|
December 9th, 2014 | #41 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Quote:
This contributes to why Britain has yet to produce another Richard the Lionheart after converting to Protestantism. Since then, we get self-serving dirtbags like Churchill and Cromwell, who only take action when it reaps immediate material profit even when they know full well what they're doing is wrong. It's also why a disproportionate number of the NSDAP's high command, despite being mostly agnostic, came from Catholic regions like Bavaria and Austria. Not endorsing Christianity, at this point a primarily Christian based movement are as dumb as an Odinist based one. But differentiating between the different sects is important when approaching the topic. Quote:
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona |
||
December 9th, 2014 | #42 | |||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Quote:
I completely understand your cynicism, but it's misplaced. Without Jews and handpicked elites trained in the Masonic school of politics, Aryan societies are for the most part transparent and just. Destroying conditions that give power to the man behind the curtain, who has controlled every liberal democracy to this day, leads to a freer society. Public institutions don't work in multicultural, Jew-run societies, but that doesn't make them inherently bad. The reason whites don't like going to the public pool is because the majority of the people in it are dangerous and unsanitary niggers and Mexicans. Build them a public pool for only whites, and you'll have everyone wanting to go take a swim. If you think a country that has a large number of illiterates can sustain a modern Western civilization, you're out of your mind. You frame the question as if everyone in your utopian society would have the financial means to pay for private school, but that simply isn't true. Quote:
The first sentence disqualifies everything else you've written. You're willing to use state-power to crush those who seek to fight against your revolution, and thus are an authoritarian yourself. Once you're open to taking that step, all talks of freedom are as hypocritical and abstract as those infantile George W Bush speeches. Outside of that, if you don't think Jews controlling major institutions (public or private) is far more relevant in explaining corruption than the institutions themselves, then what are you going to do when you take power? Raze all the universities? Burn down the courthouses? The cognitive dissonance is quite clear. When the private sphere (including gentiles) bribes and agitates for globalization and illegal immigration, because it benefits them financially, the only explanation you give is JEWS. But every fuck up in the public sphere, even when the programs are purposely designed to fail, is an issue with the public sphere itself. Quote:
George Washington was extremely close to the Jewish population of America, where Jews-many of them born outside of America-were actually granted amnesties and American citizenship. Read his letters to the Jews of Newport, Rhode Island, which was the Lower East Side of the 18th century, where Washington vows to protect Jewry by any means necessary. Look up the other ideological founders of America, Ben Franklin et al (said to be an "anti-semite", yet gave money to build a Synagogue ), and you'll see the American revolution was as Jewy as the Bolshevik revolution. Not saying you can't try and consolidate Aryan interests with the founding ideology of America, if that makes you happy. Just as long as you realize you look as silly as Russia's Nazi Bolsheviks. America's strengths are in its infinite resources, almost perfect geographical location, and large Aryan population. All of this has been wasted, thanks to the inherent failure and bullshit utopianism of its founding ideology. America would've risen as a historical superpower regardless of the system it employed, communist , capitalist, socialist whatever. Ignoring the independent factors that led to America's rise is , as you accuse others, pure ideology. Quote:
The rift between government workers and the people is thanks to the fact that the former is at war with the latter. This dichotomy would not exist in a government that actually represents the interest of white people, rather than the interests of Jews trying to exterminate white people. Quote:
The reality is, people are 50% nature and 50% conditioned, and the people writing the script for the latter 50% are always somebody else, whether you like it or not. The choice is: should the writers be a transparent and honor-bound class checked by Platonic Guardians, or should it be some junk pedaler or industrialist? Quote:
Quote:
Observing whites trying to fight against their instincts and failing under the individualist/libertarian experiment has been as pathetic as two lesbians scissoring. At the end of the day it's against our instincts and nature. I don't want whites to be ants, but I definitely don't want them to be vermin. I don't know why you dislike other whites so much that you would prefer to engage them in a rat race rather than cooperating with them. Cooperation without the multi-culturalism, Jews, and cultural Marxism is not only incredibly fulfilling, but also yields results greater than a bunch of consumerists fighting over the price of a potato.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona |
|||||||
December 10th, 2014 | #43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Quote:
Never quite understood the hatred for Poles. Ive learned from personal experience that any place that has an appreciable number of Poles, whether its Brooklyn or London, usually has plenty of racially aware and friendly people. Give me 1 Polack over 1000 WASPy richard spencers.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona |
|
December 10th, 2014 | #44 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 258
|
Most of the "Poles" I run into are Russians, and Russians are pretty much scum.
