|
November 2nd, 2008 | #81 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
|
November 2nd, 2008 | #82 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: relegational
Posts: 2,265
|
Quote:
...He insinuated himself into the company of those who were celebrated for their conversation... |
|
November 2nd, 2008 | #83 | ||||
The Epitome of Evil
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
|
Why be vague? I am asking, because you seem to be intimating you know or are part of some Templar order with secret documents and what have you.
Perhaps thats because we are misunderstanding each other, but I really don't know. I know of several Templar 'secret' orders per se, but none is really worth notice being simply clubs for bored aristocrats and people who want some excitement with no real strings attached in their lives in order to make them feel special and superior. I don't know if that's what you are suggesting and if it isn't then please do correct, but it seems logical to infer from the way you've been talking. Secret orders/organisations, and they do exist, are generally unknown to the public, if anything is known it is usually merely the name, and their existence isn't even known beyond members, families of members and the intelligence community (whose business it is to know such things). Their members as far as I know tend to keep rather silent on the matter of belonging to any kind of formal or informal organisation. Quote:
Quote:
As I've pointed out the historical and genetic evidence is against this. Quote:
Does that cause them to be genetic perverts and to have the classic Freudian mentality, which I would assert causes their perversion and their prominence in the pornography business, I really can't say. Since I am not a biologist or a published race theorist and hence not in my estimation qualified to weigh in such important questions beyond varifying and clarifying the actual behaviour itself. Quote:
Perhaps this review might help you? They [the links I gave you] addressed the Bjerknes' argument (specifically that book of his) and I already know Bjerknes (as well as Richard Moody Jr and Ajay Sharma: the former trusted Bjerknes and got an absolute pounding intellectually [Sharma seems to be just be a weird quack and a short rebuttal to his basic equation-based argument against Einstein can be found here]) has been sliced, diced and fed to the pigs by more than couple of Physicists on various forums he has gone off spouting his crap about Einstein on. I know he can't hold an argument, because he's been addressed privately by a close friend of mine on his arguments and he stops replying fairly quickly when you take them apart (just in the manner that one scholar disputes with another: tempers fray but you don't just walk away from a debate between scholars because somebody challenged your thesis, especially when it is your main object of scholarly study and the subject of multiple books by you). If you think he is right then I suggest you take your argument to PhysicsForums and they will explain to you in exquisite detail why it is not correct. I've read Bjerknes' books and his articles, and he hasn't proven his argument but rather he acts like a jew (distorts the meaning of quotes for one example) in order to 'evidence' his predetermined thesis. He also has some really weird ideas about Zionism, National Socialism and the Protocols of Zion (which if you'd read his books you'd know about in at least the general sense). In the war against the jew the best weapon one can have is sticking to what the evidence suggests and conducting both an elastic defense and a schwerpunkt attack basing yourself on the terrain of the known and reasonably inferable/deducible. If you fight like that you will win against jews. If you step into the realm of speculation without getting your facts at least arguably right and put through a little testing first. You are more than likely to get your fingers burnt, because the jew will attack your speculation and use it as propaganda to convince the majority of readers that you are irrational and therefore not to be heeded. The jew is the great master of the lie, but he is also a master of derogatory propaganda.
__________________
|
||||
November 2nd, 2008 | #84 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,760
|
Quote:
Not the greatest source, but still: www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-Europeans Sacrifice was important as were sacrificial rites. For Catholics, for example, mass is a holy sacrifice. |
|
November 2nd, 2008 | #85 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
|
November 2nd, 2008 | #86 | |
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
|
Quote:
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together. |
|
November 2nd, 2008 | #87 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
http://mises.org/story/2294
Short messages need not be profound. They simply must communicate your ideas. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method |
November 2nd, 2008 | #88 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,760
|
I was trying to convey that for anything worthwhile, some degree of pain or exertion or cost is required. Perhaps I should have used the word struggle.
|
November 2nd, 2008 | #89 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
Quote:
No matter how much pain or exertion is felt when aiming to reach a goal, it's important to realize that aiming for a lofty worthwhile goal is noble. If you aim for the stars and land in the mud, it's better than aiming for the mud and making it. Strategies can always be adjusted as well as goals depending on the improvements of moral values and character of the individual. |
|
November 2nd, 2008 | #90 |
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
|
You're a dickhead.
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together. |
November 2nd, 2008 | #91 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
|
November 2nd, 2008 | #92 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,760
|
Consider Russell's paradox:
If, in the act of embracing the greater human family, the policies of the Christian churches hasten the demise of those human families who have historically nurtured and maintained them, are they truly "universal" churches? Is it religion?[/I][/QUOTE] Well, IMO, when Whites revive their tribal instinct, Christianity will be practiced properly and will reflect Natural Law. In the big historical picture, we are in unique times--never before have we had this degree of globalization/commercialization/massive immigration of aliens, etc. Christianity, like all segments of society, will need to go through a "baptism of fire" type of experience. The key is to balance natural instincts and our spiritual dimension in order to have a healthy, balanced society. I did a crappy job of copying your quote |
November 2nd, 2008 | #93 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
|
November 2nd, 2008 | #94 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
Quote:
http://www.darklyrics.com/lyrics/tes...eworder.html#3 Apology accepted. Last edited by Mike Mazzone of Palatine; November 2nd, 2008 at 08:35 PM. |
|
November 2nd, 2008 | #95 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Quote:
Being buried with one's master/husband was considered honorable and it was something that one could escape. Such deep loyalty as to refuse to live without a person is honorable. As for Christians - their sacrifice was in blood fighting in the name of a spook. When before did anyone fight in the name of a divine entity? It was understood that Gods can favor you in a time of war but never did it occur to anyone that you are fighting for a God. It's the nature of polytheism - since the Gods have different interests than humans the idea that one can call a war for a God wasn't possible. In my opinion the only sacrifice one makes at mass is one's time. |
|
November 3rd, 2008 | #96 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
|
How does one make a human sacrifice? If sacrifice means to 'give up' something, how do you go about giving up something that you do not posses, such as someone elses life? This would be an offering, given by the person who dies, not a sacrifice on the part of the killer.
|
November 3rd, 2008 | #97 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
Quote:
At the quantum level, everything is energy. You see one tornado here and another tornado there yet they're both the same wind. Polytheism became monotheism. Quote:
The aggressive warrior will lead with the sword. If the defender leads with a sword as well a cycle of lose-lose violence begins that will end either with the death of both warriors in battle, or a win-lose victory for one aggressor. The assertive warrior will lead with the shield. The defender must attempt to maintain territory dominance or yield to his opponent's assertiveness. A win-win deal can be reached by both parties. Habitable territory and essential resources were far more scarce prior to the development of industrial civilization. However, our mindset of scarcity still exists, and wholesale slaughter of the win-lose variety is still common. |
||
November 3rd, 2008 | #98 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: relegational
Posts: 2,265
|
|
November 3rd, 2008 | #99 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
|
November 3rd, 2008 | #100 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Quote:
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|