Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old January 31st, 2011 #21
Brad
Anti-semite Pro-human
 
Brad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Penal colony 37-144
Posts: 2,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by E. Moolnar View Post
How to respond, to you as I see this issue. You are somewhat a naïve fool overall on how the Australian system works from the inside or yet you turn a blind eye, self-denial and to the like fail to see the whole picture.
Hmm. How to respond to you, a complete fuckwit.

I don't.
__________________
Words hold power, for words influence thought, and thought shapes reality.

B.B. aka Arbiter of all truth.
 
Old January 31st, 2011 #22
E. Moolnar
Angry Kitty
 
E. Moolnar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Litter tray at Temple David
Posts: 146
Default

Quote:
Firstly, thank you for providing what appears to be an account from a supporter of O'Connell who was actually in the court.

As a supporter we can't expect you to be completely objective, especially if you were part of the crowd that O'Connell was playing to during the trial.
I only attended the sentencing not the trial, so I was not part of the crowd of supporters when the guilty verdict was made.


Quote:
Leaving aside the punctuation of your first sentence, lets look at some of the observations you present and how they compare with what we have learned from other sources.

Firstly you say two of the jury were wearing jew headgear. If jews are <1% of the population how did they manage to get on this jury in such proportions? Not only that, another 3 "looked" jewish. Surely one of O'Connells supporters would have taken some photographs or video of all these jews supposedly coming and going from the court?
No photographs were posted online to my knowledge, and any way this could be considered thretening or harrasing behavour.

Quote:
Why did O'Connell bow to this jury supposedly full of jews each day in court, while refusing to acknowledge the judge?
That you must ask him, I would assume that this was before we was denied the chance present his evidence in defence. During sentencing on the 31st he did not bow to the jury.
(He must have believed that the jury would be impartial, compared to the court overall)

Quote:
Surely the "who’s who of the Perth Jewish community, and including a representative of the Israeli embassy" could not have objected to this public scrutiny outside the court? Name them. Name these jews. Post the pictures.
From what chatter I picked from the public gallery, most were members of the Perth Hebrew congregation, Keyser’s immediate family. This included the embassy representative in the chatter. Also mentioned a reporter from a Jewish community rag, guessing the Jewgle Perth or Australian Jewish News.

I could see outside the court building, there was media from local TV, by the time the news was broadcasted in the evening, the news clips were just cut & paste of Brendon’s own footage along with him outside court from a previous event following a sensational narration.


Quote:
Yes we know the Keyser jew is unpleasant to look at, we have seen the video. But the whole public gallery was similarly unpleasant?
I was sitting behind, Keyser was sitting next to his mother. The surrounding individuals whispering to him and showing gestures of support. The atmosphere felt a bit uncomfortable if the court did not Jews in question present would be more tolerable.


Quote:
Provide some photographic or video material from the courtroom so we can see it for ourselves.
I personally did not take photographs, since I do not own a camera and this would have gotten me un- wanted attention. I mentioned that the news clips from 31st was just cut & paste footage from previous dates. If you can find other media releases from the 31st then post them on the forum.

Quote:
No we are not going to accept that it was all the fault of the jury, and the judge that you think hears things from higher up, or the courtroom audience, when it is as clear as day that O'Connell wanted these convictions from the beginning, and did everything possible in the courtroom to obtain them. Either that or he is disabled by drug abuse.
Probably you are right about Brendon self-martyring I see this was the second option after he had evidence prepared but the judge did not allow to be used in his defence.

Drug abuse? I think not; it would have been reported in the media for some time, before trial. His appearance does not suggest if the was a drug user.

Quote:
Were you pretending to be a Freeman, and did you refuse to stand for the judge?
I was not the one on trial, and to avoid the possible embarrassment of being held in contempt of court. So to sow some respect I stood up, as did every one in the court. (Except Brendon)

Quote:
Please shed any light on any previous drug convictions for O'Connell.
It would have been mentioned in the media as I stated already.

O'Connell was dealt with by a court of the State of Western Australia, population 2 million from an Australian population of 22 million.
 
Old January 31st, 2011 #23
Darius Appleby
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: high rainfall coastal strip of the White Continent nation
Posts: 3,602
Arrow Ethnic community welcomes racial vilification sentence

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2...01/3126539.htm

Quote:
Ethnic community welcomes racial vilification sentence

Updated 1 hour 2 minutes ago

PreviousNextSlideshow: Photo 1 of 2

Brendon O'Connell is the first person in WA to be convicted under racial vilification laws

MAP: Perth 6000
RELATED STORY: Man jailed over anti-semitic video


The Ethnic Community Council of Western Australia has welcomed the jail term imposed on a Perth man who posted a racist video online.

Brendon Lee O'Connell of Maylands was sentenced to three years in prison after being found guilty of six offences under Western Australia's racial vilification laws.