|
December 10th, 2014 | #45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Quote:
But for all intents and purposes, Von Hindenburg is pretty Polish looking, as Prussians can be. Nothing worse than people attributing racial reasoning to their ideological or chauvinistic hatreds, it undermines the entire science and gives cultural Marxists lots of ammo (IE, "How The Irish Became White" by infamous white-exterminationist kike Noel Ignatiev, which is a staple in most mandatory "race and society" college curriculums). Day didn't like the Poles because he supported Germany, which is fine and I agree with him, but he frames them up unfairly. Most of those Baltic portions Poland had control over have been part of the Polish-Lithuanian Common wealth since the 15th century. Ukrainians, Latvians, etc were able to live in their communities unbothered by Poles partially ruling them. The rush to assimilate people at gunpoint that Day describes in Poland was because the United States and Britain were giving legs to ethnic tension in Eastern and Southeastern Europe. If you don't assimilate or drive out minorities from your territory in the 1930's, you're going to have a Kosovo situation on your hands. All of these diplomatic challenges were created by the USA (Woodrow Wilson) and the Jews advising him (Baruch, Warburg, etc) for this reason: to keep Europe in perpetual conflict and especially keep Germany distracted to undermine it's natural role as a superpower and lessen it's powerful economic and diplomatic influence in South-Eastern and Baltic Europe. How do I know this? Because when the Germans invaded the Balkans for example, they brokered some treaties (in the Balkans, between Hungary and Romania, etc) that left everyone extremely happy, but were repealed by the allies after the war back to the broken borders which have led to contemporary issues in the region.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona Last edited by Joe_Smith; December 10th, 2014 at 06:13 PM. |
|
December 10th, 2014 | #46 |
Administrator
|
|
December 10th, 2014 | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
|
Much appreciated Alex. A couple of chapters in and I'm really enjoying it.
If time, energy and motivation permits, I think I speak for many people when I say that you ought to consider continuing with this Audiobook+commenting-format and add more interesting books to the archives. |
December 10th, 2014 | #48 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
December 10th, 2014 | #49 | |
Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,679
|
Quote:
Hmn... I've only listened to the first minute, but I can see that it clocks in at over two hours. I can only imagine how Alex is going to run this topic into double, sudden death overtime. |
|
December 10th, 2014 | #50 |
Administrator
|
I went ahead and recorded (with commentary) Chapters 1-2 of E. Michael Jones's Living Machines: Bauhaus Archaeology as Sexual Ideology
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...ines-Ch1-2.mp3 (1:32) Most Helpful Customer Reviews 11 of 12 people found the following review helpful Rollicking overview of modernist architecture By Amazon Customer on February 11, 2007 Format: Paperback This book is very insightful, because it helps us question something that is so often taken for granted: the shape of buildings around us. It is a fast read at only 120 pages, but touches on several big ideas about the influence of architecture on individuals as well as countries and history. My amateur interest in architecture is spurred to further investigation after reading this informative and provocative book. I'm giving it 5 stars for the readability and "a-ha" spark of realization factor. The book is not without its flaws, as it is clearly based on a series of lectures, so suffers from the typical continuity/context issues that stricter editing could have cured. Originally addressed to people familiar with modern architecural history and Ivy League colleges of the United States, some of the unexplained references earlier in the book are eventually resolved in later chapters. One other criticism is that so much of the book seems to be an "ad hominum" attack on Gropius, even going so far as to psycho-analyze several events in rather symbolic detail. 5 of 5 people found the following review helpful Architecture as anti-theology By Jacob on March 8, 2009 Format: Paperback Bauhaus architecture can be seen in houses that have flat roofs, non load-bearing walls, and are raised above the earth. The nature of Bauhaus architecture is that of modern man: designed to be functional and nothing else. Not only in homes but in apartments as well. Bauhaus represents virtually every condominium, high-rise apartment, and college dorm in the world (is it any wonder that college dorm life is virtually synonymous with sexual orgy?). Bauhaus architecture was the invention of Walter Gropius after the first world war. The goal of Bauhaus architecture is to design a building where man's ties to the ground and family are severed but at the same time he lives in close proximity with other people while never developing ties to these people (this is necessary for sexual liberation; p. 84). The college dorm gives one enough privacy for sexual escapades but enough proximity to other people to make the act possible. Dorms are simply cubes stacked one upon another. There is no soul there, nor can there be. Bauhaus architecture is not merely meant to destroy the family, but to propogate an entirely new social order. It was to represent politics by design, or state socialism (107). The anti-Christian nature of Bauhaus is evident in the flat roof: a flat roof by definition is an imposition of ideology upon a reality (e.g., it will leak). But more importantly, a flat roof represents modern man's negation of God, and without God there is no future (102). The alternative to Bauhaus, which Jones does not develop, is in the rich moral vision given us by Christianity. The Gothic cathedral, the meditarranean villa, and the Byzantium dome all represent a God who is not only truth and goodness, but beauty himself. The solution, Jones notes, is to go back to the fork in the road where we made the wrong turn and fix it (67). 