|
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
August 3rd, 2005 | #81 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Former USA
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
He conspired with other Jews. That makes it a "Jewish Conspiracy". It's so simple even a monkey can grasp it. |
|
August 3rd, 2005 | #82 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sweetie, that he was a Jew doesn't make everything he does a "conspiracy." Try again. Or maybe it's time you admit that you don't know, eh, bullshitter? Come on, be a man, admit you can't be sure your freaky conspiracy theory is true.
Why do you think no WN organization has ever handed out fliers with the heading "READ ABOUT THE GREAT JEWISH CONSPIRACY THAT CONTROLS CHRISTIANITY SO IT WON'T ACCEPT LENDING AGAINST INTEREST"? Btw, you are suspiciously silent on the fact that your precious quotes contradict you. Hitler clearly says in those quotes you laborously gathered that he believed Paul acted on his own. He was not part of the Great Conspiracy you earlier said controlled the Catholic Church. What do you have to say about that? Isn't Hitler just a big ol' meanie for not agreeing with your precious theory? |
August 3rd, 2005 | #83 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Former USA
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
Hitler said it was Saul's idea, and it's common knowledge that Saul was working with other Jews. The other gospel-writers and the other early "christians" were Jewish. I had you pegged from the your first post on this topic... a pseudo-intellectual, a sophist, and a fuckhead. Did I miss anything? |
|
August 4th, 2005 | #84 |
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
The issue here isn't whether Christianity is a detriment to the white race or whether it has allowed Jews to remain in our society and psyche, but rather the way it is being worded. You try to attract people with that and they'll A. Call you a conspiracy nut, and B. many will just say "so what". You have no idea how VAST is the breadth of white apathy these days.
Rather than focusing on the intentions of Christianity's founders almost 2000 years ago, we need to focus on REVERSING the psychological damage TODAY. We also must weed out the Christian-psyhcology behind other "secular" creeds expoused in the Western world(e.g. humanism). The problem is HERE, and NOW, and the most dangerous Jew is the little Jew in our heads. We all grew up in this society; whether in a Christian or non-Christian home we have been raised under that mindset. We need a total remapping of our psyche. Bickering about who knew what nearly 2,000 years ago is pointless.
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
August 4th, 2005 | #85 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: S.E.PA
Posts: 1,626
|
A functioning brain, capable of extrapolation.
__________________
KILL YOUR TV! Or at least stop taking it more seriously than a goldfish. |
August 4th, 2005 | #86 | |||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Quote:
What Hitler speculated one evening without proof, is no proof of your theory whatsoever. Or do you think Hitler was some sort of all-knowing god? Yes or no? You can answer that simple question, can't you? It doesn't matter what HITLER guessed. It doesn't matter what NIETZSCHE guessed. It doesn't matter that PIERCE once sent you an email reply saying he wanted you to join the NA, an email you have saved and drooled over all these years as if he would be agreeing with your feverish paranoia. Don't you realize he sent similar replies to all racialists who managed to move their lazy asses enough to send an email? Didn't that ever occur to you? Oh, sorry to burst your bubble then. Quote:
I ask again, little boy: what PROOF do you have that Paul was an agent of your ridiculous Great Conspiracy that controlled the Catholic Church and stretched through thousands of years? Are you going to answer that now, or are you going to avoid the question like a lying Jew once again? Here's a hint: SOMEONE ELSE'S GUESSWORK DOESN'T COUNT AS PROOF. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT, YES OR NO? Last edited by _DC_; August 4th, 2005 at 08:21 AM. |
|||
August 4th, 2005 | #87 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 603
|
Quote:
"Come, I will show you the punishment of the great prostitute, who sits on many waters. Do you believe that this "great" prostitute is that same whore of Babylon? I believe that this whore is today, the catholic church? What say you? |
August 4th, 2005 | #88 | |
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
Revelation was originally a Jewish, not Christian(there was little difference at the time) document. It described the coming of the Jewish Messiah to punish the Romans, not Jesus. It wasn't until someone attached a Christian preface to it that it suddenly became associated with Christianity and therefore a second coming. The Whore of Babylon is most likely something that existed in the time of the author.
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
|
August 4th, 2005 | #89 | |||||||
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Former USA
Posts: 365
|
One more piece of evidence for the thinking people:
The "maddening wine" that Jeremiah referred to is mentioned multiple times by the Jews who wrote the Book of Revelation (Revelation means "a revealing"): Here is one example: Quote:
Saul, being a devout Pharisee, correctly recognized that the pacifistic dualism adhered to by the Essenes was a blasphemy, and began persecuting them. However, when he realized that he could use such "black & white" divisive dualism as "a sword" with which to divide Roman society against itself, he realized he had found the weapon prophesied by Jeremiah, and decided to use it to destroy Rome. Dualism is an irrational form of absolutist divisiveness first conceived by the Aryan prophet Zarathustra. Once Zoroastrianism took hold in Persia, a collective madness took over the people, and they began to wage holy wars of extermination against all "unbelievers". That was the first Jihad. That same dualism in Jerusalem was correctly viewed as an abomination (or "adultueration") by Saul. However, instead of fighting it, he decided to reshape it and put it into a form attractive to all the nations and kings "of the North", to fulfill the command of Jeremiah: Quote:
That is why he wrote the following in his book The Antichrist: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||
August 4th, 2005 | #90 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
Quote:
His arguments run counter to the basic tenets of white nationalism. I invite other posters to read his words on these subjects.
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
|
August 4th, 2005 | #91 | |
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
A vast, shadowy conspiracy is not a tenet of white nationalism. Well, maybe it is. I don't know it's hard to tell when nobody has ever attempted to create a rigid set of tenets for white nationalism.