He posted a 15 minute video on YouTube which showed him insulting a Jewish man outside a shopping centre and telling Jews their days were numbered.

O'Connell is the first person in WA to be convicted under the laws.

The Council's Maria Saraceni says she hopes the tough penalty acts as a deterrent.

"Obviously where there is a penalty such as imprisonment, it has an immediate impact on the person who has been found guilty, but there is a wider message for the community at large," she said.

Since the sentencing O'Connell's supporters have posted an attack on the judge, the judicial system and the Jewish community, on his blog.

Tags: law-crime-and-justice, courts-and-trials, wa, perth-6000

First posted 1 hour 36 minutes ago
 
Old January 31st, 2011 #24
Darius Appleby
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: high rainfall coastal strip of the White Continent nation
Posts: 3,602
Arrow O’Connell: a wake-up call to anti-Israel “social-justice activists”

http://www.jwire.com.au/featured-art...E2%80%9D/14759

Quote:
J-Wire
Jewish Online News from Australia and New Zealand

Browse > Home / Featured Articles / O’Connell: a wake-up call to anti-Israel “social-justice activists”

O’Connell: a wake-up call to anti-Israel “social-justice activists”

Leave a Comment January 31, 2011 by Steve Lieblich

Last week Brendon Lee O’Connell was convicted on 6 counts of anti-Jewish harassment and vilification in the Western Australian District Court by a 12-person jury, after a 2-week trial in which the accused prominently exhibited his guilt by repeating his crime ad nauseum in the courtroom. On Monday he was sentenced to a total of 3 years imprisonment.

Brendan O'Connell with text - YouTube still

O’Connell was at a Friends of Palestine protest in May 2009, against the sale of Israeli oranges, when he harassed and taunted a Jewish student, shouting that Judaism is a “religion and race of hate” and the student is a “racist homicidal maniac”.
During the trial he compared Judaism to an organised crime syndicate, said he was proud to be associated with holocaust denier Fredrick Toben, and asserted that “Jews control the entire world”. He also referred repeatedly to a massive, well-worn volume entitled “Judaism Discovered” full of multicoloured stickers apparently marking his favourite “juicy bits”. This 1102-page antisemite’s textbook, which is banned from sale by Amazon, asserts that Judaism is a “Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit …” His supporters claim that “Judaism is a horribly repugnant cult based on hatred of Christ, occultic doctrines, racial divisiveness, sexual barbarism, and voodoo rituals” and describe “Orthodox Judaism as the ideological survival of the most ossified traditions of Babylonian paganism, concealed beneath a complex system of dissimulation and misdirection”.
It is now clear that O’Connell’s poisonous rants and outlandish libels during the trial, and over many prior years of online antisemitic activism, were simply plagiarised from “Judaism Discovered”. It is therefore tempting to dismiss O’Connell as a narcissistic, muck-raking crackpot. However O’Connell blends ancient lies with a new type of antisemitism, parading as a “social justice” campaign. So he also exemplifies the worst aspects of this new and recent anti-Israel “BDS” (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) movement that has attracted support from some fringe elements in Australia. Despite its semblance of “social justice”, it actually aims to destroy the Jewish homeland and vilify Jews.
Throughout his trial O’Connell repeatedly referred to “occupied Palestine”. When the jury retired, he shouted from the dock that it would be “an honour” to be imprisoned “for Palestine and Iraq”. After the verdict was pronounced he shouted “Soon Benjamin Netanyahu will be in the dock …Free Palestine …Free Iraq!”
While it is, of course, perfectly legitimate to criticise Israel’s policies, there is a red line that separates legitimate political expression from prejudice or bigotry. Natan Sharansky’s “3D test” defines that boundary: if it DEMONISES, DE-LEGITIMISES or applies a DOUBLE STANDARD, then it’s bigotry, whether the target is Judaism, Islam, Asians or any other group.
In “BDS, Anti-Semitism’s New Face” published in Israel National News, 16 January 2011, Moshe Dann explains that “Anti-Semites around the world have found a new and more subtle form of attack: …BDS campaigns. Wielding clichés like ‘apartheid,’ ‘war crimes,’ ‘stealing Palestinian land,’ ‘oppressing Palestinians,’ and ‘end the occupation,’ these groups seek to delegitimize and isolate Israel as part of their program to destroy Israel …The goal of BDS campaigns …is not territorial, but existential.”
Bernard-Henri Lévy, a French philosopher, writes in Huffington Post, 25 January 2011 that “…we are faced here with a skilfully orchestrated but …bellicose, anti-democratic and, in a word, perfectly despicable campaign … Regardless of what its promoters and its useful idiots say, the only real, accepted, hackneyed goal of this boycott campaign is to de-legitimize Israel…”
Levi also notes that the BDS movement doesn’t boycott Sudan, which is guilty of genocide in Darfur, nor China, guilty of massive violations of human rights in Tibet and elsewhere, nor Iran, nor those despotic Arab regimes whose citizens’ have no freedom of expression.
Omar Barghouti, a founder of the “BDS”movement, has made it clear that his goal is “not two States but two Palestines.” Ali Abunimah, co-founder of Electronic Intifada and BDS leader, equates Israel to Nazi Germany, conveniently ignoring the fact that it was the Palestinian Arab leadership in the 1930’s and 1940’s who were allies of the Nazi regime. And Sabeel, an Arab Christian group, provides a “theological” fig leaf by reviving the antisemitic concept that Christians replace the Christ-killing Jews as the Chosen People. (It’s interesting to note that extremist Islamists now apply their version of this Replacement Theology to Jews, Christians and other “infidels”.)
So the BDS movement fails the 3D test on all three counts. It DEMONISES Jews as “the new Nazis”; it DE-LEGITIMISES the Jewish nation; and by incessantly targeting open, democratic Israel for censure while ignoring many blatant human-rights abusers, it applies a DOUBE STANDARD.
As Michael Danby, Member for Melbourne Ports recently said: “What is next for [the BDS campaign]? Are they now going to paint the Star of David on shops selling Israeli products?”
Seen in this light, the O’Connell phenomenon should be a wake-up call to the small bands of earnest-looking, anti-Israel “social-justice activists” that occasionally pop up in supermarkets and shopping malls. Whether these useful idiots are misguided, ignorant, just plain antisemitic, or some combination of them all, they promote neither peace nor the welfare of their purported “friends” in the Middle East. They are merely fostering and encouraging more crackpot criminal behaviour, like O’Connell’s.

