That's my whole point: we already have a "porn as free speech" culture; and that is to a large degree due to US Supreme Court decisions.

My question is, do we side with the Supreme Court? Do we agree with the status quo of "porn as free speech"?

Quote:
In some stupid british newspaper on the second page every week, or whenever it is published, is some porn whore who is naked. And people buy this shit.
You're thinking of The Sun, which is owned by kike Rupert Murdoch.
 
Old March 7th, 2009 #4
Bassanio
Hath not a Goy eyes?
 
Bassanio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Venice
Posts: 4,287
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
That's my whole point: we already have a "porn as free speech" culture; and that is to a large degree due to US Supreme Court decisions.
This has little to do with the Supreme Court and everything to do with the Jew. If porn were somehow beneficial to the goyim, then you can rest assured that the Jew would have the Supreme Court interpret the Kwanstitution differently.


Porn is synonymous with isolation, depravation, obsession, enfeeblement and masturbation. Porn is for psychologically sterilized pussies. Real men fuck real women.

The day you start fapping more than fucking, is the day you ought to put a gun to your head.
__________________
The Goy cries out in ecstasy as the Jew strikes him.
 
Old March 7th, 2009 #5
Mike Jahn
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,526
Blog Entries: 3
Lightbulb

Of course porn serves the Jews but you have to consider that women don't date just anybody so a lot of guys watch porn because they can't have sex as much as they want to. For myself I never understood how the porn fan doesn't get bored with it? I mean how is one movie different from the next?

But until you fix everything else that is wrong in society to get rid of porn would cause an increase in the amount of rapes..even the number of rapist White men would increase if porn was no longer available.
 
Old March 8th, 2009 #6
Tommy Vercetti
Junior Member
 
Tommy Vercetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Quote:
But until you fix everything else that is wrong in society to get rid of porn would cause an increase in the amount of rapes..even the number of rapist White men would increase if porn was no longer available.
This is true, however it's probably more of an absolute.

Contrary to the Judeo-Feminist lie that porn is an incentive to rape; a rise porn availability consistently coincides with a reduction in rape figures.
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96
 
Old March 8th, 2009 #7
Gott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jahn View Post
Of course porn serves the Jews but you have to consider that women don't date just anybody so a lot of guys watch porn because they can't have sex as much as they want to. For myself I never understood how the porn fan doesn't get bored with it? I mean how is one movie different from the next?

But until you fix everything else that is wrong in society to get rid of porn would cause an increase in the amount of rapes..even the number of rapist White men would increase if porn was no longer available.
Porn is fantasy, rather than reality. Bad. Yes for free speech, of no interest to men grounded in the real world. Are there any anymore (including me)?
 
Old March 8th, 2009 #8
fdtwainth
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Blog Entries: 397
Default

No, if the screening of sexual acts involved paying money to participants in any form. It is simply a form of prostitution.

In contrast, if the screening of porn involved no money paid to participants, and involved no unnatural intercourse, yes it is free speech.
 
Old March 8th, 2009 #9
Tommy Vercetti
Junior Member
 
Tommy Vercetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
Default

I think the heart of the issue with porn/prostitution is that it's a resurrection of the pagan sacred whore.

Is the money issue really fundamental here?

This is an issue of culture, an issue of moral values.

Although monetary exchange is in many ways inseparable from porn/prostitution, the fundamental issue is not of money.

Sacred Prostitutes | Google Search

Quote:
Mention the Sacred Whore to most people and you'll get raised eyebrows or disgusted grimaces. Many of us believe that prostitution is all about money for street hookers, fame for Hollywood starlets, or security for suburban housewifes. Prophetic texts, rituals, and icons are called sacred, even particular mountains or rivers are considered sacred, but whores?

Sexually empowered women are called bitches, dykes, ball-busters, etc., by both sexes. Sexually independent women, once respected as sacred vessels of the Goddess, are degraded as evil temptresses, obstacles between man and a sexless heaven. One exception is the paradise of Islam, although it is a men-only club stocked full with re-virginating nymphs; Islamic women are said to be soul-less.

The term "sacred whore" is not oxymoronic. If we explore the etymology of the words "whore" or "harlot," we find that the split between "priestess" and "prostitute" is a relatively recent one. In her book When God Was A Woman, Merlin Stone informs us that the Hebrew word zonah means both prostitute and prophetess.

The separation into priestess and prostitute, or sacred and profane polarities, occurred for western civilization when the early fathers of Christianity claimed power by abolishing goddess worship and other nature-based pagan religions. In actuality the bipartite woman, both whore and madonna, was a construct of the early Papal Councils around 600 AD.
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96
 
Old March 16th, 2009 #10
Tommy Vercetti
Junior Member
 
Tommy Vercetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
jewsign

The porn biz sure do admire the Freemason Founders. Today they are among the most vocal and influential "free speech" lobbyists.



Hate speech laws will be passed but porn will still be available without restriction. When are those on the right going to abandon the hypocritical "rights" paradigm? When are those on the right going to realise that the Freemason Constitution is the cause of - not solution to - many of our problems?

Looking for "free speech" from the Freemason Constitution and Freemason Supreme Court is a complete waste of time. Abandon compromised systems and seek remedy elsewhere.

Link

Quote:
The Constitution is a fraud on the people and should be abandoned. It has not protected us from civil or foreign wars, from inflation and federal corruption. It is in fact the engine of all these crimes, authorizing such racketeering as the private Federal Reserve Corporation and its collection agency, the IRS. The Bill of Rights was our great champion for many years but it, too, has collapsed because it is in conflict with the first Seven Articles of the US Constitution. The Supreme Court protects the Constitution but it does not protect the Bill of Rights.

The First Amendment has become a license for our natural enemies to corrupt our children and ourselves with the most vile pornography, which has nothing to do with the right to criticize the government.

