|
|
View Poll Results: Porn As Free Speech: Do You Agree? | |||
Yes | 3 | 18.75% | |
No | 13 | 81.25% | |
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
March 6th, 2009 | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
|
Porn As Free Speech: Do You Agree?
The US Supreme Court, in its interpretation of the Freemason Constitution of the United States, has ruled consistently in favour of "porn as free speech". It hasn't always been put this simply and transparently, of course, but that's what it amounts to.
As the Internet age unfolded, "porn as free speech" led to the creation of a high-revenue, ubiquitous, ever-expanding industry. One of the more recent cases is from 2004 where the Supreme Court considered a law that would fine websites for making explicit material available to kids. The result of this for the industry would be that new restrictive regitration and identification procedures would be required. The law was deemed unconstitutional. I am not fully au fait with the specifics of the case, but this was perhaps related to the .xxx domain, which was predictably abandoned also. Now I see see porn, especially mass porn, as Judaic and deterimental to our people - not simply by virtue of the fact that most porn businesses are run by Jews. As Alex Linder has argued often, Jews prefer a loose sexual regime - the masses are easier to control in this regime. They are distracted from the machinations of the Jew. It also leads to a hypersexualisation of culture where freedom becomes defined in simply sexual terms. To that end, I disagree with the Supreme Court's sequentially pro-mass porn decisions. What do you think? |
March 6th, 2009 | #2 |
WN Mother
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,469
|
Isn't it already? How much further can it get, seriously? Porn stars doing it in the middle of the streets? It is almost there. FFS, you can't even walk into any store here without the flipping lesbian/interracial bs being thrown in your face right when you walk in the door. Porn is not in any way hidden here. In some stupid british newspaper on the second page every week, or whenever it is published, is some porn whore who is naked. And people buy this shit. At least it is somewhat hidden in America. As for the internet, are you kidding. Go to any website and there's some ad for porn, or soft core porn or whatever you call it. Like *meet singles* bs with some broad half pulling her shirt off. Shouldn't it be *meet whores.*
This topic pisses me off too much so I am stopping here. Fuck porn, fuck jews, fuck white people who condone this crap, fuck anyone wasting their time and money on it. Twits. It is ruining our kids, our women and our men. (Sorry for the language, sometimes we need to vent.)
__________________
jews do NOT deserve to have the letter 'j' capitalized, not even if it is the first word of a sentence. |
March 6th, 2009 | #3 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
|
It's a serious issue, and one worth venting about.
Quote:
My question is, do we side with the Supreme Court? Do we agree with the status quo of "porn as free speech"? Quote:
|
||
March 7th, 2009 | #4 | |
Hath not a Goy eyes?
|
Quote:
Porn is synonymous with isolation, depravation, obsession, enfeeblement and masturbation. Porn is for psychologically sterilized pussies. Real men fuck real women. The day you start fapping more than fucking, is the day you ought to put a gun to your head.
__________________
The Goy cries out in ecstasy as the Jew strikes him. |
|
March 7th, 2009 | #5 |
Banned
|
Of course porn serves the Jews but you have to consider that women don't date just anybody so a lot of guys watch porn because they can't have sex as much as they want to. For myself I never understood how the porn fan doesn't get bored with it? I mean how is one movie different from the next?
But until you fix everything else that is wrong in society to get rid of porn would cause an increase in the amount of rapes..even the number of rapist White men would increase if porn was no longer available. |
March 8th, 2009 | #6 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
|
Quote:
Contrary to the Judeo-Feminist lie that porn is an incentive to rape; a rise porn availability consistently coincides with a reduction in rape figures.
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96 |
|
March 8th, 2009 | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
|
|
March 8th, 2009 | #8 |
Guest
|
No, if the screening of sexual acts involved paying money to participants in any form. It is simply a form of prostitution.
In contrast, if the screening of porn involved no money paid to participants, and involved no unnatural intercourse, yes it is free speech. |
March 8th, 2009 | #9 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
|
I think the heart of the issue with porn/prostitution is that it's a resurrection of the pagan sacred whore.
Is the money issue really fundamental here? This is an issue of culture, an issue of moral values. Although monetary exchange is in many ways inseparable from porn/prostitution, the fundamental issue is not of money. Sacred Prostitutes | Google Search Quote:
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96 |
|
March 16th, 2009 | #10 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
|
The porn biz sure do admire the Freemason Founders. Today they are among the most vocal and influential "free speech" lobbyists.
Hate speech laws will be passed but porn will still be available without restriction. When are those on the right going to abandon the hypocritical "rights" paradigm? When are those on the right going to realise that the Freemason Constitution is the cause of - not solution to - many of our problems? Looking for "free speech" from the Freemason Constitution and Freemason Supreme Court is a complete waste of time. Abandon compromised systems and seek remedy elsewhere. Link Quote:
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96 |
|
March 16th, 2009 | #11 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
The old method of communities determining what is obscenity before the 1970s was fine.
The new method is just the kikes opening up local markets to their mass market porn distro. |
March 16th, 2009 | #12 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stagliano |
|
March 16th, 2009 | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,278
|
As long as it does not involve anything interracial, kiddie porn, incest, etc it should nor be the states business. Telling people what ro read, think write or say promotes effeminacy, weakness, submisivness and idiocy.Men who are too weak to decide these things on their own are too weak ro fight kill and die for their race
But if it involves the former things the fucks should be beheaded Personally though even "normal" porn is boring and an inadquate substitute for the real thing
__________________
"You can check out any time you want, but you can never leave" |
March 17th, 2009 | #14 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
Come on. Porn mainlined via the internet is what promotes submissiveness and weakness. Its also a cash cow for the Jewish porn producer and peddler, who is usually the most loathsome jewish type from what I can tell. Cutting this trade down would be cutting major money out of the pockets of Jews. http://www.forbes.com/2001/05/25/0524porn.html How big? Some say 10 - 14 BILLION IN ANNUAL SALES. Forbes says ONLY 3.9 billion Not a small number. As for any white guys doing all the macho crap lets get realistic. Years of macho talk have got WN nowhere. Last edited by Antiochus Epiphanes; March 17th, 2009 at 09:40 AM. |
|
March 17th, 2009 | #15 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
If you want to really read about pagan sex practices, read Julius Evola's Metaphysics of Sex. You know what gets me? We went in seventy years from a puritannical mindset that censored books like DH Lawrence's Chatterly's Lover to a state which tolerates mass distribution of bestiality over the internet. Unfuckingbelievable. Talk about over-reaction. |
|
March 17th, 2009 | #16 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
|
Quote:
Also, if you have legalised prostitution it's going to be hard to justify a ban on porn. Quote:
It's like feminists blaming "male chauvinists" to justify their existence. Eh, not really. It's an instinct in itself.
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96 |
||
March 17th, 2009 | #17 |
resident psycho
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,259
|
|
March 17th, 2009 | #18 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
|
Quote:
Prostitution and porn follow the same principle.
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96 |
|
March 17th, 2009 | #19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Posts: 215
Blog Entries: 3
|
I don't really get the whole bashing the Puritans meme.
The sexual communist order that we have today is alternative. Does anyone else not see the contradiction in deriding "Puritan America" (which is a misnomer anyway - the US and its Constitution were established by Freemasons) while simultaneously denouncing mass porn, etc. If one really is anti-Puritan, or anything resembling Puritanism, they will gladly embrace the sexual communist order.
__________________
I am a centrist social authoritarian.
Left: 0.51, Authoritarian: 4.96 |
March 17th, 2009 | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The U.S. Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism
Posts: 1,434
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|