RELATED STORIES

ACTU Assistant Secretary checking anti-Israel Union Activists
Perth anti-Semite charged over YouTube videos
Anti-Semitism rife in Victorian Universities
Sydney students call for Israel boycott
Anti-Semitic attacks in Australia reach an all-time high
 
Old January 31st, 2011 #25
Bassanio
Hath not a Goy eyes?
 
Bassanio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Venice
Posts: 4,287
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
Natan Sharansky’s “3D test” defines that boundary: if it DEMONISES, DE-LEGITIMISES or applies a DOUBLE STANDARD, then it’s bigotry, whether the target is Judaism, Islam, Asians or any other group.
The 3 fucking D test? How much more fucking brazen can you get? The judenswine have been doing nothing but demonizing, de-legitimizing and applying a double standard to white nations since the last century.
__________________
The Goy cries out in ecstasy as the Jew strikes him.
 
Old January 31st, 2011 #26
Darius Appleby
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: high rainfall coastal strip of the White Continent nation
Posts: 3,602
Arrow link to David Duke

http://www.davidduke.com/general/bre...tml#more-22501

Quote:
Brendon O’Connell Found Guilty Of “Racial Hatred”

An honest hero has been sent to jail. Evil destroys. Brendon O’Connell took an open stand against that destruction. The following are two articles about the wrongful accusation and wrongful guilty verdict of O’Connell. He is a man who exposed the truth about Zionist racism. Because Jewish supremacists see themselves above self-examination for their own wrongs, they tolerate absolutely no criticism whatsoever for any evil they commit. These diabolical supremacists daily exact their revenge by sacrificing others to protect themselves, scapegoating the innocent to preserve their own false self-image of perfection, and blaming and destroying people who expose their guilt, tactics they have perfected over the past 65 years.

The first article spotlights the Zionists’ lies and their deliberate attempts to confuse facts with their lies.

Evil people always attack rather than face their own failures. What is the failure of the Jewish Supremacists? They have forgotten the meaning of “Never Again”, but narcissistically use those words as license to commit genocide against the Palestinians. Why did they get revenge against Brendon O’Connell?–He Remembered.

–Admin

Memo To The Jury Who Convicted Brendon O’Connell

January 29, 2011

That it took you seven hours of deliberation to return a guilty verdict upon Brendon O’Connell demonstrates that there was much discussion among you as to whether Brendon was actually guilty of seven counts of “racial vilification” as charged. I wonder if you would have returned a guilty verdict had Brendon been allowed by the trial judge to present all of the evidence that he had prepared in his defence. I wonder what your reaction would have been after you had studied “The Russian Petition To Classify The Kitzur Shulchan Aruch As Hate Literature” by Michael A. Hoffman and had you read excerpts from “A Study In Anti-Gentilism” by former U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Gordon Mohr.

But the trial judge would not permit Brendon to present this vitally-important literature to you. Nor would he allow the accused to show you evidence of Jews being a religious group, not a race. Although you were allowed to hear evidence from Rabbi David Freilich in which it was contested that Jews are a race, the trial judge would not permit Brendon O’Connell to present evidence from Rabbi Harry Waton that they are not.