The Second Amendment has just been declared null and void with a recent USSC decision, which paves the way for confiscation and martial law.

The Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments have been ripped up by the Patriot Act and the US Army's atrocities at Camp X-ray and other places.
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96
 
Old March 16th, 2009 #11
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

The old method of communities determining what is obscenity before the 1970s was fine.

The new method is just the kikes opening up local markets to their mass market porn distro.
 
Old March 16th, 2009 #12
Erik Fitzgerald
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,127
Blog Entries: 3
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy Vercetti View Post
The porn biz sure do admire the Freemason Founders. Today they are among the most vocal and influential "free speech" lobbyists.

John "Buttman" Stagliano the HIV positive porn director. He's a libertarian, which means he likes limited government so that he can pursue all means and forms of deviance. The kind of freaks that come out of the woodwork aren't the types that the Founding Fathers would have really understood. Even though they were indeed free masons, they still never fathomed the end of their freedom designs for this country.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stagliano
 
Old March 16th, 2009 #13
diabloblanco92
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,278
Default

As long as it does not involve anything interracial, kiddie porn, incest, etc it should nor be the states business. Telling people what ro read, think write or say promotes effeminacy, weakness, submisivness and idiocy.Men who are too weak to decide these things on their own are too weak ro fight kill and die for their race

But if it involves the former things the fucks should be beheaded

Personally though even "normal" porn is boring and an inadquate substitute for the real thing
__________________
"You can check out any time you want, but you can never leave"
 
Old March 17th, 2009 #14
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diabloblanco92 View Post
As long as it does not involve anything interracial, kiddie porn, incest, etc it should nor be the states business. Telling people what ro read, think write or say promotes effeminacy, weakness, submisivness and idiocy.Men who are too weak to decide these things on their own are too weak ro fight kill and die for their race
......
Ah fuck here we go with some limperterian bullshit.

Come on. Porn mainlined via the internet is what promotes submissiveness and weakness. Its also a cash cow for the Jewish porn producer and peddler, who is usually the most loathsome jewish type from what I can tell. Cutting this trade down would be cutting major money out of the pockets of Jews.

http://www.forbes.com/2001/05/25/0524porn.html

How big? Some say 10 - 14 BILLION IN ANNUAL SALES. Forbes says ONLY 3.9 billion Not a small number.

As for any white guys doing all the macho crap lets get realistic. Years of macho talk have got WN nowhere.

Last edited by Antiochus Epiphanes; March 17th, 2009 at 09:40 AM.
 
Old March 17th, 2009 #15
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy Vercetti View Post
I think the heart of the issue with porn/prostitution is that it's a resurrection of the pagan sacred whore.
Is the money issue really fundamental here?
This is an issue of culture, an issue of moral values.
Although monetary exchange is in many ways inseparable from porn/prostitution, the fundamental issue is not of money.
Better to have limited legalization of prostitution in regulated and sanitary brothels than the hardcore-porn-heroin mainlined via the internet into every PC. Disgusting obscenity a few clicks away from every adolescent who knows how to use the internet, for starters. Not a problem?

If you want to really read about pagan sex practices, read Julius Evola's Metaphysics of Sex.

You know what gets me? We went in seventy years from a puritannical mindset that censored books like DH Lawrence's Chatterly's Lover to a state which tolerates mass distribution of bestiality over the internet. Unfuckingbelievable. Talk about over-reaction.
 
Old March 17th, 2009 #16
Tommy Vercetti
Junior Member
 
Tommy Vercetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Quote:
Better to have limited legalization of prostitution in regulated and sanitary brothels than the hardcore-porn-heroin mainlined via the internet into every PC.
I would argue what is the difference between the brothel prostitute and the Internet porn prostitute.

Also, if you have legalised prostitution it's going to be hard to justify a ban on porn.

Quote:
You know what gets me? We went in seventy years from a puritannical mindset that censored books like DH Lawrence's Chatterly's Lover to a state which tolerates mass distribution of bestiality over the internet. Unfuckingbelievable. Talk about over-reaction.
I don't think this is a "reaction" to Puritanism as a movement in and of itself.

It's like feminists blaming "male chauvinists" to justify their existence. Eh, not really. It's an instinct in itself.
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96
 
Old March 17th, 2009 #17
Pixi
resident psycho
 
Pixi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy Vercetti View Post
Good points AE, but I would argue what is the difference between the brothel prostitute and the Internet porn prostitute?
When you visit a brothel you are fucking a woman. When you jerk off to porn you are only fucking your hand.
 
Old March 17th, 2009 #18
Tommy Vercetti
Junior Member
 
Tommy Vercetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pixi View Post
When you visit a brothel you are fucking a woman. When you jerk off to porn you are only fucking your hand.
A prostitute offers services exclusively on the basis of sex appeal. Their services are bought exclusively on the basis of providing sexual gratification.

Prostitution and porn follow the same principle.
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96
 
Old March 17th, 2009 #19
Tommy Vercetti
Junior Member
 
Tommy Vercetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
Default

I don't really get the whole bashing the Puritans meme.

The sexual communist order that we have today is alternative.

Does anyone else not see the contradiction in deriding "Puritan America" (which is a misnomer anyway - the US and its Constitution were established by Freemasons) while simultaneously denouncing mass porn, etc.

If one really is anti-Puritan, or anything resembling Puritanism, they will gladly embrace the sexual communist order.
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96
 
Old March 17th, 2009 #20
Steve Lillywhite
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The U.S. Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism
Posts: 1,434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy Vercetti View Post
"porn as free speech"
If fucking is part of free speech I should be able to get my dick
sucked at every newsstand in the country!

The newsrooms would be indistinguishable from whorehouses.


_
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.
Page generated in 1.79288 seconds.