|
June 24th, 2010 | #381 |
Kill The 'Kwa
|
If you listen to that recording of Steele from the jail house to his wife and son, it comes across as manipulative. When his son asks him the question "did you" it kinda puts old Ed on the back foot. Edgar never answers in the negative as any normal person would do if he was indeed being framed.
Let's look at what is out there: 1. He has a Ukraine girlfriend ( younger than wife? ) 2. He was having money problems ? 3. The old murder the wife for the insurance money ? 4. Listening to the wife on the tape, seems the love has gone out of the marriage ? 5. His son sure thinks Ed is capable of doing this "did you" ? |
June 24th, 2010 | #382 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,749
|
Quote:
Also, what motive do the feds have to frame Steele using fabricated evidence? That he unsuccessfully defended the Aryan Nations 11 years ago, resulting in a multi-million dollar judgment against them? That he wrote a book justifying White resentment to minority "racism"? That he was a spokesman for Prussian Blue? We have a possible motive for Steele - the Ukrainian girlfriend. What would a divorce and the resulting aftermath cost? What would an insurance payout on his deceased wife be? How much did his recent medical emergency leave him in the hole? I would really like to see Steele call out an audio forensics expert to prove those tapes are fake (and see the person(s) who fabricated them go to jail) but I am not holding my breath. Two slightly differing points of view: Michael Collins Piper http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Pi...310_200000.mp3 Jim Giles http://www.radiofreemississippi.net/...ensicAudio.mp3
__________________
Smash jewish supremacy. Smash globalism. Smash ZOG. Use ad blockers at all times to starve off the (((beast))). Last edited by H.B.; June 24th, 2010 at 08:54 PM. |
|
June 24th, 2010 | #383 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FUCK YOU!
Posts: 1,477
|
Quote:
I hope nigger gang-bangers off all those who were involved in deliberately ruining an innocent man's life! Just don't turn out your children too, ZigZog-lovers... |
|
June 24th, 2010 | #384 | ||
Leaving a bruise
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Land o' Bears, PA
Posts: 1,652
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
This message is hidden because Dan_O is on your ignore list. This message is hidden because N.M. Valdez is on your ignore list. |
||
June 24th, 2010 | #385 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FUCK YOU!
Posts: 1,477
|
|
June 24th, 2010 | #386 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,763
|
First let me say that Ed is one of the most intelligent men that I have ever met. Right up there with Dr Pierce. I have personally spent time with him at his home and with his family as well as lots of hours on the phone.
Ed is too smart to hire a buffoon like this guy to plant some stupid pipe bomb if he intended it to " look like an accident". Ed loves his children and would never do anything to their mother because he knows how that would effect them to lose her. Ed holds character as a high personal moral for himself and others. Disregard the Ukrainian gf thing, it is meaningless. I would personally risk my own freedom in this case I am so sure of Ed's innocence. |
June 24th, 2010 | #387 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,763
|
Just as FYI, Ed had mentioned to some of us that he was working on a book that would expose the legal system as the fraud that it is and that he would be disbarred when it came out because it would expose so many people. I am not sure how far he was on the book but that might be a very valid reason for him to be dealt with and discredited.
|
June 24th, 2010 | #388 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FUCK YOU!
Posts: 1,477
|
Quote:
|
|
June 24th, 2010 | #389 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,130
|
Jail House Recording
It pains me to rise in defense of the character of a lawyer. Any of them are capable of far worse than the charges in this case. That being said, I must do my duty here.
At the time of the first phone call to the son, Steele was desperate to talk to his wife. They wouldn't let her talk to him at his first hearing. He had repeatedly tried to call her and his calling card was likely running out of time. His phone access was extremely limited. His son might have been his only hope. There was no time for lovey dovey family matters. It was like an 8 am takeoff clearance at O'hare in Chicago, all business and no chit chat. He was issuing orders to his son and expected them to be obeyed. When he finally did get to talk to his wife the situation was the same. Cyndi sounded like that she had no sleep and was half out of it. She clearly is a jealous woman. She filed for a divorce in 2000 when she caught her husband on an internet dating website in San Mateo California. They kissed and made up a few months later and dismissed the divorce. The job of editing a false conversation is much more difficult than commonly believed, depending upon the quality of the final result. The pitch of the voice varies during the day. Early in the morning it is lower by several half steps. It also varies with age in a given individual. Old men have higher pitched voices than young men. The recording doesn't have to be perfect. It only has to be good enough to convince Cyndi that her husband tried to kill her. Once she admits that was his voice on the informant tape, it will do no good for her to change her mind later. They will always say it was witness intimidation. Steele was absolutely correct that this was a top level prosecution when Cyndi was summoned to the Attorney General's office to authenticate the tape. The jury will not have heard the way Steele speaks over the years. They may not have the sense of pitch that goes with a musical ear. As some poster correctly pointed out, background noise may have been inserted to cover up sloppy edits. Steele is highly proficient on websites and is his own webmaster. He was an electronic expert in the Coast Guard and knows what he's up against. To be a bit crude but extremely accurate, Steele's balls were in Cyndi's hands and he knew it. |
June 24th, 2010 | #390 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,130
|
April's Theory
My last post and April's crossed in cyberspace. My money says that she has solved the mystery of why they wanted him in prison. Since she personally knows the family, I defer to her defense of his character.
|
June 24th, 2010 | #391 |
Kill The 'Kwa
|
From Rex, Steeles son "did you" .... no answer in the negative from Steele, listen close Steele pauses, then continues on as if the question wasn't asked.
|
June 24th, 2010 | #392 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,187
|
April, I would hope that, if asked, you would appear as a character witness for Edgar.