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
|
August 4th, 2005 | #92 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Former USA
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
|
|
August 4th, 2005 | #93 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Former USA
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
On the contrary, the Jews are engaged in a conspiracy against all other peoples, and it is all detailed right there in their own religious writings. |
|
August 4th, 2005 | #94 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Former USA
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
The book of Revelation was written about events that happened over 1900 years ago... it has nothing to do with the present day, except for some insane fundamentalist preachers who attempt to replicate the destruction of Aryan Rome by equating America or Europe with "Babylon", and thereby unconsciously doing the destructive work of the Jews for them. |
|
August 5th, 2005 | #95 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Run counter to? I'm afraid not. But the small group of conspiracy theorists in this forum always freak out and throw around wild accusations of "You're a Jew agent! A Jew agent! A JEW AGENT!" whenever their theories are questioned. |
|
August 5th, 2005 | #96 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
White . . . "Nobility", I see you are still too afraid to answer my questions. I smile when I see how incapable you are of answering simple, direct questions, and instead resort to whining.
1. You claimed there was a huge Jewish conspiracy stretching through thousands of years, and that Paul was an agent of it. Now that huge conspiracy has shrunk to a handfull of Jews acting on their own, with Paul in charge. How is it your millennia-old, huge conspiracy has suddenly shrunk to just an agreement between a few individuals? Why did you change it? 2. What Hitler speculated about one evening, is no proof of your theory whatsoever. Or do you think Hitler was always right in everything he said? Yes or no? Do you think Nietzsche was always right in everything he said? Yes or no? 3. I ask again: what PROOF do you have that Paul was an agent of your Great Conspiracy that controlled the Catholic Church and stretched through thousands of years? And no, quotes of other people's speculation doesn't count as proof. |
August 5th, 2005 | #97 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Former USA
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
Quote:
Where did I say it was a "huge" conspiracy? Quote:
Quote:
n. The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true. Proof in whose mind... yours? If so, then you are the only one who can delineate what conditions would constitute "proof" in your mind. I can't read your mind, nor would I want to. However, you have repeatedly refused to establish the conditions which would constitute "proof" by your standards, making it impossible to meet them. Since you have no real interest in this topic, or in finding the truth of the matter, your insincere demands for "proof" are just a cloaked attempt to disturb the discussion and give me a hard time because you simply don't like me personally. That's ok... I don't like you either. But, I have no need to hide my dislike of you behind sophistry as you have done repeatedly. Blatantly dishonest behaviour of your sort is very Jew-like. |
||||
August 5th, 2005 | #98 | ||||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This is fun!
Quote:
Let us see how: Look at White Nobility squirming and twisting words like a Jew again! Evasion of question, #1: Quote:
Chain, is he still doing a good job? Do you think that last evasion was a good reply? Very well, then. Scratch the word huge. You claimed it was a big conspiracy, one that controlled what was written in the Bible about moneylending hundreds of years after Jesus lived -- that could hardly be the work of a single man. Only lately, when it has been shown you have no proof of such a conspiracy, have you pretended you only meant it was Paul and a few others involved in it. Evasion of question, #2: Quote:
Let me rephrase, then: do you think everything you have ever read by Hitler and Nietzsche is true? And whether or not you have read everything by them, you should be able to answer this simple question: do you think they were right about everything they ever said? I can answer that question, if posed to me: I don't think they were right in everything they ever said. It's a pretty obvious answer. I don't think any other poster here at VNNF thinks they were right in everything they ever said either. It's just not humanly possible. What about you, what do you think? I know why you are avoiding the question: if you admit that they could be wrong, then the speculations you quote over and over, showing they thought Paul hated the Roman Empire which you claim is proof they believed in a conspiracy, aren't necessarily true, just because the speculations come from Mighty Nietzsche and Mighty Hitler. And then you have nothing! Evasion of question, #3: Quote:
What a pathetic lie. As if that would save you. And besides, I think the only one here who doubts what the words proof and evidence mean are ... you. Nobody else is impressed by your squirming. I ask again: what proof do you have Paul was an agent of a Jewish conspiracy? Quoting someone else's speculation does not constitute proof. Nor does it help you to twist words, or try to find spelling errors. Sorry, boy. |
||||
August 5th, 2005 | #99 | |||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Right. I refer to your title for this thread: Jew Plan for Economic Enslavement of Goyim, proven by Jew-Bible AND Protocols of Zion The title doesn't say "Paul's plan." You obviously thought of a much bigger conspiracy, which you also reveal in your earlier posts. But now you can't back that up. Your turn. Quote:
Emotional outbursts? I am just laughing at you. You're the one with the emotional outbursts. I am a "fucking shithead" or whatever. I told you to keep it civil, and now that you don't ... you have only yourself to blame. Quote:
Ooh, I am going on ignore. Yeah, right. LOL Must the the thousandth time someone says that, only to show later he was lying. You also lied when you said you have replied to every question. You have repeatedly avoided questions. For example, you avoid the once below, which I now post again: Let me rephrase, then: do you think everything you have ever read by Hitler and Nietzsche is true? And whether or not you have read everything by them, you should be able to answer this simple question: do you think they were right about everything they ever said? I can answer that question, if posed to me: I don't think they were right in everything they ever said. It's a pretty obvious answer. I don't think any other poster here at VNNF thinks they were right in everything they ever said either. It's just not humanly possible. What about you, what do you think? |
|||
August 5th, 2005 | #100 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You wrote that I was going on ignore, and now you show you lied. And now you have deleted it to cover your lie.
LOL I knew you lied, of course. You also lied about never posting here before, just lurking -- eh, Jarl? You also lied about having studied economics in college. You also lied about answering every question. For example, you cannot answer the questions I ask in my last post here. Four lies by you, just off the top of my head. |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|