The following quotation is from the book “Jewish History, Jewish Religion : The Weight of Three Thousand Years” by Israel Shahak:

The Jews themselves universally described themselves as a religious community or, to be precise, a religious nation. ‘Our people is a people only because of the Torah (Religious Law)’ – this saying by one of the highest authorities, Rabbi Sa’adia Hagga’on who lived in the 10th century, has become proverbial.

This next quotation has been lifted from the book “The Thirteenth Tribe” by Arthur Koestler:

The large majority of surviving Jews in the world is of Eastern European-and thus mainly Khazar-origin. If so, this would mean that their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga, not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race; and that generally they are more closely related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Should this turn out to be the case, then the term ‘anti-Semitism’ would become void of meaning, based on misapprehension shared by both the killers and their victims. The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetrated.

Had you been allowed to read “Zionism and Race” by Fred E. Foldvary and had you been permitted to view the photographs of white-skinned Jews and coloured-skinned Jews that are available for perusal here, you might well have found yourselves deliberating much longer then the seven hours you did. And had the trial judge not denied Brendon O’Connell his legal right to present crucial evidence in his defence, you might well then have found yourselves asking one another this fundamental question: “How can Jews be a race when one faction are white-skinned and another black?”

After considering this peculiar anomaly you would surely have concluded that Jews cannot possibly be a race. Ergo you would not have returned a guilty verdict on six of the “racial vilification” charges upon which Brendon O’Connell stood trial. But the trial judge would not permit this crucial evidence to be presented for your consideration. Brendon was correct when he accused the trial judge of treason, for the “learned” Judge Wisbey has certainly shown himself to be a traitor to the cause of justice if nothing else.

You heard evidence from two young Jewish men, Stanley Keyser and Timothy Peach, of how they attended a protest at a supermarket in Perth on 2nd May 2009 that had been organised by the ‘Friends of Palestine’ group to express concern at the supermarket selling oranges which had been imported from Israel. According to Peach, he and Keyser were there to “observe” and to “hand out flyers to educate the protesters about Israel”. Keyser and Peach are not the only Jews who have shown-up at an event so to “observe” and document the proceedings. Keyser and Peach had been noticed by Brendon taking photographs of the pro-Palestine protestors and he decided to challenge them. The rest is history. And if you the jury seriously believe that two Jewish activists would turn-up at a pro-Palestinian protest so to “educate the protesters about Israel”, then I have a bridge in Manhattan to sell you. Did you not wonder why Stanley Keyser, an Australian citizen, is more concerned with Israel-related issues than he is with Australian affairs? Take a look at this filthy, little liar’s YouTube account and see how many videos relating to Australian issues you can find. If you can find just one, that will be one more than I managed to find. Did Keyser’s membership of the extremist Jewish group, Chabad Lubavitch, not trouble you? Obviously not.
Read the rest of the article and see the added videos, including one by David Duke, here.
Brendon O’Connell Found Guilty Of “Racial Hatred”

Brendan Lee O’Connell, 38, represented himself before a jury in the Perth District Court after firing the lawyer who had been defending him against an accusation that he posted an anti-semitic video online.

O’Connell faced seven charges related to the posting of a verbal altercation he had with Stanley Keyser and Timothy Peach, who are Jewish, and was found guilty on six.

An argument broke out between the three men at an IGA supermarket in South Perth on May 2, 2009, where a Friends of Palestine group was holding a protest against Israeli oranges.

Mr Peach, 19, told the court during the trial that he was a member of the Australasian Union of Jewish Students at the time and had attended the rally to “observe” and hand out flyers to educate the protesters about Israel.

He said he was “angry”, “confused” and “offended” by O’Connell when he started to film the two Jewish men and argue with them about their religion.

During the trial, O’Connell refused to acknowledge Judge Henry Wisbey when he entered the court and, instead, rose to bow to the jury.

About a dozen supporters in the court cheered when O’Connell labelled the proceedings “a kangaroo court” and gave a long, repetitive rant about the King James Bible and the Constitution.

The video that O’Connell posted online was shown on the first day of the trial.

“You have a religion of racism, hate, homicide and ethnic cleansing,” O’Connell says to the men on the video.

“You are a racist, homicidal maniac.”

When the jury found O’Connell guilty on Friday, he shouted: “Free Palestine! Free Iraq!” before being taken away.

Outside court, Mr Keyser’s mother Shelley said it was “a big relief” for the “terrible” ordeal to be over.

O’Connell was remanded in custody and is due to reappear in court on Monday.

Article source: Brendon O’Connell Blog
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM.
Page generated in 0.07892 seconds.