That being said, I hope this never goes to trial and the whole zog machine against him crashes under the weight of itz lies. This whole thing stinks as I said in the beginning and I haven't changed my mind. |
June 24th, 2010 | #393 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
|
Quote:
__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today." -Ralph Waldo Emerson |
|
June 24th, 2010 | #394 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
Quote:
I think based on thematic discontinuity that the tape of Himmler's second Posen speech was altered with splicing (probably by the Army Signal Corps) in order to bolster war propaganda and justify the postwar order, just as many people think that the Osama bin Ladin banquet video is a fraud. However, as far as I know it's unprecedented for something like that to be done to frame somebody for a trial. A fraud like that done for war propaganda is never going to be scrutinized in a genuine legal process the way this recording will. Is there any precedent for Steele's "Mission Impossible" claim? Is the framing of one man really worth that much trouble and risk? (Sorry, I will not accept O.J. Simpson as a valid response.)
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com Last edited by Hadding; June 24th, 2010 at 11:14 PM. |
|
June 24th, 2010 | #395 | ||||||
∞ 𐌙 λ
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,497
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The point being, maybe NW would consider Steele a WN-lite, but the government may have considered him Tea Party-heavy. And not unreasonable to consider Tea Partyers and proto-NW who have not lost their life savings, lost their jobs, lost their houses, lost their free speech, lost their right to own a gun, etc. |
||||||
June 25th, 2010 | #396 |
∞ 𐌙 λ
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,497
|
Strange that the evidence, the Steele and Fairfax recordings, were going to presented to Steele's wife during a phone call. By the Attorney General office, "no less".
Consider this, if the government was claiming that a man has been having a affair with another woman, would the Attorney General's office call the man's wife and say, "we will be sending you and e-mail with a picture of husband with his mistress, please confirm that the man in the picture is your husband." I find it hard to believe that would ever happen. So why would the government want to have the Steele's wife authenticate the evidence out-of-band before a trial date has even been set? 1) Turn her against Steele a soon as possible. Remember, at this time there was not court order to block Steele from contacting his wife. 2) The government had nothing to lose, and everything to gain, by presenting the evidence out-of-band. If she said it was not her husbands voice or could not be positive it was her husbands voice, nothing is really lost. But she said yes, that is my husbands voice, game over. 3) Once Steele was confronted with his wife's confirmation he likely would be forced to consider a plea bargain and voluntarily accept 2 or 5 sentence or face a possible 20 or 25 sentence. Remember Steele is 64 and when he got out he would have been discredited. 4) Also, by having the evidence presented during a phone call, the government would have had full control of the quality-of-service and therefor could have made any abnormalities in the recording harder to detect. What is the likelihood the Attorney General office would have said to Mrs. Steele, please be very careful and think before you make any comment regarding the recording, because your words could become the key evidence to imprisoning your husband for the rest of his life. |
June 25th, 2010 | #397 | |
∞ 𐌙 λ
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,497
|
Quote:
So that is why I would be more likely to believe that the government, either izreal or america, would have used a voice impersonator that has been training for a long period of time to imitate Steele's voice. This voice impersonator could have reached a high level of perfection that is digitally impossible to distinguish his voice from Steele's. After that point was reached the ZOG moved forward. An intentionally poorly place recording device, in a barn with bad acoustics and various barn noises in the background, would only contributed to the success of the scheme. Why is this so hard to believe? Haven't people made a living being impersonators of famous people. Could a jew like been trained to impersonate Steele's voice? To pull this off, the only thing the government needed was for Fairfax to go along with it with the scheme. For this to happen, the government only needed to be able to blackmail Fairfax with jail time longer, maybe life, if he did not go along. Maybe the government set Fairfax up earlier? How hard would that have been? And now Fairfax knows he will be a dead man if he opens his mouth. If the jew was willing and able to kill one of its own loose cannons that knew too much, it will have no problems killing Fairfax. |
|
June 25th, 2010 | #398 | ||
∞ 𐌙 λ
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,497
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
June 25th, 2010 | #399 | |
∞ 𐌙 λ
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,497
|
Quote:
http://www.spokesman.com/audio/2010/...-call-his-son/ How many others hear "did you"? Also note, at the 3:15 mark that Rex Steele stated that he thought it was a "bit fishy" that the Attorney General office contacted his mother. Given that and the fact that he stated that his mother was concerned that whom ever was after Steele may come after the rest of the family, it is clear that Steele family must have been having conversations about this being a setup of Steele before before Steele ever contacted them after the arrest. |
|
June 25th, 2010 | #400 | |
∞ 𐌙 λ
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,497
|
Quote:
Steele had one, and only one goal in the second call to his wife. That was to explain to her that it would be her who certified that the recordings and all that would imply. Steele was obviously in full defense lawyer mode saying what he needed to say to protect his client. |
|
Tags |
edgar steele |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|