15 of 19 people found the following review helpful An outstanding third offering. . . By David Zampino VINE VOICE on November 21, 2002 . . .in E. Michael Jones' frontal assult on modernism! In "Degenerate Moderns", Jones reveals how much of modern society was brought about by persons whose personal lives (and beliefs) could best be described as deviant. In "Dionysos Rising", he addresses certain trends in music which somewhat less success. In this volume, he takes on Walter Gropius and the Balhaus School of Design. The style is quite different from the previous two books and reads almost like a novel. In the book we learn how Gropius' own beliefs about sex, family, and religion (and his, shall we say, deviancies in these areas of life) influenced his architectural work. A devastating critique of the International school of architecture in general, and Walter Gropius' work in particular. Last edited by Alex Linder; December 10th, 2014 at 10:43 PM. |
December 10th, 2014 | #51 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
December 10th, 2014 | #52 |
Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,679
|
|
December 10th, 2014 | #53 |
Administrator
|
|
December 10th, 2014 | #54 |
Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,679
|
I think the anecdotal stuff helps round out your personality and qualify your opinion. Without it you come across as smart as hell and deeply read, but possibly a little light on real world experience. Recounting the early days of your internship in D.C. dispels that presumption.
|
December 11th, 2014 | #55 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Quote:
Speaking of Iran, E Michael Jones (if I'm not mistaken) actually won a literature prize there. A lot of people dismiss Iran, but it's important to know just how much of a turning point their revolution has been in contemporary history. Unfortunately, you are over the top ideological about the topic, forcing your own beliefs on the reading when it's a stretch at best. The Gropius Haus am Horn, with all its ugliness, is used by libertarians to demonstrate the "success" of capitalism because it utilized then rare materials such as rubber. Most of the products created by the Bauhaus were so expensive only the rich could afford them, and were all the rage with German Jews and bourgeoisie. The cookie cutter structure of the style was created to favor capitalist standardization, and thus they could be mass produced for low cost and high profit (this was Gropius' specific intent, and what he promised Warburg, Hearst, and other Jew and Anglo industrialists he tried to recruit to support his project). By 1933 socialist Nazis closed the Bauhaus for being degenerate soulless Judaic bullshit, and Gropius moved to America. Jones is critiquing modernity, not socialism. That's the reason why the "International style" became the default in soulless capitalist jew-nests like Chicago and New York, and later expanded throughout the country. Some Bauhaus students were communists and leftists, but Gropius was a businessman. The whole Bauhaus project is a great example of communists and capitalists working together to destroy the world: Quote:
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona Last edited by Joe_Smith; December 11th, 2014 at 03:13 AM. |
||
December 11th, 2014 | #57 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
December 11th, 2014 | #58 |
Administrator
|
yes... i'm not sure what happened there but i noticed the same thing. it is still audible to me, fairly loud even. but i record stuff probably too loud because i cant stand when it's too soft or boderline. it always seems easier to turn it down. so as long as no reverb, i record it very high. but, sorry about that. i dont know what happened other than i paused and took headphones off and the volume nob i must have accidentally rolled down a little. but it should be audible.
|
December 11th, 2014 | #59 | |||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
December 11th, 2014 | #60 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,460
|
Quote:
I actually found his "square head" and "round head" analogy pretty amusing personally. Although a stereotype its actually pretty true (like most stereotypes). I remember growing up with my cousins who are half Slavic and they had noticeably bigger heads than us. Sometimes we laughed about it and even referred to them as "slavic big heads" Of course there was never any question about their whiteness as they were blonde and blue eyed like us but it was obvious they were from a different white tribe to us, just based on the shape of their face and head. My family being of Germanic origin had much more structured jawlines and longer thinner heads. Anyway, yes I agree, the "round heads" were unfairly being categorized by DAY as being a type of inferior human and I felt uncomfortable with that. I personally find Polish girls extremely attractive. Even dated one for a while. She was lovely! Great body as well! Tall, lean and sexy |
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|